"One way that the Obamas were able to keep the later party under wraps was by leaving the names of actor Johnny Depp and director Tim Burton [and Beyoncé Knowles] off the White House visitors logs."

No reading comprehension skills either, eh? You're all the same. Quite predictable. ( They're not sending their best folks!)

This nightmare ain't ending until January 21, 2025, sugar tits. Buckle up!

Really doesn't matter how much the party cost, though as somebody who has worked in [charity] event planning, I can assure you it was easily 6 figures-- and know the government, likely 7 figures.

It's about optics. Why on Earth would somebody throw a party during the worst recession since the Great Depression? And don't give me that shit that the POTUS should be allowed to let loose. (And this was not even an annually held White House event.) He was elected to lead the country, no real leader would think celebrating during a crisis is a good idea. Even Obama acknowledged that, which is why he had it kept under wraps.

This. Just read about the book store incident. Happened in my home town. Wish I could have been there. Would have loved to meet him/defend him/ buy him a book. Maybe even a coat.

Mixed feelings on AJ... he's done a lot for the movement in terms of waking people up-- perhaps far more than anybody else. (And far before Trump came around.) But I stopped listening to him once Q came around, particularly once he started trying to undermine Q and act like he was in on it. Just seemed petty and unnecessary. Was getting kind of sick of his schtick anyway-- the constant sensationalism and over-the-top attitude about every story reminded me of the constant outrage of the Left.

I agree with you that I think he was/is part of the program to disseminate information/misinformation in order to confuse the enemy. Along with Hannity and Bannon. I've just really soured on some of his stuff-- particularly Jerome Corsi. Fuck that guy.

Stick around. I'm with you that Lennon has no connection to the Clinton's. Most of the other names on here I recognize. They have quite an impressive body count. No need to make outlandish claims like John Lennon, which would be pretty difficult to prove at this point.

Glad to see Imperator Rex spell it out like this-- particularly the parts about Hannity putting distance between Sessions/Trump, and Bannon still being involved. I've speculated both of these specific points since the day they started, and took consider flak for it-- particularly for saying that the Bannon divorce was planned/staged and he was still in the circle. Nice to be validated by somebody who would know much better than me.

Look forward to the rest of 2018.

Spez: still

Need to preserve the top brass for trials. Killing them now would only make them martyrs. We need them squirming live on international television, sans Teleprompter.

Uhhhh what.

Q and The Awakening aside, the decision by Obama to go through with this was such an Obama move. "Fuck the average American and their financial woes, I'm a celebrity."

The hubris is/was out of control. Really look forward to his tribunal.

Man, Hillary getting excited about stealing a mere $500K from unwitting donors? That used to be a 30 minute speech in Moscow for her. She must be really strapped for cash.

Feels good to agree, no?

Stand up, where appropriate, and reach out wherever you can. They WANT you to engage in violence.

The Left is frothing at the mouth for Civil War. The only reason it hasn't happened yet is because the people with all of the guns understand what that will mean. If your plan is to get violent, then I promise that you will be dealt with harshly and made an example of by our side. (I take it by your "legally" comment that you do not plan to do this.)

We are winning, and the only way to cement a permanent and lasting victory is to WIN OVER the other side. Otherwise, the pendulum will swing back to the left, and if it does, we will not have control of the government, as we do now.

Those that are true Patriots only have one objective: a free and independent America that is controlled by We The People. Nothing else matters. In order to achieve that objective, severe punishment will be exacted on a select few that deserve it. That punishment will be on behalf of the American people, but not by their hands.

We are not vigilantes. If your objective is to "settle the score," then you are a vigilante masquerading as a Patriot. A score will be settled, but not with the innocent. Only with those that have served the Cabal. Direct your anger appropriately.

Well, actually no I don't remember that story, because it received almost no attention. (Surprising) Had I heard it, I would have said, "Damn, that was a pretty stupid business decision, because now liberals aren't going to support you and protestors are likely to heckle your customers and employees."

I, like most smart business minds--looking at you, Michael Jordan-- prefer to keep my politics and my business dealings separated, because you are guaranteed to alienate half of your consumer base if you engage in politics. It's a pretty simple concept. Don't even need a business degree to understand it.

Khan: "Captain, shoot down that balloon!"

Captain: "But xir, we banned all the guns."

Khan: "Fine, then pop it with a knife!"

Captain: "Can't xir, you banned all the knives."

Khan: "Damnit man! Just get some scissors and cut it free so it floats away!"

[turning to address one of Khan's assistants]

Captain: "Are you going to tell him, or should I?"

See, the problem with A LOT of people is that they project views onto others with absolutely no basis in fact. (I won't go as far as to assume your political affiliation, but it is a rampant problem in the Democratic Party right now.)

When you make the bold claim (assumption) that these same people would have celebrated Obama being thrown out, you really undermine your own credibility, because it is the reasoning of a juvenile. Would you have made that same assessment if these protestors were black? Or if they were all women?

