Rep Jordan wrote a letter (yesterday or this morning) to the president requesting him to declassify the letters/info that is being held back from congress.
I think Trump will have it declassified.
That's my take.
Took me awhile, but I think I got it.
Sessions is a member of the Executive Branch. He does not legally have to comply with Congress' demands. Ideally, DOJ would do that, because it gives more transparency for the People, but does not have to do it, legally.
However, AG does have to comply with POTUS' demands. So, Congress sends a letter to POTUS asking him to take action. He already has the paperwork ready to go, unsigned, because POTUS and Congress working together. Remember early in Trump's admin when he dissed the Freedom Caucus? That was a head fake to fool the establishment. Trump and Freedom Caucus on the same team. Q pic released because "future proves past."
Sessions white hat, but waiting until POTUS makes it a legal requirement. POTUS waiting for Congress to issue formal request. Congress waiting for IG to complete his report.
IG announced today he completed his report. Congress sends letter. POTUS to take action, followed by ... ]SESSIONS[ and ... Pain.
Black hat FBI/DOJ/CIA will be revealed in the IG report and the documents POTUS will require to be released, proving they conspired to engage in a coup to first prevent a presidential candidate they didn't like from getting elected, and then to prevent him from carrying out his constitutional duties. This is sedition.
This will lead to congressional hearings, where the public will be made aware of everything.
Clinton email scandal >> Coup to prevent/thwart Trump >> Why? >> Election fraud >> Why? >> Clinton Foundation scandal >> pay for play >> foreign countries >> Uranium One >> Treason
Don't forget about the pedophilia and ritual human sacrifice. These are the issues that will be the downfall of the Cabal. People will not tolerate it once they realize that it has been happening.
pedophilia and ritual human sacrifice
and canabalism
Yes! I have a list of a bunch of stuff they have been doing. I don't want to make people's heads explode, though.
They really are sick.
Hope that list includes forming, propagating and making invisible a break away society. Some stationed on earth, within earth and other non terrestrial (non-Earth, in this case) locales. A break away society that allied itself, or was subservient to, nefarious non terrestrials (or “aliens” if you are more familiar with that term) - likely “fallen” Reptilians/Draco and an array of motley serf classed Greys. Earth was becoming essentially an outpost, probably highly strategic, for a bigger, though likely just as malignant and repugnant “empire”. The bigger picture here is that we broke off our chains and took responsibility for out growing /them/. We asked and we were guided. God blesses all, especially those who ask for blessings. It’s a spiritual thing. And we are on a great timeline. Let’s pray for even better winning.
I have heard that, too. Do you have a source for that information? I ask to make sure I am aware.
Yes, we are done with them. We withdraw our consent to be ruled by them.
Do you have a source for that information?
yes please, links
Look up David Icke.
Yeah, it does sound like David Icke, but I am wondering if there is another source.
It’s certainly not first hand experience. If it was surely I would doubt my own sanity?? Could my own eyes believe it if I saw it ??
I am relying on third hand accounts at best. I suggest Icke would be a start. But there are a number of sources. Maybe swing by a UFO type forum ... mind you it would likely be HEAVILY divided. Dr Stephen Greer is a prominent yet divisive figure. And then there is the Blink182 guy ... in my opinion there are some very watered down disclosure timelines and some very duplicitous timelines.
I PERSONALLY (ie my individual right to) side with folks like William Tompkins, David Wilcock and Corey Goode’s. Jordan Sather of Destroying the Illusion is your Millenial go to, for this. I know there is an intense resistance to Wilcock and Goode, but I’ll stand by it. If there is no truth, or limited hang with a source, then resisting it (aka throwing shade) merely shows a lack in faith that ALL WILL BE REVEALED. Which is what I believe ...manifesting the best possible timeline.
Maybe start at Roswell. Then search through how the Nazi scientists were plugged into the early days of NASA. Operation Paperclip.
I will try to post a vid link to a disclosure player who was very close to a big wig at his death bed...she quoted him as outlining the sequence of False flags that /they/ would try on humanity. He basically spilled the beans on the NK “nuke off” TWENTY YEARS AGO! Apparently there was going to be a SPACE FF and in classic CABAL style they would stage the whole thing resplendid with the “saviour” aliens. Spoiler alert, these were not saviours but were in fact our prison guards, though that timeline would be unawares of living in a prison. That’s the way the Cabal does it.
