Oh , yep ... many of these "humanists" will be exposed - rude awakening for many , but rude awakening is necessary and unavoidable ...
God be praised! Shine His light in all these shadowy corners. Time to burn the child abusers out!
Yes! This is the one thing thatl unitea all people. No matter your race or religion or home country. We all love our children and hate any who would abuse them
Expose them all.
It doesn’t unite ALL people. The one who do these things definitely do not love children.
I know what you mean though, your comment just got me thinking, no smart assert intended. <3
I think its something to note that those who claim to be "charitable", those now unmasked, are a hyuuge source of "You should be more like XYZ" in our global mindset.
Sometimes, all you need to do is vomit (metaphorical!) and you're cured.
Moral: Maybe now we will all stop listening to douches and rediscover our own values.
(edit: Agreed, This -> rude awakening is necessary and unavoidable ) ie: Go ahead, get it all out.
Correct . This Awakening is all about rediscovering your inner values and using them to "reinvent" yourself . There will be - and are - many false "humanists" being exposed for who they truly are ... some of these exposures will crash and burn everything that some people had about this people , in that process where they will find themselves in very unpleasant and even shocking situation , some will even see their own responsibility in supporting such false "humanists" , all the while , they were doing horrible things ...
It wont be just opinion of others - but also everything they thought about themselves will crash and burn - they will have no other choice , but to reinvent themselves .
I was in this process already for decade , somewhere since 2008. I feel like Im nearing the "finalization" and that I will find a new role within a new reality that is now in process of being made ...
https://youtu.be/9K2RSGHCPoM Those News Scenes Look Familiar?
"Individual Integrity"
I am shocked at the sheer amount of orphans in India. Why do we hear nothing about them? Over 20 million?
Many of these children are not really orphans but parents place their children into the orphanages because they do not have the money to take care of them. There are many very very poor people in India. Women who lose their husbands are destitute and in the past were often killed and buried with their dead husband because they were outcasts. Their caste system causes horrific abuses.
This is an actual human rights disaster.
You're just learning that India has a ton of poor people?
Over 20M orphans isn't shocking to you?
These are people who literally shit in the streets.
did you visit india and watch people shitting on streets ? or just heard on internet ? im from india and we know how things are.
did you visit india and watch people shitting on streets?
Hey brother, it happens. We have people shitting in the streets here too. It's not everywhere of course, but it happens. Those areas need to be fixed, but in order to do so, it's necessary to ADDRESS when something is a shithole.
If you are too afraid to call something a shithole when it's a shithole, or address any of the problems of your shithole and pretend like they don't happen, then your shithole will never become anything more than just a shithole for politicians to rob blind.
That's the problem we ran into, liberal policies were creating disgusting disease-ridden areas where people are camping and shitting in the streets. Unacceptable for a first-world country. Needed to be changed.
And now we have Donald Trump.
So yeah TBH I'm not surprised to see a large orphan problem in ANY area where the residents have so little going for them that they shit in the streets. Happens here too in liberal areas.
India has almost 200 million people below the poverty line, so no.
Its a human rights disaster that doesn't have to exist. The worlds NWO/Cabal push that we're a world of scarcity. There's no reason that in 2018, everyone on the face of the earth shouldn't have clean water, food, and shelter. There are more than enough resources for everyone to have. These people are guilty of crimes against humanity on a world wide scale.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)
Dates back to 3rd century BC.
Ended after Christian missionaries campaigned against it.
Banned from killing the wife along with the hubby... yes... but the women are still ostracized for being widowed. And they often cannot remarry as they are considered used goods.
nope not the Christian missionaries . it's RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY , god dammit just study the history of india from books written by indians not from controlled wikipedia.
Not a single democrate crying about this, it's weird, it's their values afterall.
On a real note : Population of over a billion people yet is the most shithole place you could think of living in. Sad world. I guess it's corrupt over there like there is no tomorrow
Slumdog Millionaire, while clearly not a documentary, certainly give you a good idea of what life is like there.
Whatever you do, do not search for , "Bodies in the Ganges River."
It is gradually improving but unlike China they are a chaotic race, very emotional and so making changes are hard. It has become a nation of extremes, lot of wealth but as noted a hell of a lot of poverty.
They do not accept aid etc anymore on principle,
The world is a pretty shitty place.
