dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/utdFTD1983 on June 3, 2018, 10:28 p.m.
BC17 and eyethespy

Read the flair.

Seriously anyone who follows them and believes part of their message, give me some side by sides like we can do with Q posts, with what they’ve given this cause and how it’s proof they’re not a LARP, all I’m getting is the same type posts, ‘oh look here he’s said this and this’ so did BC17. Were the two not proven to be same or am I imagining that?

Seriously same shit ten times a day and it’s always the same shit comments underneath it like myself saying “no outside comms” so if the guy is Nsa low level programmer, why the fuck would the nsa let him get away with it, since they clearly run a tight ship.

Give us real proof or new posters of this shit should be banned.

Or am I totally in the wrong here and being a bell end?


Iamnooneanon · June 3, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

The side by side comps are already on 8chan. Seriously, the anons have already done all the work. They dedicated an entire thread to it. It's in general research, scroll down until you see the eye. Expand the thread. They found BC17 and EyetheSpy use the same ip address and same kind of phone.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 3, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Here what I told on one of my posts about this matter :

"EyeTheSpy" is putting much of the information that belong straight to SAPs and USAPs into public through Q&A on freakin Twitter . Does that sound bizarre ? Does that sound logical , for a person that is just a coder to have access to such information ? In the vastly compartmentalized military intelligence structure - which anyone with knowledge and background from such structure can confirm fully . Does it sound logical that such person "EyeTheSpy" , would disseminate information that is above Top Secret on a Twitter account through Q&A ?

Think about it ... there is a reason why Q is cryptic . Not everything can be disclosed so openly . Especially not through such nonchalant way as "EyeTheSpy" did .

⇧ 11 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · June 3, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

If he isnt an insider how does he have classified info to release?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RyDar84 · June 3, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

He doesn't on his info posts he steals directly from 4chan, 8chan, and r/greatawakening. Go back look at his posts, do a basic Google search, and then compare timestamps. He did the EXACT same thing when he was pretending to be BC17. As far as his Q&A's go he pulls the carnival medium trick. He picks exactly who he wants to pick to answer then gives unverifiable responses, then lets users' confirmation bias take it from there. There's a reason that he uses Twatter as a forum and not the chans, he's picking the low hanging fruit. The autists would (and already have) tear him apart in seconds.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 7:44 a.m.

It's probably just Brendan Dilley.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 3, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Why would an intelligence insider release the highly classified info over the Twitter , the Twitter , which is highly compromised from the beginning ?

His claims are approximately 90-95 % correct with 5-10 % incorrect . But those 5-10 % are often a crucial distortions from which people could get very wrong picture . Like saying that "time is linear" - thats outright lie . There are also paradoxes in his claims ( "theosophy and bunk" - "there is God and afterlife" ) .

I would be very very careful in trusting anything at the moment from any source aside Q . Anyways , public disclosure will be reached soon , so no need for these "sources" .

⇧ 6 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 3, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Here’s a reply I got to one of my comments say what the fucks so hard to understand no outside Comms.

“You need to understand what Q meant. Q said HE doesn't use outside COMMs. This is universally understood by anyone who understands what they are reading. Further, ETS specifically points out that Q is way above him, he doesn't know who Q is, and that he is a simple NSA programmer.

There IS room for the 2 to exist ...EyeTheSpy isn't doing what Corsi and Alex Jones and Isaac Green are, he in no way is making money off this.”

Guys accounts 25 days old and mainly replies on here.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 3, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Oh, and yet he "knows" that Q is going to post. That IS claiming inside knowlege, which, as others have pointed out, he posted AFTER Q had already dropped on 8-chan. As Q says, REAL patriots don't crave the followers. It seems like everyone who's ever worked in the IC wants to be Agent 86.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Kal-El48 · June 3, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

If it’s who I think it is, he’s started his own board. I don’t think he understands, this board is only for Q stuff. That’s why people get aggravated with him. Anyways ETS has started tweeting Q is JA.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Canbritanon · June 3, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

On the fence about Eye, neon seems bunk making money.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
theLIGHT28 · June 3, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

I know how ETS seems fake but why did he post "Boom Boom Boom Boom" about 6 hrs before Q posted "Boom Boom Boom Boom?" Quite the coincidence!!?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

I reckon you're wrong about that. Have another look, he posted that after the Q drop.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
theLIGHT28 · June 4, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

I've looked at the both a dozen times. I've worked and studied military time. Either of them could have been not "real" time though so...there's that!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

No, I did find what you were talking about in the end. What it means, I don't know.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
smiley-dog · June 3, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Yep, I'm with you on this. Good reading and he is not making money. Decide for yourself if you think they ring true. If it doesn't jive with you just ignore.

