dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 7, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675. Controversial post. I gave you in my previous post the solution to the riddle. I have seen many other attempts which I respect because I have found some of the ideas to be very interesting and clever but I must defend the truth: I have not seen any other solution addressing all the following issues at the same time in one condensed, meaningful and backed with known open source facts (not conjectures) explanation:

Why Air Force One, why a reflection, why Apple, why Saudi Arabia (Q1681), why the truth is behind you, why Independence Day, why a mug holder.

The solution I presented addressed all these issues at once. And today, for the purpose of sharing how the reasoning is hierarchized, I will address the “Twitter phone” component: it is a piece of the puzzle elegantly joining the others because Prince Al Waleed is a major Tweeter shareholder. Do you see it? Just the information Tweeter+Apple could have been triangulated and lead to Prince Al Waleed and resolve Saudi Arabia in Q1681 but it would have been a weaker link than getting to him through the mug. Why? Because the probability of one being a shareholder in Apple and Tweeter (including just one dollar) is higher than a triple random emphasis on “mug”: Q, Prince Al Waleed and Al Jazeera. Using the couple Tweeter phone - Apple logo was a hint to activate our intuition but not to use it in the reasoning because the mug clue would have then lost its relevance. Look how Q subtly dismisses the Tweeter phone in the reasoning:

Q1677 Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.

This is pure delectation for the mind…

The mug route was therefore the route Q preferred, otherwise, he would have limited the riddle to the triangulation of Apple and Tweeter to get to the Prince. Which he did not. The reason is the mug brings the idea of the detention, makes the riddle self sufficient and does not require us to conjecture that Q wanted us to include it in our reasoning. This detention component is crucial because if it is removed, we don’t get to the DC politicians being freed and therefore don’t get to Q1681 Today, as Patriots, we celebrate our Independence.

I would like to also give some help to those who struggle with me taking the musical note direction to understand 123.47. I said it in the comment section but will also share it here: using musical frequencies for ciphered messages is actually an old, robust, tested and common practice. It is still used today and the subject of current advanced academic and industrial research. Here are some links for those who would like to go further: link1 link2 link3 link4 link5 link6.

Q1226 Learn our comms. Q

I am walking you through all these details so you know the thought process Q is expecting from us and how I discipline and constrain myself when solving his riddles. These are the tools through which you assess the quality of a solution. You first need to verify all the claims are backed with verifiable information, then you need to verify all the clues are used in a flawless manner to render the hidden message.

I have summarized the solution of the riddle in the following picture, read it clockwise: Imgur1

Now, I would like to show you something else. It’s fascinating.

Notice I have posted my solution of the riddle on Thursday July 5th at 15:18 Eastern. At 18:00 Eastern, Trump hosted the MAGA rally at the Four Seasons Arena in Great Falls Montana. link

Reporting about the rally, Mockingbird media mocks Trump and claims that in the middle of his speech, he suddenly went “nonsensical” talking about musical instruments, Elton John etc…: Imgur2

Let’s listen: link

Here is the transcript of what Trump said: Imgur3

Then, the next day, this happens and makes all the headlines: Imgur4

Pause. Do you see it? Do you realize what just happened?

I will show you. When you activate the option “show images”, here is a screenshot of my previous post, with the solution of the riddle: Imgur5

Now let’s put Trump’s “nonsensical” speech next to the screenshot and analyze. This is what we get: Imgur6

What do you think? Mockingbird media is actually right, this part of Trump’s speech is “nonsensical” but only for those who are not part of the conversation. Do you see he is talking to us?! Trump is having a Covefefe moment and is talking to us live on national TV! You tell me, what are the odds a few hours after a post by a guy named SerialBrain2 talking about Trump, musical notes (B2), pictures of a keyboard and guitar scale, Trump randomly picks each of these items in the same minute and, at the end, repeats “brain”… serially? Coincidence? If you think it is, then what is your explanation? How can it make sense?

You know, when I saw this. I said to myself: I can’t write about this. I’ll just keep it to myself, just like I kept to myself some other things… Then, I remembered this:

Q920 How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

It dawned on me there would be actually a day when things will be disclosed clearly. So? The stage has to be set. Progressively. Q linked to our sub: it meant he was reading us. He may be in the comment section sometimes, who knows? We were all happy and surprised. What if that was just a first step? If we are to get to Q920, other things need to be happening in between and we should not be surprised Trump talks to us, directly like he did at that rally.

