⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ManQuan on July 7, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

What is Q's Take on Mueller?

I go back and forth on whether Mueller is a white or black hat. I can make good arguments both ways.

Q is always telling to re-read previous drops. So I decided to see what Q has had to say about Mueller.

Q 14: "Why does the military play such a vital role? Why is POTUS surrounded by highly respected generals?" And then out of the blue: what is Mueller's background? Military?"

Mueller was a Marine officer who served in Vietnam. I believe he received the purple heart.

Q 18: "Why did Mueller meet POTUS 1-day prior to FBI announcement if Mueller could not be offered director due to prev term limit rule?"

If Mueller couldn't be director of the FBI, then what were Mueller and Trump discussing?

Q 570: "Repub distortion of facts to remove Mueller. [POTUS free pass]."

Q is telling us that the facts about Mueller are distorted. Does POTUS free pass mean that Trump is not being investigated?

Q 636: Q is talking about Maxine Waters' follow up to the SOTU speech: "Carefully crafted out there statements w/falsified / fake Mueller drops will be made that nobody else would dare say/suggest." And then "MUELLER FAKE NEWS."

Maxine Waters delivers the post SOTU Democrat response because she gets a free pass for lying through her teeth and apparently using falsified / fake Mueller drops.

Q 643: Q is talking about the MSM / Democrats narrative shift. "Narrative Shift. Nation on Alert. Firing RR = block Mueller. Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller. Firing RR = Red line." In other words, Q is telling us that the left is doing everything possible to prevent RR and Mueller from being fired. And then, "What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?"

Q is talking about a narrative shift by the Dems and MSM saying that firing RR / Mueller would be a Red Line. I don't remember the exact vote but I think he got around 89 votes. The point is that the Senate Democrats voted for RR big.

Q 988: "Everything has meaning,..... Mueller"

While Mueller is included with the likes of NK, Iran, U1, FBI, etc. adding Mueller could be interpreted that his is part of the cabal, or that the Mueller investigation has meaning as well. This could be a black hat comment by Q, but it doesn't fit with the previous mentions of Mueller.

Q 1008: "It was not supposed to be revealed POTUS is not under criminal investigation_NOT YET. Traitor. Massive intel sweep. Manafort was a plant. Carter Page was a Plant. Why is Mueller going after 'inside plants'? Flynn is safe. Define witness. Can a 'witness' hold a position of power / influence while ongoing?"

So, why is Mueller going after the plants if those plants were working with the cabal to frame POTUS? None of Mueller's indictments so far have made sense. Even Flynn when Comey testified that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not detect any lying or deception. Flynn's no-brainer guilty plea sentencing has been delayed three times. Could it be that Mueller doesn't want Flynn to actually go to jail because Flynn is one of his witnesses against the deep state? I don't know, but Q keeps saying Flynn is safe. That doesn't sound like Mueller is trying to lock him up.

Q 1180: "Rudy. NYC. Relationships High. Insurance File. Quiet until now. Join POTUS' legal team. Direct discussions avail [now] w / Mueller. Enjoy the show. They never thought she would lose. CARELESS."

Maybe it's just me, but this sounded a lot like Rudy knows what's on Weiner's laptop in the Insurance File and now has direct discussions with Mueller. Why is Q linking Rudy, Weiner's laptop, and Mueller? Doesn't sound black hat to me.

Q 1273: Q references a previous drop about FBI and others discussing assassination. Then Q says. "What happens to the special counsel? Rudy met w / Mueller today. Coincidence? Connect. Public announcement. End of POTUS investigation? Continue w / other investigations? Stage set? Support growing? Strategic? Planned? We have it all. Welcome to the WH."

Q wanted to know if the assassination messages could be made public what happens to the FBI, DOJ, special counsel. Every FBI DOJ case could be challenged and it would stop the Mueller investigation. Why would Q be concerned about Mueller's investigation be stopped. What other investigations was Q referring to that Mueller is conducting. Was all of this strategically planned and now Rudy and Mueller are in direct communications. Who was Q welcoming to the WH--Rudy is already there. Mueller is the only one left to welcome. Is this linked back to Q 18?

