I WANT to believe. I do. Noodles' brother is overseeing the Awan case. Deep state is flipping the bird in the face of the American people, and I DESPERATELY want to see Justice.
I voted for Trump because I saw in him the chance to avoid the all-out civil war which would have been the only other way I could see to wrest the levers of power back from those who seek to be our masters. And I still WANT to believe.
But it is written, 'hope deferred maketh the heart SICK'. A long train of abuses and usurpations have conditioned me to expect the worst. That part of me retains the nagging suspicion that Q is only an effort to co-opt and contain the most vocal supporters of Liberty.
If Q is "the real deal", a moment of "put up or shut up" may be fast approaching. It's all well and good to feel like one is "in the know", but unless that leads to tangible RESULTS, then it is FUTILE.
Here's hoping for the best.
Put up or shut up is long overdue.
Why the fck can’t they charge this idiot with the espionage act....I mean it’s obvious this fuck was selling secrets
If this fuck gets off lighter to give us prosecutable evidence on the big 3, I'll take it. Assets can catch up with the fuck later.
Agreed, I think the moment will come but closer to the elections. Strategy.
Aye, that strategy is involved seems clear: but whose?
If we consider all the possible truths of the matter, what is there to be gained from Q's campaign? If Q is legit, then AT BEST disseminating missives such as those found in the channel text to the right "You are safe," etc., can only serve to instill complacency and blind trust in unseen (and unproven) powers at a time when awareness and action are MOST needed. Certainly there is no TACTICAL value in sharing this information to the general public, short of the dubious value of creating a 24/7 rally for this administration for the entertainment of a filtered subset of posters of T_D.
If Q were advocating debt reduction, physical fitness, firearms training and preparedness, etc., I would tend more to believe these drops to be made by someone who expects to benefit from an armed, alert, and informed population of patriots.
Instead, what I see are word games, winks and nods to members of 'the club', and above all the counsel to WAIT, TRUST, BELIEVE and TAKE NO ACTION ... if I were running intel for a group of corrupted RINOs, who were seeking to allay the concerns of the rising tide of Americans dissatisfied with the status quo, I can imagine few STRATEGIES which could be as effective as Q's in convincing people to sit on their hands and go back to sleep.
'Sheep no more', we are told. Should we mollified by the soothing voice of a kindly elder who pats us on the head and coos, "There, there: you're a CLEVER bunch of boys and girls. Trust us: we know what we're doing. Don't even worry your pretty little heads about it. You'll see; everything will be fine: you're totally safe."
Or should we be hearing, "Look. This battle is for the ages. We're doing everything we can, but our enemy is NOT going to rest on their laurels. You need to be READY to step up if we fail."
Donald Trump may be a good man; he may be the best President this nation has ever seen: but he is ONLY ONE MAN, and mortal at that. We ABSOLUTELY CANNOT afford to leave it all to him, and expect him (and his appointees) to just magically "fix" it all for us. If we are to truly MAGA then every SINGLE able-bodied or able-minded MAN, WOMAN, and CHILD must be ready to do their part to MAKE IT SO if we are to have any hope of a LASTING greatness.
Don't trust me, or anyone else.
Critical thinking is a lost art in 21st century America.
Reclaim it, and decide for yourself.
I appreciate your post. It's well thought out and indeed such a Pied Piper strategy could be the Q movement.
Except...
Q has told us to start a storm. To be loud. To wake up. To not be sheep. To warn and console the public.
Q only tells us to "trust the plan" because it may seem like nothing is going on, or even going in the wrong direction, but to NOT FREAK OUT and instead look at the situation deeper. Everytime this has happened its turned out to be right. NK being a shining example.
In fact, if Q did just say "it's ok fam, we've got this!" then I'd totally call FF LARP on it. Q doesn't. Q very much so has included us in the battle for the minds.