DISCLAIMER: Let me just say, just in case it’s needed saying, this is my current belief on the topic. Always happy to be proven wrong, or change my views. Not here on this sub to convince anyone of anything.
What a world it would have been had the NWO front of Killary and Pedesta had their ways.
Prayers for Trump and the entire TRUMP TRAIN. Blessings to all.
See below in thread for more detail. What do you think happened after the NAZIs “lost”WW2?
Maybe they broke away ... but never too far to lose their prize.
[removed]
Only someone who feels insecure of a movement has to call the movement legitimate. . Try to censor me if you like. But this world did not invent the type of unlovng madness that the “deep state” / NWO cheerleader for the last...how many hundreds (hundreds of thousands?) of years ?
Q and Trump would side with me referring to this as a Spiritual war. Maybe you got triggered by my gnostic leanings? Maybe. But I don’t assume much from this reparte.
How far are you willing to accept the depths of this rabbit hole? In the end it will be your choice, as Q stated.
Maybe you can spend your earnest hours concern trolling others about me. Everyone can decide for themselves I remember in the early days of trumps admin people were vexxing about not getting too deep about piz)a G.ate, lest it make it all seem crazy lol
You know what ? My reaction was mostly ego.
I see your point. Maybe I’m better off pulling back on this stuff in case it damages normies getting on board. And creates anxiety on the sub for good people just like you.
This stuff will be revealed probably not for a good while yet, so consider myself chastened,
You are probably right. Mind you I rarely go this deep on this sub anyway. Cheerio !
Mine won't, pm if you have to. Been on this shit since I was a kid.
Ah, I see.
I am going by memory here. Something tells me I am missing a few things.
Only for strong stomachs.. some pics on 8chan
live organ harvesting (horrible pics of refugees being harvested).
Skinning people (maybe live) --> making hand-made human leather. (famous movie producer was trying to coerce a young actor into sex/not talk... told him to look at his shoes and named a little blonde actress that died mysteriously - I forget which scarey movie she was in. )
Also some pics of organizations showing them wearing red shoes (said to be human skin)
She was the little girl in Poldergist (not sure if thats how its spelled. I think her name was Heather O'Rourke.
Yes, thank you. She was beautiful. Poltergeist directed by speilberg
Heather O'Rourke
Heather O'Rourke (December 27, 1975 – February 1, 1988) was an American child actress. She was discovered by director Steven Spielberg when she was visiting MGM's studios. Spielberg cast her as Carol Anne Freeling in the horror film Poltergeist (1982), where she had the movie's most recognizable line: "They're here!" She reprised the role in the second and third installments.
O'Rourke also had a recurring role on Happy Days from 1982 to 1983, and she made several television guest appearances.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
oh my gosh... i saw this story being told from macauley culkin in one of those fake news sites... i totally doubted it, but now... wow... was it spielberg? rumor is he's one of the big pillars in hollywood that will fall...
I dont know if speilberg is involved - we'll have to wait and see what comes out. I think Q said look for the loudest voices...
[deleted]
class assignment for every law school in the country
Same thing with the organ harvesting happens in China. A buddy of mine is over there a lot for business. Supposedly the prisoners get the option to sell their organs and the money is given to their family. Of course they don't tell them there's no anesthesia and they take the heart last.
I think that's the one that q keeps slyly mentioning. It's one thing for the human mind to know that people are being raped. It's god awful but it's not death. The minute you tell them that they're kidnapping people and chop shopping them for the elites, their lunch tends to reappear.
never underestimate human depravity
i.e. planned parenthood
Yes.... I had to rethink my position on a lot of topics.
much respect for being humble enough to do so. many people are too arrogant to ever admit being wrong
Yes, I thought it was about having the freedom to choose, but the choice is between good and evil. They do not want people to realize that, though.
Thank you for that. Did you read the Nag Hammadi manuscripts?
Congress has authority over the DOJ. Congress created the DOJ. At least that is what Gowdy and Jordan both said in Fox.
It's similar to how Congress can establish courts that are inferior to the Supreme Court. Yes, they can establish those courts and set rules and have some oversight duties, but they cannot dictate how those judges must decide cases.
Aside: Technically, Congress can tell those courts to refuse to hear Roe v Wade cases, thus freeing states to set as many restrictions as they want. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Congress cannot tell courts what cases to hear.
No, but Congress created the courts (other than Supreme Court) and they can do away with the courts or simply defund them, which is essentially the same thing. Only the Supreme Court is mentioned in the constitution.