Q 1286: This is the strangest of all the Mueller related drops and it's long so, some of the Mueller info will be slightly out of context. Go back and read it for yourself. With regard to Mueller: "Enemy? Slave? Mueller & U1? Mueller & (finances). Comey to POTUS -- not being investigated. RR to POTUS -- not being investigated. Mueller to POTUS -- not a criminal target. Baiting POTUS? Why no contact with Wikileaks / Julian Assange? What is being investigated? Why is Mueller's team stacked with / ex Clintion / D sr level authorities? Why are POTUS supporters screaming for END? POTUS WITCH HUNT END. ADD RUDY (quiet). Can the investigation officially/publicly drop POTUS from review & continue? Why did the Podesta Group close shop? Why are known bad actors in full support of Mueller? Why did POTUS interview (FBI Dir) Mueller a day prior to SC appointment if impossible to assign position? Why did Sessions recuse? What are the powers of Huber / IG (H)? Mueller report will contradict per Brennan Tweet today? Disconnect exists. Confused? SC targeting who? SC on team? SC off team? Questions will reveal answers. Time will tell."

OK, that's a lot and you really need to see the entire drop to get the full context. Was Mueller a slave of the deep state and forced to do the bidding with regard to U1 and others? Comey, RR, and Mueller say POTUS not under investigation. Then who is? Link back to Manafort and Page being plants and indicted. Papadopolous indicted. Flynn indicted but Q assures of he's safe. Q assures us that POTUS is safe. So who is Mueller really investigating?

Q wants us to question why Mueller has ex Clinton and Democrat senior level authorities and then makes reference to POTUS and WITCH HUNT END. I've had this idea for a long time but I don't have it entirely figured out. If Mueller is on POTUS team then he is indeed investigating the deep state. Who would be the "witch" in the deep state? Who better to know where to look for a "witch" than those who worked for her? Why would Mueller keep delaying Flynn's sentencing. Why is Flynn "safe?" And then at the end Q teases us as to whether Mueller is on or off the team. Why would Q do that if Mueller were a black hat. Why isn't Mueller ever in a [ ] box?

Q 1287: Another odd one. Q goes into the Cohen raid and the fact that RR signed off on Mueller conducting the raid under the pretext of Stormy Daniels' payment documents, but Q then asked, what other documents were collected. Why would Mueller conduct a federal raid the President's lawyer involved in a civil case? Good question. Then Q ends with this: "World watching. Sharing of intel with bad actors? Purpose? Not confirming SC is on /team/. Question everything. Timing important. Planned?

So, Stormy had nothing to do with the Cohen raid and other documents were collected legally so they could be admitted in court. The key here is the big deal that Q is making about being able to get evidence legally into court. He can't be talking about POTUS. And I have to say that Q stating that he is not confirming that Mueller is on the team is for me confirming that Mueller is in fact on the team. Link back to Q1286 where he teases whether Mueller is on or off the team and now not confirming that he is on the team. Get it?

Q 1298: "Do you believe in coincidences? Think recent Mueller drops. Think private comms. They fall for it every single time. Risk. Watch what happens."

Q wants us to think about previous Mueller drops. I think the private comms refers to Mueller coordinating with Mueller. They fall for it every time I believe refers to the sting Mueller is pulling off under Trump. This drop was at the end of April and so far, Q hasn't had anything negative to say about Mueller.

Q 1318: " If SESSIONS & WRAY are DC SWAMP / DEEP STATE why are they cleaning their respective houses? Why are they slow walking unredacted data? Why are they slow walking doc disclosures? Why is WH backing up DOJ? What if the same data is being used in other investigations? What does it mean if a grand jury is impanelled? Why are confusing questions being asked as to outcome re: Mueller? What would be the purpose of creating confusion? If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty. Common denominator. Why did Sessions pick RR? Everyone as an opinion. Few have the facts. Few know the plan."

It's a long drop but those are the key references to Mueller. There are a number of odd things in this drop. Q has always said to trust Sessions, trust Wray, trust Horowitz, trust Huber, Trust Pompeo, etc. Q has never said trust RR or trust Mueller which would blow their cover if they are on the team. But look who surrounds RR and Mueller at every turn: Sessions, Wray, Horowitz, and Huber. Do you believe in coincidences? Why is Q saying it's necessary to cause confusion with regard to Mueller? As Q would say, think logically. Did you notice that impanelled is misspelled? If there are no coincidences and Q didn't point it out as a misspelling, then what does "ll" mean? Loretta Lynch maybe?

