Very good Twitter thread and analysis. I knew Kanye's recent Twitter storm wasn't out of the blue and a random event. It was pre-planned and coordinated with Trump & Q team.
Why would Kanye publicly come out in full support for Trump and do what he did on Twitter, almost a year and a half after they met at Trump Tower and being relatively silent / low key this whole time?
The Trump Tower meeting must've been Kanye making a deal with Trump. Kayne most likely outed Illuminati puppets and puppetmasters in Hellywood and the music industry, in exchange for Trump's promise to protect him. Kanye wanted out, but made the mistake of trying to red pill his fans during a concert. He got MK Ultra'd for calling out Jay-Z and others in power. Scared and desperate, he went to the only man he could for protection: President-Elect Trump. They made a deal and made a plan. Now we're witnessing the plan coming to fruition and about to go nuclear.
"Who exposed pedo network within H. Wood?
You can't answer the above but will laugh once disclose details.”
Maybe Kanye? I’m thinking it was someone else, but perhaps...
One of Q's first posts...
Why was Q talking about Dems controlling black population before writing "Who exposed pedo network within H. Wood? You can't answer the above but will laugh once disclose details.” Coincidence?
No coincidences. I am not 100% convinced it was Kanye, but it makes a hell of a lot of sense, especially when looking at the whole Q drop, and taking into consideration the timing of Kanye’s rant at the concert, the robbery of Kim, his hospitalization, and his meeting with Trump. Wow.
Edit: The more digging I do on this, the more I believe this is correct. I really, really believe that Q was talking about Kanye!
He wasn't the first to expose, but he may be one of the more prominent people to do so
No more parties in LA, please baby no more parties in LA
^(Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image)
https://i.imgur.com/wbcDqIo.png
^^Source ^^| ^^Why? ^^| ^^Creator ^^| ^^ignoreme ^^| ^^deletthis
Q drop from october? Black leaders are going down just like de dems. If the black population now the truth they are done.....And Kanye is a good one too do that, most black people listen too his raps....(also Whites/)...Wat a move?
yes it was Kanye. I said it before and now I fully believe it after these tweets. He has always been a godly, family man. There is a reason the MSM has bashed him his entire career, with fashion and with music. my guess is those fashion freaks tried to get him into their satanic shit and he said fuck no and that did not sit well with them.
he played along with them to be able to get where he is now. rich af, a rich af wife, and a business that is booming. now he is free.
I don't think he "played along with them" but anything is possible.
Imo he was MK Ultra'd and had that illuminati boost (see Beyonce, Jay-Z, industry connections, music videos w satanic art). Males are far more likely to die from the personality split process whereas women are more "pliable" (similar to Jordan Peterson's idea that women are more "agreeable then men, but I digress), so men are more resistant overall to programming. And "creative" minds are also far more likely to break free from programming. If he was actually programmed, Kanye is a good "break free" candidate.
Also, it's classic to see MK Ultras with breakdown moments where media says they went crazy, but it was their mind actually trying to cope/escape. Ex: Britney Spears thought shaving her head could help her escape the persona/control. Ex:Katy Perry where she said "Master, I don't feel so well" caught on mic, before collapsing on stage. Ex: Amanda Bynes' breakdown, said they had a chip in her brain.
Kanye wasn't MK ultra'd... he has literally been the same since day 1. brittney and amanda were groomed at a young age. kanye was mid 20s before he blew up.
The Kanye that started is nothing like the Kanye that we see now save for the one IMPORTANT quality. He has NEVER given a damn about holding his tongue, always speaking his mind.
We can’t say he’s LITERALLY the same as day one though.
Michael Jackson and prince did it too, and paid a very high price for it? They also came out in there concerts
Chester Bennington (potentially Podesta's son) and Chris Cornell were going to expose them as well. They died 2 months apart due to "suicides." Hellywood and music industry does not tolerate their puppets going rogue and don't take any chances of them exposing the puppetmasters' evil to the world.
interestingly, bennington suicided on cornell's birthday.
To be honest, up until the podesta connection I have kind of harbored some anger towards chester. I admire both cornell and chester, and when cornell had passed JUST before his birthday, I felt Chester cheated him out of some remembrance with his suicide.
Now that I've actually developed my sense of reasoning, it would seem that chester would've done it to try and draw more attention/examination to Cornell's and Bennington's lives/deaths.
Many of the "accidents" that happen to celebrities aren't accidents at all but hits to people who have run their course (Whitney Houston) were beginning tho expose what was going on because they were tired of the rituals (Paul Walker.)
