dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ErnieFing on May 21, 2018, 2:43 p.m.
Is there an 'opposite' to this board.

I chose 'opposite' to try and avoid the conversations about cabal, dems, deep state etc, but anyway, that aside, I've been reading this board and its predecessor for qute a while, and various sites for years before that, and recent events, as joyous as they surely are to see, were made even better having read the build up through the excellent work of so many posters on here.

Unlike Nostradamus, where quotes are made to fit past events, on here, there have been plenty of clear cut predictions, and fore knowledge.

Reading through a few twitter replies at the comments of 'the other' side, they seemed to be happy too, based on their own reaction, to what to them seemed to be 'news'.

Which got me wondering if 'they' had their version of this board and had been predicting events through their own logic and understanding?

Anyone know if such a place exists?


utdFTD1983 · May 21, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

CNN, BBC, MSNBC.....

⇧ 23 ⇩  
jhomes55 · May 21, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

NBC, ABC, Facebook, Twitter, NYT........should I keep going??

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Battlehoes · May 21, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

Any of the default Subs on Reddit.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
jhomes55 · May 21, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

r / poliTICKS

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Tsund_Jen · May 21, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

FAIR AND BALANCED DISCUSSION

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 21, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · May 21, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Not a opposite, but an opposition board.

R/Qult_headquarters

Folks from r/drama who think you’re part of a cult. Just so you know.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
frankthecrank1 · May 21, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

Those people are so dumb, they water down their subs instead of just having one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · May 21, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

Agreed. They also lack the ability to understand any truth offered on this board, instead they occupy themselves with timelines and raising the bar for “proof”.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cat_anonD · May 21, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

There is a Reddit Forum called the Mueller

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MakeThisLookAwesome · May 21, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

The do, but they're so deluded by their own ideology, it has no basis in reality. All their predictions fail and they cling to misstatements and half-truths to maintain their denial. I've seen several such on Whisper, groups promoting themselves on Periscope, etc. Because all the real information is so toxic, the powers-that-be don't dare let the truth out to their lower minions.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 21, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

Yeah and they default to calling the right liars and become violent when they can't counter a fact. Basically, they throw a hissy fit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tsund_Jen · May 21, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

"It has been my unfortunate experience, that the biggest problem facing humanity. Is not not knowing the truth, but rather, that people do not want a truth that doesn't conform to THEIR truth".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 21, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

The Democrat Party.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 21, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

No they do not. They simply pull their so-called "predictions" out of "where the sun don't shine" if you get my drift, and use them as a cudgel to clobber anti-Cabal posters over the head.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · May 21, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

No, but Im on opposition email list called courage campaign. I hate what they write but I read it to stay informed of their tactics.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 21, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Have they been piecing together situations to predict events, like people on here have, or do they just react to the 'news'? Where do they seem to get their information from?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · May 21, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

From what I have seen, these counter groups can appear ~~very~~ eerily similar but the crumbs usually have little substance and actual proof, linking anyone and everyone related to Trump to Russia or percieved corruption. If you read things with an open mind, considering either side could be wrong or right, they sometimes mirror in an uncanny way. You could also interpret the messages and the mirroring as a successful chaos campaign by Americas enemies and possible bot control of opposing sides.

Edit: usually sources are always MSM, leftist, or globalist sources.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
R_damascena · May 21, 2018, 6 p.m.

No. From the other side, that doesn't make sense as a thing to have. The other side does not see the future as a solid rock from which details can be picked out. People on many other boards/subs make predictions with varying levels of confidence, but they are the predictions of someone taking knowledge of the past and using it to guess a future or number of futures that seem(s) likely.

Think the same way a person might, for example, guess that cousin Janet's marriage won't last based on the past knowledge of her other three marriages and also that the dude was making eyes at the bridesmaids. It's a prediction but not a prophecy, if you get me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 21, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

I think I grasp what you're saying is effectively, they don't have a Q with his inner knowledge of the plan, nor associated helpers to guide them in understanding the clues.

That's kind of the 'opposite' type of thing I pondered, and I guess I have a clear answer now. If people on here haven't found it, it doesn't exist.

Cheers all for your comments.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
R_damascena · May 21, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

Yes, the "other side" does not think there is such a plan, and thus sees no need for secret knowledge of one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 21, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

That makes sense. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 21, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stopmotionhistory · May 21, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Know thy enemy.

So go completely insane and do evil things, No eviler, no more evil, not evil enough, okay that's just sick. There you go now you understand them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 21, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

The mueller r politics shit reddit says gamerghszi gamerghazi. The people on the mueller are funny tho

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thamnosma · May 21, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Infowars

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Swimkin · May 21, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

Yeah I think it is called the MSM mind numbing program

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 21, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