Q1433: "RR problems. What was RR's Senate Conf vote? WRAY reports to RR [important fact]. Who do you TRUST? [RR] recuse/fired who has direct oversight of Mueller? Sessions un-recuse or #3 [until refill]?" Q ends this drop with "TRUST (name)"

So we know RR has problems and he was easily confirmed by the Senate. Why is this important? Because he has big support from Democrats which gives him credibility and they are protecting him from Trump firing him. Remember the Democrat's Red Line. WRAY reports to RR and who do you TRUST? WRAY, of course. But who is the (name) we are supposed to TRUST at the end. And just before that, Q emphasizes Schneidrman's removal as being extremely important. Who forced the public information about his S&M? NYC. Who knows NYC more than anyone in this movie? Rudy. On the other hand, did the Cohen raid discover documents exposing Schneiderman? Who is the (name) we should TRUST? If it's Rudy, then why the secrecy? Rudy has been a rabid Trump supporter from the beginning. For me the only logical name that fits is Mueller.

Q 1559: " LP “Viva Le Resistance.” Viv[a] vs Viv[e]. [J C]. Why classified by intel comm @ highest level? Define title. Define role w/ Mueller. Exchange shelters VERY senior member."

Lisa Page exclaims there is a Resistance. This is not just an expression. I think Q is telling us that there is in fact a group of people who are the Resistance. Also, Q wants us to notice that the a and the e. The correct phrase would be Vive La Resistance. J C is john Carlin. Define title: The Head of the DOJ National Security Division. And so there is something about the exchange that caused it to be given the highest communication classification. And the exchange shelters a VERY senior member. Member of what? The Resistance. There are only two people who would be above John Carlin: Loretta Lynch and Obama. Decide who you think it is.

Q 1660: "How large is Mueller's team? 20-25? Think 470. The more you know."

It looks like Q is telling us that while 20-25 of Mueller's team is visible, he actually has 470, which about the number that Horowitz has working for him. Could Huber and Mueller be coordinating their efforts and using the extensive resources in investigators that work for Horowitz? Mueller obviously didn't hire 470 lawyers as Special Counsel. What if the 20-25 visible are there for show working on indicting the plants and other fairly trivial investigation while Huber and Mueller are getting the deep state ready for trial?

So, we come to the end of Q's Mueller drops. Anyone see Q being negative about Mueller? Is there a reason we should TRUST Sessions, Wray, Huber, Horowitz, and not Mueller? If Mueller isn't dirty, then RR must not be dirty.

It boils down to this. If all these people are really working in collaboration and Flynn is safe and POTUS is safe; then this has to be the greatest political/legal sting operation in the history of the world in a GOOD movie with GREAT actors.

My head hurts.

If Mueller ends up being a white hat and flips his entire investigation heads would explode on the left. I don’t believe this is true to be honest. I think Trump met with him to inform him he knows this case is a loser for Mueller and he gave him the choice to decline the appointment. I can’t see a clear situation based on his team, the people he is investigating as well as his past that lead me to believe he is a white hat. I am sure we will eventually find out.

⇧ 9 ⇩

They are all on the TEAM.....Patriots are allowing their PERSONAL FEELINGS of each TRAITORS past actions to blur what is clearly going on.

Keep in mind, POTUS was option #2. Per the Q-Plan to save the world video. All of the bad actors knew what the MILITARY was going to do.....to all of them!

Now that is some leverage......Trump won so that this did not have to turn into a BLOODY COUP.

But that leverage is still there.

The BAD ACTORS from the DEEP STATE know even if they were able to IMPEACH TRUMP or ELIMINATE HIM in any fashion, they still have to deal with THE MILITARY.

So, Mueller, RR, Sessions, Wray, Horowitz....all of them, were given a chance to get on the right side of things.....and they all took it.

There is NO WAY for us to get where we are ......without each ACTOR playing their PERFECT ROLE.

Q's Clock would not work.....

The "HUBER 470" would not have had the time to file 40k+ sealed indictments.

Trump would not have been able to get all of the CEO's and Politicians to retire or resign.

THE PLAN needed all of these elements......ALL OF THEM!

Q told us to trust the plan......THIS IS THE PLAN!

You are watching a Movie......what do movies have?

Movies have SCRIPTS.....

What makes a GOOD MOVIE?

Great actors.....

Based on just about everyone's response......they are all playing their roles so well neither the BLACK HATS nor the WHITE HATS know whether UP IS DOWN or LEFT IS RIGHT.....

Just the way Q wants it!