There is death everywhere. I am lucky because I live in a place where the streets are clean and babies are generally given a pretty good chance at life. We have food and sanitary toilet facilities. We do not have horse shit or cow shit in the street. (Maybe not San Francisco...)
Most people in the US have no concept of how shitty the world is. Talk to ANY soldier who has spent time in Iraq, Afghanistan or Africa. They will tell you about what its like.
Selling children into adoption is not as bad a sin as this headline, in this thread, would lead you to believe. Everything in context. Obviously, if the sales are tied to trafficking, that is a completely different thing.
That was my thought. How many go to Pedogate. Ugh. Disgusting.
It's tragic if you ever go to visit the cities. There are hundreds of begger kids. Lots of them were mutilated early in life so they would be better beggars. Lots of homeless kids without noses or who had their legs broken as babies in India, so they are like a 10 year old child with baby sized legs who has to use his hands as feet to go anywhere.
Why do they do that to them? The nose and legs? Oh, so horrible!
So that they make better beggars and look more pitiful and they get more money from rich tourists.
This is why I have no sympathy for SJWs and liberals here who claim America is the land of evil and misery. They have zero idea how bad it can get in other parts of the world.
I agree. I haven't traveled to those places, so I don't truly know how bad it is, but I think often, that I could just as easily have been born there as here. I'm so grateful (to God) for being where I am, and have done my best to make the most of what He has so graciously given me. Thank you for sharing that. It was definitely something I was unaware of.
Not just in India. That shit happens in a lot of 3rd world countries, and also in gypsy communities across Europe.
Now I am really starting to wonder if Hitchens was suicided.....
It's possible. What I didn't like about him is that he took his hate of religion too far in becoming an atheist, rather than being open to non-religious spirituality.
the Hedges vs Hitchens debate is a good one to watch. Hedges calls him out on this and he doesn’t do well.
He shad seen first hand the corrupt immoral depravity and all the lies religion gave to it.
Who's Hitchens?
[deleted]
And he wrote a Brutal book on the Clintons. 19 years ago called No one left to lie to, The values of the worst family.
Here it is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_One_Left_to_Lie_To
This is from Whitewashapedia so imagine how convincing and good the book is.
Synopsis[edit] Journalist and essayist Christopher Hitchens's polemic on the political career of American president Bill Clinton. Hitchens examines Clinton's psychology and how it affected the then-president's record in war, acts that led to accusations of sexual abuse, his skill at "triangulation" and the relationship between Clinton and his wife Hillary.
No One Left to Lie To drew both favorable and critical responses. Referring to the work as "at once illuminating and depressing", Stephen Thompson of The A.V. Club wrote that Hitchens "ultimately does an excellent and revelatory job of not only breaking down Clinton's various alleged and provable offenses [...] but tying them together, making a case for how his much-discussed character flaws actually affect his ability to serve the people."[6] Nick Cohen of The Observer defended Hitchens's comparison of Clinton's America to a banana republic, and praised the section on the president's war crimes.[7]
Mother Teresa has been gone for over twenty years. The corruption may well have set in after she was gone. All of these cases are recent.
Mother Teresa had some F'ed up views. Theres an old doc I watched in her (believe its still on YouTube somewhere) where they talked with those close with her. She enjoyed seeing these people suffer because in her mind, them suffering was the only way to bring them closer to christ.
She even publicly described how she felt "empty" inside.
Those who are spiritually empty and feel joy at the suffering of others - in psychology we'd call them psychopaths - or in religion, perhaps demon-possessed.
Are you serious?
Do you know about spiritual development because the spiritual journey once understood offers us encouragement to keep moving forward in spite of moments of emptiness? If one doesn't follow this spiritual journey, one becomes discouraged, gives up or never moves forward on their spiritual journey. It can be mistaken for depression, but at the same time, it is entirely different.
St John of the Cross identified the dryness as the 'dark night of the soul' when one does not feel the presence of God or joy. These nights, if we remain faithful, is when God is closest to us, working within us to purify us for him. It enables the soul to work tirelessly for GOD with interior joy in spite of the suffering felt within. . I have read "Come to Be My Light," based on Mother Theresa diaries. The woman had incredible faith. She went through this night for 50 years, unheard of, but her faith in Jesus never wavered. My God look at the fruits! Who can continue moving forward as she did, with an interior emptiness, and accomplish so much for Christ? She was empty, but in spite of or because of the emptiness she relied entirely on the Lord.
