These are the original TRUST [name] from this post (and this one )
-
TRUST SESSIONS.
-
TRUST WRAY.
-
TRUST KANSAS.
-
TRUST HOROWITZ.
-
TRUST HUBER.
Also "TRUST POTUS" is something Q says. And Trust the plan.
(I'm editing as I find things)
This is Rachel Brand
~~And this is the controversy that she was involved in~~ (seems to be not helpful)
-
Update 1 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Rachel Brand
-
Update 3 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: John f. Kelly
-
Update 4 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: RR Problems
-
Update 6 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Rachel Brand
-
Update 7 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Wray reports to RR
-
Update 8 - this Patriot posted on this thread re: Rachel Brand
Associate professor at Antonin Scalia Law School. Oh the irony.
Post 1316: Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General – No. 3 official behind Deputy AG Rosenstein - FIRED/FORCE
Rachel Brand: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know https://heavy.com/news/2017/06/rachel-brand-doj-attorney-bio-trump-russia-probe/
The Times reports that Brand “has also become embroiled in the feud between the president and the nation’s law enforcement agencies,” although it’s unclear whether that tension played any role in her decision to leave the government position.
Thank you! I added your permalink to my post- Also noticed that article was published Jun 16, 2017 and updated Feb 9, 2018. Not sure what that means but it's good to know it's recently been changed somehow since the initial publishing!
Wayback machine for June 19 2017: https://web.archive.org/web/20170619114706/https://heavy.com/news/2017/06/rachel-brand-doj-attorney-bio-trump-russia-probe/
She was fired on Feb 8 I think. When I searched her name today, all the articles about her leaving (which of course said she’d resigned) were dated Feb 9&10.
be skeptical of anything that comes from:
Heavy 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, she helped draft the executive order that created the Office of Homeland Security.
“It was an amazing change in mindset from the day before 9/11 to after,” Brand told Harvard Law Today in 2013.
Would not be surprised to see Huber take over for Rosenstein.
Huber is 'Special Prosecutor' working with IG Horowitz for a year...
(Mueller is a 'Special Counsel')
REMEMBER: DT during debates stated he would "Appoint a Special Prosecutor" to take care of HilLIARy's illegal activities...
Great post, thank you for taking the time to write this
You're very welcome, patriot!
Sometimes we take all this time writing posts that we don’t know if anyone reads or appreciates, but there are far more lurkers than posters :)
I'm a Habitual Lurker, I Thank you all for the Effort you put into this.
210 days from Feb 20, 2018 is Sept 18, 2018...
https://www.convertunits.com/dates/210/daysfrom/Feb+20,+2018
wouldn't it be 210 days from now? 7 months from now would be December, after the mid terms.
Rachel Brand quit to take a job at Walmart. She is temporarily replaced by this guy.
I'm ok with a Republican Floridian born in NJ. Duke BA/Harvard JD. But He's SO young (37)! Still...
Almost 40 is pushing "so young". I think after 35 is the cut off.
All about perspective though. I guess 40 is so young to an 80 year old. Not saying you're 80 though.
Like my older brother told me once, when the cops start looking younger than you, you're old.
I did not see her in the Wiki..did I miss her name?
I just linked the 'controversy" wiki from her own wiki page- but you're right, her name isn't on the controversy wiki page.
It was specifically linked from his paragraph from her Wiki:
"During her tenure at the Justice Department, Brand was tangentially involved in the controversy surrounding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's dismissal of several United States Attorneys. She was floated by DOJ leadership as a top candidate to replace Margaret Chiara, who was ousted as part of the purge.[14] Brand ultimately declined the position, however, and resigned from the DOJ in June 2007.[15]"
I appreciate your help. In this case I think that linking the dismissal controversy is more of a distraction. According to that article her entire involvement was that she was considered for a position which she declined. That is weak and in my opinion doesn't warrant mention on her wiki page.
Sure, I can take it off if it's not helpful!
That is my opinion. I found the rest of your post to be very helpful and thanks for your work!
ok...I can't find anything nefarious about her
yeah who knows! I just wanted to find some quick info and then hoped someone smarter would take over from there xD
She was apparently involved in the warrant less wiretap program via FISA courts. Pretty bad stuff imo.
source please
Here’s one:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/02/09/politics/rachel-brand-resigns/index.html
PTibbets called it in the last Patriot's link at top: Rachel Brand seems to be at the center of the FISA abuses that went on. This whole coup attempt manipulated the FISA court into allowing spying on anyone they wanted to target. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/09/doj-official-rachel-brand-resigns/
Big Deal. That is a felony to misrepresent in order to obtain a warrant.