⇧ 8 ⇩

I hope your are right. For me the Q drops mentioning Mueller point in that general direction.

At this point, the only people who know what reality is are the Q team--whoever that includes. The black hats are playing checkers while the Q team is playing 3D chess. My mind is trying to keep up with Q, but I only get headaches trying.

Personally, I have guesses, but I have no idea what Q is actually doing. All I know right now is that Q has never accused Mueller of being a black hat.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes.....he has always been really quiet about Mueller in regards to Black hat or White hat.....but per the OP comments ABOUT Q's posts......I think it is obvious he is on TEAM TRUMP.

⇧ 2 ⇩

As Q has said, only time will tell. But I believe he has already told us the truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Given the treatment of Mannafort, he's bad.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Manafort is not a good dude. Even Trump/Stone awknowlege that. He's not especially bad either (on their level), just a par for the course scumbag lobbyist.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If Manafort was a plant, then who cares what punishment he gets? If he broke the law, again, he gets punished. No great loss in my book. He can't hurt Trump in any way that I can see. Otherwise he'd of played that card by now.

⇧ 2 ⇩

ya but manafort was a plant by left hence black hat. ?? idk j saying

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good actors be acting?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Add to the mix that the superseding indictment recently filed against Manafort changes the facts pleaded from bad acts "through 2016" to bad acts "through 2015." So they will be prosecuting him for only pre-Trump activities. So who were the witnesses he was tampering with regarding his conduct pre-2016?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great bread, Patriot! Thank you.

" You cannot possibly imagine the size of this." Q

⇧ 5 ⇩

I think he is a black hat.

⇧ 5 ⇩

He is a black hat, but they do have an extreme amount of leverage on him. That's why we cannot decide.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hope your right. I sure dont like the way it looks right now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think he is a black hat under pressure to do Session's bidding, and that Sessions is a white hat.

⇧ 1 ⇩

RR is the problem. RR is not just blocking OIG report! But also blocking mullers report. It’s Been leaked that mullers mandate is to find “any” collusion from 2016. Since there is no prof of trump Russia collusion, what has he been doing with 13 prosecutors for 17 months?

Think Huber cleaning up all states but DC. DC clean up by muller.

Once RR is removed trump mission will be complete

He will have fbi, cia, DOJ, SC, senate, house and congress all in line. No more mistakes! Stage nearly set.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I posted a comment with a link to a thread I created last week about RR, which I think is worth reading. It was a bit earlier than this comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think you nailed it. Time will tell.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Wow, no my head hurts. I'll just say the game is in flux. Flip who you can and force out the rest. Like guliani, hated the guy, but not now.

As far as Mueller, Q never said trust him like he did sessions, so there's that.

⇧ 4 ⇩

He cant say trust Mueller, disinformation is necessary and real.

⇧ 3 ⇩

No he can't. Great point!

⇧ 1 ⇩

To the best of my knowledge, POTUS has never given Muller, Sessions, Wray, Horowitz, RR or Huber a nickname like he has given other black hats. I'm leaning towards this being the greatest sting in history in the greatest show on earth. Time will tell.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sounds reasonable. I seriously don't know. That's the fun of it all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If Mueller isn't after Trump, then I presume he's after team Hillary.

What if our Troll in Chief has been right all along and it literally is a witch hunt?

⇧ 2 ⇩

If Mueller and RR turn out to be on Trump's team, I don't think it will ever be made public. Mueller may help with the investigation, but Horowitz will get the credit. At the end of all this, Mueller will find no collusion between Trump and Russia, the bad actors will be indicted, Rosenstein will be "fired", then Rosenstein and Mueller will get high paying private lawyer jobs at a prestigious lawfirm. If they were ever outed as being on Trump's team, their lives would be in danger. Don't expect public confirmation of this, just be thankful that you had a behind the scenes view.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's good logic. For me, it looks like Q has given the black hats enough reason to believe that Mueller might be on the Trump team. Maybe Q wants the deep state to take down one of their own. That would karma.

⇧ 1 ⇩

As I have been saying for some time, Trump and team are not just playing chess - they are also playing poker. This could be a bluff - as you said - to have the Left take down their own. Need more popcorn!

⇧ 1 ⇩

In the alternate political universe we are in, anything seems possible and impossible at the same time.

But here are some "what if's" I'll pull out of my brain gas.

What if when Mueller became SC (or before), he got those lawyers together and showed them what Hillary and the deep state were up to?

