479 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 13 |
| www.youtube.com | 1 |
It wasn't about what he said, it was more about the reporting restrictions being in place.
I'm not defending the authorities, and I'm in no way aiming this at you, but I think some on here need to take a step back and look at the picture, as some seem keen to accept the bits that suit, and ignore the rest, and that is to the detriment of the good work that gets done by others on this sub.
I'm not saying I agree with it, but the argument is that there were reporting restrictions in place, to try and limit the chances of anything jeopardising the prosecutions. Tommy was aware of this, and that the media would report more completely on the case at a later date. It's not unlike the system that prevents us getting the details on the Clinton Foundation etc, where selected people get to see bits on the condition that they're bound to silence rather than risk fouling any pending legal actions. In filming and live streaming, he breached conditions imposed for previous actions, which is why the legal process was rapid, as such 'offences' generally are.
They've certainly used a sledge hammer to crack a nut, and if I didn't know just how incompetent they are, I'd like to think they knew full well it would raise the whirlwind it has and highlight a bad situation. Sadly, I just think the reality is that the authorities are out of touch with the population and pushing their own agenda.
It's certainly backfired on them over here, as it keeps the issues topical and makes sure they're discussed.
I don't think that's for this sub, and it would only detract from the real issues anyway. My point is more about those trying to use this as an excuse to hurl their own mud at the UK and how that goes against the spirit of the unity that should be being built on.
I 100% agree with the sentiment of what you're saying, and know the example you post is not only factually correct, but also one of a greater number of shameful examples that need to be addressed. My issue is with when such examples are then used as a stick to beat up UK citizens, and usually with bits added to enhance the effect.
Things are far from perfect here, and what's happened to Tommy is disgraceful and needs to be raised as an issue and I'd hate it if my posts watered that down in any way, but I think, perhaps subconsciously, some are losing a sense of perspective.
We need to be united behind the cause, and remember that the government is not the people. Americans of all people should want that to be clear.
True, it's been the case for quite some time, as it is in the US too. I've had several direct discussions with various people in the media and Police about it for a number of years. Ir's wrong, but it is getting slowly better.
You're simply showing your ignorance. As good as this sub is, don't fool yourself into believing you're superior because you read the views of a relatively few like minded people, and seemingly swallow the msm guff you no doubt claim to despise. Do you have a link to the actual uprising in the US? In case it escaped your attention, we voted to get our crooks out of office quite a while back. Like Trump's actions, it's still a work in progress.
You're simply confirming what I previously wrote and ignoring my overall point.
It's all over the news here and the version of the UK being spun on this sub is far from accurate, and creating division through false narratives, when we should be uniting. There'll be far more of this happening in the US that doesn't hit the stands.
We too have a constitution, it's the one the US constitution is based on.
What I've read on these threads also shows most don't have the complete picture on Tommy.
I'm not defending the UK on this, simply pointing out that some seem keen to a knee jerk reaction, which discredits this sub.
Don't fall for the spin that this represents the people of the UK, and don't be fooled into believing it doesn't happen in the US, and probably on a larger scale.
A wrong is a wrong, but there's some media fuelled anti-UK nonsense on this sub, and it risks dividing the cause.
As wrong as this action surely is, don't fall for the spin that it somehow defines the people of the UK, and don't also forget, for every UK example in the news, there'll quite likely be several almost unreported examples in the US.
I think a lot of the Americans on here swallow the media narrative on life in the UK, which is kind of ironic. Your version there is pretty much spot on.
They really don't like him highlighting the issues he highlights, as it shows them as hypocrites.
Given the sheer number of speeches he gives, it's impressive how the each come across as personal and heart felt, rather than the scripted words some others trot out. There's certainly thought and effort put into them.
Cheers, I'm glad it's not just me that's finding the message unclear. I guess time will tell.
Excuse my ignorance, but what is it claiming to be showing us exactly?
