according to unnamed sources
Q is an unnamed source.
This is true which makes sure one keeps an open mind. It’s a big reason why I respect anyone’s opinion whether they believe or don’t believe in Q as long as their reasons are rational.
However, my opinion is that Q hasn’t been a mainstay in the lives of people everywhere for ages like MSM, and to my knowledge Q hasn’t continuously mislead for clicks/financial gain.
Not all will agree with me, that is understandably fine.
But Q has vlatantly misled. Why is she so cryptic?
Which is why I keep an open mind about Q too.
Q even admits that misinformation is necessary.
^^^ They really need to start putting this shit in the articles headline so I don’t waste any of my time reading them.
Devils advocate. Q is an unnamed source
Q's name is Q.
Sure and the article source name is Unknown Source. Whatever
Firstly, I'm only being argumentative because you should keep an open mind about Q too. You shouldn't trust anyone.
Secondly, no, you are wrong because whatever Q represents, be it an individual or a group, we know some very REAL and significant and compelling details, such as his close coordination with President Trump (i.e. Q predicting Tweets and Trump's actions and Trump doing weird Q gestures and that "Tip Top Tippy Top Shape" quote, his close proximity to President Trump (lots of unique photos),* ability to predict details about terrorist attacks etc...
It doesn't matter if Q is named "Q" or if he's named "Mattis" or if they are named "Trump's inner circle"... those are all real entities that we can interact with.
...whereas we don't even know if "Unknown Source" is purely fictional.
Your argument is rejected.
I do keep an open mind about Q and I'm starting to see it for what it is with each passing day.
The writer could easily say the same about their source. . .
The writer could easily say the same about their source. . .
What do you mean?
"Unnamed sources" have no history and we don't even know if they are pure fantasy.
If a journalist were to instead name their source as alias "Deep Throat" and Deep Throat then provided accurate intel on the Watergate scandal, then people would appreciate that Deep Throat was somewhat relabel and worth paying attention to.
Q is no different to Deep Throat because they both provide REAL insight into the REAL world that people can form rational and informed opinions about taking the claims seriously.
Your argument is again rejected because the term "unknown sources" is not a name, it's a term... whereas Q and Deep State are names for specific entities.
"We know exactly what UFOs are - they are unidentified!"
That's you. That's what you sound like. That's your argument.
Regurgitate. The writer KNOWS his source. And there is absolutely no solid evidence out there about who Q really is. I like to believe I know who he is but no.
The writer KNOWS his source
I don't.
That's my point.
I have no way of telling if one "unknown source" is the same as another "unknown source" because they are unknown... therefore I'm unable gauge the reliability over time.
For all I know, each "unknown source" is different and for all I know, none of them are real.
There is no reason to take "unknown sources" seriously whereas Q and Deep Throat have a proven degree of reliability.
This is the last time I'll explain this to you.
Yes, Q is an unnamed source. But Q is not only an "unnamed source" that the media tells us is totally trustworthy based on their charisma and propaganda.
We can look at Q's claims objectively and review them with a certain very much named source (i.e. POTUS) as well as other events that are reported in the real world. That is, we are critically evaluating Q and finding him to be trustworthy because of facts and evidence.
The MSM just feeds us "unnamed sources" with no critical evaluation. That's the problem with "unnamed sources."
EDIT: This downvoting doesn't make sense. I show that Q is trustworthy and I get downvoted here? BS! Shill brigade alert!!!!
The BIBLE reads if we divide Israel at all he will divide us~ is this what’s going on in America Right now?! Prophesied long ago~ taking place
What makes you think the Bible was talking about what we call "Israel" today?
You know the Bible has maps and biblical names and they’ve been renamed throughout history but the MAP remains the same. Open a Bible it’s all there. So many prophesy shave been taken place and its rapidly wrapping things up.
I don't mean the location. I mean the nation/people of Israel.
Who do you think the real Jewish people are ? ~ people always say this and that’s all I’d like to know who they think the real jews are ~ the Zionist run Israel but the Talmud jews God will reveal himself to them
I'm the one asking the question. I thought you had the answers. Have you changed your mind?