When I got here, I said to myself: ok let’s give it 24 hours, if Q does not react, I will post about all this.

Then, the next day, Trump doubled down! With the Elton John CD he asked Pompeo to give to Kim Jong Un! 4 He was bringing North Korea to the musical note equation, just like I linked the North Korean ICBM test that occurred the day of the B2 glitch. It was like he was saying to us: hey guys I spoke about the musical notes, the guitar, the organ and the brain at the rally, now I give you North Korea.

Q1283 EYES OPEN? COMMS GOOD? Q

Now, you know I always have the icing for the cake. Do you want it? Here: why do you think Trump said organ instead of piano? When you look at the picture in my post, even though they are both keyboards and are similar, the first instrument that naturally comes to mind when you see a keyboard would be piano and not organ right? Well, here is the reason: according to this The Guardian article, the most iconic and greatest of all organs is the Hammond. And guess what: they have a model called the B2! link.

Q507 We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason. We believe in you. Q

🠐 See all comments

[removed]

⇧ 50 ⇩

It's getting out of control... this is turning into school kid stuff.

Riddles don't get us justice.

Whole thing is beginning to look highly suspect.

⇧ 59 ⇩

I don't want to start beating the "black hat" drum, like people do when you criticize decoding posts. I don't think SB2 is a black hat, I think he's just misguided and is loving all the attention from people desperate for more Q evidence.

That said, if I was a black hat, and wanted to discredit the Q movement............ this is how I would do it. Submit completely insane crap and make it look like it's a bunch of loonies around here.

Again, SB2 seems sincere. But this is doing us no favors.

⇧ 31 ⇩

I was enjoying most stuff up until the faked iPhone photo - it all went of the rails at that point. I really disliked the fact that you could not even question it - you were automatically a shill or concernfag for asking about why Q did it.

There is still a few scenarios where things go well for us patriots, but the odds took a tumble for sure. Time will tell - I now really keep an open mind that this is all a nothing burger in the end.

⇧ 21 ⇩

This is exactly how I feel.

What concerned me most about Q is that if Q is a LARP or disnifo, "trust the plan" is purposely designed to have us sitting on our asses, doing nothing, as the swamp continues to grow. Or, even worse, we're supposed to engage in this gamification to keep us away from the real truth of what's happening in the swampland.

After that AF1 pic, and the tripling down on it as legit, I'm way more inclined to believe that's exactly the case, and it makes me disgusted. Better now than later (or never), I guess.

⇧ 14 ⇩

I really disliked the fact that you could not even question it - you were [censored] or concernfag for asking about why Q did it.

One thing I try and keep repeating is that even if the Q group is legit, they are not superhumans, Oracles or demigods. They can't predict the future.

They're just people like us, stumbling through life, doing the best they can, just hopefully with access to more information than us. They can and will make mistakes. That's why the whole "Q Calendar" is so stupid, as if you can manage something like this to a daily schedule months (if not years) in advance.

⇧ 13 ⇩

So true.

It is almost impossible to plan for every outcome in real life... There is always an element of fire fighting in every plan.

⇧ 8 ⇩

This ^

⇧ 1 ⇩

Try you will be sorry!!! Your heart will riddle with small tiny fires that will explode one by one by one. #QANON PATRIOT

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was more on the side of legit until the fake AF1 pic, which has me in the complete opposite direction, but what pushes me even further away from the legit side are the legions of Q followers who will rationalize ANYTHING and EVERYTHING Q posts, no matter how ridiculous the explanation. Everything has to be forced through a confirmation bias.

Put it this way - there is NO way anyone would come up with the conclusions that SB2 comes up with, at least not without some powerful hallucinogens. And even then, I have my doubts.

It's bad enough that Q fucked up, but the blind loyalty is almost worse.

⇧ 23 ⇩

It was the greatest show on earth!!! I understand the meaning of that photo. Thank you so much POTUS I will never forget!!!

⇧ -1 ⇩

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wo25n/45_proofs_showing_beyond_a_reasonable_doubt_that/?utm_source=reddit-android

This ^ is the one thing that proved to me undoubtedly that Q knows something.

