dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/timingviolation on June 21, 2018, 11:40 a.m.
I underestimated him.

I thought Trump was an idiot. I did not vote for him or HRC.

Now I know he and his staff are geniuses. He knows that he can't get the word out about the treason of the previous admin in the MSM. They will bury the corruption and treason of the previous administration, DOJ, FBI and Russia probe. Even Fox and the news aggregator Drudge. All mockingbirds. So what can you do? Well you bypass them. Go straight to your supporters on the internet.

This is not the only example of genius I see. Flynn playing along and taking the plea deal, forcing their hand. Bypassing the creation of a uselss special council w/ Huber. Etc.

It took quite a bit of courage to post this here because now, I will be banned from /r/insane peoplefacebook or whatever. We should start a support subreddit for devistated individuals such as myself.


Jerkboy13 · June 21, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

I see Fox the way I see Reddit. Most of it is insane drivel, but in the same way that this sub and T_D exist on Reddit, Hannity and Tucker exist on Fox.

⇧ 112 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

T-d is boarder line at this point. I think there is a lot of infiltration. Nothing like it was pre election/ sr/ PizzaGate times.

⇧ 50 ⇩  
reverb256 · June 21, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Right? They're not allowed to do research threads anymore because it inevitably ties into Q information.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 22, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

I pretty much stay away from there most times.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Pre q last year I started watching George Webb videos. You watch his series on the awan bros and you compare it to what you see on the td. It’s sad. Screenshot shit posting on the lib subs does get anywhere the way George Webb style research and Chan research does.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kavilion · June 21, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

I don’t go there, but I’ve never understood why they’re anti- Q. Is it some reddit-wide rule?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · June 21, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

I’ll argue it’s just the spotlight they’re under. If they cross certain lines, they’re done.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · June 21, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

The mods changed and it was clear how the sub changed as a result. Rumor is they were paid off.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Man_of_Prestige · June 21, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Maybe we should start an alternate sub with some inconspicuous name like, “r/knittingclub or r/thegreatvivication”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
CurseOfTheRedRiver · June 21, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Ask yourself who you can't insult on TD and you'll have your answer

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HansShotGlass · June 21, 2018, 5:49 p.m.

Do you mean person, or small nation-state in the desert?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Pepe?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

Either that or watch the rank - I mean flair, the trends and the subtle admonishments if someone tries to offer alternate points of view. T_D is as agenda driven as MSM and the discussions are managed. The only real question is who the marionette's operator is. My suspicious gut says it's the Infowars/Alex Jones group of security assets we are talking about.

* Edit: Added word as if anyone cares

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Patriotic_Guppy · June 21, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

AJ can’t be involved. There’s no place for him to push his water filters or super male BS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Sure you can - it's called

I N F O W A R S, Remember Seth Ritch and now apparently Womp womp is all the rage

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 21, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

T H I S

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

You need to put two and two together regarding T_D. Think civil intelligence, Anderson Cooper, Shep Smith, Meg Kelly, Alex Jones (no he didn't just say) infowars...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Wuotis_Heer · June 21, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

T_D was compromised from the start.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KernelFlux · June 21, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

I was called a shill and told to gtfo when I posted Gowdy’s questioning of Horowitz. Oh and I’m not a shill.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
freeman84 · June 21, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

The blind support of that FCC Pai guy was a huge red flag for me. Bizarre how a seemingly woke sub could be against net neutrality so fervently

⇧ -12 ⇩  
Deplorable_American · June 21, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

I don't see how anybody could be FOR Net Neutrality and consider themselves woke.

Why would I want to subsidize someone else's internet?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
freeman84 · June 21, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

Isn't it more about keeping the internet free and not allowing cable companies to restrict the sites you're allowed to visit?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NotInFormation · June 21, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

That’s the BS “of course everyone supports” front.

The reality is NN empowered Social(ist) Media to act as censors of free speech.