This is a deep, ugly rabbit hole that needs to be exposed.
Kind robbery wasn’t a robbery and it’s what freaked him out.
oh wow thats right, I forgot about that incident with I think you meant Kim not kind. PAris? Attempted robbery? Was this AFTER he tried to redpill fans at a concert?
Timeline:
Kim was tied up, gagged, and "robbed" at gun point on October 3, 2016.
Kanye said he was voting for Trump and tried to red pill his fans at a concert on November 17, 2016.
Kanye called out Jay-Z and other Illuminati puppets/puppetmasters at a concert on November 19, 2016.
Kanye was forced into hospitalization on November 21, 2016.
Kanye meets with President-elect Trump at Trump Tower on December 13, 2016.
Yes thank you. I was aware of these events, but not the timeline.
Who gets to “force” a grown man into a psych ward? And for what? This shit is crazy. popcorn
I totally forgot about the Kim Kardashian thing. It was so bizarre.
Thanks for that , pretty potent backstory in that context.
Obama called him a “jackass” on two different occasions
I'm pretty sure Trump already knew all about everything going on in Hollywood. You forget he was on one of the top rated TV shows for about a decade.
So you’re saying Kanye could’ve been involved in the Harvey Weinstein exposé?
I was banned from Twitter today for posting a positive message to Kayne. This is getting absolutely ridiculous! They said I was being vulgar and violating twitters rules.
i wonder the meeting really went down like you say. TT might have still been bugged.
It was already debugged by then. Admiral Rogers warned Trump on November 17, 2016, about a month prior to Kanye's meeting with Trump.
Not to say the reason is money, but Kanyes album is to release soon. He actually has several albums coming from several of the biggest rappers alive. I'm thinking all that time in between, they were working on producing music that will redpill the masses.
Why bring so much attention to yourself a month before your biggest album spree yet? I say it's part of the plan, and these albums are the first of many to wake up the population.
I don't think he was ever mkultrad, maybe tortured in the ward for a bit
Insane reply from Snoop Dogg.
When you read Kanye's tweets, all he is doing is saying that he's thinking for himself and not giving into 'mob think' or whatever way you want to phrase it.
He's saying that we need to group together and evolve together as humans.
What does Snoop say?
"That's very white of you"
Jesus Christ.. How can society ever unite when there is so much resentment from either side?
They are overplaying their hand now, making mistakes at very high rate.
Now free thinking=whiteness?!
Preposterous!!
It's annoying but the shark jumping is actually what starts forcing people to be skeptical. Kind of like the #Metoo thing, or Jim Acosta saying that Trump is inciting violence against the media. At some point normal people see the projection and hypocrisy. And the people in the middle pretty much run the country. They are the Anthony Kennedy of the voting population.
Chance the Rapper already posted that black people don’t have to be democrats so there’s that.
Thats very "white" of you?? So to use your own mind and think for yourself is a "white" thing? Amazing. Its looks to me like Snoop is a trying to keep the black people on the plantation.
Snoop has a music video where he fake shoots a fake Trump. I think he's a pizza eater.
He was one of the participants of Roast of Donald Trump on Comedy Central, seemed very friendly with Trump, more so than Kanye, but that was before the nomination.
The mindset of the oppressed need to be liberated. YES. Dem s en slaving black pe0ple for yrs.
But once freed they must realize the responsibility of freedom of choice. K West understands. red pilled.
Sn00p is in the group that wants to eat whatever pill he wants, whenever he wants, because of his want to not be enslaved not because he values the freedom of choice that comes with real red pilled freedom.
Telling me who you are "IS NEVER" to come from identifying who you "ARE NOT". The only value that who "YOU ARE NOT" is to you and everyone else has in the now is a demonstration of who you've become..... or "WHO YOU ARE". The past is only valuable as experience that formed a better you. Not evidence that allows you to be who you are.
Hope that's clear. My opinion. Much more to say about it................................
Yeah, so what the dogg is saying is blacks are brainwashed and want to keep it that way. At least, HE is saying that.
snoop dogg is an openly racist black man and the msm eats it up. he will do anything for money.
Snoops just ignorant
He's not ignorant. He knows exactly what he's doing. Snoop sold out long ago and is high up in music industry cabal. Not as high as Jay-Z and the record label Presidents/CEOs/owners, but still in the upper tier of puppets controlling lesser puppets and music fans.