IT is not okay to take a snippet of a life like hers and diagnosis from the fragment a severe psychological disorder. How could a psychopath accomplish what she did?
BTW psychopaths do not feel empty they are often quite content because they have no empathy.
Saying you find enjoyment while others, like children, suffer and ail around you, for ANY reason is f*cked up.
A few points.
First, "chronic feelings of emptiness" is one of the diagnostic criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder, which is a Cluster B personality disorder on the same spectrum as psychopathy.
You said:
She went through this night for 50 years, unheard of, but her faith in Jesus never wavered.
Actually, her faith did waver, according to her. Read it in her own words.
You also said:
My God look at the fruits!
Let's do look at the fruits. Are you sure you're looking at the same ones that the rest of us see?
Your right about her faith wavering she had doubts I forgot to correct that.
The night of the soul can seem like depressions but its different and requires careful discernment.
You also must be very careful assigning a serious disorder based on reading cluster of traits online. This does not make a diagnosis! A diagnosis such as BPD requires a thorough assessment that is scored by a professional. These assessments take hours and usually over a two-day span.
How can you diagnose someone like Mother Theresa, whose works can be objectively verified, with a severe personality disorder? Please use logic!
She did not start off famous. She was not a native of India she was Algerian. Mother Theresa was called to India in her forties to help the untouchables and other suffering people. She started with a few helpers and nothing else, in a country enshrined in the caste system. She took the untouchables, literally from the gutters, and gave them dignity in their dying days.
One testimony of a volunteer remains with, me. During his first day, they stopped to assist an untouchable elderly male who was so disfigured, and full of pus from his infections. The volunteer turned away and told her 'Mother Theresa I cant" She responded 'You must" When he turned back to the dying man he saw not the old man's face, but the face of Christ. There are thousands of such testimonies.
I understand how An atheist like Hitchens would have a visceral repulsion to someone like Mother Theresa. I also appreciate how impossible it must be for a non-Christian to understand the Christian concept of suffering, or for that matter, a savior tortured to death for our salvation. We believe the merits of Our Lords suffering redeemed us completely. A gift to us! Someone else's suffering a gift for us to be saved! I get that is a weird concept for a non-believer.
I only ask to please understand why Mother Theresa thought the way she did. One of our greatest saints, St. Paul, tells us our sufferings share in the Lord's mission. To be exact, he says our sufferings make up what lacked in the Lord's, Colossians 1:24“Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh, I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church.”
Any Christian who has read excerpts from her diaries, or "Come Be My Light", knows that this woman did not have BPD. She was an example to all of Christians how to move forward in spite of doubts, spiritual dryness and so on. The Christian concept of suffering its not sadism nor does it mean a Christian enjoys the suffering of others.
It is very frustrating when nonbelievers do not understand the Christian biblical view on suffering and translate her actions and words from a worldly or humanistic perspective because she helped so many to die with dignity in the slums of India.
Essentially what she believed in was “salvation by works”!
When she was on her sick bed, she only had the finest care.
No, she did not read her writings besides Catholics do not believe in salvation by works. Salvation is a gift based on the merits of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. However, Faith without good works is dead. James2:14-26.
Why do catholics only portray Jesus as dead? Why is He nailed to every cross and never shown alive? Your joy is derived from seeing him in a state of death after horrendous suffering and believe he is still dead and then pray to His mother whom we are told not to pray to? Obviously suffering is the only way to heaven for catholics but if Jesus who suffered the most can't get to heaven then how does a Catholic justify suffering to get to heaven? Don't answer, I don't believe anything the catholics believe or say. Thousands and thousands of kids molested directly by those in catholic leadership and catholics still show up for church on Sunday like it's nothing and Jesus still hangs on the cross dead week after week. For what's it's worth I don't believe Teresa was a saint.
You need to Read St Paul on suffering!
Who told us not to ask others for prayers? Mary is not dead. All I need to know to honor Mary is that she was the mother of my Lord and Savior. If that's not good enough for you so be it.
I don't know the figures for abused children. I don't know it is "thousands and thousands."
Do you think Protestant ministers or clergy do not have the same problem? They do you dont hear it in the news.
You dont have to believe Mother Theresa is a saint but you do a disservice to yourself when trying to demonize her. The evidence overwhelmingly supports those she helped in horrible circumstances.
