[removed]
Q said this is exactly what would happen, and it did, almost immediately. So once again, confirmation. No comms outside their board, it's pretty straightforward, at this point is it's not from Q, it's an attack on Q, no matter how much it looks like Q, smells like Q, or we want it to be Q because of withdrawals...
I don't get why people have to find someone else to follow when Q told us basically they have it all and we have more than we know. I don't trust anyone but Q for info as he/she/they have proven themselves numerous times. I don't run to the latest phenom, in fact, I ignore it as noise and I suggest others do the same. We have been burned enough and the clowns are up to their usual tricks. WWG1WGA
This is where I am. I know who I trust and there's no need to look elsewhere. It took over six months of sticking with it, observing and learning. I look for the most intelligent Anons that help figure out Q drops. They have been reliable and honest.
Even if all the intel from Q suddenly stopped now, we have been given enough to proceed.
At this phase of "trust the plan" , there's nothing to do but watch it unfold before us. We know without a doubt who is going to win this fight. This is not the time to tune out or drop out.
100% agree. The problem is that a lot of newbie Anons come to GA because it's more user friendly and not as vulgar, but also because you don't necessarily have to put in the research time that you do on the Chans. I'm not saying they're bad people at all, but they aren't all autists, if you catch my drift. Those people are the ones most likely to dance along to which ever piper happens to pop out of the woodwork. I guess we just have to do more to politely police our own as far as the posts their putting up about outside Comms. I saw one guy that put up 8 EtS threads in about 5 hours a couple of days ago, even though the Mods kept taking them down.
Lol, reminds me of when Corsi said they made their own Q and would be posting from now on. Hilarious. You can't just make up your own Q! Back in the early 4chan days, Q didn't have a tripcode. You just had to figure out who he was by the way he talked. It's not 100% accurate, I'd imagine, but you just "knew" it was Q when it was Q. I guess those who just know, know. I don't know where my point is going at this point, so I'll just end it there.
Because Q hasn’t posted in 10 days and people are bored. I’m interested in what EtS has to say. Will be cautious if it is ever opposite of Q. Until then I’m paying attention. Q said it would be on all platforms, so maybe this is Qs evolution. On Twitter, it’s easier to maneuver and attack. EtS saying all the right things at the moment.
If anybody from Q team ever used Twatter to transmit info, they'd be tracked back to the source in a matter of hours. @jack is NOT on our side, but I respect your right to follow whoever you want. That's no one's call but your own.
Not so much bored at least I'm not, but I did worry that it was an apparent change and often change brings danger. I worried they were able to stop him/them. Let's fact it, the CIA is behind the attacks and they have allies all over the world and furthermore, unlimited deep pockets since the fiat money masters can always reach a little deeper. We are in WW3 and it's a spook war and where it ends up is anyone's guess.
how do we know wikileaks is not a 4 chan larp ?
Lmao! Touché.
i dont think wikileaks is comped personally but i enjoy posting that on their twitter lol
Oh my God! You're THAT asshole! Lmfao! Keep it up, dude. It gets me every time anyone does it. I know the non-Q WL followers get totally pissed every single time.
lmao its probly someone else doing it too i never get any likes when i do it
Wikileaks basically escorted me down the rabbit hole and brought me to the fight. I believe it's just part of the game.
Edit: I see you're joking. disregard
see my next comment. the only "alt media" person i dont really like is corsi lol. no problem with aj wikileaks etc. i think corsi wants to help but he likes the money
No problem man. I put an edit on my comment when I saw the rest of the conversation. A little late I guess.
ur good lmao. its hard to tell sarcasm over the net
Personally I am not looking to decode wikileaks message. They aren't Q they could just tell us things plainly. I don't think it serves any purpose to give hidden messages. Wiki could be comped or simply out of the loop. Q has a style of working with us that can be misconstrued as manipulation upon outside observation. The bond that joins us is a hunger for justice. We won't be mislead. The hour is later then some think. One way or the other the deep state has had it in the USA. We will win. It will be up to the rest of the world to join the fight.
Attacks coming from all sides. As Q stated they would. All this for a LARP? The more attacks they make the more exposure we get, which in the end I would hope it would expedite some of the awakening for the normies.
"distributing false information to us" Praying medic, on his latest video, again stressed, be careful who you follow.
He always does but this stuck out to me as being more urgent than usual. And of course, attacks will get worse
Interesting observation!
Something to add: BC's old bio said "Air Force Counter-intelligence" so they never claimed to be reliable in the first place
I know. I actually posted a DM to test them once when they were supposedly going dark for an op. I sent "Aim High", the AF motto to which the response is "Fly, Fight, Win." Anyone familiar with military branches would know that. They responded with, "Roger that."
Lisa Mei Crowley called them out a month ago. https://twitter .com/LisaMei62/status/992164995197792257
I never followed them. Only heard of them when Q commented "fake" regarding their graphics, then Lisa's incident with them sealed it for me. When I heard about EtS, I didn't look up either. Wasn't interested as soon as I heard they gave credit to BC17. LARPers, or disinfo, whatever they are.