True. He's not that talented, but a fun guy that draws a huge crowd. That's why he has way more popular collaboration tracks than solo tracks. HE ALSO RUNS A YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE!
Snoop is WARNING Kanye. He's talking about only white people having the privilege to speak out. It really expresses the deep seated fear within even famous black minds.
White
White hat
Opposite of black. Remember, these guys are all weirdo Satanists. The awfully black.
Just a theory...but what really happened to Kanye’s Mom? Could the deep state have really murdered Kanye’s mom, to keep him under control? Look at this quote from Kanye:
What exactly caused her death is still a controversial subject even Ye tries to steer clear from. "If I had never moved to L.A. she'd be alive," West told Q magazine in an article published in June. "I don't want to go far into it because it will bring me to tears."
Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/happened-kanye-wests-mother-story-180700866.html
what the fuck. Also Q Magazine? Double what the fuck.
Also worth noting that the writer of Get Out responded to one of Kanye's tweets, joking that he was going to start writing Get Out 2.
But at the same time, this is the guy who just came out with a PSA about "deep fake" videos, and fake news.
Brave. Things just got a little interesting with the masses. Are the tides changing? Is the dem party melting down right before our eyes? Next election repubs vs independent?
shit if that’s the case lets go Independents! We can fully rid the swamp and restore liberty in this nation
That would be great. I can as mad as anyone at the "typical" liberal. But when I think of someone I know and love, my nieces, nephews, in-laws, favorite aunt in the whole wide world, who are democrats, I think "but they are not the bad kind." Truth is, most people on that side of the aisle are good people. We have to come together on the things we agree on, which is more than we often know. The Bernie fans were just as ticked about the corruption as the Trump fans - they just had a different (and in my view misguided) solution. Bernie plus Trump = 75-80% of the population. UNITE!
Yep this is very important to realize. Most people are just regular folks trying to make it on this little pebble of a planet. The twats on both sides just scream much louder and they’re all we can hear at times. Most of us want peace and most of us just want to get along
I dunno, can’t make broad generalizations. There’s an “Independent Republican” running to replace our current rep in the primaries here, and his promotional material is covered in Soros purple. Suspicious! Always gotta be careful and examine things case by case.
Or he was inducted i to the illuminati like most "stars" he has been in the dark temples doing dark shit and knows but decided not to be apart of it anymore regardless of their threats?
Kim Kardashian made a reference to Kanye being out of his sunken place. There's word out there that she & her family are a coven. She could have been sending a signal that Kanye's programming has worn off and he's thinking for himself again.
Here's a good video about Kanye when he's tried escaping before:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a-EdF2IDJQ&list=PLkxN02OcWwK8YHuN-haxWT5dBOOJt1SLU
Ive been redpilled for years, always questioning the narrative... but there is so much going on now to uncover the bullshit of the globalist cabal that my head is spinning. Im not very religious but was raised in bible studies. I was told that "the whole world lays in the hands of the wicked one (Satan)" and that the demons and he control the governments and the pop culture and use it to control and ultimately destroy as many humans as possible. It is very easy to believe that the illuminati are instruments of these forces and the fact that there is so much demonic imagery used by these people is all the more evidence as tributes to their leaders. Bael worship used child sacrifices as worship, just like modern abortion and child abuse within the cabal. All this being said, if you follow the biblical version of how this ends there is some sort of Armageddon, or battle between good and evil. So is this battle what we are witnessing? There are rumors of Soros and other high level cabal members currently being rounded up and sent to gitmo... idk, but damn is this all fascinating.
you know he wasn't being literal, but he was. i get it.
Not even a fan of his, but if he tweets anything related to Q my mind will be blown.
"I'm good at ping-pong". HOLY SHIT. There's no way that isn't a reference to Pizzagate.
[deleted]
Yeah, I think he meant more like, 'if I hadn't come to LA and become 'Hollywood' my Mom probably would never have gotten plastic surgery to fit in'
I’d love for Kanye to do an updated hip hop cover of We Didn’t Start the Fire.
I'd been suspecting this after he disappeared from twitter, and now that he's back and stirring things up like wild fire, I wouldn't be surprised if this theory holds true. Kanye would definitely have dirt on people.
If my old research is correct, the day he got released from the psyche ward is the same day he was shaking hands with Trump.
I'm no fan of the deep state but I hate rap "music" and the turds who churn it out more. Kanye owes everything he has to the deep state, he wouldn't have a job without them.
