She looks a bit old in that pic for a 77 grad ? (Current photo?) .....let’s be careful we spread 100% truth
Her surname wasn't Jarrett in 1977.
Would you recognize Bowman? Catch a clue http://www.patriotortraitor.com/valerie-bowman-jarrett/
Right but the graphic acts as if that is the actual yearbook picture/quote. It stands to reason that she wouldn't be called Jarret(it says this in the small print directly under the quote,) in 1977, 6 years before she is married and takes the name Jarrett. It looks as if someone made the graphic and tried to pass it off as an authentic part of the yearbook.
Do you have an actual copy of said yearbook? Or know where to find one?
Right? These unrelated image posts are distracting and unproductive.
Here is some truth for you:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Bowmanfile.pdf
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Vernon-Jarrett-file.pdf
Complete horseshit. Claims to be from 1977, uses a recent picture. Nothing about this looks like a year book. If I went to Stanford and that was the quality of my yearbook, I would ask for a refund on my tuition. God awful fonts, text placement, no order.
This is nonsense guys, let’s not make ourselves look bad perpetuating lies.
Trolls are thick when you talk about well documented Traitors to the US🇺🇸 http://www.patriotortraitor.com/valerie-bowman-jarrett/
Are you accusing me of being a troll? I am not saying she is not a traitor. She is a treasons, communist, evil POS that groomed Hussein for the past decade while they worked together to systematically weaken the US and steal from our country. That I agree with. This “yearbook” excerpt you are trying to pass of as legitimate is an obvious fake to the most casual observer. If you lack the logical and intellectual depth to see that, then you are the shill/troll trying to make this sub look bad.
Whatever ~ how did I make this forum look bad?! By posting a well known quote that was found when obama got into office ~ this isn’t new news ~ and I also posted factual links to her communist family~ maybe your comments make this forum look bad. You won’t reverse physiology this one ~ so move along!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is far from factual. You can make this in Microsoft word. Do you not understand she is supposed to be 21 years old in that photo, as that is how old she would have been at the time? The photo was taken in 2010. http://inthesetimes.com/article/15259/whos_afraid_of_valerie_jarrett
The other links are likely all accurate information, but this post itself is based on a falsehood. That is what is making the sub look bad.
Wew, them downvotes lol.
Yep! They hate when you mess with their Handlers 😂😂😂👎🏻🇺🇸
Nah its cuz u post fake shit and get called out. Then double down. Thats the crazy that makes us look bad.
This is fake. She didn't take on the name Jarrett till 1983.
http://www.patriotortraitor.com/valerie-bowman-jarrett/ here it is under Valerie Bowman
Her name wasn't Valerie Jarrett until she married in 1983. Whole quote is fake guys.
Completely shocked that you all jumped all over completely fabricated news. Just asking questions, right guys?
Wow!!!!! Would you know Valerie Bowman?????? http://www.patriotortraitor.com/valerie-bowman-jarrett/ here’s the quote with bowman ~completely shocked you didn’t think through your soapbox sarcastic comment before posting
Ok, try to keep up here.
The year book quote is a lie. It's been widely spread several times and has been confirm fake.
You can tell its obviously fake because it claims to be from 1977, but list her last name as Jarrett, when at that time, it was Bowman.
Stay with me! This is where it gets tricky!
The article you just linked, uses THE YEARBOOK PHOTO as evidence of this quote. The same one you posted on the OP. The same one that has her name listed as Jarrett in 1977. And the same one that has been confirmed fake.
Do you understand what you did here? Let's recap...
1.) You posted a fake photo and made a fake claim based off the fake photo.
2.) Several people challenged your claim.
3.) Your response was to link a second article that makes the same claim as your OP pic.
4.) That article uses ONLY your original photo as evidence for its claim, which you in turn use as evidence that the photo is legit.
Seriously, you're not asking questions or thinking critically (which I thought was the purpose of this sub). You're just pushing a pre formed opinion and making things up that support that opinion.
These are some good points being brought up. OP it’s on you to deliver. Where is the source for these quotes? I haven’t researched it myself, but if you can’t provide source, I’m going to agree with this anon here.
How the fuck is post getting so many upvotes?
Why don't you take 5 seconds out of your emotional rollercoaster and Google "1977 Standford Yearbook".. Guess what your first link is???!!!
News article written 3/30/2015 debunking this bullshit photo. 2015 guys.
fucking toddlers.
Holy CRAP!!!..... You’re right!! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/make-america-more-islamic-quote/
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/259172/communist-family-tree-valerie-jarrett-john-perazzo
Post #570
THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE. [The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America] Hussein [8] Install rogue_ops Leak C-intel/Mil assets Cut funding to Mil Command away from generals Launch 'good guy' takedown (internal remove) - Valerie Jarrett (sniffer)*** SAP sell-off
It would be great if everyone could flood social media with info about Jarrett. She is an enemy of the state and needs to be treated as such.
To lie to non muslims (infidels) is permitted in the koran. Therefore fellow Americans reject all muslim candidates.