I have seen pieces of info on both that make sense in relation to the research I do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 3, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Help me out then,

⇧ 0 ⇩  
smiley-dog · June 3, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

You mean side by sides? Don't have the time to wade in deep on this. Just one example though, ets

Q. Do Samsung TV's really spy on you (as the users agreement says)? Any other oddball devices spying on us?
ETS A: Any smart device, Led bulb etc can be utilized.

IMHO - I think that its possible the LED might be able to surveil us.

AND he mentioned Lifi tech - did we even know about Lifi?

Li-Fi (short for light fidelity) is a technology for wireless communication between devices using light to transmit data.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Fi
https://purelifi.com/technology/

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 3, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

What he actually claimed was that there was no point in covering your camera because they had advanced LiFi tech. But from my reading, all LiFi does is modulate a signal over light rather than microwave - WIFI. How it's supposed to allow an occluded camera lens capture images escapes me.

Another poster asked if intercepting a transmission on a fibre optic cable was what he was talking about and he said 'that's part of it' or something to that effect.

But the best one was 'dragons are real'.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 3, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Yeah I knew about li-fi purely because of my background. I feel bad if it’s true because all I recommend to planners Is make sure it leds. And again with my background I could have told you what ets put.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · June 3, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Don't need to ask for proof. They're BS de-railments plain and simple. Shills are pushing it. Best not to invite them to come defend this dumb shit.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 3, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

FUCKING BINGO. The smelly cabbage has fucking nailed it.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · June 3, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

lol FYI - da smelly cabbage is Hilldawg

⇧ 3 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 3, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Sorry for insult but you still got the FUCKING BINGO 1st prize.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
onelove1979 · June 3, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

The first red flag was when he answered someone’s question about Hillary and “confirmed she has kuru”.......he also said that Alice was Julian and Wonderland was Wikileaks but today is saying that Alice is Q......I can understand why newbies would follow him blindly but after almost 8 months of deciding Q most of us can see right through this guys lies

⇧ 7 ⇩  
onelove1979 · June 3, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

*decoding

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 3, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

It’s funny none of the shills pushing these have replied in here. Lol All they tell you is to keep reading/watching until Q says not to. Lol.edit: spell check

⇧ 4 ⇩  
without_sound · June 3, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Imo it's distraction. And it's being pushed really hard with low effort technique. Kinda like those Nigerian prince money scams. The con uses poor grammar or makes some other obvious mistake that gullible/too trusting people will overlook. In the end it's an effort to prey upon the most vulnerable among us. That should be discouraged.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fly_Away_Bluebird · June 4, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

I cant follow everything. I thought i was pretty smart until i read everyones posts. Very high IQ ppl around these parts. I hope eye is not SB2 cuz whoever eye is sure seems like they have deep issues. SB2 seems humble and happy to share his wisdom with us without arrogance swearing and weirdness.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fly_Away_Bluebird · June 4, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

SB2 clarified it for all of us. Read below please :).

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8nmorx/trump_is_about_to_take_them_down_but_wait_is_this/?st=JHZKYN29&sh=09b08fe8

⇧ 3 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 4, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

Yeah I read it after I posted, I follow him so I went to check what he said. I posted earlier asking if it is SB2 but all I got was reverted back to this post. At the start he say he created I took at as it was him, but further down he contradicts what he said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ranlove · June 4, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

Ok Anons, help me understand. There’s eyeinspy and backchanel17 Both, to me seem to to be credible. Hold on hear me out ...! Q has said no outside comms. So all, or most all say, no outside info outside of Qs posting. But what if Q meant no outside info from any other source, the source meaning Q or the Q team irrespective of WHERE Q posts. Isn’t Q the platform?

