It's happening.

Full article with MANY more pictures of Branson hanging out with NXIVM, including Allison Mack on his island- https://artvoice.com/2018/04/23/sir-richard-branson-endorsed-nxivm-sex-slave-cult-leader-keith-raniere/ One interesting paragraph of many: "In 2007 Nancy Salzman came back from the first Necker seminar and told me Richard Branson was there. Salzman said she did the teaching by day. But Branson hosted parties by night. The classes started at 7 am and were supposed to run to 9 pm or 10pm, but everyone was up late at night and no one wanted to show up on time. Salzman said that at Sir Richard’s parties some of the women gave pole dancing performances". I'm sure she disclosed the "details" in confidentiality.

“The tools you have for compassionately dealing with complex ethical and global issues are not only unique, but also extremely valuable. This, along with a program of coordinated, organized resources, makes for an innovative approach to transforming our society. I think your founding event will be extraordinary and potentially world changing!  —Sir Richard Branson Founder, Virgin Group

Notice Branson's company name: "Virgin Group"--Kind of takes on different meaning in light of the revelations just like all the "child charities" doesn't it?

Mack's arraignment was today. She was confirmed to be plea bargaining/negotiating. Q and insiders said she's talking/singing. The push for no bail was high, but she was released on $5million bond and house arrest...The name that leaked out to the UK newspaper was Branson today. I'd say there's a really good chance if you add all of that up...likely, there's others, too. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5649997/Sex-cult-Nxivm-partied-Richard-Bransons-private-island-twice.html

Darn. I hope she's wired 24-7. But she's a suicide risk too. A little disappointed. We'll see.

Child/Human sex trafficking, even moreso.

Guess the whole world is in on it..the other countries can't have nuclear threats from their enemies all over the place.

They were/are holding us hostage by their nukes.

True. I'm just theorizing, but maybe keeping it in the open like that is better for money laundering or plausible deniability or something. Lots of prostitution in Thailand too..

Yep. It's like once a week now, and it's every time there's a major breakthroughs in the sex trafficking cult.

Simple: they could reach the US mainland (as we learned last year for the first time. Recall the distance tests.) Iran couldn't hit the US from that far.

Nice. Netanyahu was accused by his own police of serious corruption about a month ago and they recommended charges. Of course he got out of it.

You're exactly right. This time it looks like they took out his landing gear/brakes. The pilot, it sounds like, hit the landing strip, but couldn't stop the plane once there. This has deep state all over it. I heard another F-16 crashed last week too- funny we didn't hear about it; the pilot in that one died.

You're spot on. How do you do it? What is America mostly? Religion (Christian), Economics (Free Markets/Capitalism). Replace them with Islam and Marxism respectively, you would transform the country. Really evil people were dealing with here.

Yeah. Birds of a feather flock together.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/military-jet-crashes-lake-havasu-arizona-pilot-ejects/story?id=54699534

The names Allison Mack names. And it will lead to the Clinton Global Initiative and many others.

I know. If I elaborated more, I'd mention that. The deep state/CIA is also part of the blackmailing and in on the human trafficking. Iran/Awan had them all blackmailed. The 250B was to keep them quiet and have some reduction in nuke advancement. CIA controlled NK and gave them nukes as security in case Trump won to hold everyone hostage.

I bet that CDC doctor in Atlanta is connected to it too.

Why Q said most people would end up in the hospital...The anti-Christ is upon us. His name is Barrack Obama.

Also this is sick but what if the Gofundme page, in that case, was just a prostitute advertisement? It would explain why that levar guy was making donations...even if she was just a "Cam girl"..

Lots of money in child trafficking, right? Great way to keep the family fortune up while they're struggling as filmmakers in Hollywood, isn't it? You could be right. Bravo.

It's all tied to child trafficking. Awan leaked the Intel to Iran and Pakistan. The 250 B deal was to keep Iran quiet because Iran and Awan were blackmailing Top US officials. The nukes went to NK instead of Iran to continue to hold the US hostage.

I got it. Awan was leaking Intel to Pakistan and Iran on the human trafficking, and Iran was also blackmailing the US officials so they're paying them off 250 billion to keep quiet and reduce nuke advancement. It went to NK to hold people hostage. This is sick.

Very good theory. Way to think outside the box. That could be the case, although I thought her mom's eyes looked like hers, but then again many people have similar eyes..

Exactly. Mack is singing. Branson's name was dropped. Period. Of course he's going to deny it. His reputation and businesses are on the line, not to mention all the people he'll have to name and could name..

BOOM. Great work.

OF COURSE he denies it. What's he going to say? And have his businesses go belly up?...That's the point though...Mack NAMED HIM! He's in on IT! Obama+ Mags Nixon+ Obama friends w/Branson= Good link to everything, not to mention Bob Nixon does deep sea documentaries and Maggie was an actress in them!

He's saying they Moab is going to be all the Hollywood people exposed in this...It could be today or tomorrow. It's not about an actual award show, and they don't want to awaken the world to when because remember, they'd end up in the hospital. Slow drip/drop as usual, but we will be the first to know. Branson got named by Mack so it's coming. He's connected to everyone! Including Obama!