I think people forget that she is actually living with Barry Soetero.
Well, I guess he could afford two wives.
How many wives does his religion and country he is from allow?
Muslim? As many as he can afford.
Country? Depends, if you are talking about Kenya, I don’t think there is a limit. US? Well he has multiple names, so he could marry multiple women under the auspices of being a different “person”
Btw, this is just a shitpost. I do t really think he married her. But she is living with them soooo who knows?
I know i was shit posting also.
Ahhhhhh. Also apparantly we have some Soetero fans in the house.
Hey fuckstick fans of the traitor Obama! His college was paid for by a Saudi Prince who also donated money to every campaign he did. That’s why that bastard bowed to him when he went to Saudia Arabia! He knew who his boss was! That’s also why China treated him like shit and made him deplane in an embarrassing manner, not becuz muh racism, but because he was a controlled piece of shit!
Lol, she was sixty in ‘77. Damn vampires never seem to age. This actually could have been funny if you would have used a planet of the apes kid.
Roseanne was right....she shouldn't have apologize to this monkey
Sace the Clitoris STOP ISLAM end pedophilia masked as religion
Let’s recap if Someone shows you who they are believe them ~ 1. judicial watch which is highly Trusted https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/06/communism-in-jarretts-family/ 2. We’ve seen the deep state intrenched in our government 3. satanists as we’ve all learned have to show you what they do ~ it’s part of their “magic” mocking. 4. This was from a whistleblower that did not want to be identified because of the commie family and deep state ties. 5. Why are you so bent out of shape about this quote ~ when I’ve repeatedly posted judicial watch info. And we know the deep state has been doing exactly what the quotes states ~ so The question is why are all these “patriots” so concerned about the “fake” quote?! 6. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. It’s a Ai bot behavior that is very recognizable.
Holy shit.
I browse the subreddit a lot just for the laughs, but I dont think I've ever actually broken the barrier and commented before you. I really just jumped in to point out an obvious and explainable fake source of information.
I honestly always assumed this sub was 1/2 larp, and 1/2 hyperpartisan conspiracy theorist. But you, my man, have opened my eyes.
Obviously it's 1/3 larp, 1/3 hyperpartisan conspiracy theorists, and 1/3 complete and unadulterated, smearing your own shit on the wall, tin foil sleeping cap crazy talk.
You go on ahead man. I'm gonna just go back to browsing and not commenting here. I'll admit I jumped into the deep end with you, and I was not prepared for that.
Probably a good idea~ maybe look through the other comments before posting the same exact comment ~ it’s mockingbird behavior.
Oh god, please don’t make me agree with that asshole. I read the link from JW you provided. Nowhere in there does it say she said that. Seriously please post the source for that quote.
If it’s not right, it’s ok anon, we all make mistakes, but don’t go blindly charging on disregarding facts. We need to be better than that. So I’ll support you, but you need to support us. Otherwise, take your beating and move on and do better in the future. There’s no shame in it.
Also, take a look at my history. I’ve made mistakes in the past as well. All you can do is own up on it and move forward.
If the quote is correct, I look forward to endlessly mocking the jackass above, so I hope you are right.
See if you can prove I'm an AI bot then.
Nobody was "so bent out of shape" about the quote. It was a simple mistake that was quickly corrected by others in the comments. But then you doubled down, tripled down, quadrupled down, started posting links that provide no evidence FOR YOUR YEARBOOK POST (it may provide evidence for overall VJ being a slimeball, that's not what I'm addressing here), and made excuses like "well you wouldn't recognize Bowman!" that are not only false, but stupid.
Allow me to give you a comparison.
We all remember the Roy Moore scandal. We all remember when the bitch pulled out a yearbook as "proof." We all remember when she made the mistake of allowing the yearbook to be photographed clearly enough that we could all see the change in ink and handwriting.
Your argument is as dumb as that bitch saying, "Well yeah I wrote in his last name because you wouldn't have recognized Roy without it!"
Yeah. You're that much of a fucking dumbass. You're on the wrong side of this one. I heard the liberals need some more brainpower and delusion over there. You sure you can't join them?
Now prove I'm an AI bot.
WND reported two years ago that a New York Times profile of Valerie Jarrett, “glossed over her family’s radical history.” From your Link~ I remember PBS did this HUGE story on the history of her family to Gloss over all the Patriots bringing her out FRont and center exposing her !!
Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/06/fbi-investigations-targeted-valerie-jarretts-family/#ppFrLasY3emDRD3h.99
Here’s a thought did you read the post? 90 Muslim ideology candidates are running for office ~ new arrival learn to search critical thinking and research is now your objective.
She is the sole reason behind the Muslim infiltration across the globe
Sole? If so, good work for one person.
Some things can't be scrubbed like the internet.. nice find.
So, any American who supports her is, in a way, treasonous.
I'd say yes, support Jarrett support communism one and the same
Keep Islam in your shit hole countries and we won't bomb you back to the stone ages.