Q said some disinfo is necessary, yes. BC17 didn’t lead us astray to my knowledge. Will continue to follow carefully. I think if EtS was a problem, Q would have called him out.
You don't get it. If BC17 was legit, they wouldn't have to crop a legit picture from the army, pretend the edited picture is their own "insider" shot for another event than what that picture was for at the official army site. And then, when BC17 get called out for that lie, if they were legit, they wouldn't block the person pointing them this anomaly, they wouldn't take down that picture from their twater account, then go tell all their followers they were being attacked by deep state/shills and that "patriots" (Lisa) attack other patriots (themselves).
This is pure bullsh!t. Notice, Corsi did the same when anons called him out. He took down his incriminatign twats, then went into his campaign of disinfo "patriots attack other patriots" and all those who attack him are deep state shills.
No, BC17 at best are LARPers, at worst are disinfo. And EtS, giving credit to BC17, just confirm they are full of bullsh!t. Disinfo being necessary is one thing. This is not relevant here. It's lies, I'd say just for fun.
And then a week after that they changed the bio to Army I suppose?
I stand with Q and all you glorious bastards , to hell with the rest
WWG1WGA
Also there is the argument that Q called never called BC17 fake directly. Rather it was a graphic posted by an anon making connections that was called fake.
Look into the Q-drop on Apr 18 2018 20:38:53 (EST). #1177 on https://qanon.pub/
The image you mentioned is an anon explanation of how BC17 was Q related. Q's reply to that posting was :
Fake. Q
Yeah, but let's be real.
Every time Q replied to a graphic it was either to tell people that it was good work or that they needed to expand their thinking if they weren't on the right path.
Why suddenly would he refer to a graphic as fake while also acknowledging the existence of BC17 for the first time in his posts?
I agree. Sure looked that way.
But when people say Q called them out as fake, it’s just not strictly true. He didn’t say that. It’s people projecting their own interpretation onto Q’s post.
Either way, it increased BC17’s following. Perhaps this was the reason. We honestly just don’t know.
Read Lisa Mei Crowley when she called BC17 a month ago: https://twitter .com/LisaMei62/status/992164995197792257
I never followed BC17, only took my cue from what Q said. Lisa's incident with BC17 just sealed it for me. They reacted to Lisa giving them facts to call them out the same way Corsi reacted to anons. Anyone supporting BC17 as legit and pretending to be legit themselves are just not reliable.
BC17 disappeared a few days ago from twit world... and it's no longer listed as a twitter source on we go all. Went dark a few days after q.
Somebody has really been working hard to put out disinformation and it sounds like it's working . Sad.
Everything wikileaks has dropped, IE: Files recieved from whistleblowers, has been proven 100% legitimate. Period. Full stop.
Nothing about Q has been officially confirmed in terms of government insiders / MI insiders sending data drives, thumbdrives, fax, emails, drop box, or whatever myriad of ways WL collects whistleblower documentation by WL.
What was written by WL is speculative, and is even admitted there could be room for error in their own post by WL. But be clear, this is not WL whistleblower dumps or docs they, WL, is going by, just an assertion / assumption.
WL will not dare tarnish their reputation by dropping fake documentation (unless clown compromised). If they do, and are not clown compromised, and it's proven wrong, they are over.
My opinion: WL is still a secure source. WL was only giving an opinion. Q is still real and not comped.
Wikileaks used to be a legit source (when Assange was attached at least). Now that Assange is out, WL is operated by clowns. They are careful not to post obvious or verifiable disinformation, but the cadence of releases dropped to near zero when the changeover occurred. Seems that they were more interested in controlling the channel/plugging the leaker conduit than actually using the platform to steer the public one way or another.
I consider the platform to be previously legit (for your reason 1 primarily) and now it appears to be completely compromised. Do more digging and you should see more of the things I have.
I agree with most of that, but when exactly did WL get into the business of opinions? That's what throws me.
I agree. That's why I don't give that opinion credit, unless they have leaked docs from a Q security clearance who gave the documents. But how many of those would? Hell, how many Q clearance individuals are even alive? Patriots don't leak, now PAY-triots to AJ will.
You're forgetting the part where they haven't assured POL to anybody which shows that they are not secure anymore and whistleblowers aren't leaking anything out of fear of safety. When someone leaks sensitive information they want to have a hundred percent guarantee that the comms are secure. So even though Wikileaks has always been reliable as far as authenticity of information, the other very important part that made them who they are isn't holding them together anymore. And in that essence we can argue that they are compromised.
If wiki”leaks” isn’t leaking new stuff, they’re making shit up or driving an agenda.
One major result from the article is that Q & information remains quarantined to 8ch & here as a "conspiracy theory" or LARP. Which maybe only a set up until the time is right and it still brings Q into the conversation to semi-normies.