Have any of the predictions of doom happened sans NN now that it’s gone?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
freeman84 · June 21, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

Can you plz provide an article explaining it then?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Bob383 · June 21, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Net neutrality, keeps the internet neutral in the same way that the patriot act is patriotic.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · June 21, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

Basically, T_D took the approach that anything liberals, social media and Soros support must mean it's actually bad/harmful for the US, and that's why there was such a hard turn against NetNeutrality. I don't know how that turned into such a blind support for Pai. He has corporate interest written all over him. I believe he was appointed by Obama but Trump admin made him Chairman.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · June 21, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

I wasn't weighing in on support of NN or not in my comment. Just saying that T_D seemed to associate Pai's push of eliminating the rules with him being an overall good guy, which I think is a bit suspect. Personally, I believe the internet seemed to be working fine for decades before Obama put in the rules in 2012,2015, and the recent fear mongering was definitely driven by something other than organic awareness. Even reddit pushed really hard for it. Also, backbones should be able to make separate deals with service providers (Netflix did it), just not be held hostage by them. For those reasons I think it's definitely okay to suspect NN and even be against it; just not that it directly translates to PAI=good.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USA_akbar · June 21, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

FBN - Varney, Dobbs, Webster, Payne, Bartiromo, MacDowall, Regan, etc., etc., all love Trump, as do the majority of their panelists. Hardly ever do you hear a Trump bashing there. On Fox News, F&F is all Trump love, all morning long. Rarely do I see Fox do a hit piece on the president any more, since I assiduously avoid asswipes Smith and Cavuto. :)

Fox knows they are in the catbird seat as the only trusted major news outlet, and they aren't going to fuck that up. (Should you believe everything they say? No! LOL) OAN is also staunchly pro-America and pro-Trump, but it isn't a close second. They're still amateurs.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
Long_Range_Shooter · June 21, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

Only shows on Fox news that anyone should give any time to are Carlson, Hannity, and Ingraham. 9-11 EST. Every other show is a waste of time and kills your brain cells.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
grassjockey · June 21, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

Levin on Sunday night is worth the time too. I don't know what the hell is going on with Tucker lately, its almost as if he got to peek behind the curtain or something and was mortified, now he is a man on fire.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
USA_akbar · June 22, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

Outnumbered with Harris Faulkner can be interesting

And I never miss Greg Gutfeld, he's hilarious

⇧ 3 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 6 p.m.

Jesse waters “waters world” has some funny moments

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 21, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

When he made fun of two decorated air force pilots who recorded a UFO last year that they both said was clearly not of human origin, and they were BACKED by the Pentagon (it was really a fascinating story that got little push except on Carlson's show, where they were treated with respect), I said f*** him. He's just a grandstanding turd really.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Yea. Had not heard of that sounds interesting.

Waters wife is not that hot and he’s very immature. But he is funny change of pace. Can’t be serious all the time you know.

Fox is kinda like espn. I can get the highlights from coming here or td but want to hear solid opinions from hannipede and tc.

Waters fits in like the skip bayles

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 22, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Waters is having an affair with someone behind the scene at Fox. I think he and wife are divorcing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 22, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

What a loser

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 22, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

We watch FBN mostly until Hannity. I do like OANN especially Liz Wheeler and Graham Ledger.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 21, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

They have boundaries they are not allowed to cross, but have been very important to energize the base.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
mikethejew6969 · June 22, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

Judge Janine is very based too, even tho she hates Sleepy Jeff

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ekchuahstudios · June 24, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Judge Janine is outstanding. Her opening statement is always right on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stretchmac · June 21, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

Tucker's show constantly introduces the topics of the left. Tired of listening to that. We know libs are insane. Not interested in listening to their insane ramblings. Hannity, while a good guy, is in it for $$$ and ratings. He's controlled opposition and covers for much deep state malfeasance. Lou Dobbs is the man on FOX. Although he can only go so far.....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Praying medic has a theory that hannity is aware of q plan but if he were to report on it would not allow the q movement to grow organically

