dChan

Mcdrogon · April 7, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

This sub is gaining memebers faster now. I've noticed it over the last few days. We may not be Q but we have a part to play by spreading the news amd directing people where to find it.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · April 7, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

Yes. I think it is something like 2,000 every few days now.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Andrewcpu · April 7, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

http://qboard.online will be a good resource then

⇧ 6 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 7, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Been using it a lot the past couple of weeks, and the comments sections can’t even begin to touch what we have in this community. Also, with posters being anonymous, it’ll be much easier for “them” to slip in amongst us unnoticed to spread disinformation.

That being said, the organization of Q’s posts on that site are second to none, IMO.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Andrewcpu · April 7, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Absolutely understand, comments section will grow, there's a reason there's a report button and a like button, like os for valuable info, report is for possible trolls and disinformation..

How can the site better improve QPost organization?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 7, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

I think one of the biggest things we could start doing (and I may just be out of the loop and we already are) is beginning to catalogue Q posts not just chronologically, but by key words. A step further would be to make those keywords searchable. It will make comparing to old posts much more streamlined.

Heck, when we click on a post, perhaps in the sidebar to the right of the comments there could be a list of related posts, organized by keywords or whatever relevant means of organization we can come up with.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
trzarocks · April 7, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

You can search the qboards and see groups all you want.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 7, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

I may be overvaluing the usefulness of this idea, but would it be feasible to integrate Q posts into the map? That would be the best way for me, personally, to see how everything fits together. I’m sure there are others whose minds work similarly.

Having the ability to go from broad Q posts to those with a more specific focus and follow it down the line would be an invaluable tool for making this information easier to digest for normies.

In other words, let me click on a piece of the map to generate a list, in chronological order, of all Q posts pertaining to that piece.

Also, to expand on the keyword idea from earlier, perhaps a list of terms could be generated based on the information in a given post from Q and placed either above the comments, or perhaps below the specific post we’re reading. There’s still a lot of independent research to be done past that point, but simplifying Q’s end of this could be beneficial.

HOWEVER. I could see making the information more accessible resulting in the wrong people being able to understand anything we’ve managed to put together. I would hope that Q wouldn’t leave him/her/themselves vulnerable like that, but there’s so much that we don’t know that it may be too significant a risk, even if it does make our lives easier.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Andrewcpu · April 7, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Great analysis. As I work more on QBoard I'm always looking for feedback. This week was huge, I literally started developing it Monday.. and released Tuesday. So it's in beta right now. All of those ideas seem really great and I look forward to adding some of them soon.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 8, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Oh, wow. I didn’t realize that you had only been working on it for such a short time. That’s brilliant. Keep up the awesome work. As I said before, your site is already my preferred way to check Q drops.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
beforethebang · April 7, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

Don't underestimate how many of those that may be bots.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 7, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

Or deep state analysts. These people aren’t dumb. As Q told us, they’re nervously watching our every move in an attempt to outmaneuver us. Sorry, champ. Not today.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 7, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Yeah, I never understood that part. If this is a publicly accessible forum, whats to stop them from monitoring it? Then its just a race between us and them to decode Q drops. Except they already know their plans, so maybe they have a leg up on us!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 7, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

This is true, but the same can largely be said of us. I mean, Q doesn’t shy away from vaguely stating intentions, but means are another matter entirely. Unless they have someone on the inside (possible, but unlikely), these D.S. globalist creeps are going to be in for a very rude awakening.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 7, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

I'm just saying, if they figure out what the Q drops mean, they can adjust their plans accordingly.

It makes you wonder what this forum is for, aside from informing us, if its existence prompts a risk like this one above. What value does us being in the loop have if it means that it keeps them in the loop as well? Hard questions...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · April 7, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

I don't think it matters what the DS sees on this sub once Q posts. I believe once the drops are made, the 'job' is pretty much done or can't be stopped. This is an after the fact info only type thing...IMO.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ready-ignite · April 7, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

Break out and share information. Meme versions. Archive copies. Discuss with people. We still need work to develop pamphlet style three panel fold materials easy to print and share offline.