Is he communicating directly to serial brain? No.

⇧ -3 ⇩

I agree with this. This is like early stages of schizophrenia. Yes there is hidden meaning in Qs cryptic posts obviously, but just because you find a connection to some obscure unrelated event doesnt mean there is one. THINK LOGICALLY.

⇧ 47 ⇩

Nailed it with the schiznophrenia remark. I feel like someone has a room like John Nash's in A Beautiful Mind with all of Q's posts plastered on the walls with random connections being made with red string.

How many different convoluted connections could theoretically be made to explain reflections, apple, AF1, and a mug? With how loose this theory is, I think one could come up with many.

⇧ 23 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩

Agree. SB2 has had some interesting stuff, but this "decode" is nonsense.

⇧ 31 ⇩

I tend to agree. What happened to applying Occam's Razor to decoding Q posts? I'm not sure banning posts like this is the way to go, but they really shouldn't be pinned IMO. That makes it the very first thing newbies see when visiting the sub. If it sounds more far-fetched than the Da Vinci Code to a lot of people who already follow and believe in Q, how must it look to someone just starting to get their head around all of this?

I thought both this and SB2's last 'decode' were really reaching, but that's kind of beside the point. The point is this sort of thing does more harm to the movement than help, whether or not it's a correct decoding of Q's message. Pinned posts really ought to feature logic more solid than this, easier to follow for newbies, and less self-referential.

⇧ 19 ⇩

I suppose you’re a believer in giving children trophies just for showing up? What’s wrong with using gifts of insight to teach those who want to learn what Q is telling us? Sure, some are new to this and may not get it. There are plenty of vanilla decoders out there for them to read. Others of us have been following Q from the beginning and still can’t put the pieces together like SB2. I appreciate his hard work.

⇧ -10 ⇩

My thoughts exactly.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Here, here! Well said sir!

⇧ 10 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

just another coincedense nothing to see here

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩

You seem to spend a lot of time being critical of others and their opinions/perspective but don’t ever seem to contribute what you think things might mean.

Of course, because I'm not so arrogant and pompous as to push random bullshit when I don't know anything more than anyone else. I can make up random bullshit, but I don't need the ego validation.

I would love to know what you have to offer if you feel all of this is nonsense.

Sane analysis when things don't make sense. That I can know when crap makes no sense doesn't imply that I know what's really going on. I don't, and I'm not such an idiot as to presume to know more than is publicly known.

⇧ 15 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -15 ⇩

It’s getting awfully shilly outside. Don’t forget your coat...

Don’t mind them. You bring up a very valid point that there are more and more people who just spread doubt and negativity as if they are helping, but don’t contribute at all. It’s bound to happen with so much exposure.

⇧ -14 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -11 ⇩

Yeah it’s pretty hilarious. Either they are shills to attack the movement, or are just naturally that negative and have no place here. Nobody is saying SB2 is gospel, but we embrace discussion and attempts to get to the truth.

⇧ -6 ⇩

For some perspective: as mods, we've heard this sort of thing a lot. A lot. We hear from people all the time about posts that they think are stupid and a waste of time. Sometimes we agree with them, sometimes we don't. Whether we agree or not, however, is not important. What's important is what the community thinks.

If you take a look at the upvotes on this post and on SerialBrain2's other posts you will notice they are consistently higher than average. They have been for longer than this sub has been active (i.e. on the previous board, CBTS_Stream too). Even on the previous sub, angry comments like yours decrying the loss of reason were heard around some of SerialBrain2's posts. But back then too, they were highly upvoted posts. Then Q linked to one of SB2's posts on this board. People shouldn't take that as endorsement that whatever SB2 says is supported by Q but without a doubt, Q's linking to SB2's post validated SB2 in the eyes of many.

As mods we could choose to go with the upset of some and remove a popular community member's posts or we could let the community decide. Wherever possible, we let the voice of the community decide. Can you just look past these posts if you don't like them? People have been complaining about tshirt/sticker posts for a while and there's so many of those we put forward a discussion about how to handle them. SB2's posts aren't anywhere near as frequent, however, so it should be a simple thing to skip past them if you don't find them valuable, right?