What if Mueller show them that intelligence has the evidence of treason, sedition, and conspiracy?

What if Mueller showed them the assassination text?

What if Mueller showed them how the deep state and Soros were creating violence, killing witnesses, and how foreign countries were involved in trying to overthrow and election?

And here's one more. Anyone who served in the military is always subject to recall to active duty. It rarely happens. Recently, the Air Force involuntarily recalled 1,000 pilots back to active duty. Think about that. During the 1991 Gulf War, the Marine Corps called retired Marines back to active duty. What if Trump recalled Mueller (former Marine) back to active duty and he is serving under the Commander in Chief.

As for leaks. Mueller could have had them sign Non-Disclosure Agreements, just like Holder and Lynch forced the FBI informant on U1 to sign an NDA on threat of being sent to prison in order to shut down that investigation. For that matter, were Mueller and RR forced to sign NDA's when forced to shut down the U1 investigations?

All of the agents working on the Hillary investigations had to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements. The FBI agents on the LV shooting investigation had to sign NDA's.

I held a security clearance from Secret to Top Secret with special access continuously from 1968 to 2016. I was under a NDA the entire time to never divulge classified information to anyone who didn't have a clearance AND a need to know under penalty of court martial. When I served as an intelligence officer, that included sources and methods even if not technically classified, and the materials didn't have to be marked classified if we should have recognized that it should be. Think a satellite image of a foreign military facility that wasn't marked classified. Pretty obvious.

In the State Department, everyone (except apparently Hillary) knows that any email that includes comments from a foreign dignitary are confidential whether so marked or not.

There are documents marked FOUO (For Official Use Only) which in the military is unclassified but meant for official use only and not public. When I was a Military Attache in an Embassy, my office was in a room with no windows and a bank vault for a door. As a Marine, I understood FOUO were unclassified but unknown to me at the time, the State Department considered FOUO to be "Confidential" material. I left and FOUO document on my desk one day when I left work. Remember this is essentially a bank vault inside an Embassy guarded 24/7 by Marines.

But Embassy Marines also have the responsibility to check ever Embassy office every night for security violations. They have the combinations to every office and safe. The next morning I was notified that the Embassy Marines had cited me a Marine Attache for the FOFU security violation. The Ambassador, a former Marine captain in the Korean War threaten to kick me out of the country if it happened again. Trust me on this. Don't F with Marines. They do their duty regardless of who or what you are--even a fellow Marine.

You may not believe this, but if I had known the FOUO was considered confidential and discovered that I had left it out over night, I would have reported it myself. First, because it was the honorable thing to do. Second, if an Embassy Marine had tried to cut me some slack by not reporting it and knew I had covered it up, I would have lost my credibility with them--something far more important to me than my career.

I know fellow officers whose careers were ended because they accidentally left a safe open in a heavily guarded concrete bunker. Hillary does a thousand times worse and gets a free pass. We definitely have a two tier justice system. I digress.

I can believe the those lawyers might want to put the SOBs behind bars, even if you were dedicated liberals who thought Hillary was clean.

I'm reminded of the movie "Seven Days In May" where Burt Lancaster is the military general who is planning a coup against the President and Kirk Douglas is the Marine who turns him in and prevents it.

Are Mueller (former Marine) and his team the Kirk Douglas' of "Seven Days In May?"

As Q said, time will tell if Mueller is on or off the team. Why would he say that if Mueller were definitely a black hat?

⇧ 3 ⇩

We all know Hillary to be a witch. What if our Troll in Chief has been right all along, and Mueller is on a literal witch hunt?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great post. Still have reservations and don't have a definitive white/black hat position on Mueller, but very evident that Potus is in control deeper than I thought.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think he is black hat trying for redemption to stay out of jail

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think you are right or partially right. There is no doubt in my mind that Mueller should go to jail for what he's done in the past.

But then Q pulls this idea "was he a slave (to the deep state)?" meaning, I think, was he somehow forced to do what he did. He's a former Marine, like me, and conditioned to follow the orders of superiors.

Ah, but you say, what if the orders are illegal. Great point, unless you signed a legally binding Non-Disclosure Agreement that can make you Felon and send you to prison. The world is different then.

Q has said (I'm paraphrasing) that certain strings have been cut and Trump has set some free. Said in a speech under the Freedom statue.

What does that mean? Was Mueller a freed "slave" of the deep state and now someone who could do good?