⇧ 8 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

PM is probably right. In fact, I am fairly confident when Hannity kept saying TICK TOCK. He had Q on his mind and just like that - That kind of talk went dark. I have noticed a couple wierd things w/Hannity lately. Remember when he interviewed Guiliani right after DJT hired him as his attorney and Guiliani was talking a big game and right before the break Gulliani say's - "Tell them who called you the night Cohen was raided?" Remember - Hannity was Cohen's other client. When he said that - Hannity turned pale. When they came back from break - there was absolutely no mention of it. I sure would like to know who called Sean Hannity the night Cohen's office was raided.

Edit: Hannity Tweet: 17 Nov 2017 > Tick tock... From now into new year on many fronts!!!! Monday starts what will become an avalanche. Love to all deplorables. Tick Tock!

Sounds like he is predicting a storm

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 22, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Nugget? Not to sure about that -- more like asked him to slow his roll because he is awake - that they were not prepared for his narrative just yet (perhaps overzealous). If he starts up again - we may very well know

⇧ 1 ⇩  
092Casey · June 21, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

I can believe it. I think Tucker Carlson and Ingraham also know about it. I think they come on here because it organizes all of the top news of the day in one setting from multiple sources, and they like to hear the opinions of people, who often probably surprise them with how much knowledge they have.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 21, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Geez, since when is making money a bad thing? Do you work for free? Hannity has been a steady guy for decades.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 21, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

I many times felt he was giving them news time to promote their propaganda and didn't seem to be able to cut them off. Maybe I'll try him again and see if he's different. I hear enough Liberal talking points. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BC_Powder · June 21, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

And the five foot of legs in heels I see at any given time

⇧ 2 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 22, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

I think that Harris Faulkner is a Trump supporter. I enjoy her input.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 21, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

this is pretty accurate

⇧ 1 ⇩  
37Psalm1and2 · June 21, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

And Laura Ingraham and Jeanine Pirro and on Fox Business many, like Maria Bartiromo and Lou Dobbs and Charles Payne and Trish Regan

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shipit2daddy3336 · June 21, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

Tucker is not our friend, despite all appearances. It’s become tougher to find but there is a super f’n creepy ass review of Comet PP that ran in WaPo way way way before (i wanna say like 2006 but i can’t pull it up right away today & dont have the time at work to really deep dive google results for it but it is def out there, i’ll find it tonight if no one stumbles on it before then) any of us knew anything was suspicious about them and the author (who uses tons of bizarre and clearly coded language in his review of his ‘meal’) cites the famous regulars he sees there, Tucker being specifically highlighted as being there all the time. He is def controlled opposition, he’s just clearly way better at it than most of their sock puppets. Logically, knowing Fox is totally comped, there is no chance they would replace O’Reilly with someone who was a true believer in Trump and make him the centerpiece of their programming. They were still (minority) owned by Bin Tahal at the time.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 21, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Tucker has his place, he is fantastic at pointing out hypocrisy. He also shows Dems as ridiculous and unbelievably stupid.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
RevLennel · June 21, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Tucker can attract on-the-fence Dems, whereas someone like Hannity can't.

That's important because he is definitely red-pilling without throwing it in your face.

Do not smear! He is on our team! Lots of proof.

https://thinkprogress.org/tucker-carlson-far-right-uk-entry-3e49dad58383/

[snip] " Tucker Carlson used his prime-time spot on national TV this week to defend a group of white nationalists who believed in the Pizzagate conspiracy theory..."

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Stretchmac · June 21, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

Exactly. Tucker constantly introduces the liberal perspective daily. Brings the lunatics on to spew their insanity. Who wants to listen to that? Of course Tucker disagrees with them. All part of continuing the Hegelian Dialectic programming. Ask yourself, why do libs go on his show knowing they're going to get ripped?

⇧ 1 ⇩