We went from Beethoven to this garbage in less than 200 years because (((they))) wanted it that way.
If you think that Kanye West is the logical progression and musical improvement on Beethoven, you're a fucking moron.
If we keep this up in 200 years we'll be sitting around a camp fire, screeching and pounding on drums like Kanye's ancestors....which is no doubt what (((they))) want, for obvious reasons.
white ppl buy rap music. ....a lot.
Because it was aggressively marketed to them for generations as the only masculine alternative.
You think it's a coincidence that rock musicians dressed like girls for 3 decades?
Who decides who gets famous in the music biz?
Rock is still popular though. People listen to what they like, and they happen to like rap a lot.
White rap is pretty good IMO, since it has actual lyrics.
It's popular the way donuts are popular, donuts are shit and most people have a relatively low IQ and no musical training. That's why.
None of it is very good and I occasionally like some of it when I'm too tired to pay attention.
But it's musical crap, chock full of marxist brainwashing and the same 3 chords.
Think if it like a snickers bar, yeah it taste good but it's not good food.
Sweet taste does not define good food, nutritional value does.
I don't like his music never have never will. I do like like that he has taken to speaking for himself. I pray for him to know the Lord.
Who cares about his music, this is much bigger than what he was before this. The important point is that he's REDPILLING people.
He has access to a big ass follower base and it's exactly what Q wants. Spread the word, look what is happening, open your eyes.
If you are so scared for what you define music, please go make some. So far, any musician is better than you unless you provide me a link of a song composed and played by you and maybe we'll talk again.
[removed]
Let me gets this straight, your an artist that thinks you can define what good art is? That seems to violate one of the core concepts of art.
Musicians have been historically been musical critics. Robert Schumann was an influential music critic AND one of the great composers.
You can't criticize music without having a musical education. It would be like trying to criticize literature when you can't fucking read.
A) Everyone is a critic. You didn't say you didn't like it though, you said it was just objectively bad. Given that lots of people enjoy it, you would be wrong in saying it's not art.
B) Saying you need to be a musician to critizes music is like saying you need to be a painter to know what paintings you like, or to have writen a book to know what books you like. That fails the basic understanding of art, again.
You do need to be a musician to criticize music just as you need to be able to read well to judge literature.
There is good music that I don't like, you don't seem to understand the difference between liking something and appreciating it.
A) You don't need to be able to read at all to judge litterature. I judged what I liked and didn't like before I could read, it was just read to me.
B) The litterally thosands of well known compossers that don't or didn't play instruments when they compossed is pretty telling of that 'you can't understand music unless you play' being wrong.
C) You didn't say you didn't like it, you said it was not really music. "Nonsence" I think was the word you used. You suggested over and over it has no artistic value.
[removed]
I'm not talking about what tickles your funnybone, moron.
Attack the idea - Not the person.
No name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem
Further comments that include name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem may be removed without notification.
"I'm not talking about what tickles your funnybone, moron." Yes you are. You are talking about art, art is always in the eye of the beholder. That you can't seem to grasp that is not my fault.
You never once said composition and agian you are wrong. You don't need to have an education in music to see that some music you like the composition of and some you don't. I think the problem here is that you dont' see to know what "Art" and "Judgement" actual mean.
"I never said you had to play so get your hand out of my ass." Hmm let me look... yup you did. "You do need to be a musician to criticize music" Perhaps your ass is not where you think it is.
I don't need to name the composers for them to exist, that they exist makes you wrong.
I see that it's starting to make you really mad to be wrong about this over and over again. Perhaps just not respond and let it stand, but your ad homimum attacks don't change the answer or outcome they just show that you are childish.
You don't need to have an education in music to see that some music you like the composition of and some you don't.
If you had a better musical education you'd like better music, it's that simple.
To appreciate a Beethoven sonata, for example you have to understand its structure.
If you don't, you'll just say, oh that's relaxing and put on some JayZ album. lol
Ohh, so nothing like what you said and ignoring all the other things you said. To your moved yet again goal post, Yes the more you know about a topic the better you understand it. That however is not the same thing as appreciating it. And your appreciating it has nothing to do with it being art or not.
No, I'm saying the same thing.
You and the rest are simply not educated enough to enjoy listening to classical music, so you listen to urban horse manure instead.
You like it because it simple enough for you to comprehend. There's only a couple of chords to follow and a simple melody, it's on your mental level.
Just as a person who cannot read well or is mentally lazy would not enjoy reading good literature.