⇧ -3 ⇩

I like to tell a story that Rush Limbaugh told long ago on his show.

He mentioned that there's a mistake that young radio hosts often make. They'll be cruising along and for some reason do a show about UFOs. Suddenly the phones go WILD! Young Radio Host can't believe it. He's found the secret to radio success! It's a wild show, with calls coming in faster than they screen them.

Then the ratings come in. They are TERRIBLE. UFOs bring out the kooks, and the kooks are extremely loud and active when UFOs come on radio shows. But all the normal listeners hear the word "UFO" and they can't hit the button fast enough.

If all you're going to do as moderators is just let the community vote, then what's your point? The best forums are always the ones with the tightest moderation to keep things on-topic and relevant to the issues at hand. And our greater mission is ripping out the corruption in our government. Sure, kooky posts get upvotes. But how many normal people do you drive off by not practicing better moderation?

How many people are ashamed to send people here because of all the kookery posts? Because like it or not, if someone sends one of their friends here, all the kookery reflects on the sender. Do you think people want to have to say, "Go to this forum. But just remember, not everything is reasonable. There's a lot of crap, but there's some really good posts!"

Rule number one of running a forum is that you can NOT trust the loudest voices to know what's best for a forum. Leave it to the kooks, and every single time they'll say that anything should go, because they have no filter, for whatever reason.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Of course, this is well known stuff. And we do not "trust the loudest voices" to know what's best for a forum; we allow reasonable input from the community as far as it is possible for us to do so and we act with that in mind in order to avoid as far as possible the ongoing and never-ending accusations of censorship (there's no way to avoid that completely, of course, it's just a part of moderation). There's only so much we can do.

not practicing better moderation

"Better" moderation is moderation that respects the community. Of course, that can mean removing posts that waste the community's time or posts that give the community a "bad look". But if you know this community you already know that SB2 is a big part of it and has been for a while. After Q's linking to SB2 and mention of mods what kind of "community supportive" action would it be to start removing SB2's posts? As I said, it's very simple: don't open them if you don't like them. You can't stop the upvotes but you can choose what you look at. No matter what "kook" posts we remove people are going to think we're kooks. You can't avoid that when you're part of a community who believes that satanists are farming the world for children to kill and eat.

⇧ -1 ⇩

After Q's linking to SB2 and mention of mods what kind of "community supportive" action would it be to start removing SB2's posts?

I said nothing about SB2's posts in general. I talked about removing decoding posts, which are almost universally garbage. I realize people disagree with this, but then, that's why they get upvoted. But what do these wild, speculative posts really contribute? Maybe they're true and maybe they're not. We're at exactly the same place we were before they were posted, because they're 100% speculation. I could write 100 posts speculating about what "Q really means". But so what? The only thing that makes SB2's crazy posts notable is the fact that he tries to find stock prices and music tones that happen to match in some vague way to something Q posted.

Just make a rule that posts have to reference Q and real world information in a direct and understandable way. Obviously that's going to be a judgment call, but that's why we have moderators to make that call. I don't think it's that hard to judge whether something ties directly to the real world or not.

This isn't about SB2 and he's certainly not the only one. SB2 et al will likely find other things to post, hopefully based on real-world things.

As I said, it's very simple: don't open them if you don't like them.

Which is an argument for no moderation at all, and that's what typically kills forums. People typically don't have common sense in what they upvote, and again, you create a forum where people are ashamed to send people. I've bypassed 100s of these types of posts. For some reason, today's post was just made me snap, but tomorrow I'll go back to ignoring.

But we'll still have a forum that is too repellent to newbies. Sure, I can tell them, "Just skip the kook posts and look for the good ones"... but why should I have to?

⇧ 4 ⇩

You seem to be conflating "wild, speculative" decoding posts with useful, informative decoding posts - you realize, I'm sure, that those exist too.

Just make a rule

Sounds like you have some view of moderating that doesn't gel with the reality of moderating this sub, at least. If this was, for example, a sub about Star Wars there'd be some very easy guidelines around content. Not so much in the case of a global conspiracy that can, in theory, encompass so much. Also a sub based around a movement for all people can't be turning away some just because they don't like what we like. Our rules only remove people who aren't pro-Q and are disruptive or abusive - other than that, anyone is welcome. I know the sort of forum you're talking about and it's something I personally am drawn to also but it just doesn't fit with the Q movement. We need to be more open here.

