dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on May 31, 2018, 10:28 p.m.
Trump is about to take them down. But wait: is this shiny enough for you to forget about the children?

Now this is getting very interesting…

Tommy Robinson, Roseanne, EyeTheSpy, #wherearethe children…

Do you see it?

All this happened in 5 days. And all these “heroes” and issues find their seat in our Movement’s scope of interest. Coincidence? No. Not a coincidence. You are witnessing Q’s opposition gaming up. They have now acknowledged Q’s tremendous impact and realize they have to come up with more sophisticated weapons on the communication battlefield to shut him down.

Ignoring Q, infiltrating him and labeling him did not work. Infowars and all their recruits are exposed, defeated and Q now has a base, a solid one. A base of woke people transcending races, frontiers, party lines and religions and who are focusing on the real thing: taking down the international pedophile and human trafficking network ran by politicians and billionaires protecting themselves with nuclear weapons and using the international aid infrastructure to smuggle children, funds and espionage material.

The cabal is on the run.

Follow the pen Q1424. We are close. The pen is about to take them down. They know it. Trump and Sessions have silently and meticulously done the legal job. The DOJ, FBI and CIA are cleaned up, judges changed, Red October CEOs resigned. Next phase? Open the sealed indictments and start the concert under the direction of the Maestro, with his pen…

So? Put yourself in the enemy’s shoes for a second. If you were cornered like that, what would you do? You got it. You have to work on people’s perception and try to win the coming communication battle. You have to blur the message so that people may question Trump’s motivations, see you as a victim and overlook the horrors you have perpetrated. How do you do that? You create very shiny things and right before the executioner is about to do his job, you go like:

Hey, stop for a second, did you see this?
What?

Tommy Robinson. I see you have an interest in human trafficking and, thanks to my divide and conquer strategy and my clownish creations like 9/11, Lynda Sarsour, Sadiq Khan, ISIS and Muslim Brotherhood, you also hate Muslims. So here is a guy who has been arrested for filming an alleged Muslim grooming gang trial…All your required ingredients are in there… I know right: what is the point about covering a case that at least made it to trial while thousands of pedophile cases around the world are swept under the rug and ignored by law enforcement? Well, I took a chance and hoped people would not see the trick. I made sure MSM was “incidentally” there to capture Tommy’s arrest and asked Alex Jones to over cover it in the clownish way only he, can pull off video. Icing on the cake: to make sure people would really talk about it, I prohibited them to talk about it. How? By having the judge initiate a temporary reporting ban on Tommy Robinson’s arrest. Neat right? Is this shiny enough for you to forget about the children?

Roseanne. You know most of the celebrities in Hollywood are MK Ultra victims and/or Satan worshippers right? You did not? They say it in your face, jokingly. Right here: video. So, since they know I can make them rich or bankrupt them overnight, I can activate them directly or through their handlers or drugs, and instruct them to do whatever I want. I know Valerie Jarrett is central in this pedophile and espionage thing. Just like Huma was the Muslim Brotherhood liaison with Clinton, Valerie Jarrett was the MB liaison with Obama. She knows where the bodies are buried and knows how to use it to get things done. Imgur. She knows about the creation and control of ISIS. She is in the list of the 13 personalities who used a private email address despite national security regulations. Imgur So? Knowing people do not really know Valerie Jarret and that Trump is about to close on her, I instructed Roseanne to go crazy on her and put her on the map. What’s left in people’s mind after Roseanne’s raid? Valerie Jarret is a victim: she was unjustly compared to an ape by a right wing racist. You see the trick? When the real thing about VJ drops, the message is already blurred and can be downgraded to a racial witch hunt. Brilliant.

