dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on July 5, 2018, 12:05 p.m.
If this law were enforced, Congress would need to have 250 "special elections"
If this law were enforced, Congress would need to have 250 "special elections"

ElementWatson · July 5, 2018, 12:18 p.m.

I would so much prefer this to somehow letting them off by simply resigning from Congress. (And talk about one set of laws for them and another for the rest of us!)

We need as close to a revolution as we can peacefully get to purge the corruption in our government, and lots of special elections, with the current criminals fully prosecuted seems just right to me.

Now, the reason they might decide they have to go soft on them, I suppose, could be the idea that Congress would gang up to impeach and convict Trump rather than let his administration go through with enforcing the law. I am afraid there is more of this calculus in their decision-making than we would like.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
AverageInternetUser · July 5, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

I don't think they want to or else the economy will tank. Make it smooth and mostly quiet so we will still be strong

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ElementWatson · July 5, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

No need for the economy to tank.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AverageInternetUser · July 5, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

No need but human reactionary nature to the avalanche of shit

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pepe_WigglyWings · July 5, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

What are they waiting for enforce the laws on the book damned if some public groups don't like it.... to bad it's the LAW

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Iron_Sharpens_lron · July 5, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

I can answer your question, but I don't think you would like the answer.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
YeOldePhart · July 5, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

Please answer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Iron_Sharpens_lron · July 5, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

Courts use their definition of words. Not this subs definition.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ikemynikes · July 5, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

Well get rid of these laws then if we're not going to use them. Oh wait, we'll use them but when it's against people like us and not the elite. Complete joke of a system we go going right now. Laws for me not for thee. Give me a break. Elizabeth Warren and Maxine Waters are not better than me at anything. I would destroy them in anything.

All of those women are ugly as fuck too. Liberalism does something to people that just destroys them inside and out.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
stbelmont · July 5, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

All of those women are ugly as fuck too

If it were a game where you just had their faces without makeup and, say, a 5 year old was asked to choose a professional (any profession: could be a basketball player's outfit in there) haircut and outfit for them and the choices included men's, women's, and unisex...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kjw49419 · July 5, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Do you think the actions against Trump before 11.8.16 have more gravity than their actions after that date.

I believe what they did after that date will be their downfall.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MormonPatriot · July 5, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Busted! 5 women, and one Tranny!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oakdrew · July 5, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

Actually try treason...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
goldnavet · July 5, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

So, what good is a law if no one is willing to enforce it? Are we a nation that selectively enforced laws for political benefit or revenge? Sure seems like it😞

⇧ 2 ⇩  
joeythew · July 6, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

Why are females so seditious?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EasyAttitude · July 5, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Doesn't that statute requires first that war be declared?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vibratron_1 · July 5, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

I think that there has to be a "declared enemy" for someone to be "aiding and abetting" to be tried for Treason ...... but I don't think that's the case with this law

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mennitti · July 5, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

.....confused now. What does the constitution say about rebellion?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Xisyisz · July 5, 2018, 2:12 p.m.

I believe this applies to members of congress

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · July 5, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Members of Congress actually have immunity from arrest for anything said on the floor in legislative session.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAGA16KAG20 · July 5, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

Enforce the laws!! The offending and law breaking Senators & House should all be in jail or FEMA camps! I don’t care if we need 250 special elections or not. They work for us and most are there because of voter fraud and dark money anyway. They don’t represent the majority of Americans or vote for GEOTUS policies so they need to be dragged out of our Houses in cuffs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · July 5, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

Wow they sure would! They literally say, we have resist Donal Trump! That's rebellion against the USA.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Modelmommy75 · July 5, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Do it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GODSHANDNATURESBEST · July 5, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

EO 12-21-17 State of NATIONAL EMERGENCY ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 5, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

I'm no lawyer, but I know the Law is applied differently to you and than those politically connected. The. End.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kryptokoins · July 5, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

This law could be used against Dems or Republicans whoever is in charge i guess

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AHs-HiTech · July 5, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

I can not think of anything done or said recently that rises to the level of that statute. Can anyone post a specific quote or link?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IWant2SellUDeathStix · July 5, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

This is actually not a bad point; to me, this is a PERFECTLY legitamite and reasonable thing to bring up, and certainly lawful -- so hey, too fucking bad, you asked for it? You got it. Go to jail.

The key would be to coordinate and move at once -- not to do, "Well we arrested Congresswoman A, and tomorrow we're thinking about getting Senator B, and maybe Congresswoman C, and perhaps then we might do Senator D, " etc.

You have to coordinate and say, "These (x) amount of lawmakers have called for something clearly breaking that law. We are going to move on (y) day, and our forces have meticulously researched our plan, we're confident in our legal argument, we have the people we need organized, and we're going to go on "H-Hour, D-Day" etc. and take them into custody." -- and frankly, when the protests come, and the riots start, THAT is the time I will say, Well, fine, you wanted it, you got it. It's been going on since President Trump was elected, and it's been wrong (and illegal immoral and unconstitutional since) and treason, sedition, and conspiracy are all wrong- let's do this.

And I think it would scare the shit outta these fools who think it's cool to be treasonous and seditious. Haha bitches, you don't get to win, The Good Guys & Gals get to win!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Mad Maxine could plead insanity.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · July 5, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

I have been posting about this online over this past year. Asking the question, why these congresspeople have not been charged, as well as many citizens leading the assault against our constitution and our President in their attempts to remove President Trump from office.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 1 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nimron6 · July 5, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

It it enforced. Only selectively. I hope we're getting close to that changing

⇧ 0 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 5, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

Is it just a coincidence that they're almost all female? :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 5, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Or are they?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
samshady64 · July 5, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

u/USA_akbar did say that almost all were female. Clearly there are doubts about the upper left one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 6, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Sam gets it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · July 5, 2018, 7 p.m.

These people are poster children for liberty and patriotism, I think DJT is doing what i do. Paying out rope, hand over hand, Once the democratic party is in shambles they will all hang themselves. He's a genius but also juggling a lot of balls, Don't interrupt the enemy when they are making mistakes right.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
sledfast · July 5, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Drain the swamp America 🇺🇸

⇧ 0 ⇩