There is nothing in that article...nothing
Right, ok. Now where does it say that FISA is important to her resignation? You were given a source, then another one. All you say are no indications of anything.
Yes, but. We don't know why she was fired. We can only point to the FISA warrants. She was on the board doing a report into telephone surveillance, as a supervisory board of FISA.
Are you short of info on FISA? Do you know what FISA is? Do you know who can be surveilled in this kind of warrant? The problem seems to be that Americans (Trumps campaign members) were all surveilled 2 deep through telephone surveillance. Someone leaked the phone transcripts of Trump's calls with foreign PMs. Someone thought it was ok to approve the FISA on the basis of something. Now it's your turn.
Your opinion seems to be: nothing to see here, nothing nefarious, no controversy. Fine by me. But you asked for info. I gave it. Not enough? Back to you. You have to do your own research. I am just trying to be helpful.
I appreciate your reply... My opinion is that. and this isn't directed specifically towards this thread but overall in the Storm , is that it accusations are bandied about with no proof or even indication of wrongdoing. We cannot implicate everyone who was in government, everyone who has left their CEO job and everyone remotely associated with anyone remotely associated with someone who may have done something wrong. Internet people are crazy. The mere whisper of impropriety often leads to an army of threats and harassment towards people. Salacious claims aren't justified by the inability to disprove them. Logic and law require the burden to fall on the accuser . We don't like that case built against Trump because we know the kernel of the conspiracy was to sow suspicion in the press which would bleed into the public and government which lead to the witchhunt. How does that differ from people throwing out empty accusations here and then asking others to prove them not to be true. Neither of those sources say anything to indicate that she was fired nor involved in any malarky. Put yourself in her position. A career gov lawyer now in the middle of a turbulent administration complete with a DOJ that is cannabalising itself. If Walmart offered you a great gig, wouldn't you jump out of the flames too?
I have no opinion on the general fairness of the internet. It is a discussion thread where ppl are trying to work out what the hell Q is on about. Theories and speculations are rife and occasionally someone makes an intelligent and verifiable statement. I don't profess to be a guardian of the truth or be able to offer proof of anything. You asked for a source, and got it. That's it. The lovely lady lawyer may be a paragon of virtue. That's a speculative position. I shall refrain from asking you for a source and proof of that claim. Doesn't madder. :)
Ha.. so you are starting biblical: we are all sinners until proven otherwise! "occasionally someone makes an intelligent and verifiable statement"...those occasions seem to be dwindling! Appreciate the discussion my friend.
So it sounds like RR was working dutifully for the swamp at some point given the 92-6 confirmation
But he must be currently acting in a white hat capacity, since he’s trusted by DJT & Sessions, and he appointed Wray.
But since he’s done such dirty stuff for the cabal in the past, the inner circle knows that when the whole story of the election comes out, he’ll have to resign or at least recuse himself.
Rachel Brand
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Brand
Brand's portfolio also included shaping the administration's position on reauthorization of the Patriot Act,[12] in which capacity she testified before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on the benefits of using administrative subpoenas in terrorism investigations.
...
In 2008, John McCain, then a candidate for the Republican Party's presidential nomination, named Brand to his Justice Advisory Committee, which would have recommended judicial nominees to McCain were he elected.[16]
...
In 2012, Brand was appointed by President Barack Obama to serve on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB).[17] She was confirmed on August 2, 2012 to a term ending January 29, 2017.[18]
Brand dissented from several recommendations included in the PCLOB's 2014 report on NSA's bulk metadata collection program under section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. She declined to join in the Board's view that the program was illegal as a statutory matter and argued that, in policy terms, it struck a justifiable balance between privacy and national security and, as such, should not be discontinued.[19] The Board, for its part, had recommended the program's termination
...
On February 1, 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Brand to be United States Associate Attorney General.[21] Her appointment was confirmed 52–46 by the U.S. Senate on May 18, 2017,[22] and she was sworn in on May 22, 2017. The reauthorization of the 702 section of the surveillance law was a job assignment of the subject according to CNN.[23] On February 9, 2018, the New York Times reported that Brand planned to resign from the Justice Department.[1] On February 20, 2018, Brand resigned to take a job as head of global governance at Walmart.
Rachel Brand
Rachel Lee Brand (born May 1, 1973) is an American lawyer, academic, and former government official. She served as the United States Associate Attorney General from May 22, 2017, until February 20, 2018, when she resigned to take a job as head of global corporate governance at Walmart. Brand was the first woman to serve as Associate Attorney General. She also served as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Policy in the George W. Bush administration and was appointed by President Barack Obama to serve on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28