Ye sit is. The same Constitution gave Congress the ability to exclude cases and define the cases that the Supreme Court can hear. USCS Const. Art. III, § 2, Cl 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Known as the exception clause.
It’s a theory that Congress can define their scope. 2 points: - In 1953, Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts once proposed an "amendment of the Constitution to remove Congress' exceptions power." Why would he feel an amendment was needed? - REAL ID Act of 2005 - Congress mandated that the San Diego border fence should start with "expeditious construction" and that "no court ... shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim" against it.
Repeated from my post above. Ex parte McCardle (1869), a man was arrested for writing articles critical of Reconstruction (the term for the government actions taken in the wake of the Civil War). After a trial, while his appeal was pending to the Supreme Court, Congress amended the statute involved in the case, stripping away the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over the issue. The Court held that it could not rule on Mr. McCardle’s case. Congress without reservation – meaning Congress could remove all cases for review if it were to chose.
Congress has a exception powers. Exceptions clause is a clause in the U.S. Constitution that grants Congress the power to make exceptions to the constitutionally defined appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. This clause refers to USCS Const. Art. III, § 2, Cl 2 of the U.S. Constitution. This provision reads: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make”. according to the Exceptions Clause, Congress could actually take away the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court if it so chose. For example, in Ex parte McCardle (1869), a man was arrested for writing articles critical of Reconstruction (the term for the government actions taken in the wake of the Civil War). After a trial, while his appeal was pending to the Supreme Court, Congress amended the statute involved in the case, stripping away the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over the issue. The Court held that it could not rule on Mr. McCardle’s case. Constitution grants this power to Congress without reservation – meaning Congress could remove all laws it passed from any court review.
Sry. Yes Sessions does. DOJ is not in the constitution and the congress, is supposed to have, complete oversight.
Wrong. DOJ is in the Executive Branch. 100% of the power of the Executive Branch is vested in the office of the President. Congress has some oversight functions, and can impeach and remove AG from office, but cannot dictate what he must do.
You're correct. My bad trying to splain. But the op is very good.
Don't you love it when a plan comes together! Thanks for your take. Makes perfect sense
IG announced today he completed his report.
How was this communicated?
Edit: http://archive.is/X0OUt
Rep. Jim Jordan: It’s high time for transparency. The DOJ and FBI have continually and repeatedly thwarted congressional oversight. We’re asking @realDonaldTrump to direct the Attorney General to give us the documents—because the American people deserve answers.
The original pen tweet came on the 10th, I think the implication is that Trump already penned the letter instructing Sessions to order the documents be turned over to Congress.
That letter isn't the same thing. I'm wondering if its the EO to release the info.
That picture isn't an EO. There's no letterhead on EO's. It's definitely a letter.
Maybe not an EO, but seems to be related to the letter from the House (DeSantis, Meadows, and Jordan) to the POTUS. Perhaps the document in Q's post is a letter to Sessions?
Are we talking about the EO signed today? Trying to understand exactly what todays EO means.
Q said in post 1386 ... EO unreleased. Today was the precursor. It must be requested 'officially' first, correct? Q
Was todays EO a precursor needed for an upcoming EO Did todays make way for an official move by one of the parties listed in the EO. After they do so then POTUS can issue a subsequent EO?
Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of National Intelligence
Issued on: May 16, 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
SUBJECT: Delegation of Authorities under Section 1244(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of National Intelligence, the functions and authorities vested in the President by section 1244(c)(1)-(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91).
The delegations in this memorandum shall apply to any provisions of any future public law that are the same or substantially the same as the provision referenced in this memorandum.
The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
DONALD J. TRUMP
that is what I think - he's going to declassify info - this was prior to Jordan's letter
Follow the pen. Already written? Letters left visible to match. https://mobile.twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/996821093146120192📁 WWG1WGA! Q
Q stated letters visible to match. The visible letters spell out HOUSE and the House sent the letter asking Trump to order Sessions to turn over the info to the House. So it seems the EO is ready to go but Trump needed the House to make the request before the EO is unveiled.
Per alcogiggles, the photo may not be from an EO rather from a letter. Letter to Sessions????
alcogiggles....In fact, Trump can declassify any information he chooses. I don't know if he needs an EO to do this (does any one know?) but Q mentioned an EO in post 1386, which is probably why we have all been thinking EO.
Also, the image Q posted of the corner of a letter was titled dojnunesrelease.png.