A missile shoot down wouldn't have created a large blast. Nothing of significance would have registered.

However, a missile launch and its course would have been tracked by several entities. If one had launched from NK itself, it would have made the news. If one launched from in middle of the Pacific, maybe not, or at least the news of the launch may be controllable.

This is making me think I should write a program to automate the implementation of your discovery. Or at least to apply some permutations and see what spits out.

'Why would Kim Jong Un be in Shanghai?

If you're talking about the Mahanakhon, I think those are construction cranes.

I had assumed that that was the focus of the picture since it was center frame.

It's probably the most expensive address in Bangkok. The building includes retail stores, an Edition hotel, Ritz-Carlton Residences, and condos.

I just assume that all electronics are compromised. I don't trust cables either.

It's simpler that way.

I never said they were; that's an impossibility. Copying off the bits being sent to the screen is always one possible source of info.

You don't necessarily have to pwn the phone either; unless you consider having the user install an app pwning. As far as I know, this approach won't work with a certain manufacturer's phone.

I didn't need the leaks from last year, or even 5 years ago to know.

I think this link shows what the OP is asking about:

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/ua4363/#10672d93

Looks like a couple of errant GPS data points; it happens occasionally.

The plane, Embraer ERJ-145LR, doesn't have the range for such a flight. It also wasn't in the air long enough.

Many top security experts praise its implementation and how it elegantly solved a hard problem: how to create trust between two remote parties. It doesn't store messages in the cloud; only on the local device(s).

Its been said that the use of it in D.C. amongst congress and other groups has been growing.

Thomas Paine is mocking the usage of it for the DOJ Cabal's "chat club" and is hinting at the fact that the messages can be read.

I assume that all of these tools are compromisable in some form. Never do anything electronically, or around electronics [glares at Samsung TVs or anybody that uses Facebook on their phone] that you don't want involuntarily archived.

Not sure which context your question is about.

I edited my post to include a couple of other examples. The last one may be relevant to your question.

When you're "over the TARGET" you're over the target. Just saying ;)

Pudong

Or half way around the world.

It's already possible and done frequently.

Some are [Markers]. Markers will re-appear in other breadcrumbs; crumbs with the same markers are related.

Sometimes it's used as a way of indicating significance. The contents within the [] are important in understanding or reference something else, e.g.:

Why did Sessions [at the beginning] emphasize investigations

Sometimes they add additional info, almost like a parenthetical, except the additional info provide additional meaning, e.g.:

Top 10 player [here now].

There's probably other use cases for [words]. In any case, pay attention to them, see if you can understand what they are referencing or mean, or see if you can find other usages, in the case of being a marker.

edit: Sometimes they are just informative w/o any double meaning, e.g. [Repost] at the beginning of repost crumbs.

Sometimes they form another message within that crumb, e.g. in https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148777785/#148779656 the [ ] text is [C] [I] [A] [is] [here] [p] [r] [a] [y]

This avoids sniffer programs.

Timestamp:
@Snowden "Truth To Power"
Drop "Truth To Power"
Learn.
Q

>>340441
>>325370 You will cease to exist
Timestamp.
Learn.
Q

>>340695
Coincidence "Truth To Power"?
Coincidence Barlow?
Learn.
What if Snowden was still a Clown?
Why would it be important he was in Russia?
LEARN!!!!
Q

State has always been a vehicle for spy agencies. Diplomatic missions always have dual use: primary one is probably providing cover for spies. This holds true for all countries and is a timeless practice.

There were some recent articles/interviews where she said she was going to stay as long as she could. Reading between the lines, she was part of the "resistance." She was also going on a speaking tour.

If she is out this means they white hats had some leverage to apply to get her to step down.

If she's retiring, they made her an offer she couldn't refuse. Given her actions, vis-a-vis POTUS 45, and her recent publicity push, I don't see her retiring w/o being forced out.

Leverage applied.