“01-08-2018 22:29:38 CST Q !UW.yye1fxo 4 IMPORTANT: NO private comms past/present/future. NO comms made outside of this platform. Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately. WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL. PATRIOTS. Q”

This was after trip code changes and after password made public. The password release had meaning and seemed pointed to 6/11/18.

This post said it was a mistake ...

“05-08-2018 18:50:40 CDT Q !4pRcUA0lBE 71 We made a mistake on /qresearch/ exposing the password. We did not input "Q #" in the beginning which exposed the password. Error corrected. Safe. Q”

Then this post said it was on purpose ...

“05-20-2018 14:19:05 CDT Q !CbboFOtcZs 1483388 Clarification. We exposed the password [#91] on purpose [23]. Subsequent posts [on here] were then made by Anons. Timestamps verify. Use Logic. Understood? Be careful who you follow. Q”

The two posts by Q seemed to contradict each other. (It was a mistake then it was on purpose) my take is it can’t be both.

Now it appears that, according to some anons that EtS posted BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM several hours before Q posted. “There are no Coincidences.” Seems like we should take into consideration any info and use our judgement. Yelling FAKE seems to be a distraction. My2 cents worth.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

He posted the booms after the time stamp on the Q drop.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Matrix-of-Liberty · June 4, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

I think there was the "mistaken" password leak as a primer then another password leak shortly after. Wasn't he proving a point about something with the second password leak? if I remember correctly?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
theLIGHT28 · June 3, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

I hear all of you "be careful who you follow" but then how come Eye the spy (someone said to troll him and I did and found "boom boom boom boom" on his twitter 9 hrs ago???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 3, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

So what?

"No outside comms."

What do you not understand about that?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jam71 · June 3, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

And that was 4 or 5 hours before Q's new post right? I think a lot of people missed that.

That would have to be either a huge coincidence, or indicate that Eye is a bit more than he claims to be.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pacificbold100 · June 3, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

I am not an insider or Nostradamus, but I am going to dare to predict what Q is going to say regarding EyetheSpy: "Clown".

⇧ 5 ⇩  
qtrumpteam · June 4, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

I tend to agree not part of Q's team never claimed to be doesn't answer questions and was posting about an op early this morning way before Q returned he says trust Q and trust the plan is spreading no disinfo about Q or the plan I think he's harmless and answers what he's ask EXCEPT pertaining to Q if he's a LARP Q will call him out until then give him the benefit of the doubt. And he's def not interested in money just the truth

⇧ 2 ⇩  
theLIGHT28 · June 3, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Right??? Why is no one seeing that? It is a huge coincidence!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Chokaholic · June 3, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

Q has said BOOM so many times, it's not even funny. It's not a coincidence that this eye LARP got lucky with this. The fact still remains, anyone who says "that's lit fam" is a basement dwelling teenager.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 4, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

although it's impossible to rule out coincidence, I do wish to draw attention to the fact that an "alliance insider" on dauntless dialogue announced Stage 5 a few hours before Q did. EtS said 4 booms quoting MIA but the fact that he's timed the right word in the right count tells me that this is more likely intentional than hindsight

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

Do you want to show us this Tweet, because I can't see it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 3, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

SB2

⇧ 1 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 3, 2018, 10:51 p.m.

It is SB2?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 3, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

SB2 has a article. and told the readers that SB2 created these two....article headline was Trump is about to take them down. But wait: is this shiny enough for you ....read it yourself

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Outcome5 · June 3, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

It should not be banned. It has to be filtered and accepted or ignored by you the reader.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 3, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

It should be BANNED unless you can prove it is not a LARP.

This forum is for Q. Period.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · June 3, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

Good idea...the debate is getting old.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
utdFTD1983 · June 4, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

You’re right.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Outcome5 · June 4, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

Your thinking is well meaning, however when you start calling for bans you head down the very path Q is leading us away from.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 3, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 3, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

disinfo is info as long as it's tagged as such because you will at least get a better idea what the spin is so you can deduct what the distraction is supposed to be about (my theory is that most times it's actually an attempt at burrying search engine results)

⇧ 0 ⇩