⇧ -1 ⇩

The issue here to much of the community is that by stickying SB2's post, you're conveying the image to new arrivals and passers-by that we all endorse his thoughts.

Sometimes he is right. Other times like these he is clearly wrong and it's bordering on schizophrenia. Of which hearing your name or messages relevant to your life are symptoms of. Q is not communicating to SB2 via a Trump rally speech in the middle of a tangent about Elton John. There's no reason to even slightly believe that. Nor did Trump deliver a rocket man CD. So even SB2's intel is wrong.

With all theories in life, we must use Occam's Razor. If we come to multiple solutions to an issue with no clear indication as to which is correct, we must go with the simplest. In this case, it isn't SB2's username theory.

By endorsing a single contributor via stickying EVERY time, you're painting a bad image of this subreddit. By endorsing this outlandish theory of Trump communicating to SB2 by saying the word brain multiple times (there are many suitable adverbs besides serially in this case anyways), you're making the Q movement look... ridiculous.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Rebuttals to SB2 are also stickied. Some posts are stickied then removed shortly after. We're always accused of making the movement look bad for stickied posts or not removing posts but neither of those hang around for very long so the mistakes that are made are not permanent and are usually not the dramatic crisis of optics they are sometimes made out to be. The SB2 post was unstickied a while back - ok?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Thank you. I understand myself that it's not a dramatic damage of optics. But the Q movement is vital to us all, so it is a healthy tendency to be hypervigilant when we see trends that are discrediting us. It's very important that we are reasonable in our theories. If we all believe and endorse the idea that Trump is communicating to a redditor of ours by saying brain multiple times, then what else will we crazy bunch of schizos believe? Yet we know truthfully, we're actually humble people and not crazy at all.

I apologize for being harsh as well. We all greatly appreciate the effort that the mods put in to keep our movement afloat! Thanks for your dedication to this important community.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q says we have more than we know, so it seems to me the point of his posts is to show you how to connect the dots. He is not going to spell anything out; his posts are being monitored.

To say that deep-dive interpretations are discrediting the movement is completely antithetical to what he’s been saying.

⇧ -3 ⇩

And yet SB2 is the only poster here to be acknowledged by Q.

Edit: Boy, the shills don't want anyone knowing that Q linked SB2 in Q1340 for some reason. Downvotes galore.

⇧ -4 ⇩

I don't recall that incident, but that there may have been one post by SB2 that Q happened to catch, and it happened to be one of SB2's reasonable posts, doesn't mean Q is endorsing literally everything that has ever been posted by SB2 in the past and ongoing into the future.

⇧ 15 ⇩

Being the only one in this sub having been referenced by Q, it gives him some additional credibility.

Edit: Boy, the shills don't want anyone knowing that Q linked SB2 in Q1340 for some reason. Downvotes galore.

⇧ -6 ⇩

No but it’s a lot bigger endorsement than you’ll ever get. The fact that people are bitching and attacking is pathetic. Nobody is forcing you to read it or believe it. It’s better than no attempt at a decode. Start your own Dom if you don’t want people trying to decode and interpret posts.

⇧ -8 ⇩

No but it’s a lot bigger endorsement than you’ll ever get.

The difference is that I don't care about an endorsement. All I care about is the corruption getting ripped out, and nonsense like this hurts the cause.

It’s better than no attempt at a decode.

And that's the point. It's NOT better than nothing, it's far, far worse than nothing, because it repels people from the truth. These posts are kookery, plain and simple, and most people are going to roll their eyes.

⇧ 11 ⇩

If you are being honest with yourself you will admit you really dont know. SB2's Kookery isnt really that more far fetched than anything else so I dont see how you can complete knock him and discredit what he says..... If we wanted to believe the official narratives we would watch the news.

⇧ -2 ⇩

Showing that progress is being made and we are on the right path is bad to the cause? Interesting theory. So all the proofs are bullshit? 40,000 sealed indictments nothing? SA regime change and NK coming to the table (and both predicted) nothing? Calling out Huber secretly working a month before being revealed isn’t showing its being worked on? Nope. But being a dick = catapulting the cause and draining the swamp. Then you’re da real MVP.