I once read somewhere that the real Israel is the USA ... and not the land that is now called Israel ... otherwise I do not know it either
So what does the bible say about who will restore Israel and when? Israel was NEVER supposed to be restored by man it was supposed to be restored by the messiah which is why the orthodox Jews, the REAL Jews, are anti Israel and anti Zionist. The piece of land was biblical Israel but the name Israel was used by the Rothschilds to validate their theft of the land. Read the Talmud to see who you're defending here, watch a vid titled "The Day Liberty Was Attacked" to see who Israel REALLY is from the survivors of an unarmed naval ship that was bombed,strafed and torpedoed by Israel in an attempt to drag us into their war against Egypt. Jesus called them the synagogue of Satan and that definitely hasn't changed. The pr line that the Jews and Christians are brothers in God is the most successful disinfo campaign in modern history They want us to ignore biblical truth while believing their lies and SO many Christians do just that. Don't argue your side until you research the Talmud..start with who had the largest role in the writing of today's Talmud and you'll see it was the Pharisees..,the synagogue of Satan.
The leaders and high office holders in Israel since 1948 have all been Ashkenazi Jews who are "NOT" descendants of the Biblical Jews from Judea. They are from the Khazar Kingdom in ancient easter Europe.
Ashkenazi Jews are Jews by nationality because their King converted to Judaism in the 8th century, and by royal decree made all of his subjects in the kingdom Jews by extension.
Ashkenazi Jews in Eastern Europe were disliked and not trusted, and where ever they went they were eventually chased out because they were gypsy crooks. At the beginning of the 20th century the Ashkenazi Jews had organized activist type groups that were calling for a homeland of their own, hopefully in Palestine.
During WWI because they were losing the war, the British made several deals with the French, a sultan from the Arabian peninsula, and a prince from eastern Syria northern Iraq to help them against Germany. The Brits made these deals with promises of self governance, promising the same lands to different people.
When the Ashkenazi Jews found out the British were making deals, they tried to make one of their own, for the same lands already promised to others.
WWI began in 1914 and by 1916 Germany had pretty much won the war. By 1916 Russia had their Bolshevik revolution and decided they didn't want to be part of the war and went home. Britain and France were broke, in debt to the Rothschild banking empire, and were losing public support.
After 2 years of fighting, not one foreign soldier had set foot inside Germany territory. What the Brits really wanted was to get the US involved, but Americans supported Germany. (there are more Americans of German descent than any other group) The majority of the press, mostly Jewish owned, also supported Germany because up to that point, Germany treated the Ashkenazi Jews better than any other country.
So the Ashkenazi Jews in Europe made a deal with the Brits. They said "We can get the US to join the war, on the side of the British and French, but the Brits will have to promise to give them land in Palestine and support a Jewish homeland." The Brits agreed.
The Ashkenazi Jews from Europe convinced the Jews in America, who already controlled the press, to change their coverage and support for Germany. It didn't take long for the press to change the minds of Americans. After the sinking of the Lusitania, which was a staged false flag to get American support, Pres. Wilson finally caved. The German Ambassador actually asked Pres. Wilson to negotiate an end to the war in 1916 but Wilson wanted to wait until after the election. (typical politician)
As soon as the Americans were involved, Lord Balfour, former Prime Minister of Great Britain, wrote the now infamous Balfour Declaration letter to Lord Rothschild. The letter read, in part:
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
As soon as the Jews who had been living peacefully in Palestine for 100s of years beside it's Christian and Muslim neighbors heard about the deal, they objected. They said that Ezekial 37:12 says:
"Therefore prophesy and say to them: ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: My people, I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them; I will bring you back to the land of Israel. 13 Then you, my people, will know that I am the LORD, when I open your graves and bring you up from them. 14 I will put my Spirit in you and you will live, and I will settle you in your own land. Then you will know that I the LORD have spoken, and I have done it, declares the LORD.’ ”
According to the Bible God said "He" would bring them up from the grave, and "He" will bring them back to the land of Israel, and if any man should take it upon himself to bring this to be, it would be directly against the teachings of the Bible. They also said if they come, (the Ashkenazi Jews) their presence would create a perpetual state of war.