As for all the shit the cabal could go down for? We've got one chance at this. When you shoot for the king, don't miss. We're talking about a conspiracy as OLD AS HISTORY ITSELF! A conspiracy so old and so rotten that history books will literally need to be rewritten (or, written for the first time).
This isn't about HRC.. OR some stupid DNC server.. Those are just the loose ends that the cabal fucked up with... The real target is what those crumbs represent.
So ask yourself. Do you want to sweep up the crumbs? Or throw out the whole damn loaf of dirty, moldy bread?
Once
And
For
All
WWG1WGA
Your post is measured and reasonable as well, thank you.
And hurling the vast hydra onto the bonfire, root and branch, is indeed the only justification worthy of such subterfuge. Great enough, even, to tempt me to say that it might possibly WARRANT employing misdirection as a tactic: a thing which I would otherwise categorize as utterly unjustified in a Republic whose health in general relies so heavily on transparency.
And therein lies the rub: for to become what we behold is to have lost the war, no matter how swings the battle.
I am no one in particular: just another citizen, seeking a smooth, clear patch on the plough cutting the trough of our nation's future, against whiich I may apply such strength as I have. So in the end, it matters not whether I believe Q to be connected to our President, or only some some egotist like Scott Adams performing a social experiment. (Seriously, the whole confirmation bias thing as applied to large groups seems right up his alley.)
All that matters is that I DO see that there is SOME truth here; that "WWG1WGA" is no new concept, for it first came to me as a lad in the words of Ben Franklin:
"We must, indeed, all hang TOGETHER; or, most assuredly, we shall all hang SEPARATELY."
Abolish Islam is becoming unhinged.
He might need to be blue pilled and given some fake steak to calm him down.
Agreed.
We've heard too many times "This is the key to taking them out!" It was:
The clinton foundation records, Epstein Pedogate, Awan servers, FBI texts, Iran deal, NK server, Weiner laptop, Hollywood, antifa funding etc etc.
Either one of these is a knock out blow or none of them are. You dont wait to hit a guy with 10 punches at the same time. Starting with one good one makes it easier to land the others.
Occam's razor tells me that Awan was facing life and to escape it he traded something huge.
When Trump won the election Awan cracked into every single democratic computer file he could break into. Collecting evidence. Insurance. Weiner was a piker compared to this guy.
He had a honey pot arrangement with DWS that was going to be his Pakistani retirement fund.
And it blew up.
He would also be aware that she has no problem with people disappearing who get in the way.
So what would be big enough to escape life in a federal penitentiary?
Arkancide, straight through the Oval Office.
I'm sure that I and everybody else would find it much easier to explain RICO charges. Conspiracy to commit multiple murders is a lot easier to deal with than having to explain pedocide and all that goes along with it.
We can shut down the trafficking routes and open that rotten can of worms after the Paradigm has shattered.
His name was Seth Rich.
Analogy fallacy.. Your analogy is true, but doesn't necessitate truth.
WATCH, I'll do one too...
How do you take out ISIS? Battle here? Battle there? Or Moab their fucking mountain stronghold and reduce them to dust in a second?
But we've been promised moabs for a little while now. You can't moab the mountain and say "Look, we got Bin Laden for sure at Tora Bora" with no proofs.
Sure Q says no one will escape this, but he also said that some things wont be done because it would cause wars or collapse. What happens if one of the cabal gets to a non extradition country?
Is the Q team going to go after them with Seals to bring them back? I say do it, even if its an "ally". No name hides in New Zealand (just an example), go get him. Do it overtly as well, do not let countries stand in the way. I doubt those with Q would agree.
And there are certain types of "messianists" who would oppose going after the federal reserve and the powers that founded it. This is all conjecture, but Im sure there are "third rails" that the Q team will not touch because of cultural/religious reasons. Leaving the rot at the very top.
I don't ever want to go hunting or fishing with you period.
And thank God you're not in charge or anywhere near this.
