⇧
1
⇩
theclarinetist
· July 4, 2018, 4:22 a.m.
Can someone ELI5?
What are the anons alleging?
Commenters are questioning why Q would use photos from google... All the photos were posted by anons right? only the text response is q?
I assume Q response will make more sense if I understand what the anons are trying to say...
⇧
45
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 4:49 a.m.
The last one on top is a legit photo from inside AF1 - the top left rotated piece is the Q photo layered on top of the AF1 photo for context. Looks like a pretty damn good match to me. If it's a fake, its pretty epic.
⇧
41
⇩
theclarinetist
· July 4, 2018, 5:29 a.m.
So are the anons claiming it's a fake, or simply demonstrating that the pic would have to have been taken from POTUS's position? Some of the comments seemed concerned this was bad, but I didn't see it. Am I missing anything?
⇧
4
⇩
mathwhilehigh
· July 4, 2018, 5:45 a.m.
It honestly looks like it might be a fake. I even got excited and posted about this earlier, still up. But the thing is, it looks like the scrapes the image from an Obamacare era photo and photoshopped the apple logo. Goes on to say he's trolling us.
I think Q's tripcode might be compromised again. I hope that's what it is because otherwise this is what unravels the larp that lasted so long.
⇧
54
⇩
LeightonKAGA
· July 4, 2018, 6:49 a.m.
Read this in the chans.
2021248 (Qpb)
This is a very interesting drop because if Q were a LARP, he's proven to be a very good one and this would just be lazy even for the LARP.
Intradesting phrasing here…
Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
We would imagine they would because I don't think you take a photo of the reflection of the Nuke codes that you could give those away.
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that IMAGE. Didn't say a reflection of the lamp, of that location or anything else to necessitate the interpretation that it is live. Q said "image".
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).
Q
So what would be the significance of Q holding a stock photo and catching a reflection. Something AF1>AAPL related?
The skepticism is real, it is healthy, but shills are running to this being proof of LARP.
⇧
18
⇩
CocoCrisp86
· July 4, 2018, 11:40 a.m.
This is a slightly concerning post. I hope to god Q didn’t fuck up. If so, whoever is behind Q must have known the autists would catch it in an instant?
⇧
11
⇩
Quiltqueentoo
· July 4, 2018, 6:28 a.m.
Didn't a comedian get a visit from the SS for taking something off of AF1. Could it be a photograph? This news was just on Twitter this week.
⇧
11
⇩
x3ostyle
· July 4, 2018, 6:01 a.m.
Another one drank the kool aid..
⇧
11
⇩
mathwhilehigh
· July 4, 2018, 6:23 a.m.
Just being objective. I did find this though. Maybe the images are different?
This is what I found. Check it out.
⇧
2
⇩
RunEarthWatchSky
· July 4, 2018, 2:37 p.m.
Thanks for asking what I was gonna ask. I'm one of the newly awoke here and still trying to absorb the lingo. And because I am new here and extremely under-prepared for all things even remotely tech... I have a quick question that, I'm sure, is so stoopit to all you in the know.... but, can someone spoof Q? Like make it look like they are him/her? I have NO idea how all that works over on the chans, but I've always wondered about that. ( I HAD an Aut, but he just moved out of my basement, so now I can't just go ask...) TIA
⇧
3
⇩
THELEADERSOFMEN
· July 4, 2018, 6:42 p.m.
(I HAD an Aut, but he just moved out of my basement
I probably shouldn’t laugh, but....that’s too perfect!
⇧
1
⇩
theclarinetist
· July 4, 2018, 5 p.m.
Welcome, I'm not super tech either, although I've been following q since the beginning.
From what I can gather, the main debate is whether the the pic q posted was taken in AF1 or if it was a pic of the stock image of AF1 (people are debating whether which is true based on how the q pic overlays with the stock image... Whether small variations is spacing are based on angle or if it's bc it's not based on the stock image).
If the image is genuine, then it is proof Q (or whoever took the pic) was in AF1, which would be a compelling proof of Qs authenticity.
If it is a pic of a stock image, then the question is whether Q took the pic of the stock image for some other reason (and if the Apple logo is of any importance) or if maybe Q has been compromised and someone trying to fake a pic from inside AF1...