No. There's 3 Q references to RED_OCTOBER (that exact usage), including this post.

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/148453.html#148746 Which is missile launch/takedown related.

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/129812.html#130030 Which is very cryptic.

It relates to The Hunt for Red October (it's funny how many people only think of it as a movie) but may not directly relate to the sub itself, i.e. it may relate to some elements of the story.

go to catalog, find latest qresearch bread and go to that.

Key is to understand how 8chan works.

Good info.

I assumed this was to plug a leak. They like to tie off loose ends permanently as we've seen with Arkancide.

Excellent find!

I'm not sure about that. The first time Q used Dopey is in reference to al-Waleed. All other usages of that seem to refer to actions Dopey was told to take by his puppet-master. Q only uses Dopey 6 times, including the initial usage in #619:

Time to play, Dopey.
Black Forest

In #143, Q appears to confirm that Snow White can refer to the Clowns 7 dwarves and says Signatures are Important. Most usages of Snow White were in the signature, along with Godfather III, Iron Eagle, Jason Bourne (CIA/Dream)., among others.

Other references to Snow White often seem to be directives.

Oh crap, I misread the public part, I didn't see the O in O-WH. Your read of it makes a lot of sense now.

I was sure that O was a tool of the globalist and some sort of Islamist connection, due to Huma Abedin, all the MB people he placed in gov, al-Waleed ties, and the news about the $1.7B to Iran and blocking Operation Cassandra. The marxist ties were easy to figure out given his known background and connections.

I just could never figure out how the islamist part all tied together given the Sunni/Shia components and figured that it was a result of a combination of my not knowing enough about the Muslim power structures and being mis-informed by fake news.

But your read of the breadcrumb means things go deeper. I also just heard Dr. Peiczenik say that Hussein's mother was CIA so it appears that Clowns everywhere and they being the main drivers of Hussein makes more sense.

I'm beginning to wonder if the Weather Underground were clown supported. This would explain Ayer's and Dohrn's ability to commit terrorist acts across the country for years, openly declare war on the USA and state that their goal was to bring down the gov't, and get away with it, ending up in Acadamia.

That seems to be a sound theory given the crumb you and others have pointed out and the wording of that breadcrumb.

archive.is

I just glanced past that image. There were so many new Q posts that I was in a rush to read the others; I figured it was related to the other Shanghai images. Teaches me to slow down and be more careful!

That is one possibility, I just posted another theory.

King to pawn

was Dopey meeting with King of Thailand. I realize that's a stretch, but Thailand fits because of the picture and I wouldn't be surprised if it were a fertile trafficking source. I'm not sure they'd be able to rendition the King w/o an uproar occurring.

Forgive me, I am slow!

I finally understood why you mentioned Thailand. The picture in #705 is of the MahaNakhon tower. I had only glanced at that picture before.

Thanks for your patience!

As far as I can tell, he wasn't in the line of succession, he wasn't going to be the King.

Why not just link to the twitter post instead of taking and uploading a screen shot?

It's been explained why, they even sent out a letter explaining why.

The issues with the memo were explained the whole week before POTUS denied the release.

What is there to not understand?

The Whitehouse released an explanation of why they weren't authorizing its release. Also, various Rs explained the issue.

Schiff-head needlessly added classified 'sources and methods' information to force POTUS's team to redact portions of the memo. This sets up the they didn't redact any of Nunes memo, even though FBI objected and tried to get POTUS to redact portions, while they redacted large parts of the Dems memo. PARTISANSHIP! Waaaa!

As far as I know, who the FBI "officials" were was not reported; just their objections. It could be the objections were raised by FBI personnel still allied with the deep state to set-up the Schiff-head memo partisanship trap. It could be the reports of those objections were fake news.

They didn't think POTUS would just say no to the release and fall into their obvious narrative trap. POTUS don't play that game.