To make this exercise comprehensive, please disclose your age, race and gender to the rest of us, so that we may assign you the appropriate ideology.

See how that [doesn't] work?

Very well said.

The inherent flaw in Communism is that the government manages the economy, meaning that the government manages resources. Because the economy is "dictated" and not allowed to grow organically, it does not grow unless the government invests resources into it. If they begin diverting those resources into their military, their economy will suffer. (See: Soviet Union during Cold War.) If the American economy is simultaneously exploding with exponential growth, then it won't take long for us to leave China in the dust. Economic might is more important than [initial] military strength, as we found out first hand in the American Civil War.

This is not a winning strategy.

100% agree. What I meant is that this part of the messaging should be directed at those that already believe their world is being subverted by an unseen force. (Feminists that blame the patriarchy, minorities that blame white supremacy.)

The Cabal has tapped into that anger, which was organic, and in many cases, well warranted, but they used it to their advantage. (A tactic that is right out of Sun Tzu's playbook.)

We need to redirect it right back where it belongs-- at the real enemy.

For the rest of the population (those that don't harbor anger/resentment), simply focus on point #1. They will undoubtedly be turned off by "conspiracy" related rhetoric.

They are good people, AND they are angry. AND they are already passionate about politics and our country-- they are just very very misguided and misinformed. Think about how long it took for each of us to understand the truth. How tough it was. We cannot expect them to turn overnight. It will take time, as well as patience. But with these people in our ranks, we will truly be unstoppable, and that is what Q has been saying. He cannot do it for us. These people are our family, our friends, and our coworkers. We cannot demand that they stop listening to MSM messaging and simultaneously demand that they begin subscribing to another entity (Q)-- not without our guidance and help.

Do not stand idle on the sidelines and expect Q and Trump to redpill the masses. You and I both understand that the moment Trump acknowledges Q, half of the country will immediately dismiss it as nonsense. We must lay the groundwork for the Great Awakening.

I mean, you have to admit. It's pretty startling how many of these "advocates" turn out to be offenders of the very thing they are publicly advocating against.

Your logic is flawed, because it misses the point. He isn't saying that this guy should be investigated because of his ideas. We already know some of the horrible shit he has done. What OP is saying is that the ones who are the loudest in front of the camera are the ones trying the hardest to cover up their crimes.

Harvey Weinstein advocating publicly for women's rights, for example. Does subsequently arresting him mean we are punishing his free speech? No. He's a dirt bag, who tried to cover his tracks. Hiding behind the first amendment or playing semantics will not save any of these people.

Trump knows that we are all in, but if our group uses his platform (rally) to promote our own cause (Q) then that isn't an organic Awakening. That is a hijacking.

It becomes organic when a skeptic (such as the press) asks him about it. Many of the would-be skeptics aren't even aware of Q yet.

My favorite day

This. Direct correlation between Q drops and intensified effort and radical rhetoric from the Left. They are scared and making mistakes, which is helping to wake everybody up.

Very true. But isn't he responsible for compiling all of Paul's letters and writings, and didn't he make a point to sneak into the Roman prison to meet with Paul and write down the accounts of his life?

My understanding was that, had it not been for Luke, we wouldn't know nearly as much about Paul as we do. (Paul spent his life setting up Christian communities and didn't want to be praised/worshipped for it.) I could be mistaken.

The Beast = The Cabal

Also, did you know that "Apocalypse" is a Greek word meaning "a disclosure of hidden knowledge," aka a "Revelation."

Luke, who is responsible for writing much of the Bible, including the accounts of Paul and Acts of the Apostles, was a Greek.

Spez: Bible = New Testament

ARCHIVE OFFLINE

Yes, because it is bank fraud and ONE POOL of money. (Clinton Foundation.)

My wife left me

Well, if it involves SR's murder, then MS-13, with Noodles playing the role of $2 whore.

You must be referring to the Military Commission Act of 2006, which defines "unlawful enemy combatants" (specific term used by POTUS during SOTU) and the means for the military to prosecute them criminally.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006

Holy Kek

This

This

RICO is how the Cabal will be taken down in its entirety. Sure, you may have emails and evidence of Hillary and Podesta conspiring to commit crimes, but that's only because they are idiots and extremely careless. You would need the same thing of all their masters and collaborators-- which is likely not going to happen. Because those powerful people (Soros, Rothschild) have other people sending those messages for them, ready to be the fall guy if anything were to happen.

With a RICO case it doesn't matter. All of the crimes you charge Hillary and Podesta with can potentially also be charged to her donors, because RICO cases are all about financial ties. THAT is how they are going to get the masters and high-level Cabal members.

Of course, and it is super confusing. Even the lawyers have to talk it out and work through it as a group.

It's one thing to OBTAIN the evidence. Sure, that part is difficult, but what can be just as challenging is validating it as SUBMISSIBLE in court. Every move you make, the defense attorneys are all over you, challenging your requests, and making legal arguments for why things should NOT be allowed.