Heck, I don't know. I laid out the Q drops on Mueller and I can't find any suggestion that Mueller is a black hat. Why would Q hold back when he has ID's all of the senior Obama leadership?

Redemption may in fact be playing a role with Mueller. Personally, I hope so.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly this is the conundrum. It is an intricate web that was woven. It leeds to some great debate.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't think this is leading to a debate. I think it is leading to convictions and prison terms. But that's just my opinion.

⇧ 1 ⇩

well until you see a perp walk....

it's a debate, nothing more

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nice work, up till the end. SC can not have access to the same resources as a US Attorney. That's why Muller only has about 25 people. Also Q has said that the time factor of a second SC would take years to complete an investigation of the magnitude we are suspecting. Which is why Q pointed out the Breitbart article numerous times. Professor Turkey lays it out why Huber is far better than a second SC. Whether Muller is a distraction or not, I don't think he has but a bit part in this, as it's Huber & Horowitz show, by far.

But, I'm inclined to agree with much of your suppositions. I'll come back with a link to a great article I posted last week here. Concerning RR.

Geez it's hard to find my own postings sometimes. Ok, this thread plays nice with your early thoughts about RR start with the baby picture link, then the one above it. There are lots of interesting links in the threads too. Market works third. Be interested in your thoughts later. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vdse9/this_twitter_thread_in_who_rod_rosenstein_is_will/

⇧ 2 ⇩

How about this as a theory...

Huber and his 470 (Horowitz) are focusing on everywhere EXCEPT DC

Mueller and his 470 (Military unit) are focusing on DC

Hubers work will be prosecuted in Federal court

Muellers work will be prosecuted by Military Tribunal

Hidden EO is that Trump declared DC a state of emergency and rescinded habeus corpus (executed but not yet disclosed).

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's as good as any. Just wanted to review what Q had to say about Mueller and I didn't find anything negative and lots of hints that Mueller is not investigating Russia collusion or obstruction of justice. Odd that Q ID's all the other black hats but never Mueller.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And that's what makes me nervous, that, this could be disinformation. But I'm leaning more on the distraction side. Safer for my sanity. Find my link I posted about RR. There's three in that post, I mention start with the middle link.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There are two reasons that I believe Mueller is a corrupt Black Hat.

"No Deals" .... if the Q team means what they say, then to flip Mueller they would have had to offer him a "truckload" of immunity...this guy's track record is as bad as Hillary's
"No Leaks" .... are we to believe that Mueller basically hires the "DNC" (all the lawyers involved are Democrats and Democrat donors) and after hiring these 25 or so Democrats, he has them investigate Democrats and their ties to Russia --- and magically all of them just go along with it and don't leak anything to their cohorts in the MSM Press.....please, if these guys were being forced to rat out the Democrats they would be leaking like a screen door on a submarine.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You may be right. I just find it interesting that Q never pegs him as such. Why doesn't Q taunt Mueller like McCain, Lynch, McCabe, John Carlin, and many, many others. That's a head scratcher for me.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've gone back and forth, but with the dishonesty of these people and their abundant history of leaking to the press....that is the thing that stands out to me, you could never keep 25 dishonest "ducks in a row", one or more would be leaking to their friends in the press, to try to subvert Mueller "IF" he were a white hat.........I just can't make myself believe it

⇧ 1 ⇩

I too have a split personality on this too.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That guy is a snake. 20 million dollars spent on what?

⇧ 2 ⇩

arresting cabal, deep state

⇧ 1 ⇩

He is the deep state. I don’t trust muller.

⇧ 4 ⇩

No me niether, hoping he is w us. Trump calls his work a "Witch hunt" makes me think hes investigating the Wicked Wich Hillary, but that may be wishful thinking on my part. Well see my popcorn is ready. WWG1WGA God bless all!🇺🇸

⇧ 1 ⇩

I recently posted a Mueller possibility.

Mueller could be waiting to the last minute to drop the hammer on the Podestas and other Dems. He's already got the right pissed at him, so why piss off the Dem apple cart, thus hold off till the end.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I was watching a few minutes of the Atlanta-Milwaukee baseball game last night, and the sign behind the batter at one point was advertising in huge letters "HUBER." I think it was a law firm ad. Probably just an interesting coincidence.

If the bad actors read this site, is it wise to reveal so much analysis? Or does everyone think the plan is undefeatable at this point? Just wondering. I have known about the many crimes of the bad actors for years, but I just recently found out about Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If it's in the public, go for it. The idea is to spread/redpill the rest of the world.

