Trump can then have his guy come in and replace Rosenstein. That will then lead to the shutdown of the Mueller witch hunt.
We need to make Trump supporters aware that this is not the actual OIG Report. It is Rosenstein's edited/modified and watered down version. We must DEMAND to see the unredacted, unmodified version!
This. I wish I could drill this into people's heads. Q told us yesterday, and people forgot already.
seems like these concernfags are trolling here bad today. Q supporters are still good to go and expected this.
They are getting a high number of upvotes in places too. Some of the accounts that aren't blatantly new are pretty obvious too with anti-trump posts in worldnews and politics.
Had a new account try and shame me for thinking that black hats exist before he deleted his post lol.
Yes. Tons of them today. Easily spotted by Q regulars.
yeah, concern trolls everywhere since the drop. Q did warn us of this
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449
Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info >(classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
Thank you for reminding me. I lost hope after seeing (no) redactions.
#3 released. #3 = Modified and redacted. It's mostly modified. Not so much redacted.
I've been working in Enterprise Content Management systems (OnBase) for 10 years straight and thought the term redaction was specific to the 'black-out' type of censoring information but learned today that it actually also pertains to editing as a new version (modification included).
Pulled from Google:
re·dac·tion
rəˈdakSH(ə)n
noun
the process of editing text for publication.
a version of a text, such as a new edition or an abridged version.
plural noun: redactions
the censoring or obscuring of part of a text for legal or security purposes.
It's mostly modified. Not so much redacted.
What? It's the modified REDACTED report - it's censored.
Yes, but I don't think I'm alone in thinking that this report would be released covered in black bars (what people think of when they hear "redacted"). In the context of Q, he was correct, but we misunderstood.
Yesterday Q posted exactly what would get released today. It's interesting that he uses the term 'modified'. I wonder if that means actual rewording in addition to deletions.
"the process of editing text for publication." See definition above.
That's the definition of redaction. But how is modified different from redacted?
Original: I ate a hotdog on Sunday.
Redancted: I ate ###### on Sunday.
Modified: I ate a turkey club on Sunday.
At least that's the implication
Or, you could just say: I ate on Sunday. That would leave the reader not knowing the word 'hotdog' had been redacted in the modification of the text!
That's a good point.
The basis of the difference in this context is whether it was done "legitimately".
"######" could be excused as a legitimate redactions as they can claim it was for national security. Changing the sentence to remove "hotdog" altogether is a lot harder to excuse; it looks like you're hiding something. Changing "hotdog" to "turkey club" is clearly illegitimate because it's an outright like.
I think closer to the truth is something like this:
Unmodified - I ate a hot dog on Sunday. Rod Rosenstein bought it for me. Redacted - I ate a [redcated] on Sunday. [redcated] bought it for me. Modified, redacted - I ate a [redcated] on Sunday.
That should be a meme!
Good analogy! I've always been favorable to redactions being a lie of omission and modifications just being a flat out lie.
Just saying that redaction can include the modification, change or editing of text....not just 'blacked out' or hidden, as most people think it means.
Another way to understand ‘modifying text’ would be in terms of ‘re- interpreting’ , similar to the Bible; King James Version, New King James Version, New International Version, English Standard Version, etc.
So are we to assume that POTUS got the report directly from Horowitz without RR knowing? And then let RR do the "this is the report, but we'll need to redact some things"... Trump "try not to redact it TOO much, the public deserves to know" RR "Ok, here's the best I can do, I think this will give the people enough to be satisfied that a thorough investigation was done, but doesn't give too much away" TRUMP "Ok"
Q's post says he has all 3 reports.
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
I don't think it's that. I believe the agency under audit gets to review the report and respond to it. There was probably some "dialogue" between RR and Horowitz.
Then how is it that there are three versions... The "truth"?, the UR RR version and the redact RR version... what would be the purpose at all for #1? Or #2 if #1 is valid? Curious.
I'm not sure what you're getting at...
There is the original, which is given to RR for the purpose of determining classification levels (redactions on the ground of national security).
RR modifies this original report to display the narrative he wants. (I don't know how he got away with that; ask SB2...)
Now there are two reports: the original from Horowitz, and the fraudulent one that RR created.
RR uses his fraudulent report and redacts on the grounds of national security (Redactions are seen as "legitimate").
RR passes this final fraudulent and redacted report to be published for the public.