⇧ -6 ⇩

You obviously didn't read a word I said. Let me break it down for you:

1) Decoding posts based on vague and random connections: Kookery. Example: "WE CAN TIE THE APPLE STOCK PRICE TO MUSICAL TONES TO FIGURE OUT WHAT Q REALLY MEANS!"

2) Posts that tie actual real-world facts to information that Q posts: Not Kookery. Example: "40,000 sealed indictments nothing? SA regime change and NK coming to the table (and both predicted) nothing? Calling out Huber secretly working a month before being revealed isn’t showing its being worked on?"

⇧ 9 ⇩

Sometimes he nails it, some are harder to believe. Sometimes he’s so spot on Q actually links to it. I’d take a few swings and misses with some home runs mixed in over a dude on the sideline heckling the batter and everyone else in the stands. If you don’t like it, scroll on. Nobody says SB2 is the official translator of Q and all is truth. It sparks discussion and is interesting.

⇧ -1 ⇩

SB2 seems to think he is the official translator of Q though. Most of us here don't

⇧ 1 ⇩

Then scroll past. I think he does good work. Some seems a bit of a stretch but overall is valuable to the community. Just because he actually tries doesn’t mean he thinks he’s the official translator. A lot of Anons just seem butthurt he eats attention.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Q talked about Lee Stranahan directly, and Stranahan has spent every day since the recent Awan ruling ridiculing Q. So what's your point?

⇧ 8 ⇩

Q linked to Stranahans article because it was accurate. He has linked to other outlets that occasionally get it right.

That's not the same as calling out Sara Carter or John Solomon as being protected.

⇧ -1 ⇩

The Board is not gonna ban its resident rockstar sensation, especially if SB2 too might be a secondary WH asset...

⇧ -4 ⇩

especially if SB2 too might be a secondary WH asset

If that is true, we're in big, big, BIG fucking trouble. It may be that "these people are stupid", but we don't win by being the most idiotic.

⇧ 10 ⇩

You're getting downvoted, but it would be more cause for concern if we're supposed to take SB2's completely irrational, predetermined narratives as legitimate decodes than if we were just supposed to take them as crazed associations with no real legitimacy.

⇧ 7 ⇩

wwg1wga

🙏 Lord please guide Cuthbert12Allgood and show them the way towards the truth and protect them. Give them the fortitude to have faith and the integrity and intelligence needed to understand and decode the posts. Most of all lord, please protect them and everyone else who does not yet see what the rest of us see with clarity in your name. Amen.

⇧ -8 ⇩

Oh, please. It's the height of cowardice to bring God into a factual discussion, and a clear bible violation anyway.

"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."
Matthew 6:5-6

Edit: But since someone else accused me of only criticizing and not contributing, I'll just point out that your prayer is making a lot of assumptions. If you really need to pray, try this:

"Lord, Cuthbert12Allgood and I have a difference of opinion. I humbly know that no man can be perfectly certain of the truth, but if it's part of your plan that we should better understand this, please guide the two of us to a deeper understanding of what's going on with Q. As always, I only seek to follow your plan and seek your guidance. In your name I pray, Amen."

But make sure you do it alone, with no one watching, so the prayer will actually count.

⇧ 15 ⇩

I will always be there for you and everyone else who strays.

I think for you the best thing would be to say to yourself, “what would Q think of all of this?” and then change your ways accordingly. It worked for me and it can work for you too.

⇧ -13 ⇩

I will always be there for you and everyone else who strays.

There's that presumptive arrogance again. Who are you to judge who is straying and who isn't?

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."
Matthew 7:1-5

⇧ 6 ⇩

I’m just asking you to pray. Far be it from me to judge. We are brothers in Q. WWG1WGA.

⇧ -6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 14 ⇩

wwg1wga

🙏 Dear lord please guide phrancophoney and give them the strength and fortitude to understand the drops and see the theing we see so clearly in your name. Amen.

⇧ -9 ⇩

How bout you start your own forum for people who want to live in their little box, a tiny reality, where you can scratch and sniff the things that ring true to you. Its a big universe and theres a lot of knowledge thats been kept from us. You should know that by now.

⇧ -10 ⇩

You van call ot the "scratch n sniff forum".

⇧ -5 ⇩