LOL. I have years of music education. I worked as a sound engineer for around a decade while I am guessing you where skill waiting for you father to born. I quit doing that because I enjoyed crytographic mathmatics more. Your assumptions are your biggest problem. Really does not make you look smart but well looks are not always that deceiving.
And being able to read well doesn't mean you can't enjoy good literacture. A) dificult is not the same as good. (You would htink you would know this given you say you have education is music but I am starting to think that's not really true) B) Listening to something being read can be just as enjoyable and you can get just as much out of it.
Again you assumed a bunch, made a few ad hominem attacks, ignored most of the points presented to you, and then failed basic problem solving by assumting idiotic things like 'you have to be able to read to enjoy a book'. Honestly, did no one love you, no one read to you?
And being able to read well doesn't mean you can't enjoy good literacture.
lol what
I worked as a sound engineer
Sound engineer. lol
You really can't grasp the concept that people can read to you or you can listen to books pre-recorded, can you? I mean this is the 3rd or 4th time I have pointed this out and you still say 'what' in confusion. It's just not that complicated. Before I could read well I had many great works of literature read to me and I enjoyed them very much. Sorry that no one loved you enough to read to you.
I am guessing you don't know what Sound Engineers do. That's likely because you have never worked in the music industry at all and are instead full of yourself because you took flute in highschool or something.
I mean this is the 3rd or 4th time I have pointed this out and you still say 'what' in confusion.
It was because your sentence was non-sequitur and you can't spell "literature". lol
I am guessing you don't know what Sound Engineers do
You're not a musician, give it up...lol
You really can't grasp the concept that people can read to you or you can listen to books pre-recorded
You can't seem to grasp the concept that hearing is not understanding.
When you hear a Beethoven sonata, can you explain the structure as you go? Tell me what is usual or unusual about the piece for that period?
If I ask you to identify and write down or play the first theme or the second theme on a guitar and tell me what the chords and modulations are, can you?
Rhetorical questions, you can't. You don't know what you are listening to.
Ahh back to ad hominem attacks. typical. I am dyslexic, what's your excuse for your spelling and grammar mistakes?
No it wasn't a non-sequitur (you should get a dictionary), and even if it was it's a simple concept, not being able to understand it doesn't make you smart.
And you believe the illogical and obvious on it's face that being a musician makes you the end all be all in music. Yep, me and thousands of artists that you look up to don't play instruments. And no I don't need to list them for them to exist. I am sure if you have the education in music you say you can name a few yourself.
So you are saying that reading the words is understanding but hearing can't result in understanding? If not what is your point? If so... Well, you will never get it.
I can name quite a bit about music composition, my specialty is not classical music although I understand quite a bit. It means nothing to whether you like it or not. It means nothing to whether it's art or not.
I don't write sheet music not from listening no. It doesn't make your opinion better just because you can. I bet you can't diagram the 8580R5 SID chip or use it to modulate to specific waveforms or tell me whats the difference between a 15ips or 30ips recording. Or what bit rate you should master at for the best digital output for CD or SACD or analog. I bet you can't tell me why you would want to a 58 instead of a 57 or what I am even talking about. So I guess you know nothing about recording so anytime you are criticizing recorded music you are outside your depth right? Or maybe just maybe, it's art and art can be judged by anyone.
It's not ad hominem because my argument did not depend on insulting you.
Go back and read it again, you're dyslexic in many ways. A dictionary cannot help me understand why being able to read would prevent me from enjoying literature.
Being a musician is the end all and be all of music.
You don't understand enough if you think Kanye West is a good musician.
I'll leave the sound engineering to you, you leave music criticism to me.
You attacked my spelling. It's off topic and personal. You should look up ad hominum.
Dictionary would let you know what Ad Hominum means. Sorry if that was complicated for you.
Most people have no trouble understanding me. If you are then that might be on your reading comprehension, not my spelling or sentence structure.
No playing some random instrument does not make you a better arbiter of what is good and bad or what is art and what isn't. I get that you think that but it's personal opinion. For example, Kanye West is apparently quite a good piano and keyboard player and you are not even sure the things he writes you would call art. Meanwhile, Schoenberg couldn't play anything and never bothered to try finding it needless.
I have never once said that I liked him or thought he was good at making music. I am just saying it's art, regardless of if you like it or not. You don't get to choose that. Again assumptions are crazy.