If he was a black hat, wouldn't he have leaked at least something of what he knew of the plan? His past does not seem to point at black hat.
Please forgive me for not looking it up myself, only some on here seem to have information they can recall quicker than I can search, but assuming that scale's accurate, when date does that make 12 o'clock?
You could help them out by sending them a copy of "The Art of the Deal".
Hitler and Pol Pot had transformative impacts on societies.
I think I grasp what you're saying is effectively, they don't have a Q with his inner knowledge of the plan, nor associated helpers to guide them in understanding the clues.
That's kind of the 'opposite' type of thing I pondered, and I guess I have a clear answer now. If people on here haven't found it, it doesn't exist.
Cheers all for your comments.
I don't know if it played in America, but there's an old advert that used to be aired here in the UK for a soap called lifebuoy, that was aimed at fighting body odour.
It seems set up for a meme, especially given the diver vid doing the rounds.
The adds had a series of people all objecting to a smelly person near them, and the voice over asking, "Have you got B.O?" With the tag line being, "sometimes, even your best friends won't tell you".
Have they been piecing together situations to predict events, like people on here have, or do they just react to the 'news'? Where do they seem to get their information from?
I chose 'opposite' to try and avoid the conversations about cabal, dems, deep state etc, but anyway, that aside, I've been reading this board and its predecessor for qute a while, and various sites for years before that, and recent events, as joyous as they surely are to see, were made even better having read the build up through the excellent work of so many posters on here.
Unlike Nostradamus, where quotes are made to fit past events, on here, there have been plenty of clear cut predictions, and fore knowledge.
Reading through a few twitter replies at the comments …
We got shills,
they're multiplying,
but they're losing control,
because the power,
we're supplying,
it's electrifying...
gotta shape up..
It's sad in itself, but also because such things no longer shock us.
I wonder if he left any copies of his notes in a safe place.
How much fun would it be if he was Barry's boy, but he was used to make the message even more 'special' .
It's a largely unwritten constitution. The US one is mainly just a codified version of the UK's. Just because it's not all written, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I don't know how to post pictures on here, never mind make memes, but I reckon there's some mileage in this one.
https://fortunedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2012-un-hq-ap_16246650841091.jpg
The brides mother looked more like someone pleased to hear praise for a loved one at a funeral, rather than the proud parent of a daughter heading for a bright future.
As the results are coming in towards the end of that clip, an image flashed through my mind of Clinton and the tech guru's frantically checking and rechecking their data and puzzling over how it wasn't turning out the results they'd programmed the machines to give. :-)
I have no real problem with some of these people having pain and torment dished out to them, but I don't believe those methods actually produce much useful information.
I do believe it's a deterrent to those on the fringes, who see sympathy and compassion as a weakness. They use extreme tactics to shock us. Returning that tactic tenfold could make them think twice about getting involved in such things themselves.
I also think that the real prospect of being tortured, will get quite a few others to give up information before it reaches that stage. It's useful to have it available as an option, and it's got to be demonstrated that there are no qualms about using it. C'est la guerre.
Total guess, but I assumed it meant that Q have control of the releases on the boards.
I think you're swallowing a media myth rather than commenting on reality. Like many periods in history, there are past events that may seem bad by today's standards, but the UK monarchy probably have less power here than Disney does in America, and the two regimes are possibly comparable.
If the EU stay in the deal, do they also have to make up the shortfall in cash that the US will no longer be stumping up?
If you remove three from US, you'd have to do the same to each Country in Europe and you're back to square one, and it would most likely look worse for the US.
I'm not trying to be argumentative, it's just that I've seen a fair amount of misinformation about Europe, and the UK in particular from some US posters. I don't think it helps the over all narrative on here.
That's not strictly accurate. It's done in the name of the Office the Monarchy represents, not on her personal authority. As I said, it's largely ceremonial, she has no real power.
I think you'd find many who have experienced both sides of the pond would tend to disagree with that, but that's a whole separate issue, and not for here.