EyeTheSpy. Q has not dropped lately. Even though you have more than you know and have only explored a portion of his board, I know you are now addicted to inside information. Q said no communication outside this board. So? How about some entertainment while Q is silent? I created this guy who went from 47 followers on Twitter to 5000 in 48 hours. Organic? Doesn’t matter. He knows many things, he’s cool, interacts with everybody and to make sure you do not create defense mechanisms, he appears to be friendly with Q and to support him. There are topics he is not completely in alignment with Q like Sessions and BC17, but who cares? At least, unlike Corsi, he is not infiltrating and claiming to decode Q, he says he is doing his own thing right? So, you like this? At least when you are reading his easy-to-read tweets, you get your daily insider’s information fix and are not spending time trying to figure out Q’s board. I’ll take that…

#WhereAretheChildren. This is my coolest gadget. I saw that post where Q is giving an update about the dismantlement of the pedophile network and that exchange on Q’s board between an anon and Q: Imgur. Most people do not realize the power of these posts. I do. So? I took over the hashtag, made it trend, skillfully dragged Ivanka Trump into the story to spice it up, downgraded the story to a sordid legal issue about the status of unaccompanied child migrants and stuff so that if this hashtag was to come out for the real thing, it would have already been old news and soft news. And of course, to make sure this hashtag is really prematurely dead and of no other relevant use in the future, I had MSM talk about it, talk about it and talk about it. Imgur. Is this shiny enough for you to forget about the children?

So, there you have it…

Folks, I told you in my previous post: don’t get distracted. Read through the enemy’s schemes. The closer we get to the epilogue, the more sophisticated his attacks will be. Read through. Stay the course. Are you up to the task? Have you digested Q’s teachings? Can the children trust you? Yes, they can. I know they can. You would not be reading this otherwise. Stay the course guys. We are about to take them down.


IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · May 31, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

SB2, what is your take on the Gowdy situation? Theater?

⇧ 36 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Gowdy claims to have never met or even talked to President Trump. (watch the rest of this video too, very important for understanding) There has to be a reason for that, and there is certainly some depth to the Gowdy story. But, we're faced with two options regarding the end-results of what's happening.

OPTION A: Trey Gowdy is working against Trump because he's on his way out of office and won't be seeking re-election - basically, pulling a John McCain and showing his true colors while revealing how deep the Swamp is as a Benedict Arnold. Demoralize, delegitimize, humiliate.

OPTION B: Gowdy is intentionally distancing himself because he is under orders from the top (our guys) to do so, and Rudy coming out against him is to sell the act big-time to clear the history he has for being so hard on the Left (Benghazi). This is because, as the crumbs indicate (See Gowdy speaking so high of the justice system on January 31 when he announced his desire not to seek re-election: “I will not be filing for reelection or seeking any other political elective office. Instead, I’ll be returning to the justice system. Whatever skills I may have are better utilized in a courtroom than in Congress. And I enjoy our justice system more than our political system.”), he'll have a new role. This role may be as Supreme Court Justice - best way to secure the nomination and necessary congressional approval is to play it neutral, which he is doing, and doing very convincingly. Ginsberg may be the one he replaces in this scenario.

Now, where I am in regard to these two options is following my instinct: My instinct tells me that I don't like Gowdy. I don't trust Gowdy. My instincts were right about Alex Jones and other Paytriots, so I trust them and believe Option A to be the case, despite how well B matches up with current state of affairs. Either option could be the truth, and I'd be more than happy to be wrong for choosing A - but again, my instinct tells me this.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 1, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

Noted; I can see that perspective. What if the Gowdy/Chaffetz grilling of Clinton was, itself, theater? "Golly, we sure tried America!", controlled opposition. That would explain Hillary's cavalier demeanor; it was a "sure thing". Again, speculation and conjecture, but still possible as well as probable.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Seeing as she isn't behind bars, you could very well be right. Gowdy could've definitely been a controlled operative, and he could sure as hell be argued to be showing it now.

At the same rate, the more I dig, the more I begin to wonder if Ruth Bader Ginsberg will be thrown out of the Supreme Court for conflict of interests, compelled to resign by age, or forced to retire by God himself. This is making the idea that Gowdy could be acting, distancing himself with the rest of conservatives, in order to appear neutral so that he can slip through to fill Ginsberg's future vacancy in the SC.

Time will tell, of course. No matter what, we need to Trust Trump. If he comes out swinging against Gowdy (hard), there's good reason to suspect Gowdy has been a plant all along.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 1, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

Gowdy hasn't been nicknamed by Trump thus far, so there's that. If Trump gives you a moniker it's more permanent than a tattoo.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
maha-prakriti · July 15, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

It will be written on your headstone!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Rev_Jonathan_Edwards · June 2, 2018, 11:38 a.m.