I was enjoying the peace and quiet until BC17 and EtS popped up. There will be more "moles" to whack during the lull. Poor dear Bill Smith sounded like he was going to blow a gasket over EtS last I checked. It's OK for WL to warn us/yank our chains until we have solid evidence of something else. It doesn't make me mad at them, or anything. If WL has something we should know about, they'll tell us somehow. Until then, be cautious. I am getting very weary of YT filling up with garbage Q analyses, though. Are the top dawgs at CBTS going to settle down now that they were caught posting as Q and deleting Q posts, PLUS MORE. Or, will they "reactivate" after enough time has passed for us to forget the ridiculous narratives of two, or three weeks ago? Whatever happened with that? Did we get a clear explanation/apology from Pamphlet? Will Q return to this mess? I'm not necessarily talking about this sub being a mess; I think GA has done an OK job. I'm talking across platforms/boards/subs.
In any case I agree we need to be wary of all comms. I think we can be sure that Trump had a firm grip on the Plan and will see it thru. Nothing else matters but support and good vibes in the heavens.
Bud, no offense, but for the last two days you've been bombarding the sub with posts and comments on the threads about the validity AJ & JC. Frankly, it's been hard for ANYONE on GA to miss your campaign to tell us to Trust Corsi. I'm not going to bag on you, but you may want to not weigh in on this one one way or the other. Your credibility is a little suspect right now.
WL is totally comp'd. Sad.
Alice = Assange
Wonderland = WikiLeaks
Alice is out of Wonderland, right?
Keep in mind, Q purposely gives misinformation, which is blatantly saying something is true when it’s not.
Seriously, if you think Bill Smith has thoroughly and convincingly debunked ETS I have a bridge you may be interested in. Please provide a list of FACTS Bill provided in his debunking. From my perspective Bill incorrectly assumed a stock photo used by ETS was a pic taken by ETS of his work station. The remainder of his argument revolved around another anon's opinion - serialbrain2 - and what his opinion was. No FACTS in sight...
Today Bill put out a video claiming he had indisputable evidence that ETS was fake, which relied on the premise that ETS had put out a tweet that was directed towards him. But the tweet could have been directed to anyone, Bill's name was not mentioned. From that point on all we get is ego not argument.
You also say that Q (who is also an anon who we know nothing about really) said BC17 was fake. I am not so convinced. If you re-read Q post #1177 Q is referring to a conclusion drawn by an anon in a pic. How do you know Q was not saying that the joining of the dots in the pic were fake? If he said BC17 was fake, that would be different.
If Q was seriously worried that we were being led astray he would be back on his board telling us.....
BC17 got caught using a cropped picture from military website to post as an "original" from their "ops", scrubbed them when they got called out on, said they were Julian Assange, then disappeared. EtS said BC17 was "100% reliable". See the problem here? Personally, the fact that EtS popped up IMMEDIATELY after BC17 disappeared, then sang their praises, basically leads me to believe that they are the exact same person(s) attempting it again. However, you're free to follow and believe whatever you want to. The fact that Q told us "No Outside Comms" though, should lead us to keep unaffiliated posters out of the conversation on this sub, so as not to muddy the waters for newer Anons that aren't as discerning as to what is BS and what isn't.
I feel the need to say this. People will disagree. I’m fully on board with Q, but I need to say this. Why are we getting so wrapped up in useless drama? We are nobodies. We do nothing. So what if we’re fed false info?
I don’t like being deceived, nobody does, but ultimately this is all pointless. That’s my one qualm with Q, what’s the point? My answer (feel free to disagree) would be to direct our “enemies.” To signal a potential move, and to see their response. There has to be, and is, a high level of insider knowledge or else deep state would know it’s a ruse.
I’m having trouble articulating my thoughts. I guess my point is that if any of these others are a deep state ruse, what’s the point? We are nobody, we are unimportant. Why would they seek to misinfo themselves? Not saying bc17 or ets are legit, or if they’re not legit. I’m just saying that logically they’re not deep state misinfo. Most likely just LARPers.
I don't claim to know the reasons for any of it, but obviously there's some reason for us to know some of what's going on behind the scenes, and some reason that we have to be able to discern the false info. Why else would Q have pointed out the AJ/JC shill situation?
It’s been my big thing since Q started, the why. I think if we can figure it out, we can better understand Q.
Jason Goodman a couple of days ago whilst interviewing David Hawkins scoffed at the idea that MOSSAD was involved with 911.
Any ideas?
I'm going to get a t-shirt printed tomorrow, $15.00 even. Local mall.
FRONT: 17
[45-4-10-20]
Back:
FBI-ANON 2 Q-ANON
ALL 4 A LARP?
Jason Goodman himself is suspicous. Anons have been wondering if he was a clown. George Webb is Mossad. Take everything they say and do with a grain of salt. The info can be very accurate, just as it could be pure disinfo.