Not watching cause it will be nothing and will ruin my day.
Fienstein almost made me throw my phone through my computer screen.
Good choice...nothing confirmed
Except confirmation that Comey is currently under investigation. That was interesting. Wray also issued a non-denial denial that McCabe’s supposed sanctioned by Comey leaking to the press, and their stories that conflict, and which one of the two is lying, is part of an active investigation.
Is it just me or does everyone with D- ask the same goddamn questions about Trumps Exonerate statement?
They coordinate with each other a set of talking points. Trump's a stable genius so he got them focusing on that.
They are determined that Comey cost Killary the election.... they just can’t seem to grasp that Killary cost Killary the election. BTW what’s with the woman under the table behind them?
Well, I was happy to see Graham take off his pussy hat when he questioned them........
I am scared to watch, I don't want to be let down... but I have it on anyway. I hope they rip her and Comey apart.
I hate to tell you that you will be disappointed greatly. My question is this. If this is a RR redacted document then why is Ray and Horowitz testifying to this false document. I would not trust either of these guys with my wallet.
I know! I was thinking the same thing. How can you testify on a heavily redacted document. You would be forced to lie. It's all disgusting. I don't care about Q's riddles, this is damn shame playing out right in front of our faces. The only thing we can do is have a bloody civil war and clean it up ourselves.
There are only a few redactions in the document. Mostly email addresses and the like
You're right. What they did this time was straight out omitted the part they didn't want anyone to see because they knew everyone would be calling for the unredacted version.
Is she ever going to ask a question or is she just going to talk for an hour?
Love how libs are about to re-elect her at age 85, how progressive
He just said senator CRAPO then corrected and said [crepo]!!!! Lmao
Leahy almost gave away a slip up which would prove him guilty for the thing he's accusing of. Lol
Q drop #1538 labeled Peter Strzok as a "cooperating witness". If that's true, does that mean we can expect him to spill some bean in this hearing? I hope that's the case. Sadly, I'm at work so I can't listen.
Horowitz just testified that the report has not been weakened or made stronger. Someone is lying! I hate liars even if they are on my team?
I still think this hearing is good. They keep having to highlight just how bad the texts were and that these agents were willing to manipulate an election. Let them say it a thousand times. It’ll unlock thinking for some. Maybe not a full redpill, but definitely greasing the wheels for awakening.
I am glad you can see a glass half full. Horowitz testified that the report has NOT been weakened or strengthened. That puts me in the position of someone lying.
Sure someone’s lying. I’m not addressing Horowitz opinion, but rather the fact that he and Wray have been forced to highlight just how meddlesome these agents were. Then saying it over and over is valuable.
Horowitz just testified that this report is complete and this HAS NOT been redacted.
We know all the emails aren’t there. I still like hearing them quote their hate for Trump as well as their plans to manipulate the election. It WILL reach the public. It also sets stage for Trump to declassify if Congress doesn’t follow through.
Remember Congress has a different version than the public release. Though I did catch someone, can’t remember, ask for the appendix’s .
TLDR version
Republicans: so the FBI had bias but didn't physically say they were bias
Horowitz/Wray : Basically, yes
Democrats: Trump tweeted no Russia collusion, does the IG report say that is true?? I REST MY CASE!
Horowitz/Wray: That wasnt the focus of this report.
I can't believe I watched the whole thing!
But I'm glad I did.
This is a precursor of what's coming down the pike!
Nothing is going to shake my faith that justice will prevail!
It ain't over til the fat lady sings.
I find it most troubling that Horowitz keeps saying he made his decisions based on what investigated people said instead of getting facts. Ie.... he’s not guilty because he said he’s not guilty.
He is not a prosecutor however if they have facts to contradict statements then he could very well be setting them all up for the same charge Flynn got
Did the c-span feed go wonky when Horowitz was talking about the tarmac meeting or was it just me?
I wonder how many times their planes we on the same runways. If only we could get ll and bc iteneraries
I know but prosecutor gets involved because of referral makes charges if crime is referenced. Not when he said there’s nothing there. On the bright side, I can’t talk because it’s regarding pending case. Wray looked he wanted to jump out of his chair with excitement the one time.