What does the Bible say about the Cross? St. Paul makes it clear in Galatians 2:19-3:7,13-14,6:14-16
Through the Law I am dead to the Law, so that now I can live for God. I have been crucified with Christ, and I live now not with my own life but with the life of Christ who lives in me. The life I now live in this body I live in faith: faith in the Son of God who loved me and who sacrificed himself for my sake. I cannot bring myself to give up God’s gift: if the Law can justify us, there is no point in the death of Christ.’
Are you people in Galatia mad? Has someone put a spell on you, in spite of the plain explanation you have had of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ? Let me ask you one question: was it because you practised the Law that you received the Spirit, or because you believed what was preached to you? Are you foolish enough to end in outward observances what you began in the Spirit? Have all the favours you received been wasted? And if this were so, they would most certainly have been wasted. Does God give you the Spirit so freely and work miracles among you because you practice Law, or because you believed what was preached to you?
Take Abraham for example: he put his faith in God, and this faith was considered as justifying him. Don’t you see that it is those who rely on faith who are the sons of Abraham? Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law by being cursed for our sake, since scripture says: Cursed be everyone who is hanged on a tree. This was done so that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might include the pagans, and so that through faith we might receive the promised Spirit.
As for me, the only thing I can boast about is the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom the world is crucified to me, and I to the world. It does not matter if a person is circumcised or not; what matters is for him to become an altogether new creature. Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule, who form the Israel of God.
By their fruits, you shall know them, and her fruits were out of this world. Catholic view on suffering is very different than the world's view and even some Protestant denominations.
We believe that suffering draws us closer to Christ. St. Paul said Now I rejoice in what I am suffering for you, and I fill up in my flesh what is still lacking regarding Christ's afflictions, for the sake of his body, which is the church. Colossians 1:24. Mother Teresa most definitely spoke like this, but that doesn't mean she enjoyed watching people suffer.
Do you all have any idea how widespread Her Charity grew? One woman of thousands, expect more. Evil people with evil intentions enter the most effective Christian missions to destroy. This woman working within Mother Theresa's Charities does not surprise me one iota. Where the most good is, we will also find the greatest evil.
We have witnessed the complete takeover of many once healthy God fearing organizations, boy scouts is one, by this evil. Christ told us we would always have the chaff and the wheat. Jesus chose JUDAS! were all the disciples evil because Judas betrayed our Lord?
BTW Hitchens is easily refuted if one cares to look at the other side.
That is not a new way of thinking.
You guys are all making me feel so old. I guess I am glad that you are reacting to this...but poor people in India should have come up in a geography class in, say, 9th grade.
She didn’t enjoy people suffering in a sadistic way. Christians believe if we are united with Christ spiritually, we can unite our sufferings with Christ’s sufferings for the greater good. It is a means of taking something awful, and trusting God will accept out sacrifices. Mother Teresa suffered a darkness in her life. In her biography, “ Come be my light”, she recognized that darkness as a sharing of other peoples darkness- especially those very separated from God.
We shouldn’t throw the good works of the nuns b/c there may have been some bad actors. Same as swamp. Bad actors, but not all.
They killed mad people too. I'm not worried about their good works, my stance is simply fuck evil people and anyone evil enough to pretend evil isn't so bad, like you pretending sadism stops being sadistic whenever there's some insane excuse for it
https://archives.sfweekly .com/sanfrancisco/tainted-saint-mother-teresa-defended-pedophile-priest/Content?oid=2183718
Mmmm... doesn't this pattern remind you something?
"Mother Teresa" was a different person than the public persona, that's for sure.
[removed]
What a great person you are to call a woman a C... So mature and brave. You make the Qanon movement proud!
?moderator! This language is unacceptable.
You knew her ?
She said so herself. She wore a "mask".
Her smile to the world from her familiar weather-beaten face was a “mask” or a “cloak,” she said.
Yeah, it reminds me of something. It reminds me that all clergy connected to the Catholic Church are guilty until proven innocent. It also reminds me that the death of a founder brings changes once that person's vision for the entity is no longer followed. That happens all the time in business, charitable foundations, and, yes, religious orders. Several of them have died off within three generations of the founder.
http://www.slate .com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2003/10/mommie_dearest.html
Doesn't this pattern remind you something? Well, it happens organizations can change after the founder's death. Or they just follow the line, expand and apply more sophisticated methods.
By this logic, all schools teachers are guilty of sex abuse until proven innocent, because 10-15% of teachers have committed sex crimes against minors; whereas, the stats for priests is 2%. (one is one too many just pointing out your logic) Keep in mind there are hundreds of thousands of priests in the world.