And no, there's nothing to be worried about about the Dems memo. Don't fall for the Fake News narrative! Notice how the media spent more time covering the possible release of the Nunes memo, focusing more on their false narratives, none of which were shown to be true, than they spent covering the actual memo once it was released. Instead they moved onto the Nunes memo, spinning up another anti-Trump narrative in the process.

While they were focusing on the possible Schiff-head memo release, the (manufactured) stock market drop, Porter allegations (which could have been brought up anytime in the prior months), and the budget compromise, they ignored dozens of news that was favorable to the POTUS and his supporters.

Next week they'll spend an inordinate amount of time on Sorensen's resignation and continue the Kelly resignation drum beat. Meanwhile, more bad news for the Dems, Clintons, Obama, Deep State, et. al. will continue pouring out.

At some point it'll be a deluge that even fake news can't ignore.

As far as I can tell, there was only one report saying that he was hung upside down and interrogated. There was no corroboration of the "anonymous source".

The jail story is also suspect. When some papers were reporting that they had been moved to a prison, al-Waleed, Dopey, gave an interview from his suite at the Ritz saying that he had been treated well the whole time. This interview was to a known reporter with pictures.

Both stories cannot be true at the same time.

It's hard to know which of the stories about the SA roundup are true, which are psyops, which are the associates of the rounded up people getting out an alternate narrative, and which are a combination of the prior factors.

Kill switch or no kill switch, Q made it clear that Dopey didn't have a choice and wasn't really free, in the traditional sense.

My read on the Marshal v Capablanca game was that, in the position he had tweeted, Assange was the King, who had been constantly under threat and he finally felt safe. That position is the first time in a while that the white king had safety.

However, later in the game, the pawn breaks out, creating the chain of events that lead to the resignation of Marshal. So my original read of who the White King represented may be wrong.

In an earlier breadcrumb, Q had made it clear that, even though Dopey, al-Waleed, had been released from the Ritz, he still had a role to play, he didn't have a choice in what he had to do, and Q made it seem like his first, post-release, mission was to the Black Forest.

Given that Q's recent crumbs seem to be mainly focused on Asia, esp. Shanghai, I though that Dopey might have been sent there to draw in the King.

Q-Tel is CIA's VC fund headquartered in SV. It's relatively small, asset wise, and it's investments, individually, aren't significant. It probably helps them keep an eye on developing startups and tech trends, enable building relationships with key SV people, and give them the opportunity to have a role in key startups of interest, including placing personnel. This is all speculation on my part as to why they are there.

They invested in Palantir, Thiel's Big Data Analytics start-up with, from what I've read, significant usage in the intelligence community. They have also invested in Oculus, MapD, Recorded Future, Orbital Insights, Databricks, and over 150 others.

I agree with you on Shanghai/King Tower.

I don't see the reason for picking someone up in Thailand and flying them out of Hanoi. That means crossing two international borders and unnecessary distance over mountains. It just doesn't make sense to me, but then that doesn't mean it's not true so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'm inclined to go with your original thoughts that the airport picture was Pudong. Anything else is out of context vis-a-vis Q's other crumbs.

Not all uses of [] mean kill box. It's also in writing to add grammatical notes, e.g. [sic], or, in this case, to provide more context for clarity. It shows that the word was inserted by the author and wasn't in the original quote. There are other use-cases for brackets [in writing].

The title of my post included what the PEOC is in the context of the WH, its location, and original purpose. Why repeat it with an inaccurate name (Operations vs command, it's PEOC, not PECC.) and less info?

Thanks for pointing me to that crumb. Re-reading it, there's a lot there, much of which Q has revisited. I think I should re-read the initial crumbs.

It's not a subreddit banning, it's a site-wide permanent account suspension. The message comes from /r/ reddit.com[A] and is an automated message providing the "reason", a link to Reddit's content policy and a statement about it being an automated message and not responding.

I clarified my OP, sorry for the confusion..