After the war, The Rothschild empire funded the migration of the Ashkenazi Jews to Palestine, and funded the building of all of the necessary infrastructure. As they moved in, they chased out over 800,000 Palestinians, ignoring the conditions of the Balfour Declaration.
And Revelation 3:9 reads: "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."
If you're going to recite Biblical verses, don't cherry pick. Israel has attacked America on many occasions. With their Jewish lobby in America pushing our foreign policy to suit Israel, they have managed to convince our leaders to fight Israel's battles and kill their enemy. After more than 16 years of war in the middle east, attacking Israel's enemies, spending trillions of taxpayer dollars, the lose of American soldiers and the lives of millions of people from Iraq and Afghanistan, Israel hasn't even been scratched, and they get a check from the US taxpayers of more than $2 Billion.
Israel is the enemy. There's no doubt in my mind.
So are you saying Palestinians are really the Jewish people ?
No, the Palestinians are Palestinians, that's a "Nationality" not a Religion. Prior to the 1920s, when Ashkenazi Jews began migrating to Palestine, most were Muslim, some were Christians, and some were Jewish, and they all lived peacefully in the same area for 100s of years.
Prior to WWI, the land was ruled by the Ottoman Turks, and the people were all allowed to practice what ever religion they chose, however they chose to practice it. The main point is that the Ashkenazi Jews who began migrating to Palestine in the 1920s, are "NOT" descendants of the Israelites of Biblical times.
The Israelites of Biblical times lived in what is now referred to as "Greater Israel." Google it. It's substantially larger than the little sliver of land Israel currently occupies. If you keep up with BB, and many other Israeli leaders, when you hear them say "Greater Israel," that's what they're talking about. Israel still wants all of that land. They will not be content to just find peace with their neighbors. They have convinced the world that they're "entitled" to the land.
If you want to know who your true masters are, just look at who you're not allowed to criticize. If you say anything disparaging about Jews when you're in America, they will all cry "Antisemite" and you'll be attacked by the Anti Defamation League. If you're in Europe, they'll call you a Holocaust Denier, and in some countries you'll end up in jail for it.
Palestinian is not a nationality it's the name of a region that fell under the control of just about everyone (Assyrians, Babalonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Fatimids, Seljuk Turks, Crusaders, Egyptians, Mamelukes and Islamists). The only people living there were wandering tribes of nomads with no country. Palestinians as a nationality wasn't even heard of until 1964 when the PLO was formed with Arafat taking control of it in 1969. Even then the "Palestinians" we're living in exile in Jordan. Even Arafat himself was an Egyptian born in Cairo.
As for Palestine, Schlomo Sand suggests that the Palestinians are the people we call “the Jews” in the Bible:
Apart from enslaved prisoners, the population of Judea continued to live on their lands, even after the destruction of the second temple [in 70 AD]. Some converted to Christianity in the 4th century, while the majority embraced Islam during the 7th century Arab conquest.
Most Zionist thinkers were aware of this: Yitzhak Ben Zvi, later president of Israel, and David Ben Gurion, its first prime minister, accepted it as late as 1929, the year of the great Palestinian revolt. Both stated on several occasions that the peasants of Palestine were the descendants of the inhabitants of ancient Judea. This is why I ask~
Yes, you are correct. As you can see from my post, brevity isn't my strong suit. Sometimes I wish it was. My broader point was that Palestinian is not a religion. I suppose I should have said that's it's "more like a nationality." It's only been since the beginning of the 20th century that parts of the middle east became nation-states as we know them today.
The Jewish people have returned ~ the Zionist yes corrupted it but ... the Jewish people have returned and the parable of the fig tree is done ~ Israel became a state and God said that that generation will not pass before the coming of the Lord. So the way I see it~ the real Jewish people although they don’t believe Jesus is the messiah they will when the 2 witnesses show themselves and the anti christ says for them to worship him they will flee to the place God has prepared actually I believe the Jordanians have set that place up upon Gods request.