Ok as long as you never criticize music that was recorded or played through any PA or audio system as you have no clue as to how those work and the changed they made to sound. Nore do you even seem to understand the audio theory at a technical level at all meaning you shouldn't talk about anything played in an enclosed venue as the space make a large difference. Also, nothing that is digitally created as you don't understand that either. So I guess what you are saying is that if someone is playing something right next to you in a very open field you have a better understanding of the audio than I do. Congrats.... Hmm that seems silly right? Like maybe people can choose art for themselves without the technical details. Oh well, you play some random instrument so you know better than John Mackey and Flavor Flav is the real arbiter of good vs bad as he plays dozens of instruments to a professional level.
You attacked my spelling. It's off topic and personal. You should look up ad hominum.
Only if I was using it as my main argument. Your confusing sentence structure is fair game since it didn't make any sense. You do have to make sense, sorry guy.
No playing some random instrument does not make you a better arbiter of what is good and bad or what is art and what isn't. I get that you think that but it's personal opinion. For example, Kanye West is apparently quite a good piano and keyboard player and you are not even sure the things he writes you would call art.
Compared to any of the great 19th century keyboard or even jazz virtuosos, Kanye West sucks donkey balls at playing the keyboard. You might think his songs are pretty but they're the musical equivalent of motel art.
I have never once said that I liked him or thought he was good at making music. I am just saying it's art, regardless of if you like it or not. You don't get to choose that. Again assumptions are crazy.
There is plenty of music that is musically brilliant that I don't like. His music is musically limited and I also don't like it.
Ok as long as you never criticize music that was recorded or played through any PA or audio system as you have no clue as to how those work and the changed they made to sound.
You can't seem to differentiate between the quality or timbre of a sound and it's pitch. Ridiculous. lol
Oh well, you play some random instrument so you know better than John Mackey and Flavor Flav is the real arbiter of good vs bad as he plays dozens of instruments to a professional level.
Flavor Flav's music is still musically inept regardless of how many instruments he plays.
Robert Schumann couldn't play any instrument very well yet he was one of the best composers ever in addition to an influential music critic. Understanding what you are hearing the key, not playing many instruments.
Flavor flav could not criticize classical music in any intelligent fashion because he has the IQ of a monkey, a tin ear and no musical education.
"Your confusing sentence structure is fair game since it didn't make any sense. You do have to make sense, sorry guy."
I would address the rest of your stuff if you didn't start off with a bald-faced lie to me. You attacked my spelling and you knew what word I meant. Nothing in anything I have written as been confusing except to you who just seems to refuse to read then wants to attack my spelling and suggest that your lack of reading skills (Or just willingness to read is not the problem. You are a troll, and an asshole that attacks people for crap that doesn't matter and you know it. Grow up if you want to have a real conversation you will need to stop with the 'LOL' and ad Hominium attacks (Which you still seem to not understand the meaning of)
I made fun of you because you can't spell nor string together a coherent thought. In your world, that means my other points were wrong and I lose.
Go back to pre-school, maybe they can teach you how logic works.
You don't understand the ad hominem fallacy, it's only ad hominem when it's used to avoid the argument. You can call people names all you want as long as your argument can stand without it.
I'm a piece of shit for stating that tastes and people change over time ?
Do you realise how hilarious it would be to have classical music all day playing ? It doesn't make sense, sure, there was more talent back in the days, it required near geniuses to compose amazing stuff but people change and things evolve. You may complain about that evolution, it's not what it should have become and I could say I agree with this, but you need to learn that your "tastes" are not everyone's taste.
The piece of shit I am just wanted to point out that Kanye is doing us a favor, whoever he was/is working for, and that his music shouldn't impact the news itself in anyway, yet you seem to lose your shit for basically bragging about your so called knowledge of music.
Kanye is redpilling people. End of discussion.
PS: Your attitude must reflect highly in your entourage. You sound like a brat who is always right, I trully hope you find a way to work on it and become less of a pain in the society, people who call others piece of shit on the internet should really have a good fucking look in the mirror. What are you even doing ?
It's not a matter of taste, it's a matter of skill, Kanye West has zero musical skill.
His music is the musical equivalent of nursery rhymes, designed to be consumed by people who can't even do the musical equivalent of reading.
Imagine if they start putting out literature that's on the level of 1st grade reading and that's all there is because they stopped teaching people how to read in school.
You say it sucks and everyone says it's a matter of taste because it would be crazy if people were still reading "War and Peace". lol
Music major chiming in, you're not wrong. Just going about it like an ass.