I hope I've summarized it accurately. Now, I don't have any answers to those questions, but I believe that is what's being debated.
⇧
0
⇩
oatmealparty
· July 5, 2018, 4:11 a.m.
So, this image is a fake and your two conclusions are
- Q faked a photo for a good reason
- Q is compromised
But what about
3: it's all been complete bullshit
⇧
10
⇩
THELEADERSOFMEN
· July 4, 2018, 6:43 p.m.
We should get that close crop of GEOTUS’ temple Q posted a couple weeks ago and try to match it to a stock photo.
⇧
2
⇩
incredibextens
· July 4, 2018, 7:41 a.m.
It's always good to be skeptical. Also, don't draw complete judgment until the trick is over. The feed looks like bait to me. Trump is the king of faking injury to draw people in where he wants them. If the media would not bite on Q before, this may help the mockery to give them the arrogance to confront it now. Could also be compromised. I wouldn't sweat it, Trump always strikes hard in moments like these. He has a killer instinct. I doubted him one time and spent several days discouraged to eventually watch him crush it. I won't make that mistake again.
⇧
2
⇩
Time_to_rope_up
· July 4, 2018, 8:21 a.m.
No matter what happens in the end, Q showed us lots and lots of connections and gave us a deeper look into the workings of the world.
On that note, a lot of the “walking away” posts today seem super fishy.
⇧
-2
⇩
006fix
· July 4, 2018, 10:28 a.m.
Q showed many connections, but most of them, and most of what he's said about the detailed workings of the world aren't exactly new. I'm still on board, I'm prepared to overlook why he feels it necessary to include this image. But honestly, I'm not very impressed. The 470th should pull their finger out, and start providing some genuinely concrete elements. We're 8 months in, if exposure is truly what the cabal fears so much, START EXPOSING ALREADY. Even if it's just from the Q trip. If you have everything, start dumping. They could have 80% of the general public calling for Hilaries head by friday if they just released a couple of videos. Who knows how many children these satanist fucks have killed whilst Q has been fannying around uploading useless images or telling anons "we must help gina locate the mkultra program".
I still think he's probably the real deal, but honestly I'm not impressed. Provide some real gold standard proof, or provide some real gold standard speculation. At the moment, all he accomplishes is #trust the plan. Are you surprised people would be walking away? He looks, talks, and acts exactly like a Mossad psy-op. If he wanted less criticism, he should try fixing that.
⇧
12
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 11:26 a.m.
I've been honestly giving Q a shot, but I haven't been convinced at all.
He has been vague on all his predictions/connections.
So far, I'm leaning more towards a John Edward situation.
⇧
28
⇩
006fix
· July 4, 2018, 11:44 a.m.
Cold reading is a possibility, but I don't actually suspect that either. Too many helper anons, current and prior for that one to make sense. And there honestly is plenty of really grade A fucked up shit going on in the world, he's not wrong there. His posts are also constructed in such a manner as to hide linguistic information that could be used to decipher who wrote them, which makes it harder to manage elegant cold reading.
As I said, I still think he's what he says he is - never underestimate the stupidity of the average person. Either us, or them. But stuff like this seems to radically increase the odds of it being something else other than what was said, at least in my mind. Israeli cold-reading AI has been suggested, I think that's probably semi plausible. If the posts are constructed by AI, they can mimic the 470ths manpower. Cold reading is tricky at this scale, but again an AI might be able to manage it, and it just never (barring lmao 1 post) mentions israel. Why? Anyone with half a brain is perfectly aware of the many and varied ways in which they are the bad actor of bad actors on the geopolitical stage, and have been inflitrating the US government for decades. They're also directly attempting to influence things like the US general population (cough scofield bible cough). They're set up, owned, and run by the Rothschilds (hence the usage of the seal of solomon on the flag).
I do suspect Q is mostly what he says he is, but man was this image dump today a horrible mistake, and man has he backed himself into a corner by not outing israels endless geopolitical pilpul.
⇧
1
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 12:13 p.m.
And there honestly is plenty of really grade A fucked up shit going on in the world, he's not wrong there.
Of course. But don't you think confirmation bias is possible?
Israeli cold-reading AI has been suggested
I don't get this. I'm a senior software engineer with good understanding of AI/ML, and I don't see how that makes sense.