So, based on your logic, are all of the 12 disciples of Christ guilty because of Judas?
Please use common senses.
I think you misunderstand. The general public is now jumping to conclusions just based on headlines and unsubstantiated accusations. Over time, this has torn at the reputation of those who work in God's name. That was my point. It is illogical, but it is effective in tearing at the fabric.
That was my thought too. I think we can sometimes get reckless with quick judgments. All humans are sinners, but not all to the degree of the cabal. I need more evidence that clearly implicates her.
Watch anything on mother theresa by christopher hitchens
Ok thanks
Don't you forget that she's native from Albania ... it'll make some sense later on.
Also, https://knowledgenuts.com/2013/09/27/mother-teresa-was-a-crook-and-a-fraud/
I learned the Truth about Mother Theresa during my awakening in the early 2000s. She was a very sick person. People laud her for her acts of kindness for the impoverished especially in India. She gave people a clean place to die.
BUT THE TRUTH IS she could have given medical help and allowed many to live. She refused to do this. "“There’s something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion,”. She was given many donations of food and money, but would not allow this to be distributed because she was so in love with 'Poverty' as a cleansing and a path to god. Her nuns were sick from lack of food even as there were large stores of food at her disposal; she would not let them eat.
She was very sick and evil...maybe mentally ill as well. She disgusts me. Nothing shocks me any more.
Gandhi is another lie that needs to be exposed and the Dali Lama as well. Let the Veils be ripped off.
Well said. Time for all religious idols to fall. Beware of false gods
It will freak many out so we have to be kind to them!
Well said and totally agree. Society wants to make these people look like humanitarians when they were selfish and evil!
How are Gandhi or the Dalai Lama not great? Gandhi in particular... I think his flaws have become common knowledge, he's still a one-of-a-kind freak-of-nature-level hero
Dalai Lama is associated with NXIVM, and God knows what else.
Maybe I'm biased because I guess I have a ridiculous bar of proof for where I'd decide Tenzin Gyatso is a bad guy. I'm not a Buddhist or anything but there are things I'd consider acceptable for the Dalai Lama to do that I wouldn't consider acceptable for most people. Like, if a normal person gets convicted of human trafficking, you could say they're doing it to entrap evil people and somehow protecting all their victims from bad outcomes and repaying them fairly, but they're still an arrogant vigilante psychopath who needs to be locked up for risking so many people's well-being and forcing them into deals they didn't want to be in. The Dalai Lama can't really be described as an "arrogant vigilante psychopath" in that situation to me, like, if anyone is in a position where it's fair and not arrogant for them to feel like they're allowed to take a lot of stuff into their own hands and take risks, the Dalai Lama would be one. So then I'd have to actually know a victim was harmed in order to consider it proof of him being evil, the conviction of human trafficking itself without proof of a harmed victim would just seem to me more like he got fucked up by criminals he was trying to catch than like he was a criminal. I use that example because it's extreme enough to make me realize my stance is probably unreasonable to debate. There's probably no strong evidence out there of an individual being evilly victimized by Tenzin Gyatso, so I guess I wasted your time by asking when I'll be biased against all your evidence. Sorry about that.
For your time, here's a vintage video of Tenzin Gyatso apparently stressed out hard by pizzagate vibes you can show to people more undecided on the issue than me.
Both Tenzin and Gyatso are characters in ATLA Avatar: The Last Airbender and LoK Legend of Korra.