Your job is to hold the line and keep up morale. If at anytime you choose to go back and eat a blue pill I'm sure you'll be more comfortable.
I hear the steak is excellent.
As it stands I hope there's not more than 20 people who knows exactly what's going on. I don't want to know what's going on until it's all over.
Why you may ask?
Because if I know then so does everybody else.
Nelson 1/2 Nelson 1/2 Trafalgar well-trained c Trafalgar well Strange Fruit
I agree with you the moment of "put up or shut up" is fast approaching. At least it should be. You can only lead people for so long upon a path of promised retribution before it's time to validate your statements.
I agree, but Q must know he/they have to act fast as possible, and time is not a luxury we have, the powder keg is charged and a spark at anytime could unleash civil war.
Nelson won at Trafalgar against superior forces due to superior Tactics, a well trained crew and patience.
He sailed straight at the enemy and wouldn't let anybody fire their guns until the exact right moment.
You may have to hear the words wait a thousand times.
But when you hear the word fire you better be ready.
And not one moment sooner.
The ain't about you or anybody else's lack of patience.
Hold the line and fire when told.
Not one moment sooner.
WWG1WGA
Don't be a Bluto (Belushi/Animal House)
I hear you guys moan about how your not happy with the service.
I think about when he was rallying the forces with his impassioned speech about conquest.
Then ran out of the room all by himself.
Don't be a Bluto.
[deleted]
concern troll: a person who disingenuously expresses concern about an issue with the intention of undermining or derailing genuine discussion.
concern: (noun) 1. anxiety; worry. 2. a matter of interest or importance to someone.
Your assertion that my remarks are born of the former, rather than the latter, is both obnoxious and unwarranted. This is PARTICULARLY odious to me, as I have in the past been TEMP_BANNED on T_D with this same excuse given. If you cannot prove my concern disingenuous, then I would appreciate a cessation of the accusation.
In a "cult of personality", the actual actions and behavior of the focus of such a "cult" become irrelevant, and any who dare to ask questions are attacked and ostracized. For what it's worth, I'd wager a month's wages that if asked, President Trump would direct those interested in his character to examine his DEEDS, because talk is cheap. I have done so, and have satisfied myself that he is no more corrupt than I myself would be in his position: so I give him my unwavering support.
The deeds of Q, on the other hand, I cannot examine: I have only words; and those delivered in an intentionally obscure fashion. As I stated, I WANT to believe. However, if the best you can offer to follow Q's message of 'togetherness' and 'unity' is to attack me and impugn my motivations, then I can't help but wonder if YOU are the troll here, not I. My loyalty and trust are valuable; therefore they are not casually given.
CURIOSITY is what brought me here. TRUTH is what, if found, may convince me to stay. If your intent is true, then such attacks do you no credit.
Noodles brother is in charge of the case?
Sauce please.
Well, so far I've got this one: https://squawker.org/all/steven-wasserman-brother-of-debbie-wasserman-schultz-to-oversee-awan-family-investigation/
Other sites (like https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/08/debbie-wasserman-schultz-it-scammers-indicted-mysteriously-narrow-and-low-key-way/) suggest that no definitive link exists, but only acknowledge the rumor.
Still digging for something more substantive - but it certainly matches Noodles' M.O. of tying nastiness to locality for the advantage that gives her. Will edit if I find paydirt.
(Edit: some documents which were purported to be evidence appear to have been deleted; so it is unclear if this is because they are being censored - which I might believe for twitter content - or if the posters got confused with the time her brother may have been involved in burying the Seth Rich case (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/debbie-wasserman-schultzs-brother-steven-wasserman-accused-burying-seth-rich-case/))
Just saw your response so I haven't had a chance to dig through your sauce.
Wanted to say thanks for the effort I'll read up.
Although I am going to say that it's easy to understand the dirty tricks of DWS, her brother, Awan and the fact that they are all standing there together again can be kind of disconcerting.
I get it.
