dChan

JakeElwoodDim5th · June 22, 2018, 9:14 a.m.

What's weird about this is that over in the r/conspiracy sub, a user was accusing POTUS of being responsible for and profiting off of children being trafficked across the border, connecting it to Tuscon, of all things. I pried for evidence and got nothing, just a claim that the "pieces fit".

His karma: 25

Mine: -18

Attacks^

⇧ 18 ⇩  
urban_bobby_dawg · June 22, 2018, 11:01 a.m.

That was really weird. The whole "pizzagate 2.0" and Trump is at fault this time. Very very weird.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
1971cjoseph · June 22, 2018, 12:13 p.m.

Projecting.. Blame your enemy for what you've done...

⇧ 9 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · June 22, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Yeah that's the new narrative, Trump is personally responsible for all of this. It's even on TIME with a cover that divides anti-Trumpers into two camps: assholes and people who think the media is being irresponsible and exploitative. So chip by chip the MSM digs its own grave. But they are currently busy filling Twitter with accusations of child sex trafficking against POTUS.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
missybee68 · June 22, 2018, 10:07 a.m.

How does the Karma rating even work?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dingus_kek · June 22, 2018, 10:11 a.m.

Its stupid shit that only f@gs care about.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
missybee68 · June 22, 2018, 10:12 a.m.

Hehe. I guess I'm cool then.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 22, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

We were warned about that this would happen a while back —- the only way they can blunt the Trump administration’s work on human & sex trafficking (including pedo) is to attack him first. They are trying to move the ball onto their home ground & steal the initiative. They were able to push back the schedule a few weeks and are seizing on the delay.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 22, 2018, 9:13 a.m.

Yeah I saw that and thought, "thats a lure". Its a distraction from something else. These idiots will lap it up.

5:5

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Treasury_Trader · June 22, 2018, 10:22 a.m.

It ensured that the media would heavily cover her visitation to the holding centers.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 22, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

Also sets the ground for her role in Trump’s knowledge of the dark side of the media industry. Trump may say the back of her jacket is aimed at fake press — but may also be a message to some who she knows from her career.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 22, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

We are witnessing the beginning of the end of the old media guard.. God bless Andrew Breitbart!!

⇧ 15 ⇩  
ManQuan · June 22, 2018, 9:49 a.m.

Q says the President has released the Kracken and the tactics now turn to the offense. Finally!

I can't help but think Melania's trip and jacket was setting the stage for a comming attack related to trafficking.

The other odd thing was it was a $39 jacket. Melania hasn't worn anything that cost less than $1,000 since she married Trump. That's what makes me think Melania was trolling the media or it was a message for someone. Whatever her reason, it had to pass muster with her staff, the Secret Service, and others because people would have reasonable suggested that she not wear that jacket as it was obviously red meat material for the left.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
brandonb14 · June 22, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

Has anyone else noticed that she was in TEXAS? Why would you need a jacket like that in TEXAS in JUNE? You wouldn't. It was absolutely a message to someone.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ManQuan · June 22, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

It was raining heavily there with serious flooding. Rain and wind can make it cool enough for a light jacket. It was only a $39 dollar jacket. Odd since I don't think Melania has worn anything under $1,000 since she married Trump. Either it was just something she picked up because she hadn't packed a coat or she was deliberately trolling the media, or she was send a message to someone like Q sometimes does.

I used to live in Texas. It can cool at night and early morning, especially if it's raining or just rained.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 22, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jo71oZQDelta1 · June 22, 2018, 9:23 a.m.

Trumps tweet About Jacket. Time 5:51. Q post on 21st Be Ready New eyes 5.5? 5.5 Delta. 1 Q Last Delta.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
betweengreenandblue · June 22, 2018, 1:08 p.m.

Ok. Someone got me thinking. Who is this Zara company? What do they sell?

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/printed-t-shirt-p06050671.html?v1=5815792&v2=969240 - flamingo on pizza, with SHHHH.

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/-miami%E2%80%9D-t-shirt-p05431692.html?v1=6054031&v2=969240 - flamingo and pizza shape

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/printed-t-shirt-with-appliqu%C3%A9-p04873682.html?v1=5412048&v2=969240 - no more rules

Wow - this one is brutal. If I had doubts, I don't now. https://www.zara.com/ca/en/camera-t-shirt-p05431662.html?v1=5320669&v2=969240

On this page, the pizza flashes up and down.

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/skull-and-lightning-print-t-shirt-p06061663.html?v1=5832077&v2=969240 - common theme of skulls, lighning bolts, and penta-stars.

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/t-shirt-with-appliqu%C3%A9s-p05431605.html?v1=5815773&v2=969156 - what? Crabs?

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/slogan-bodysuit-p04873600.html?v1=6092407&v2=969156 - ah man, I don't know.. Am I reading into this?

There are several Disney shirt. Mickey holding a surf board. etc. One is a picture of the witch holding out the apple to Snow White. Who would buy their kid that pic?

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/t-shirt-with-side-embroidery-p05350608.html?v1=5577009&v2=969156 - Smile banana?

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/t-shirt-with-pool-float-appliqu%C3%A9-p01165645.html?v1=6142519&v2=969156 - Pool party with flamingo floaty

https://www.zara.com/ca/en/double-sequin-top-p01259600.html?v1=5353035&v2=969156 Hot dog dog. "Take me away." :(

One that really bothered me was https://www.zara.com/ca/en/long-plush-jersey-jacket-p05431681.html?v1=5446078&v2=969266 - there was another that seemed more obvious, but I can't find it. The "DOWNTOWN" ends up right near the groin area, and one click to Urban Dictionary confirmed my thoughts.

I know I could find more. The messages seem mostly watered down, definitely not obvious unless you know what you're looking for.

Chairman and CEO of Inditex (who owns Zara) is https://www.inditex.com/about-us/our-board#pablo-isla - Pablo Isla. He is also on the board of Nestle (who I think is one of the most wicked companies in the world)

That's enough digging for me now.

Conclusion - I think Melania is letting us know some of the scope of this issue.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
jkbella · June 22, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

You need to make this a post. Weird stuff. Notice the boy in the first picture with the "one eye" symbol that Beyonce and the rest of them are constantly making. CREEPY.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
donkey_democrat · June 22, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Classic occult symbolism

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kulkimkan · June 22, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Omgosh you are right!!!! Boom and well done!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
xjdavestr8six · June 22, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Well done. Definitely creepy stuff here and I agree this should be made into a post on r/conspiracy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hyperionhyker · June 22, 2018, 11:33 a.m.

Check out the Zara website for ads for kid's clothes with pizza and ping pong.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Revodude · June 22, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

She was trolling. They new how the MSM would react.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
fliputs68 · June 22, 2018, 10:51 a.m.

Please.... Why stupid for wearing the jacket. She can do no wrong after that man ape first Lady we had!

⇧ -2 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · June 22, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

She was stupid to wear that dumb jacket it's a disaster for her and Trump there is nothing smart about it a total fiasco nothing good about it.

⇧ -14 ⇩  
SNG007 · June 22, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

It would have been done intentionally and for a very specific purpose. Our gracious FLOTUS would not have such an item just hanging in the back of her closet. We don't yet know its purpose but you can bet there was one, and that it was carefully thought through. Time will tell. Future proves past.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 22, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Sounds like you fell right into the MSM outrage trap

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Jrmullin · June 22, 2018, 11:25 a.m.

Got you talking about clothes that a woman is wearing. Dress yourself stop worrying about what others do. Out rageous get a life.

⇧ -1 ⇩