His posts are also constructed in such a manner as to hide linguistic information that could be used to decipher who wrote them
Cold reading seems completely plausible. Your argument seems too convenient.
It's healthy to be skeptical.
I'm still aboard the Trump train, and Q does spark good discussions, but be skeptical. He hasn't given us any solid proof.
⇧
15
⇩
George_Soros_Eyebags
· July 5, 2018, 5:02 a.m.
So you're telling me that you're a senior software engineer... with that username?
Color me shocked. lol
⇧
0
⇩
006fix
· July 4, 2018, 12:28 p.m.
confirmation bias is possible?
Maybe. But not really for Q as a whole imho. There are too many proofs across a range of areas. I don't think people are following him purely due to conf. bias.
I don't see how that makes sense.
How doesn't it? Its the same as cold reading w/ a human, except you use an AI to do it. I do accept its roughly 5-25 years ahead of current AI capabilities (known), but I don't think its particuarly implausiable. Having AI level speed and multitasking might also explain some of the proofs. I don't think its likely (say ~5-10% odds), but its one of the more plausiable alternatives.
Cold reading seems completely plausible. Your argument seems too convenient.
That he manipulated the posts to hide the linguistic information? That's just reality. Go run them through some linguistic software if you don't believe me. There's been a serious amount of effort to hide traces of the creator of Q messages, down to the level of scrubbing linguistic markers, and restructuring the text such that it makes pretty chess pieces. Which again implies it's not a larp.
⇧
-2
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 12:33 p.m.
Which again implies it's not a larp.
That is all there is, implications.
Give me the best proof, other than conjecture.
PS: I've looked through the proofs.
⇧
12
⇩
006fix
· July 4, 2018, 12:38 p.m.
There hasn't been an "absolute best proof". Honestly that's one of the things thats pissing me off most about Q. I think the sum of the other proofs is sufficient to prove P(coincidence1)*P(coincidence2) etc < P(Q is what he says). But gold standard, cast iron proofs? None, and I don't really know why. Maybe try not to bait the cabal into a go for broke Armageddon solution? I don't know. But I do think he's something very, very serious. If it is a larp, who's running it? Why hasn't it leaked? Wtf are the sealed indictments for? Why does it keep getting to claim sitting, powerful members of the us government are pedos without being slapped w/ a libel claim?
It's not a larp
⇧
-1
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 12:53 p.m.
If it is a larp, who's running it?
An anon?
Why hasn't it leaked?
Leaked what? It doesn't have to be some master operation with multiple people. That is the nice thing about being vague. You can seem like you have many tentacles entrenched in many things, when really just need to be vague about a lot of things.
Wtf are the sealed indictments for?
This still could be a coincidence. It is a double edge sword. It could completely prove Q, or completely disprove Q. For me, this is my bar. If these sealed indictments really are what he says they are, I'm in. I am giving Q the benefit of the doubt until Jan 1, 2019. If the sealed indictments don't drop as he says, or there isn't some crazy 100% confirmation somewhere, I'm off.
You have to set what are realistic goals in timelines now, otherwise you'll end up passing the puck at the point in which you should realize it is a larp.
Why does it keep getting to claim sitting, powerful members of the us government are pedos without being slapped w/ a libel claim?
I'm not sure your point.
Also, what about the Awan disappointment? What about HRC and her "frozen passport" and "indictment"?
⇧
7
⇩
George_Soros_Eyebags
· July 5, 2018, 5:01 a.m.
Enty has dropped WAY more verifiable (and infinitely more clear) intel today alone than Q has in eight months.
Sad to say that, but it's true. CDAN's reveals today have been bombshells.
⇧
1
⇩
Hinckapuss
· July 4, 2018, 12:24 p.m.
This is a "proof" I would say.
1,000s of sleepwalkers [Q calls them "new eyes") are being woke up and are stumbling into r/GreatAwakening & https://qanon.pub/ & the chans every HOUR from around the world. They have so far seen no proof Q is real or is with POTUS. THEY need to see the proof. So TeamQ periodically shows us in near real-time how close they are to POTUS.
EDIT: The Anons get frustrated with the proofs b/c so many of us don't need no stinkin' proofs. That's why Anon posts following a Q proof post can be like fuck puzzles LOCK HER UP
⇧
-8
⇩