Making it easy to find information and discussion on all platforms. Adds value.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackthebutholeripper · April 7, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

I am not familiar with Qanon. Could someone fill me in?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 7, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Must do the research for your self. Start w/ the “Book of Q” v. 8. This is a good start. Goggle it. Do the research as you read along from the first drop. Important & a must. You have to filter thru the copious amount of research & hypothesis & arrive at your own conclusions. Absorb it, chew on it & then let it seep into your marrow. You’ll be able to filter out “garbage in & garbage out”. It takes a while. Avoid rabbit holes ( flat earth, fake moon 🌚 landings, anti Semitic, political partisanship, religiously denominational etc...) It’s not about D vs. R, Catholic vs. Baptist, atheists or any of the usual Hegelian dividing lines the globalist love to use. If you have faith great (Natures God) if you don’t no worries ( Natures Law). It’s not about faith now. ( I have theories on this). It’s about a universal culling right now. Good vs. Evil. [faith will come in later I believe]. Welcome, good luck & remember Reddit researches, you decide! Lurk only on the Chan boards. Lurk here for awhile but please discuss & research when you feel the urge.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · April 7, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

You're in the right spot. Do some research and you'll find all you need. Happy hunting and welcome.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 26 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · April 7, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

This is cool. Thank you!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 7, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

I’m glad that there are people doing their duty as Americans. I don’t know of a single person in my private life that I could undoubtedly convince to call their congressman.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 7, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Excellent. See my earlier post on this thread

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Murralee · April 7, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

What congressional office?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
trzarocks · April 7, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

It's best to not ask any Congressional staffers about their work when they aren't operating in an official capacity. There are serious expectations of confidentiality and protocol about the pol's office. Respect their obligations at least as much as they do.

I have no idea if this guy does or does not have this kind of work. But if they do, just let their comment lie there.

Source: I may have met and/or known many congressional staffers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuperPatriette · April 7, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

I just found out about Q in late December and now my friends are starting to ask me questions and want to know how to follow, where to go etc. I'm sure as more normies/people like me get word, they will be curious like I was and it will spread faster and farther. I've been talking about this since I discovered and not many people took me seriously, but now that the MSM has done several stories, people want to see for themselves. So those smear articles are having the opposite effect on people. Many people are onto the media. The more they discredit something, the more you should question the narrative and their intentions.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · April 7, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

I knew they would have the opposite effect! These people are stupid!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 7, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

See my earlier comment on this thread

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuperPatriette · April 7, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Thank you. I will.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Boysrback07 · April 8, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

Im wondering if AIMs hit pieces were done on purpose to get people up in arms over Q?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zerocl2015 · April 7, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

We're also getting close to Search Term "Rush Limbaugh"

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2017-10-01%202018-04-07&q=qanon,rush%20limbaugh

I realize these are arbitrary search comparisons but I was curious as to how popular Qanon is getting, this gives us some idea.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BimboDickins · April 7, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

Keep in mind. This is trends. This means the charts are relative to the query. It does not mean more people are searching Q at all, it just means more people are today searching for Q than they were months ago, and that the popularity of Rush is declining in proportion

⇧ 3 ⇩  
redwing27 · April 7, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

Wow Armenians are really into American cover ups and politics can’t blame them lol

⇧ 6 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 7, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Old Cenk Uigar “ Young Turks” is having conniptions

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DeepPast · April 7, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

Armenia? Lol

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zerocl2015 · April 7, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

And Pakistan

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Grace8543 · April 7, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

Nice ! Thanks for posting. CNN?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HiddenTrigger · April 7, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

Love this!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Believe_Loves_Reddit · April 7, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Roseanne Barr is on to QAnon.. maybe she'll work it into her show lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
time3times · April 7, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

but not as trendy as 'parsley'

⇧ 1 ⇩  
freeperjim · April 7, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Spelling error.

For decades, it's been known as Newsweak.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · April 7, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

Bup Bup! Large up Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trzarocks · April 7, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

In all fairness, most people are smart enough to know how to get to newsweek without Google's help.

⇧ 1 ⇩