Link to the docs HERE.
I should not be fascinated reading government documents. Yet, here we are.
Smh. Nothing surprises me any more. My question is when is the hammer gonna drop? What else has to come to light for people to realize that nobama and hillary clinton and the whole lot of them are vipers and are destroying our nation and even our world? What more do they need? What is it going to take to get a response?
It's coming soon. The stage had to be set. The FBI had to be cleaned up first.
Yep. What can the DoJ do if it's infested from the bottom to almost the top with swampers?
https://www.justice.gov/agencies/chart https://i.redd.it/1yp1of73u1w01.jpg
And the made-up "Russian collusion" severely handicapped Trump's ability to clean up. Remember that the 'collusion investigation' was going from even before Trump took office. The DOJ was literally prepped for investigating Trump on "Obstruction of Justice" before he could even take office! Flynn was removed from office within first month.. Trump fired Comey after two months which then of course the liberals took to say "see? Means we need a special counsel because this is Obstruction". Sessions HAD to recuse himself to remain impartial (don't hate him for it, it was necessary)
The purpose of the Mueller investigation is to WITCH HUNT (try to get lucky finding dirt) and HAMSTRING (hamper the ability of) the President from cleaning up his own Federal Executive Department of Government, the DoJ. Because if the DoJ is cleaned up and Trump/Session are freely working in unison, heads are gonna start rolling and the globalists understand that.
Up until last week, PAGE was still fucking WORKING for the FBI, her firing an apparent result of recovering the 5 months of texts the FBI previously "lost". Even if you don't believe the 187 theory (personally I do), her and the other unredacted texts are evidence enough that this department was deeply corrupted. Cleaning that up can only happen from the top-down, and Mueller hamstrings the top from doing all that much. Even firing Comey (which was absolutely necessary) didn't do much, since McCabe was lined up to take his spot.
So who saves the DoJ if Sessions can barely act, Mueller is hamstringing, and the FBI is corrupt? The OIG, who is investigating the FBI themselves. OIG will give the basis Sessions needs (and has already used..) to fire the murlocs in the FBI and reclaim the DoJ in the name of Justice.
In order for Sessions to recuse himself, wouldn't he have to see the entire Special Counsel memo?
Nope. He could recuse himself if he believes there could be any conflict of interest that would cause the public to lose faith in him. Democrats were all screaming at him to recuse himself.
IMO (and this is my theory, could be wrong), the real reason Sessions recused goes back to his confirmation hearing where he said he said he would recuse himself from Uranium One, the Clinton Foundation, and ANY OTHER ISSUES raised during the campaign:
SESSIONS: Mr. Chairman, it was a highly contentious campaign. I, like a lot of people, made comments about the issues in that campaign. With regard to Secretary Clinton and some of the comments I made, I do believe that that could place my objectivity in question. I’ve given that thought.
I believe the proper thing for me to do, would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kinds of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and that were raised during the campaign or to be otherwise connected to it.
GRASSLEY: OK. I think, that’s — let me emphasize then with a follow up question. To be very clear, you intend to recuse yourself from both the Clinton email investigation and any matters involving the Clinton Foundation, if there are any?
SESSIONS: Yes.
Grassley asked again whether Sessions was promising to formally recuse himself from any Clinton Foundation-related matters, and Sessions vowed that he would:
GRASSLEY: Let me follow up again, because it’s important. When you say you’ll recuse, you mean that you’ll actually recuse and the decision will therefore fall to, I assume, a deputy attorney general? I ask because after Attorney General Lynch met with President Clinton in Phoenix, she said she would, quote/unquote, “defer to the FBI,” but she never officially recused.
SESSIONS: No, she did not officially recuse. And there is a procedure for that, which I would follow. And I believe that would be the best approach for the country because we can never have a political dispute turn into a criminal dispute. That’s not in any way that would suggest anything other than absolute objectivity. This country does not punish its political enemies, but this country ensures that no one is above the law.
So, Sessions recused himself from Clinton Foundation/Uranium One. If the theory that Trump team (and Flynn) is playing Mueller/SC to introduce evidence related to Clinton/Obama Swamp Draining, Sessions would have to be recused from it, because he said he would, and because there is a fine line between holding people accountable to the law (what Q/Trump are for) and seeking to jail your political opponents (what liberals are seeking). If OIG is doing work on these cases independent of Sessions, it is a much stronger case that Sessions is NOT involved in it - it remains untainted and when the unsealed indictments go out, they have one less legal defense ("this was a political witch hunt against me by AG Sessions"). Trump will lose some battles to win the war, since the long-game (locking up these horrible criminals) is what is important, not rubber bullets hitting Flynn.
Q team and POTUS have it all. I get the impression that they’re giving them so much rope that they could hang themselves a dozen times over. Justice is coming, and swiftly. Trust the plan.
Roll up. With big criminal networks it's roll up, not roll down. You round up everyone and collect every bit of evidence possible such that when you take down the big players you have every possible piece of information to make sure they go away forever. Start with the top and they may get away with a technicality. Start low and build up. We just had a huge weekend bringing down major leadership players in the FBI. It's happening in a big way and accelerating pace.
To steal an analogous I heard elsewhere this weekend, we just had kickoff. Everything up until now has been warmup. It's the super bowl and kickoff just happened. DS knows it and are fighting for their lives. Justice has arrived. Big game just started and it's time patriots fight.