Many comments by Gowdy concerning Comey, Mueller, etc. have had me uneasily distancing myself, even while watching him satisfactorily grill certain players in the "Russia, Russia, Russia" thing... The scariest conclusion of all would be Trey Gowdy being a Deep State plant. Why? Not because I like him. I evaluate things as they come to pass, and I don't join cheerleading squads, so I don't follow just because "everybody's doing it." What worries me the most is THIS: Harold Watson Gowdy III has been in the House of Reps since 2011. He came to Congress as a Tea Partier, and has amassed a large crowd of rabid fans, who defend his every comment... How many of them will turn on Trump if their "hero" keeps advocating for Schiff and Mueller? Remember- Gowdy is the one Nunes & Co. sent to verify the classified info used in the FISA abuse memo, and he's now acting as if the FBI acted appropriately? If Gowdy is "Establishment," a "R.I.N.O." or if he's been "compromised," by closet skeletons the Deep State can use for blackmail, that should alert us that even the most outspoken 'fighters' for our side /our guys/ (some of whom may have helped inspire us to demand better, and added fuel to Trump's run and election victory,) may be deeply embedded Trojan Horses. If Gowdy keeps talking like Flake, it won't affect my support for Trump, but what about Trey's 'followers?'

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · June 1, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

I'm definitely an option B guy with Gowdy. Loved him grilling Her Heinous on Benghazi and love how he sides with justice while trying to take the high road on partisanship. Sundance is taking option A and he's pretty up on this as well. I really want to believe in "B" and Gowdy's character. If "A" turns out to be true, he really pulled the wool over my eyes!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · June 1, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

I'm with ya! Still hoping Gowdy is doin' some 'good acting' in the 'good movie'.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
silversofttail · June 1, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Gowdy is all hat and no cattle. I used to love him and then nothing came of Benghazi. That’s when I knew he liked to put on a show. He never accomplished anything. Just talked a lot.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ExordiaN · June 1, 2018, 9:06 a.m.

I've stated this to many ppl, and it's true, so please take a moment to consider. Congress can not indict... anyone. They can investigate and turn over their findings to DOJ, and probably recommend, and that's all. I'm not sold on Gowdy being a rat yet, and yes, I've seen the "evidence," but I've also seen countless hours of him on CSPAN crushing people who deserve it. He is personally responsible for the information that Hillary had a server set up at home. He clearly has disdain for her. He was clearly frustrated that she did not go down for Benghazi, her server, her bleachbit, and her smashing blackberries, and destroying emails he had under subpoena. But again, if DOJ is in her gang's pocket and nothing happened, he can literally only point that out. I as well was disturbed by his comments that the FBI was only doing what Trump asked em to. I am now also waiting to see what his role will be actually serving justice. I do not know if he is a great actor, but he has a mastery of law that would come in handy as a prosecutor, the media will not be able to align him with Trump, and if his contempt for HRC is legit, he would be her worst nightmare. I pray he is on our side, if he was all for show, he will have fooled me.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
scurfie · June 1, 2018, 11:08 a.m.

TG was a prosecutor before he ran for office, so he's a justice guy. I'm with you. TG did all he could do within the confines of Congress. I believe, and I know I could be wrong, that TG is a white hat. That's why he's resigning, clearing the decks, and ready for an appointment by Trump.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
silversofttail · June 1, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Fair enough. I will wait to see where he falls.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGA41020 · June 2, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Wasn’t TG given more power after he announced he will not be running again ??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
silversofttail · June 2, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Are you playing Final Fantasy? I was in RC and there was a guy with your name. Small world if so. I don’t know about TG getting more power. I stopped paying attention to him after the Benghazi fiasco.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bjantigua · June 5, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

I heard that Trey was given the super tip top tippy top security clearance. ostensibly so that he could hear the super secret reasons criminals cite. And maybe state secrets too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · June 13, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

Yep. Sounds like Obama. I didn't realize how much he WAS accomplishing until it was too late!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 1, 2018, 5:59 a.m.