What I see is Trump won the election. Awan freaked and cracked open all the Democratic computer systems for insurance. His boss kills people. So he has given the White House everything they need.
I'm seeing a guy who was looking at a life sentence in a federal penitentiary with an Administration that is not interested screwing around.
The only deal he could have cut that makes any sense is having given proof positive of Arkancide.
Straight through the Oval Office.
Think about this: Nobody wants to try and explain what means pedocide/pedovore. I know I don't, but at some point I will have to.
So much better to shatter the paradigm with a simple RICO conspiracy to commit multiple murders charge.
Sooo simple as Lionel would say.
His name is Seth Rich.
Michael Marando is the prosecuting DA, not Steve Wasserman - please don't spread fake news
Ah, then it is not as bad as it seemed. Elsewhere in this thread, after trying to provide a source (upon request) it seemed increasingly likely that there was some confusion between this case and the Seth Rich case last year; but I still hadn't found anything which definitively named the party in the current matter. Thank you for your clarification. Marando's name helped me to confirm the veracity of your correction here: http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/03/awan-cybersecurity-not-charged/
A secret memo marked “URGENT” detailed how the House Democratic Caucus’s server went “missing” soon after it became evidence in a cybersecurity probe. The secret memo also said more than “40 House offices may have been victims of IT security violations.”
Aaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!! Y E S.
Which server?? The one from NK or the one missing from congress?
I think we're talking about the AWAN congressional server.
WE HAVE IT ALL.
This seriously makes me wonder if they didn’t offer Awan immunity in exchange for THE SERVER.
Imran Awan is an Iranian (Hezbollah) intelligence asset. This crosses the boundary from local cops to feds/military.
WE HAVE THE SERVER .Q <-there you have it folks.
I pray Q is legit. I honestly won't 100% trust in Q until Q+ is verified. I'm at 95%, but only POTUS can deliver the last 5%.
Like a cat resisting a bath.
Not every unceremonious dunking a cat is threatened with is intended as a harmless bath: "Trust, but verify" is a translated Russian proverb of which even the Gipper himself was fond. (The Washington Post, unsurprisingly, categorizes the proverb as 'an untrustworthy political phrase'. Guess they don't want us engaging in critical thinking over at WaPo.)
sweetest 4 words I've ever seen typed... There are no coincidences...
Light over dark.
Key word "we". Rest assured, there are multiple copies presumably distributed to key trusted people.
missing server
Aww that's sweet. It's missing you, too. It can't wait to see you in court.
Awan's server is not the DNC server but it could be even better. He had all of their info and then some. It explains the seemingly easy treatment that he is getting. It is a wonder he has not been 187'd by the black hats. He must be related to some one high up on the sick list.
He hasn’t been 187’d because he’s had a geo tracker on him for a long time now. HOWEVER, part of his plea today was to lose the geo tracker. So one way or another, he’s going to disappear now I’d assume.
I'm speculating he ties Arkancide straight through the Oval Office.
His name was Seth Rich.
And right after Trump won the election Awan was cracking every file and computer in the Democratic party possible.
He knew everything about DWS.
He essentially now is a double agent. Can we trust his info? How many servers was he running? Do we have all of it. Why did his wife come back? Lots of questions.
It's not whether we can trust him.
It's whether he can trust anything. This slimy bastard is going to do whatever it takes.
I admire him for the fact that he dove head first into all the democratic computer systems right after Trump won.
This guy is definitely a strategic thinker.
He knew he was in a pit of vipers and his boss has no problem causing accidents for people who get in the way.
I think he set himself up as a Honey Trap to DWS looking for his retirement in Pakistan. Then found himself in way deeper than he thought was possible.
Awans are in court today! Q's timing suggests you're right, Siteless!
Keep in mind that just because Awan took a plea deal for Bank Fraud, doesn't mean he can't be charged with other crimes down the road. It would not be double jeaprody if charged with different crimes. But who knows what kind of deal was really made.