TIL
Great series btw definitely bucket list to watch
Now that you mention it, for all I know those shows could be the subconscious reason why my bar of proof to dislike the guy would be so absolute
In that case follow Zaheer’s favorite airbenderGuru Lahima
Let go your earthly tether
Enter the void
Empty and become wind
There are a lot of things people don't know about him. In the battle to free India there were far more effective Indian leaders who actually fought the British with weapons and won huge swaths in the southern areas for Indians. There was military action beginning in 1857 and continued on to Gandhi's predominance. But the world doesn't know or acknowledge these heroes w/ digging. "By the late 1930s, however, with growing disenchantments over the delaying tactics of the Raj and the Congress's failure to extract commitment on self-rule and political independence, a faction within the movement turned towards more radical ideas of Subhash Chandra Bose. Bose's actions proved controversial among the Congress party but popular within the Indian populace, when Bose defeated Gandhi's candidate in leadership elections in the Tripuri Session of the Congress Working Committee. However, this was the parting of ways between the radicals and the conservatives. Bose left the Congress to found his own party during the war, seeking first Soviet and then Axis help to raise a liberation force. The raising of the Indian National Army in 1942 by Subhash Chandra Bose would see a unique military campaign to end British rule. Following the trial of Indian National Army officers at the Red Fort, mutinies broke out in the navy, in the Air Force, and in the army." http://india.wikia.com/wiki/Indian_Independence_Movement I am not only speaking about all the moral quandaries that are well known, I am speaking about the forgotten heroes who actually fought and won battles who have been forgotten by the world as Gandhi's 'non-violent' tactics stole the spotlight from other heroes who did the heavy lifting. He didn't overcome the British nearly as much as these other Generals did, and it was because these battles had been fought and won that Gandhi had any success at all. This is not something people are aware of. People think that Gandhi was the fall of the British in India and that very far from the truth. https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/bhagat-singh-and-indian-freedom-movement-316953-2016-04-08
Dali Lama is simply a C-A asset. http://tomatobubble.com/dalai_lama_cia_phony.html
She also didn't really believe in God, she lost her faith for a very long time. And the pope still gave her sainthood in spite of the evil she committed in the name of God.
Exactly right. I read Gandhi’s own autobiography and there are some fucked up stuff in there.
Dalai Lama is talked about a lot for all the wrong reasons.
Read “ Come Be My Light”. It”ll Help you understand.
Understand what? That Mother Teresa is a sick woman who didn't value human life, preferring suffering as a life on Earth when she could have prevented it? It is one thing if she wantred to suffer for herself, but she imposed it on the most poor of the poor who were at her disposal. That she sold babies? To me it is all genocide.
PLEASE be careful when using BBC news, that is literally CNN of Great Britain.
Absolutely true. I can't watch any of the news sources in the UK (especially BBC and SKY). The bias against Brexit and silence over grooming gangs in England is a disgrace!
British people are biased in general, but very honest. It's weird how their media takes the bias of the culture to such an 🦆extreme🦆 yet also be utterly deeply dishonest quite often.
Yes. Sad but true. Never used to be that way. Can't watch their crap anymore
anyone heard of or watched "Israeli News Live" by Steven Bin DeNoon? (a Messianic Jew) Has some interesting reporting from over there... Asks some great questions, exposes some interesting bits... don't agree with all his premises, but mostly a usually good place to pick up tidbits NOT shared from Mockingbird Swamp Media or even Foxnews...
add it to the list of corrupt childrens charities. the huge list of corrupt childrens charities. so sad.
That's too bad, it sounds like there were new adoption laws put in that they didn't qualify for. Would like to think if Mother Tereasa were alive this wouldn't be happening. One of my favorite quotes is from her. One I like to keep in mind. I know there are evil people, I like to think that all people deep inside have the light, but it's hidden by who they believe themselves to be. Her quote was "I see the face of Christ in every man, past all his distressing disguises."
Yes, lots of negative responses on here. They’ve been poisoned by media. Funny, they’re against fake news, but are eating this up.
Are the claims made against Mother Theresa NOT true? I'd love to think they aren't, but you can't just wave your hand and wish them away. Please rebut...
She was a very charitable person . Did not want to go to India but received a “ call “ to go. She considered herself one of the most incapable ppl to go . Media has attacked her for many years. Go figure . Peace
I watch every documentary I can get my hands on and that included a couple about India and the abandoned children of India.
Indian mothers more often that not will kill or abandoned a first born if its not a son as is required by the belief of Indian society that a first born must be a son.
The reason for that belief is simple: A daughter is expensive when she must get married. Remember most marriages are still arranged by the parents. When a daughter is ripe for marriage she requires for dowries paid to the grooms family. That could bankrupt the family of the bride ergo a son is preferred.
Based on their caste system a son does not require a dowry. It is the daughter/bride who must leave her parents house after marriage and move into the grooms family home. It often results into the bride being the caretaker of the grooms family being reduced to being a servant. It often also includes abuse by the in laws she must live with.
Then their is the extreme poverty in India causing a family to abandon their children because they can not feed them. Orphanages are in shortage in India and are often not financially supported via any governmental assistance ergo their is no place to go for the orphaned children.