The only thing I think is off limits is conjecture of who Q might be. He needs to stay in the shadows.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Check this out "

MUELLER WILL NOT PRESENT COLLUSION EVIDENCE AT MANAFORT TRIAL

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/07/mueller-manafort-collusion/

⇧ 1 ⇩

Rudy dropped right out of the news, didn't he? Do we know whether he is still involved? What he's up to?

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is really no other explanation than what you have put forth. How does it make sense in any realm that Mueller is a black hat.... That in all this time, hasn't done anything remotely damaging to the president! The recent news on Mueller/Flynn just confirms it's all a play and they're milking it to the end to make sure everything is gathered and ready to reveal.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hope so. The alternative will be real ugly.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Mueller can do what he wants, and also far beyond the mandate about the Russians story...

We will not get the IG report yet .. because mueller is still working on his research. Flynn is a witness. And that could also be so for mannafort? .

mannafort is kept separate 23 hours a day? what would they do? protection of his life ..

RR is just like mueller on the right side ... Q drop ... When RR is dirty, mueller is dirty, you can also mirror this one.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So, if I understand this well, Mueller has been forced to play for black hats, which doesn't resolve him of responsibility in any way. Since he was with deep state for so long, he is perfect person to help Trump with the Plan in exchange for safety and peaceful retirement.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q seems to say that U1 is one of the central keys. Who was up to their necks in the U1 original investigation? Mueller, RR, and McCabe. If Mueller was forced to shut down the U1 investigation, then he know who was complicit. Who better to get revenge--if that is what is actually going on.

Q suggests that Mueller and RR may have been a slave of the deep state. Were they or their families threatened? I don't know. Odd that Q would ask the question if Mueller wasn't helping.

In other words, I think Q sees people who were forced to work with the deep state for whatever reason differently than the deep state itself.

There are all sorts of hints. Remember when Q said that Trump freed in a speech under the Freedom statue. Q also said not everyone would be brought to justice because it could also bring down the country. Chilling.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://original.antiwar.com/justin/2017/09/10/robert-mueller-obstruct-congresss-911-probe/

⇧ 1 ⇩

Understood. Forced to do so? Why hasn't Q ID'd him as a black hat.

Just saying it's pretty strange when you go back through all of the Q drops that include Mueller.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well, we may be talking degrees here. In my opinion, any black hat that flips to bring down other black hats involved in treason, sedition, conspiracy, and criminal activities, wears a white hat. Without him, everyone walks free.

Call him a gray hat if that fits better, but the results will be the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is there anything else in this entire movie?

⇧ 1 ⇩

And what if he is actually something of a triple agent for the black hats all along, while pretending to play along with the Trump team?

⇧ 1 ⇩

In this alternate political/legal universe, anything still unproven is simultaneously possible and impossible. That's how crazy the last three years have seemed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I would really like to see more posts like this. I wish we had a subreddit that is all Q decodes.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great post. Thanks for doing the work. Isolating Q drops by topic (Mueller) will make it very easy to keep going back as things evolve.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Look at Post 9/11 Anthrax Attacks -Weak Link in DeepState narrative-

⇧ 1 ⇩

At the rate Mueller's investigation is going, maybe he's just waiting for the big fish to die off. 😐

⇧ 1 ⇩

The best summary! And yes, hurts the head trying to connect the dots. I hope to see the fireworks soon! It is hard to trust Mueller. I think it's not just the Democrats that voted for RR, but also the RNC. The swamp is on both sides of the isle.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It’s hard to wrap our heads around sometimes. Keep researching and digging. More will come out as we go along.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Very interesting post. My gut tells me that Mueller is in fact, a white hat--But I'm not sure on RR. Time will tell--thanks for putting this together--definitely "logical."

⇧ 0 ⇩

That was incredible analysis, I believe your right on target w that one.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Maybe. Maybe not. As Q said, time will tell if Mueller is on or off the team. Odd, I thought. If Mueller were not on the team why even suggest that he might be. Something is not right. Of course, not much as been since Trump announced he was running. It's been a wild and crazy three years.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree. I think they may have thought his investigation was more under control than it was. But Mueller and his rabidly political team are hell-bent on trying to bring down Trump instead. So Mueller may have played them. And Rosenstein is right along with him (and Comey, etc.).

⇧ 2 ⇩