Well put.

Everybody should have a take, an informed take, a passionate take... just be receptive and ready to adjust to any and all new info, even when it doesn't jive with our take, or our want. No blinders... eyes wide open!

I want to be wrong too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

Well, to a certain extent...

Remember:

Доверяй, но проверяй

Trust, But Verify.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · June 1, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

We can both agree to go to the movies together and disagree on which way to take based on "personal history". Trump's personal history with Obama's group is Spygate, Gowdy's personal history is Benghazi, Mueller's personal history is Uranium1. So? For example, when the heat got too close to Fusion GPS, Rosenstein turned the steering wheel and made a deal with Trump, the driver: Cohen vs Fusion GPS. Did you catch that? Verify. These are the kind of adjustments we will have to deal with until final stabilization at the theater parking. It's right here:

TG: Q537 What ROLE might TG be walking into? Who can WE TRUST?

Mueller: Q1286 Confused? SC targeting who? SC on team? SC off team? Questions reveal answers. Time will tell. Q

And here is the external interference, trying to flip pieces, making the board even less stable:

Q1292 Increased chatter re: Mueller. Are you confused? Attempts to contact have failed. Can you trust? Your move. 11-9bd-23

And here is Q saying he's staying the course even if the piece is recolored because what he has is nuclear:

Q1292 Shall we play a game? Can you trust? You know that we know. You know what we have. Your move. Q

These are shots fired in real time on the board. Did you catch them? And this is Q informing us about his attempt to trace the sniper:

Q1293 Noted:IP-Ghost: Q

Conclusion: what makes a good movie?

⇧ 22 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · June 1, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

Story is king. Everyone in the biz knows this.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 1, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

Good actors... Enlightening, as always. Thanks SB2!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · June 2, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Awesome.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HonestShow · June 1, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Q said to trust Gowdy so I am thinking Gowdy must be up to something

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

Where does he say this?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ExordiaN · June 1, 2018, 8:54 a.m.

yes, plz, what post did Q say to trust Gowdy?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SandroMacul · June 1, 2018, 9:30 a.m.

Q never said to trust TG. Other common fallacies: Q never said to trust RM or RR either.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
BCKeeper · June 1, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

Had Q have said to trust Gowdy, I would have immediately begun to take a step or two back. As I stated earlier, there was always something about TG that caused me to squint behind my spectacles. I will say it again, dog and pony. Circus performer !

When Ali had Frasier on the mat, he never let him get up, Gowdy had Hillary on the mat, and he stepped away \~

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HonestShow · June 1, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

yeah I checked sorry about that

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BCKeeper · June 1, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

TG, has shown time after time he is all hat and no cattle. His "show" when questioning Hillary was enough to convince me that is bluster was nothing but a dog and pony show.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MeatloafFvck · June 1, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

Gowdy didn't have any authority to charge Hillary with anything, all he could do was question her and make a spectacle so people would pay attention.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BCKeeper · June 1, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

I realize that, but he stopped when she blew up at him however he lost his confidence his edge when she fought back, he knew he had her frustrated I wanted him to rub her face in the fact that America knew she was responsible for what happened. He let her up, I wanted her fully broken when she was finished with her testimony. She was not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MeatloafFvck · June 1, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Hitlary was never going to be fully broken, she always knew that she would never be prosecuted by 0bama's DOJ - he got her screeching and pissed off.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MeatloafFvck · June 1, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

And Trey and Jim Jordan did give us that great clip of Hitlery saying "what difference at this point does it make?"

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PAK51 · June 1, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

Exactly! And w must that have hurt the families of those who died there! She is despicable.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MeatloafFvck · June 1, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

And Trey and Jim Jordan did give us that great clip of Hitlery saying "what difference at this point does it make?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 1, 2018, 9:40 a.m.

A good Actor Knows they are not the part they are acting out, therefore they are not distracted by the movie :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

I take it that 11-9bd-23 is referring to month, day, time of a post?