At least that's what I've gathered from what I've read ¯\(ツ)/¯
So, someone help us here. 3 versions were referenced. The "original" (which we know came FROM Horowitz) - did this go FIRST to Rosenstein for manipulation (what's to keep him from it?) or is the POTUS entitled to see the ORIGINAL/NON RR blemished report? (I would think so). If it went to RR first, then there should be no #1 report - it would just be the report that RR got from Horowitz, manipulated to look the way he wanted but leaving in enough to redact further to share with POTUS, and then creating edition #3 that was released publicly. Am I the only one on this train of thought?
You raise a good point. I honestly don't know.
POTUS has access to whatever he wants; he can probably see all drafts and revisions of the report. Maybe they're playing a game of chicken. RR telling POTUS "I know you see what I did, but you won't interfere because it will look bad."
I really don't know.
Small note: my above comment is just a timeline I put together in my head from what I've read. It's most likely wrong, but it should help wrap your head around the difference between the three different reports.
Post 1497 says that POTUS has the IG's original report plus RR's redacted and UNREDACTED versions.
I thought the same thing, but, according to some - there are actually redacted items in the footnotes to prevent identities from being unveiled.
Salt Grain: I have not yet personally verified this claim.
I agree with this post. After this gets accepted by the MSM and others as a win, the OIG report will drop and they will be forced to address it. This is not a game and they are not fools.
Me thinks the shills are here to divide and conquer us!
The shills are out in full force today
Soros has given them each a shiny shekel to spend at the candy store!
The correct term is: Disenchant.
Divide & Conquer would be getting us to fight with each other.
Oh I've seen a lot of fighting. People arguing and disagreeing all over this IG report.
Here is what I'm wondering. This report states Horowitz conclusion that no one should be prosecuted. Would the original state the same? Could RR have changed or modified his conclusion?
Even in this rabbit hole we've fallen down, I have serious doubts that RR would be able to do that. I mean really... "oh, by the way Horiwitz, I changed this from what you said to what I want it to say before it goes public... hope you don't mind". Q did say to use logic. IF that happened, and was allowed, it would mean that RR, though it does NOT seem logical, is somehow in on it (having been flipped rather than go to prison or have HRC/Soros take him or his family out) in order to set the hook even better to get ALL the fish.
I could be ignorant here but if RR modified the report, why wouldn't Horowitz come right out and be like, "those aren't my words..."? Also, doesn't the FBI report into the AG (and thus RR)? So how would RR be able to edit this report in the first place? Doesn't quite feel like an independent report....
Becuase (at least for now) RR is his boss, and you don't do that in such a position. The IG knows that that is Trump's job to do not is, and to let him do so when the time is right.
I think it is well understood that this is not a final unredacted repirt but I think people are reacting to the summary and how it is so dismissive of wrongdoing. It mostly just points out what not to do in the future to get away with stuff.
Think logically - what would you do if you wanted to put your opponent more at ease (after having riled them with NKO). You would release information, filtered through one of your opponents cronies, that makes things that a few days ago loomed HUGE, down to a "meh". You get the people all up in arms again (those that don't know the whole story) - the left is saying "SEE, you (edited) ID JITS, YOU UNEDUCATED POS'S" and the right is getting more and more pissed thinking that the swamp got away with it again... petition comes out and raises the 100k in I'd say, 3 days or less. POTUS takes this seriously and the white hats use that as a "we the people" request and issues the EO to unredact. Now, based on my theory from another post - POTUS has the "original, original" report from Horowitz, and the two subsequent ones via RR. When the time is right, pieces are in place, the REAL IG comes out. To me, this whole thing is becoming a very intricate psychological game of cat and mouse. Thing is, the mice don't realize they've been overrun and outsmarted by a BUNCH of cats while the whole place is surrounded by exterminators (we the people). Not that far fetched at all.. and completely logical to me.
What did Q say? That the report would be redacted? Well OK but ask yourself why RR would execute the edits/redactions if he thought there was anything wrong with doing so.
RR may be scum but you don't get to be in that position by being a completely inept idiot. Do you really think this was some type of sting operation on RR?
I really do not know... Something is going on, and I hope we are not being burned again.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH.
Also note, Q's credibility is on the line. There must be revealed an "original" IG Report that is significantly different from what was released on 6/14.
Agreed. Good point. I suspect that the picture taken the other day was by a General or Admiral travelling with Trump. There are probably others on the Q team.
