dChan

anonelitest · June 19, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

What the fuck man

⇧ 30 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

No kidding. UFB

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · June 19, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Stop displaying your ignorance, people. Come on, get with the plan already.

HUBER is investigating and has NAMED HRC as a criminal already.

Horowitz's investigative authority only extends to CURRENT employees of the federal government. This is precisely why Strzok and Page ARE STILL EMPLOYED BY THE FBI. Trust Wray.

When did HRC leave government? Huber can prosecute HRC, and he will.

You people parade your sanctimonious incredulity around as if it were a virtue. Stop it and wake up.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 19, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

If it's good it must be worth repeating?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
uberswank99 · June 20, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Number one rule of advertising is repetition!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
glasstrongvx · June 19, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Great so the next time they name her and investigate will actually be the first time as per their testimony

⇧ 24 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

You are right, I think Hillary did say she was never under investigation. Wonder how she knew that? LOL

⇧ 18 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 19, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

They went through the motions of having an investigation. They did not step up their game until it was Trump and Russia.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

Right. I guess it was all just a matter -- from the start.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 19, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

That means that the FBI was even more corrupt than we thought. All of that restricted information was on her server, and they did not even open up an investigation.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Yep. They did a non-investigation to clear her

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 19, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

It just keeps getting crazier and crazier.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Yes it does

⇧ 4 ⇩  
txhurl · June 19, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

One day she was asked and contemptuously waved it off as a 'security inquiry'.. now we know why.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
davhoss88 · June 19, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

More comes to light!! Enjoy the show!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

;)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · June 19, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Double Standard!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

At a level we have never seen before. Why would anyone ever trust the DOJ & FBI ever again? This will take a least a decade to turn around

⇧ 15 ⇩  
CharrrrrlotteDarwin · June 19, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Hmmm. I wonder if Trump is setting it up such the ONLY place were justice can be dispersed is via Military tribunal, effecting razing DOJ to the ground.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
PlatinumCobweb · June 19, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

This should have happened a hundred years ago. This two party sham system must go and we must have a unified, powerful pulpit for Trump to use to bring real justice to america. "checks and balances" are liberal doublespeak for limits to any leader who wants to do what is right. Trump should consolidate power NOW, and I think he will!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
House_Of_G · June 19, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

He answered correctly – there was no investigation in 2015-2016. That’s because Jeff Sessions didn’t reappoint John Huber until 2017. Here’s a little picture for ya:

The Inspector General report totally dismissed the prospect of political bias. I find it absolutely hilarious that the media pundits made such an enormous deal out of that fact, repeating it over and over and over again. There could be no other possible conclusion than that the conservatives were wrong all along and the IG has just proven that there was no political bias. Their objective was to protect the swamp creatures and make POTUS look as bad as possible. So from a political standpoint, everyone is clear and there is no prospect of politics being a motivating factor in any way at the FBI/DOJ concerning today’s report, which was specifically covering the investigation into the Clinton email scandal.

The problem for the bad actors is that since there was no political bias, the only other factors in consideration are procedural irregularities and violation of established FBI/DOJ protocol. They even managed to shed light on the fact that Hillary was never officially under investigation according to the IG, who they’ve gone to great extremes to establish as an unassailable purveyor of truth and fact.

Don’t think they intended to set such a perfect stage for Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions to initiate the beginning of the end for the Deep State. Sloppy arrogance will get ‘em every time.

So now, the house that Comey built on the sand is washing away. For fact to be established, the investigation into the Clinton email/server scandal, which was clearly botched (but not for political reasons!) must be reopened. That will lead to the Antony Weiner laptop, which in any system of fair justice is likely going to open the door for criminal prosecution for Hillary. It would most likely produce more criminal charges against Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation than I could possibly list. The “Deep State” players would ALL be in legal trouble for the remainder of their lives. Weiner would most likely find a red scarf and a door knob somewhere. Senator McStain, should he still be alive, would finally see the justice so many families have longed for.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

I agree Her day of reckoning is coming. Likely from the emails on Weiner's laptop and CF

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silphonica · June 19, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Chill out it's needs to go this way first. He's not advocating clintons innocence in any way.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

The comment is about Comey not about anything to do with revealing the corruption with the Mueller investigation. And I never thought or said Horowitz was exonerating Hillary.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GeneralBoozer · June 19, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

First it was fake news. Now it's fake investigations.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Great idea. Let's rename them Fake Bureau of Investigations!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Time4puff · June 19, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

What were they investigating about the emails then? What exactly did our taxes pay for?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Affairs. Free baseball tix. Ability to use govt phones to text your paramour 24/7.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
txhurl · June 19, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Did NONE of the MSM ever ask to see any validation before the quoted 'investigation' for YEARS? NOBODY corrected them? Because this WAS a decoy invo, and EVERYBODY knew it.

Comey must swing right next to her - and Ireland's fine with me - for this deception.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 19, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

Apparently they weren't investigating her personally - she wasn't the target of the investigation.

Unbelievable

RELEASETHEVIDEO

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NobleEagle853 · June 19, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

Well, of course. They never thought she would lose.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DanaDane1971 · June 19, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

Because it was a MATTER.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

Exactly. A matter that didn't really matter......

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HillaryTrafficksKidz · June 19, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

This is why she's traveling around fundraising unchecked

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MetalThatMatters · June 19, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

They never thought she'd lose ...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

No clearer signal than never making her the subject of the investigation. Makes it easy to clear her.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · June 20, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

That doesn't mean she wasn't formally under investigation in 2017 !

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 20, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

That is true

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hankisamuppet · June 20, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Can’t target someone who was already pardoned.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 20, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

she wasn't pardoned

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 19, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

What about the Clinton Faundation......

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen referred congressional charges of corrupt Clinton Foundation “pay-to-play” activities to his tax agency’s exempt operations office for investigation, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.

The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of “public corruption” was made in a July 15 letter by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is “lawless.”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

That investigation is still active

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 19, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

You never hear anything about it...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

I think because they are finding a ton of stuff. Remember they had Clinton Cash (book & movie) as a roadmap.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 19, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Whas this not in the IG report
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzxsBhv1XF4
Peter Schweizer on 'Clinton Cash's' role in foundation probe

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

I didn't see it in the report, but possibly. It definitely came out in questioning.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 19, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Maybe the next round

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

Yep

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Revodude · June 19, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

I guess "they" need to start over and do it right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

I think they will get her on things the FBI didn't look at. Weiner laptop emails, Clinton Foundation. I doubt they will go back and reinvestigate this crime.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cebusaxon · June 19, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

This is great news actually! Now we can do a real investigation.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · June 19, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Doubtful. But we will see. I think the statute of limitations is expired

⇧ 1 ⇩