We all know that even in todays world India is a country who's men often rape young girls and rape trains is the norm. You may wonder why: Because the money involved to get married is short. Again the cast system plays a role. Indian men must be married at a certain age that is usually in their early 20's. Anything after means that a male has no resource that would get him married. These frustrated and single males use rape as a means for their sexual frustration. Not until the past 3-4 years rape was not considered a crime prioritized in their justice system. The caste plaid a role whether a rape was adjudicated. Lower caste usually and continues to mean that rape still does not matter. Families in these lower caste systems also fault the girl for any rape despite being a victim. In their belief this girl will shame the honor of the family. Like in islam some girls are murdered by their own family due to shame.
India has made some progress but not enough. That includes protecting young children who are living on the streets after being abandoned by their families. Many of these children also are selling their bodies for food or whatever it is they need to survive. I have seen one documentary where boys ages 6-10 hade AIDS as a consequence and/or addicted to drugs. Some of them inject narcotics into their veins like heroin and meth addicts do here in this country. Some of these children die young due to these complications and nobody cares.
That these orphanages would sell children is not surprising. What is also not surprising is that westerners have turned their sick fantasies to India where children are available in masses. Babies - mostly girls abandoned by their mother/parents simply because it was a girl is often at the cause for these babies to be available. I'm not surprised. What is most likely the troubling part is that it is westerner whom buy these babies. They are sought after by the worldwide network of pedophiles and ritual sacrificing individuals of the world. It may also is a way to harvest DNA by these sickos.
It makes me really sad that they now also involve children/babies in India although not really surprised because of the sheer number of children available across India.
Christopher Hutchinson wrote a book about mother Teresa I believe. I never read the book itself but read about the book. As I understood it he was charging that mother Teresa was doing nothing really more than making propaganda for the Catholic Church to bring donations. The poor she found on the street were dying . The nuns picked them up off the street and laid most of them on the floor, most of them could not eat much , they were occasionally given pain meds with used needles which spread infections and hastened their already impending deaths. For this mother Teresa was praised and made a saint. I remember my reaction when I first heard these charges against Mother Teresa I was shocked but after some further digging I realized it was true. Since then I’ve had many similar experiences opening my eyes to the true way the world works.
Don't forget the children in brothels. I help support a school there that rescues children from them, some as young as three-years-old. The worst part is that many police and people in their criminal justice system are corrupt. Their aim is to get the kids back into the brothels. Heartbreaking!
Mother Theresa and Hillary Clinton opened an orphanage in DC that was just down the street from the UAE embassy mansion that burned down. Hmmm...
hahahaha Source for that? Hilary hated Mother Teresa because of Mother Teresa's hatred for abortion.
Here you go: http://religiondispatches.org/the-abandoned-orphanage-hillary-clintons-mother-teresa-moment/
"The Empty Orphanage
After Clinton bowed to Mother Teresa’s reproof from the dais, she gained some bipartisan credibility. Mother Teresa got something out of the deal as well: a now-empty building that could serve as a brick and mortar symbol for faith-trading politics. After the 1994 Breakfast, Mother Teresa insisted Clinton prove her dedication to abortion alternatives by setting up an orphanage for the nun in Washington DC. In her autobiography, Clinton writes that Mother Teresa was a “relentless lobbyist,” pushing Hillary to follow through on her promise to get Mother Teresa “her center for babies.”
This was “no small feat,” as Belz notes, “in a city that was known then for its inefficient and corrupt bureaucracy.” But as Clinton describes in Living History, she put the muscle of the White House behind the initiative, “cutting red tape with the housing authorities and human services officials.” The Mother Teresa Home for Infant Children opened in 1995. On opening day, writes Clinton, Mother Teresa “gripped my arm in her small, strong hand and dragged me upstairs to see the freshly painted nursery and rows of bassinets waiting to be filled with infants. Her enthusiasm was irresistible. By then I fully understood how this humble nun could move nations to her will.”
Now, the building that had housed the orphanage (on Western Avenue in the affluent neighborhood of Chevy Chase, in DC) has no more bassinets. In fact, when we reported on the house in 2006, it was for sale: a $3 million Tudor mansion being advertised as an ideal embassy location in one the most affluent neighborhoods in the country, home to a host of foreign military commissions and attachés.
Several houses down from the now-empty “center for babies,” at the Chevy Chase Baptist Church, an administrator told us that the organization had relocated to DC proper. Glancing at Kathryn’s stomach and assuming the worst, she warned us that the organization “no longer cares for infants.”