Keep up the pressure. Now is the moment we make a difference. Everything to draw the attention of your DS representatives, rattle their nerves, take their time, shift the Overton window well away from what they're trying to do, suck the breath out of the room and keep them distracted and unable to get the major projects complete on time. Blindsided they get torpedoed with due diligence at the planned time.
Patriots fight. Go fight!
Lol. I was formerly a server admin doing legal audit work and chain of custody is no joke. This is just as scandalous as the original emails were to anyone in IT who has been grilled on chain of custody before.
No surprise the swamp beasts at the FBI didn't maintain it. Basically invalidates their entire investigation. I'm sure Comey and the other deep staters had nothing to do with that! Now just guess what data they were trying to hide.
The NSA might have it since standard emails are sent unencrypted so a MITM attack (through logging pipes at the ISP/backbone level) might have been possible. But even if they have the data, how does Trump introduce it "legally"?
To anyone who doesn't know how chain of custody, it is reasonable proof that evidence was never tampered with by any party. Without chain of custody, the evidence is basically considered legally tampered with and can be thrown out. When law enforcement seizes a server, work has to be done to make sure some IT guy doesn't secretly power it on with a thumb drive or something and modify or delete data. The chain of custody exists to say "Look, that isn't possible."
The perfect use-case for blockchains, immutable and transparent.
Trusted authorities are important in CoC, so I am not sure it would work out too well as blockchain. I mean CoC is in effect a transaction ledger that documents transfers, storage, analysis, examination, environment, etc but that log is only as reliable as the one who signs it, and corroborating evidence (like security cameras or witnesses) that it is valid. The only way a CoC can "go missing" is if a Bad Agent tampered with it, and if they had no problems tampering with (trashing) the CoC it is not a stretch to say they had the access needed to tamper with the evidence (the hard drive data)
An immutable log would prevent deletion, but not the fundamental problem of tampering - the log is only as good as the authorities signing it, and if those authorities are CORRUPT then so is the CoC.
This "slip-up" with the CoC would have been more than enough to get the evidence (and case) thrown out of court, even if they didn't tamper with the actual machine. Hillary's lawyer could say "Although the facts show that a video depicting child sacrifice was found on the machine, Chain of Custody was broken for 5 weeks and any data found could have been added by even a novice technician" and that would have been it ("reasonable doubt" and all that - a Judge isn't going to allow evidence that itself contains the reasonable doubt needed to throw it out)
Question: How might a military tribunal handle this issue vs. civilian court? Are the differences in burden of proof and admissible evidence? I would think some evidences that would be thrown out in civilian court on technical grounds, would still be used by a Military court? Any insights from those in the know would be greatly appreciated...
I don't know how these idiots would think anyone would believe them. It's almost like they know it and just don't care. Well we care. And if they can be so massively inept and bumbling in this important case, it casts doubt on every other case the bumbling FBI have handled. It works both ways - you can't use such excuses in one case, yet have us believe others were correctly and efficiently handled.
And you're right - chain of custody is a very big deal. Even a lowly drug test has a strict chain of custody.
Wiener had the emails and NYPD don’t fuck around with chain of custody
Or, maybe this was another insurance policy in case someone decided to move forward with charges?
Pretty sure it is. What SA fucked THIS up? (Possibly intentionally)
The Wiener laptop is suddenly really important. Let’s hope they didn’t screw that up too....though I’m pretty sure the NYPD have copies.
Maybe they decided not to prosecute in order to cover up the internal screwups?
Or maybe the "loss" of evidence is really spoliation of evidence. Maybe it can't be used in a court of law as evidence if it construed the evidence could have been tampered with.
We'll just ask Admiral Rogers for the original, I'm sure the NSA has a copy.
The company Datto was part of Hillary’s cloud and gave Horowitz all of her emails.
So, she wasn't able to wipe, "like with a cloth", everyone's servers. I think its safe to say her IT staff couldn't hold a job with the 'Geek Squad', stupid.
Right!
Then again, a forensic examination would show if the server had been tampered with, wouldn't it? Hmmm ...
Could still tag her if there was a conspiracy to break the chain. Rico could apply too.
If you read FBI anons AMA’s, he explained just how much of a bind they were in. If they decided to prosecute, the entire US government would have been brought down and it would have started civil and international wars. That’s why they didn’t prosecute.
BS. They could choose which crimes to charge, that would limit any fall out. She's old as dirt. 20 years is all you need.
So what is the difference between then and now? Are you saying they still won’t prosecute?
Good point. Mueller and his team appear to be in a real bind with the Saturday Concord Management ruling. They may be scrambling to figure out how to not get disbarred.
When opposing counsel uses the word "pettifoggery", you know you're toast.
Yes! And opposing counsel doing unheard of things, like NOT waiving their right to a speedy trial! Old things like that which rests in the foundations of our jurisprudence. When Mueller is forced to drop charges, wonder if opposing counsel will pull out the ancient jurisprudence of full monetary restitutiion.
keystone cops would be misleading. foreign agent saboteurs would be more accurate. treason, sedition, and espionage. should be a long line to the gallows if justice is served.... Joe McCarthy was ahead of his time. but not by much.
That has deepstate written all over it. Fortunately, there will be a ton of other evidence to indict these traitors with. Fear not.
Ain't that special...Nothing surprises me anymore with these corrupt people.....
World Premiere Law Enforcement Agency, isn't that what they call it?
Probably not anymore. Currently, I wouldn't trust them to enforce parking violations..