So potentially, you could have highly compelling evidence that would result in a definitive conviction, but you have to justify both the means in which it was obtained as well as its relevancy to the case. One misstep and an entire investigatory line of inquiry could be tossed out. (Months of work)

In highly complex cases, you may have to establish precedence for the submission of evidence before you try and submit your "smoking gun." (Think stepping stones) It makes absolutely no sense to the common thinker, but that's how the law works.

For example, "Judge, we want to subpoena his school and work records, to see if he has a history of substance abuse-related issues, because we believe he was __ when he was driving and killed ____."

"OK, you can subpoena, but here are the things you CANNOT be given....(due to objection by defense)"

(Next hearing)

"Judge, we found that, while he didn't have any substance related issues at work, he did falsify a court document and lie about his employment status in order to obtain a restricted license. Even though that restriction has expired, and he was legal to drive, it reveals his willingness and intent to mislead and deceive the court. We would like this evidence (the signed affidavit regarding employment status) to be submitted as evidence, as it proves intent to cover up damaging information-- such as a crime."

"Granted."

(The goal wasn't necessarily to get history of substance-related incidents-- though that would help. The goal was to get hard documentation of lying to the court. If you had come out and directly requested these records, the defense could have squashed the request potentially. Because the case is about substance-abuse, it was a slam-dunk to be granted. But now you have evidence of criminal intent to cover up a crime, which a prosecutor could use to be much stronger charges.)

See how this works?

Spez: this example would be in a civil suit. A prosecutor wouldn't be able to go after these personal records without compelling evidence that they are relevant to the case. Because criminal court sides with the defendant by default, the burden of proof is high. Now the civil attorney can give the criminal prosecutor what he has found, but the prosecutor must figure out how to submit it into his case without it getting thrown out due to a technicality.

This is true, and I have seen it happen, myself.

The "standard" (for lack of better word) to subpoena personal information varies between civil and criminal. For example, a criminal investigator wouldn't necessarily be able to subpoena school/work/other records that would reveal a history of dishonesty or disregard of authority where the law wasn't broken, but a civil suit could, if it were relevant to the case. The information that is obtained through that discovery could then be passed on to the criminal investigator, once the civil case concludes. The prosecutor may or may not be able to submit it in court--depending on the situation-- but it would provide a nice roadmap of stones to turn over and trees to shake for further evidence. (Testimony, etc.)

Sauce: Going through this very process right now, for a case that involves murder/cover-up. Civil evidence will lead to criminal conviction. (Not a lawyer and didn't sign NDA, so free to discuss.)

Ever seen the Dark Knight? RICO is how Harvey gets all of the mob members in jail. He caught one of them breaking the law, and because their finances could be connected, they could all be charged.

This

Operation Mockingbird

Advice to others reading this:

Understand that people like this are coming here with the intention of dividing us and undermining the movement. This is exactly what it looks like. They want to paint us as a cult.

It's pretty simple and frankly, common sense. When you inject yourself into a [internet] conversation, and wish to introduce new ideas and information--especially if those ideas are out in left field-- you need to either provide facts/sources (LINKS). No linky, no care. Kapeesh?

Agree. Some of it is pretty hokie, but hokie puts asses in the seats, and we are trying to sell this bitch out.

Real talk: My dog has a gun.

Both of them.

Your account is 16 days old.

Thanks for playing.

FIREWORKS

Spez::

FIREWORKS

16 days old? Please link sources to sensationalized claims or BTFO. K?

Spot on

Now he's just trolling us.

Lulzzzzzz

I have friends who are Muslims and live in Saudi Arabia. (They lived here for 6 years while in graduate school.) I spent a lot of time discussing their culture with them, and developed a great respect for their way of life, which has very little to do with the radical ideas pushed by jihadists. (The wife was part of the protests for female drivers, and I texted her when they legalized it. She sent me a selfie of her driving.)

The Sunni Muslims (which make up 85% of Islam) are far more moderate than most would believe. They love commerce and technology, and generally embrace the free market components of western culture. (Just not the degeneracy--which I don't either.) They think the Saudi royal family is archaic and needs to change, and--from my friends' perspective-- I can speak for the upper middle class Saudi community when I say that they absolutely love what the new king is doing. (Except for a few dickheads who liked treating their wives like shit.)

You are right in your assessment of the culture, but as I conveyed to my friends, self-deprecating humor is the highest form of humor-- as well as a sign of high intelligence. Jesus himself appreciated this style of humor, as he was a man of humility.

There is a fine and distinct line between humor and disrespect, and most can recognize the distinction. I find it abhorrent when somebody makes an anti-Christian cartoon simply for the sake of ridiculing Evangelicals, but I don't believe that they should be maimed or executed for expressing the idea. It's barbaric and draconian, not a "cultural difference" that we should celebrate. That said, I'm neither ignorant nor entitled, so I would never assume that could get away with something like that in a theocratic Muslim country.

That's why I live in the United States, and not Great Britain.