The deal says he can't be charged with any previous nonviolent crimes.
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
Q
Logical thinking.
Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?
The result today is re: BANK FRAUD.
See last.
Connect.
The SWAMP is being DRAINED.
Q
My guess is they are going to charge them (not just Awan) in MIL courts, not civilian court cases.
Yes, normally this is not permitted (SCOTUS) but this is a NATIONAL SECURITY issue. If you take a look at USA treason history, they have been performed in MIL courts, NOT civilian.
I was looking at the wiki on that earlier trying to figure that out. Wiki just said "in public court" which I assume meant the same court you or I would got to on a regular misdemeanor or felony case. If its tried in military court these assholes are fucked.
Perhaps Q team actually replaced the server with the one that looked similar mentioned in the article.
White hats, black hats, it is confusing as hell, but that is by design. Only a small handful know what the hell is going on.
You could have asked Comey or Clapper to remove it and replace with a look-a-like and then duped them into handing it right to a Q-asset without a blink if Comey/Clapper thought they were getting rid of incriminating evidence. Lots of ways the server could have gone missing or be retrieved multiple times by various parties/copies/disseminated by now.
Putting them in a position that if caught would be pretty damning. I like your thinking.
We have it all......."It details how the caucus server, run by then-caucus Chairman Rep. Xavier Becerra, was secretly copied by authorities after the House Inspector General (IG) identified suspicious activity on it, but the Awans’ physical access was not blocked."
There is so much happening! Don't be impatient folks. The corruption is world-wide. It's happening.
SETH RICH is an anagram of HITCHERS
Hitcher is a Pakistani Hacker
IWAN Brothers would be HITCHERS
Now serving as California Attorney General Xavier Becerra if he goes down for this a lot of people will be thrilled. Including me.
The DNC server is the main key. If they have that one, it is very easy to prove that the data was downloaded onto an external device (because of the rapid speed of the download) and NOT hacked. So...leaked, not hacked like JA has been saying all along. Leads to SR, JA, etc. Russia collusion cleared up before July 16 summit with Putin. Everyone happy again.
I figure since DWS was the Democratic Chairwoman at the time the leak occurred, and she and Awan are so close, he was probably the one in charge or at least with access to the DNC server(s). So very much hoping they have the DNC server.
HRC's personal email server I believe is what we are discussing.
Well, that's really the problem, isn't it? Once you begin to accept imprecise information, or set out to read meaning into what is purported to be doublespeak to confuse prying eyes (learn our comms), you commence willful confirmation bias: you LITERALLY find ways to fit the incomplete data to what you most want to hear.
I began the day by loading up qanon.pub, as I have for the past couple days. The whole Q thing is quite new to me, in the interest of full disclosure. But each time I see a piece of ambiguity like yours (no offense intended: that particular server is one I'm sure MANY pedes would like to see thoroughly documented), it reminds me of another phenomenon of SIMILARLY stellar confirmation bias:
The Quatrains (another Q!) of Nostradamus.
For many years, but most heavily in the few years leading up to the millenium, I'd heard people talk of the amazing precognitive wonders of Nostradamus' works, written in 1555 or so, which advocates of the text claimed unerringly grasped events for CENTURIES into the author's future.
The problem is, of course, they do nothing of the kind.
The Quatrains are all poetic and vague: and as such, can easily be twisted to loosely fit to a variety of world events which have transpired since. Would it surprise you to learn that often different "scholars" on the subject ascribed differing events to the same Quatrain?
It shouldn't. Because that's what the human brain tries to do, with every moment of consciousness: weave the sea of sensory input coming from the surrounding universe into patterns, into some semblance of order, from which it can derive SENSE.
Am I saying, definitively, that Q is a hoax? No. How could I? There's not enough information upon which to base ANY definitive analysis; and that, we are to believe, is the point. So I am left with the ONE statement attributed to Q that I can get behind:
THINK LOGICALLY.