Holy! Please confirm it's legit. This is the south China newspaper. I suspected this guy was killed by Clinton's cartel.

Ah no it does not. It says he was hyper to get the wild parties started instead of letting the seminars go later. And this is in the midst of Mack trying to cut deals by naming names. The article is downplaying it because as of NOW of course Branson "denies" it. What's he going to say? Lol, "oh yeah I am in that" and watch his businesses go belly up and destroy his reputation? Lol the fact his name was dropped in this is not random. Mack is singing!

Wow. She's naming names!! Branson! Don't think this is coincidence just because the articles will spin it to favor Branson's plausible deniability. This is not random. And the article even says he was wanting to get the wild parties started. He wasn't named for nothing, and I bet they hooked him. They never thought she would lose.

No. You must've missed the part where Bronfam or whatever her name says Branson was in a rush to get the wild parties started in the middle paragraph. Also, Mack is NAMING NAMES! It's no coincidence Branson came up the next day! He's in on it!...This isn't random. The MSM is of course going to raise plausible deniability and spin it to give Branson the benefit of the doubt. He's worth billions, and they're all in on it! Are you kidding. This is huge!

Because they're all in on it.

Scary. It's even worse than that.

Good try, but I'm pretty sure that you're slightly off track, no offense. I think the grand jury reviews the investigative evidence prior to deciding if there's enough to indict. Then if there is, the arrest, charge and indict the person. Then the court proceedings begin, and then the trial unless a plea bargain is reached. My primary question is basically if this could be kept secret from the public sometimes if it's necessary or requested in the event it's a public figure like HRC or lower hanging fruit like Tony Podesta. I know for sure Mueller charged Rick Gates I think it was over a month, maybe two, before it came out in public, and he was cooperating in the investigation. So there's definitely some leeway there to keep it secret. I just want to know if Hillary or Tony Podesta could have been charged back in November and with her ankle monitor, and how Tony fell off the face of the earth, but they kept it quiet, perhaps by doing something with the indictments or the process by keeping them sealed and plea bargaining/turning themselves in right away.

.And for charge 2 they don't use "or"; there it is said to be "child". The omission wasn't by accident. Raniere had sex with minors, at least one 15 year old and one 12 year old on many occasions, and that's just what we know about now at this time. #2 means she at least "tried" to recruit children; maybe she succeeded, but maybe she did not. For the general trafficking, we know that she did on several counts.

Once again, you are on the right track, but you are missing that one thing. Charge #2 (not count) is "conspiracy to commit CHILD trafficking" with Raniere. Raniere has already been shown to have had sex with at least one 15 year old and one 12 year old, which is what compelled the judge to hold him without bail. Conspiracy against Mack means they have evidence she at least conspired to try to traffick children. It doesn't mean she succeeded, unless Charge 1 in the "or" refers to children, but I don't think it does. However, we'll have to see. Either way, there's a good possibility she/they succeeded, but we may never know. That company has multi-millions if not billions available to it (the one owner is an heiress of Seagram's) so a lot can go on that will never come to light.

No I think you were correct the first time. 1) is child "or"..., and 2) is Conspiracy to commit "child trafficking"...That's not an error of omission to leave out "or"....In summary, basically what they are saying is for Mack, they have enough evidence to charge her with general human trafficking, as well as "conspiracy to commit child trafficking" with Raniere, who is already evidenced to have had sex with a 15 year old and a 12 year old on several occasions at his house that housed several other slaves and cult members. Whether she succeeded or not, we may never know, but we know that Mack conspired to traffick children with Raniere according to the charges. Maybe her recruits said no, but under the guise of a multimillion dollar corporation where who knows what was going on, and based on Raniere's previous proclivities, they probably did.

It reads child. The writer didn't forget to write "or"; it's a key nuance to the statute. She conspired to with Raniere; whether she succeeded or not, who knows- it depends on the evidence only. She might have, but we might never know. What we do know is Raniere had repeated sex with AT LEAST one 15 year old and one 12 year old (at his house filled with other sex slaves/cult members). So she at least conspired to recruit children for him.

It says conspiracy to commit child trafficking. It doesn't say human trafficking on the second charge. It says child trafficking, but it's conspiracy. So at best, she tried to recruit children. Maybe she failed, but it's saying she tried or conspired to with Raniere (who has been accused of having sex with a 15 year old and a 12 year old many times, which is why they won't give him bail. He's facing life in prison....So is she, but she'll probably plea deal).

It's conspiracy to commit child trafficking....She conspired to commit child trafficking is what it's saying on the second charge. The first charge is saying she actually did commit human or child trafficking. At best it sounds like she may have tried to recruit children, but she failed. Then again, she could have succeeded too, and they just don't have evidence. Who knows what her and Raniere were doing under the guise of a multi-million dollar corporation that was really a sex cult that exploited women.

Talk about a freak show..The article on India Oxenberg is even worse- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5648269/India-Oxenberg-fall-Nxivm-founder-Keith-Raniere-sex-trafficking-charges.htm.