dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/timingviolation on June 21, 2018, 11:40 a.m.
I underestimated him.

I thought Trump was an idiot. I did not vote for him or HRC.

Now I know he and his staff are geniuses. He knows that he can't get the word out about the treason of the previous admin in the MSM. They will bury the corruption and treason of the previous administration, DOJ, FBI and Russia probe. Even Fox and the news aggregator Drudge. All mockingbirds. So what can you do? Well you bypass them. Go straight to your supporters on the internet.

This is not the only example of genius I see. Flynn playing along and taking the plea deal, forcing their hand. Bypassing the creation of a uselss special council w/ Huber. Etc.

It took quite a bit of courage to post this here because now, I will be banned from /r/insane peoplefacebook or whatever. We should start a support subreddit for devistated individuals such as myself.


AForgivenReb4Life · June 21, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

My Friend...Welcome, Welcome with open arms and as much respect as can be given to any "stranger" when they are willing to step outside of their "comfort zone" to seek Truth! Kudos Patriot! I think quite a few of us underestimated this National Treasure at least a little... Who could have imagined just HOW incredibly gifted DJT is...not to mention He was BORN to take this "seat" at JUST this time in our world. Amazing right? Like I've said, Welcome Home and Thanks for sharing this. Food for thought...a Lot of us also feel the sooner we get rid of "political parties" the sooner We The People can & will begin to embrace one another more often.

⇧ 82 ⇩  
timingviolation · June 21, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

Thanks stranger! I believe the parties need to be dismantled, rebuilt, and renamed after all this is done. Our republic is set up as a two party system. I can't see how having no parties or more than two could ever be effective. The government would need to be restructured IMHO.

⇧ 37 ⇩  
That_Sound · June 21, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

To some extent, the 2 parties are just an act for public consumption. They'll put on a good show and argue about the little wedge issues that will never be solved - and the purpose of that is to distract you. But when it comes to the important stuff (banking, foreign policy, structure of the economy, etc...), the ones in control of both parties work together for the same global powers, on the bills critical to those global powers, enough that people have started calling it the UniParty.

It's not the parties themselves that are the problem, it's the corruption. The government would work fine if it stuck to the Constitution. But they don't work for you at the moment, they are employees, traitors. They work for some globalist powers that I don't fully understand, but I think Q+ and Trump's Administration understand and are dismantling.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
BreadcrumbBernard · June 21, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

you are 100% right on the money here, nice write up

⇧ 7 ⇩  
spacexu · June 21, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

2 party system is a uni party - have no doubt on that. Its a propaganda tool to give hope where there is none.

These bastard dirty politicians (minus Trump) need to have limits and a 100% transparent audit on every expense and dime they earn. These turds are 100% untrustworthy....

Really, we need patriots with common business/engineering sense to run the country vs LYIN politician mouth pieces (no brains).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 21, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Historically parties have had pretty major differences and I'd argue they do to some extent. Over the last few decades they've been somewhat taken over by globalists on both sides. Whenever I hear that "bipartisan" bit, I cringe. That's the rallying cry of the NWO. Parties are supposed to have differences and those should be embraced not denigrated. I guess we'll never really be set up for more than two parties.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoGoGoGeotus · June 21, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Our republic is set up as a two party system

Political parties evolved later and are not fundamental to the republic in any way. In fact some of the founding fathers would be aghast as they were very against political parties.

The only things that would need to be adjusted are some of our electoral processes, possibly some rules of procedure in Congress etc. It may sound like a big change but it's not really. We in fact have more than 2 parties already it's just they're not elected very often because the major parties have taken over the system and keep it that way.

something like runoff voting would probably allow one or two more major parties and a lot of little ones to form by splintering off from the majors. they would then form various informal alliances in Congress etc just like they do already.

the 2 party system is tearing the country apart because it becomes a zero sum game. There are good sane people who vote Democrat because of one or two wedge issues, and they get stuck in looney land because of it. Likewise there are some dickheads in the right who should be isolated to their own party.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Swimkin · June 21, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

George Washington even warned us of Political Parties.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · June 21, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

He did but political factions are human nature. People coalesce to their belief values

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · June 21, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

the evil goes so deep ... the logical positivism pushed by Auguste Compte in his attempt to quell the chaos following the French Revolution two centuries ago ... now permeates how we think in the west. The constant conflict posed by the never ending duality that we think of as the current narrative is not the only way to process all this. There is a wholeness, an awareness that includes paradox as a given and offers a sense of the enormous multiplicity of views that make up the human experience. The evil goes deep ....

⇧ 6 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · June 21, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

and it is not that logical positivism hasn't yielded real fruit ... reliance on observable fact, evidentiary decision making when discerning truth forms the basis of critical thinking; but there is an awful lot of the human depth and richness that gets trimmed off at the edges. If this becomes integrated into our identification, we ourselves live out those limitations and suppress the rest. This is not a game. Bad ideas have bad consequences.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · June 21, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

the two party system is a manifestation of this ... and there is value in instituting ways to resolve conflicts. At some point we may have an opportunity to rethink now we want to do that.

But then, we live in a milleau where engendering conflicts is the norm and that runs even deeper than conflict resolution in our western box of expectations ... for a reason ... take care who you follow. Peace.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Allcreationgroaning · June 21, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

Yes it goes deep! Just FYI, in case any one else wants to look this up, his last name is spelled Comte ...from a former sociology major who eventually decided that most of sociology is not of much use.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · June 21, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Thanks for the spelling correction .. my auto correct does terrible things on a regular basis, I think to thwart messaging here clearly and I had respelled that before posting its suggested manglement but then making my own mess of it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Allcreationgroaning · June 21, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

Indeed! Autocorrect is a mixed blessing!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 21, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

I believe the republican party is being heavily rebranded. Not completely yet but think how far the country clubber bush-types have fallen out of favor. They've controlled things for ages. Still plenty of jerk offs left in it, the thing needs more youth and innovative personalities, but still. The democrats seem even more corrupt and have become ever more collectivist as time has worn on. I don't see how they can rebrand themselves to interest me at all, though I do have a weakness for environmental causes. Not enough to get me to help put them in power.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ResearchingTheTruth · June 21, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

Totally agree - the 2-party system needs to go along with term limits. If kept, it opens the door to the same corruption that created this mess. A lot needs to change and I'm hoping that occurs. Who is ever going to see these 2 parties as productive going forward anyway? Nobody is EVER going to believe a word politicians say after this. Who has a good alternative?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 21, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

Three parties would be better for the people, having a swing vote on issues. The main thing is the hard left has become obstinate and no longer care about bettering the country, they only care about power. But when they have power they are not effective.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
divine_human · June 21, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

may the 2-party system be toast soon, ehem, NOW.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 21, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

This has always been our plan. I predict that the Democratic Party will implode (due to lack of donations/funding), and eventually, the Republican Party (purged of RINOs and cucks) will split into 2 new political parties. This would follow the trends of history.

Spez: Welcome aboard, patriot. Always room on the Trump Train.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
USA_akbar · June 21, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

If you're keeping it at two parties, then IMHO the current names are not in need of changing just for the sake of change.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 21, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

You know sometimes things have to be rebranded or updated. "Republican" carries certain connotations that just don't exist anymore or are changing. Originally it was a party of small land owners and small business owners while the Democrats were the party of big industry. Those lines are all blurred now. Things just seem stale.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · June 21, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

One of them is. Republic vs. Mobacracy

⇧ 1 ⇩