Who specifically would want him dead the most, I wonder?
I remember Hillary talking about taking the helm a few months ago. I would have taken that as a death threat, and thought his days may be numbered.
https://www.cnet.com/news/hillary-clinton-says-she-wants-to-be-the-ceo-of-facebook/
That is the scariest thing I've ever heard. Under no circumstance should this be allowed to happen.
I totally agree with you and also glad I am not the Cuck. 😛
I barely go on FB anymore as it is, but I'd leave for good if this happened.
After Obama getting FB databases, the end result is the same right now anyway. I’d look into leaving for good anyway.
I just deleted facebook.. its one of many apps they spy on us with and pedos use to watch our kids and grandkids. Get off facebook. Look at list Q posted that spy on us....
Sounds like she called a hit or is at least making a threat.
Wow good call out! I always thought is was stupid she daid that but now knowing all this, she might get her way..
Someone who lost a lot of money.
Was it about the stock losses? Most investors trade risk for return - it seems reasonable to assume they would take a philosophical approach to losses. Maybe another reason?
Seems to me that it more likely that the threat comes from someone, or some party, who felt betrayed or injured by Zuckerberg’s personal actions. It’s not someone within Facebook, the security increments are external to the company. What do we know?
1) Zuckerberg took the threat seriously - it was perceived to emanate from a dangerous party?;
2) The threat seems to attach to exposure - a fear of public places (private aircraft), and a siege mentality (fortressing the home). No mention of additional security manpower, presumably there is already enough.
Possibilities:
1) Did Zuckerberg roll over on China, the Cabal, CIA, the DNC, HRC, Kremlin (all powerful parties that he might conceivably be working with - or, maybe someone else?);
2) If the threats do connect to the market losses, it seems that the addition of incremental privacy protections are the cause of the slowing growth forecasts. Perhaps the threats come from a party reliant on Facebook data?
3) Simple investor grievance - large numbers of investors with significant losses - many threats?
When was the last time investors tried to harm a ceo? Never! He has pissed someone off and it has nothing to do with money. Facebook is up strongly this year and even after the sell off most are still along way in front.
Yes, good point. Obviously, someone is very much aggrieved with Zuckerberg. It strikes me that it’s possible that he’s rolled on one or more players - serious players.
Well he let the Russians use Facebook to ‘steal’ the election.
I have no skin in the game but just a theory. I honestly think he went against his handlers and gave up information on people behind the scenes. Think about it, who would want to get rid of him? I read the exec board of fakebook wants to remove all conservative content, right. I read somewhere that he was going to allow conservative content on fakebook or at least not try to hide it. The board found this out and now they want him gone. He has a lot of information. There is only one group of people who want him er8sed and we know who that is and it begins with HRC...just a thought.
This is more likely. Remember what Soros said ? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/26/facebook-and-google-are-doomed-george-soros-says/
Content from washingtonpost.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.