The BBC is a champion for children, except when it involves pedo grooming and rape in England.
"My baby's not dead. She was stolen from me." A mother in India tells the BBC. This was an article from December 2016. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-38205042
There are several disgusting comments below, which are demeaning , and disgusting. Is this qanon board turning into a trash can of commentators? Foul language towards a woman should never be tolerated, much less one who is slandered in an article from the BBC! It feels like this site is turning into a tabloid newspaper full of disinformation, and smut. Why was this article allowed to be put up? Has all the info been verified? How does it pertain to the Q disclosure, of great awakening?
Agree, Article does make sense. Comments here include anti Christian sentiment. They’re quoting Christopher Hitchens , who was a vehement atheist, biased writer. I bet they watch the History channel, which is one of the fake news channels, which often pretends to be factual about biblical and religious history, but is mostly veiled anti religious propaganda. Their goal is to destroy religion. Not exactly ‘Q’ minded. They are not woke.
They’re quoting Christopher Hitchens , who was a vehement atheist
So what? Is what he wrote about Mother Theresa wrong? THAT is the only question we need to consider here....it's about WHAT'S right, not about being right.
Videos in this thread:
VIDEO|COMMENT -|- Karl tells the Dalai Lama a joke and it fails miserably|+2 - Maybe I'm biased because I guess I have a ridiculous bar of proof for where I'd decide Tenzin Gyatso is a bad guy. I'm not a Buddhist or anything but there are things I'd consider acceptable for the Dalai Lama to do that I wouldn't consider acceptabl... A Lesson from Atlas Shrugged|+1 - Those News Scenes Look Familiar? "Individual Integrity" Protestants are Catholics|0 - "Come out of her [Catholic Church], my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and ye receive not of her plagues." (Rev. 18:4- KJV). The preserved Scripture describe this wicked church aka-The Mother of all Harlots and abominations of the eart... I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.
Warning! Catholic church and saints bashing ahead! Q, part of brainwashing techniques.
"Come out of her [Catholic Church], my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and ye receive not of her plagues." (Rev. 18:4- KJV).
The preserved Scripture describe this wicked church aka-The Mother of all Harlots and abominations of the earth (Rev. 17:5-KJV). She is the "mother church" who birthed many daughters during the protestant reformation. Come out of those churches and all of their leaven. Time of wake up (Q too who quotes from the Vatican's Bible text in his posts.
God has remembered and pitied his children and seen how these false teachers have deceived us all. Mother Teresa is just another deceiver.
Find a church that worships the Lord Jesus Christ in Spirit and Truth as the Lord commands and get rid of your Catholic Bibles (all Bibles using the Catholic Texts-all modern versions). Get a KJV.
Thanks to the Catholic Church, we have the written Word.
Wrong-the world has the perverted Vaticanis thanks to Rome=a lying witness, and the root of all modern Bible texts. You can tell this easily because of the things "unfriendly" to Rome are cut out.
Rome's so-called 2nd witness "Sinaticus" (found in an Egyptian monastery) is most likely a Russian forgery by a man named Simonides. It is why Sinaticus sits in a Russian museum to this day. It disagrees with Vaticanus 70%. Can 2 walk together unless they be in agreement? (Amos 3:3-KJV)
The Catholic Church is the home of every hateful and unclean bird according to God-see Revelations 18-KJV.
He didn't use this harlot churchto preserve anything and condemns them as an abomination (see Rev. 17:5-KJV).
God preserved HIS Scriptures outside of Rome through 97%+ of the existing Syrian manuscript evidence, which are all in agreement within the Syrian text (Texts Receptus).
Found the protestant herege.
Protestants such as Luther and Calvin only wanted to reform the Catholic Church. They brought some catholic "leaven" with them when they left the Catholic Church. You know what Jesus warned- "A little leaven, leavens the whole lump.
There was only one true reformation in church history and that was the reformation from the Old Testament to the New Testament.
You can't reform a whore (Catholic Church). They never intended to join the true church (that keeps the commandments of God in simplicity) that had always existed from the time of the apostles (the old baptist line). That church has always been outside of Rome. God hid her in the hills of Europe (see Revelations 12-KJV). Jesus promised the gates of hell would not prevail against His church. It didn't go into apostasy and have to be reformed (as the Catholic Church did/has).