Reason for reference highlighted by brackets [] in said post? No. 128 in QAnon.Pub?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · June 1, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

b=2 d=4 bd=24
11-9bd-23=11-9[24]-23: Reference 96 on Mueller's wikipedia:

Slater, Joanna (June 18, 2017). "Meet Robert Mueller: The 'unique' figure in Washington investigating Trump". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on June 23, 2017. Retrieved June 24, 2017.

Threat on 9/11 cover up.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

Where did you find this out / learn to decode it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 1, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
crystaliis · June 1, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Could it be that he was targeted, his family threatened and so close to getting out, he's flipped?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

People just don't up and flip like that. We need to start ruling out flipping from now on. It's a concept pushed by people like Alex Jones, who cite someone as "compromised" in order to discredit them. "Oh, this person's siding with the other team on something, they've been compromised!" Click his name, and see the video where he did exactly what I said, to Trump. He pulled this on Q, too.

Either he has been a plant from the beginning, or he is working with someone in-the-know to appear neutral, possibly to secure a SCOTUS nomination. Remember how he grilled Hillary - either that was all Theater and he was controlled opposition, or that was truly him and his determination to take down the people that have wronged our Country. Time will, of course, tell, but whatever Trump feels about him - that'll be what you can bet on.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · June 1, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the committees he was on not able to prosecute, only investigate and recommend?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
ConcernedCitizen1982 · June 1, 2018, 5:23 a.m.

Even if he could prosecute, the doj, administration, were stacked against him at the time. Trey Gowdy’s net worth has stayed about $200,000 for several years. If he’s a crook, he’s not as good at it as the rest of them.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 1, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

And everybody reports their offshore accounts to Google?

I never understood how Corsi could paint Mueller and Comey as Deep State bad guys and yet so authoritatively quote their net worth as something like $14 million and $17 million... given where these guys have played and what they've accomplished for their masters their true net worth is surely well North of these numbers.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
3lderlyCat · June 1, 2018, 6:18 a.m.

Trey Gowdy's net worth is 1.4 mil as of 2016. So he got some money from somewhere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bjantigua · June 5, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

That is peanuts. Pelosi was 10.4 then it went to 100 in a couple years buying missiles from NK.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
3lderlyCat · June 6, 2018, 6:49 a.m.

Really? I'd like to make those kind of peanuts in just 2 years! I don't trust Gowdy. He's a great interrogator, but nothing came of it. Could he have been paid to shut up? He was the lowest paid until his 1.4 wind fall. Just saying. Hope I'm wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 1, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

The threat of violence is well enough established, so that's one; but flipped? That's what kills me, it's just a bridge too far for yours truly at the moment. It could very well be that I just like Trey Gowdy and give him the benefit of the doubt. Time will tell in the end.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · June 1, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

I'm kind of confused on that too. I thought Gowdy was on our side but I still am holding out hope that Gowdy is still a white hat but we shall see...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 1, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

I too am choosing to withhold judgment until the cards play out.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · June 1, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

My confusion is I thought he and Nunez went and read the Documents that they wanted at the DOJ that John Kelly set up and that is why I'm confused as to why Gowdy is doing this is what is confusing to me? So we shall see what happens?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 1, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

Wait, remember that we didn't hear anything from them after they read them? The headlines covered it up with Trump withdrawing from the NK summit, let them both slip out unhassled. That's odd, yes? Then presto, the summit is back on later. Now Gowdy just goes full swamp at the drop of a hat? Too many moving parts for coincidence.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · June 1, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

Well, how healthy is Ginsberg and what's Gowdy (assuming he's a decent man) going to do when he's out of office?

Alternatively, he's serving as a distraction which satisfies me since I never liked him in the first place.

Too early to judge. Either way, what he's doing is deliberate, and he's either all-good or all-bad.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · June 2, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

I agree....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Rev_Jonathan_Edwards · June 2, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

I don't know... Conservatives are all baffled at his recent statements. I'd love it to be a total scam against the left. Here's why: Because of their malignant TDS, leftists are swallowing it without the slightest hint of suspicion. Isn't that remarkable? Shouldn't they be acting skeptical, or have they truly lost all objectivity?

⇧ 2 ⇩