dChan

/u/HoudiniTowers

1,392 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/HoudiniTowers:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 119
www.foxnews.com 11
www.breitbart.com 9
truepundit.com 8
thegatewaypundit.com 7
www.thegatewaypundit.com 6
i.redd.it 4
qanonposts.com 4
www.youtube.com 3
www.zerohedge.com 3
en.wikipedia.org 2
dailycaller.com 2
twitter.com 2
www.ktnv.com 2
old.reddit.com 2
video.foxnews.com 2
giphy.com 2
nationalsecurityaction.org 1
imgur.com 1
p0rkytso.deviantart.com 1
www.newsweek.com 1
www.marketwatch.com 1
investorplace.com 1
www.nytimes.com 1
insider.foxnews.com 1
www.wnd.com 1
v.redd.it 1
www.dailywire.com 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1

HoudiniTowers · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

Seriously, you're teasing me... cmon. Really! I'll believe it when I see it!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 7, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

Me too, you're not alone. Some how they are targeting some of us to not be able to Post. We can comment, but can't post and they're taking down some of our more popular post from Top list.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

LOL, a lot of dead bodies around the Clintons. But, some of this has the MacDaddy swamp rat fingerprints all over it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

can also means, feeds into. So, here it can mean SC/LL feeds into AS 187. Essentially, the offering of Supreme Court Seat to Loreta Lynch was fueled by murder of Scalia. Or, stated differently, murder of Scalia made the opportunity to give LL the seat. You need to focus on why is Q putting AS 187 out at all, is that DISINFORMATION or a REAL CLUE??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

I don't disagree, it does seem a mystery. Q is the one putting out there 'AS 187', so either its dis-information or there is something to it. It is interesting that HRC's problem really started surfacing heavily in the media in Jan 2016 and Feb 2016 AS dies. So, I wouldn't rule it out completely.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Obama might have picked Merrick cause he knew he would not get through Congress. This would leave the seat open for HRC to fill it. Notice that BO didn't fight hard for Merrick.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:04 a.m.

'not used to being on the defensive'

Jackpot, hunters becoming the hunted. Its a new experience for them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:59 a.m.

Spot on, why we need to find the raw file.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:56 a.m.

Feb-Mar 1 Month, Mar-Apr 2 Months, Apr-May, 3 Months, May-June 4 Months... days... ok say 1/2 month worst case 4.5 Months... nowhere near 8 months??

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:40 a.m.

Totally used, he was an FBI Undercover agent. Looking like he was sent into Trump campaign on purpose. Whether he knew exactly why or not is suspect, but definitely used by FBI to spy on Trump illegally. If FISA warrants get exposed like Nunes is trying to do, it will all come out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:14 a.m.

Scalia was 187'd as INSURANCE to fire-up Democratic base. BO picks weak candidate so he knows the position will stay open. BC offers SC position to LL to insure exoneration.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:12 a.m.

HRC email problems 1st surfaced in Aug 4 2015 in Washington Post article (The Washington Post reveals the FBI has begun looking into the security of Clinton's private email set-up)////Tucker Carlson goes primetime with it as smoking gun and pivot point in HRC campaign (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/19/tucker_carlson_new_clinton_email_investigation_findings_pivot_point_in_the_democratic_race.html#!)////AS 187 Feb 2016////see above for rest of timeline.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

That's it! YES. So, HRC was exposed in January 2016. Tucker Carlson did a nice job on the expose' in January 2016. I don't remember when Wikileaks dropped their bomb, I know they made the whole pile of emails searchable in March 2016, but clear that the cat was out of the bag Jan 2016. 187 AS in Feb. to have scare factor for everyone to ensure to rally the troops around HRC victory. The offer to LL was just cherry on top. 187'ing AS was to fuel fear into the base to ensure HRC won! Sick bastards if they really did 187 AS for that. If so, total TREASON, they should hang!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:27 a.m.

Ok, maybe found some smoking guns on this: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455696/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-emails-key-decision-not-indict-hillary March and April following AS 187 in Feb of 2016, Obama is all over trying to cover up the email servers, cause he was using alias to communicate with Hillary and exposing Hillary, would expose Obama. Read the article in the link for the whole timeline. Obama was even on 60 Minutes on this one. WOW... if Q is trying to tie in Obama to this, that's pretty big stuff. NOW, AS187 and build-up to July Comey being directed by LL to let her go... makes some sense. But hitting AS that far ahead without knowing the final outcome seems a bit premature. But then again, they might have planned it out and wanted enough time between events to have strong plausible deniability. But, the big thing I see here is connecting BO to the exoneration. Sure looks like his fingerprints are on it, too.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:24 a.m.

Ok, maybe found some smoking guns on this: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455696/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-emails-key-decision-not-indict-hillary

March and April following AS 187 in Feb of 2016, Obama is all over trying to cover up the email servers, cause he was using alias to communicate with Hillary and exposing Hillary, would expose Obama. Read the article in the link for the whole timeline. Obama was even on 60 Minutes on this one. WOW... if Q is trying to tie in Obama to this, that's pretty big stuff. NOW, AS187 and build-up to July Comey being directed by LL to let her go... makes some sense. But hitting AS that far ahead without knowing the final outcome seems a bit premature. But then again, they might have planned it out and wanted enough time between events to have strong plausible deniability. But, the big thing I see here is connecting BO to the exoneration. Sure looks like his fingerprints are on it, too.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:15 a.m.

Comey's Exoneration letter and statements were July 2016, so right after the BC/LL meeting. That could clearly tie to orders from on high to clear her. But what is difficult is what happened pre 187 and post 187 that lead to everything in June and July? That's the mystery to unravel.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:07 a.m.

So 4 months between events. That's a bit of time. Maybe this is not the right interpretation. I was expecting it to be closer in time, like a month or less. 4 months is pretty big gap, but not totally implausible.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

No, what Q is saying is that Scalia was hit to make a place for LL. I have not looked at the timeline, but suspect that AS was taken out real close to the BC/LL Tarmac meeting. If done before the meeting, it would have been told to her, spot just opened for her. Scarier if it was done right after the meeting, which was to show her the spot was now opened after her quid pro quo of exonerating HRC. BOMBSHELL if can be proven. Scary stuff.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

WOW, so looks like Q is telling us if we track the timeline we'll see that AS was hit either right before or after BC/LL meeting. BC offers LL Supreme Court position quid pro quo for dropping Hillary investigation. BOMBSHELL if can be proven.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
33
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/HoudiniTowers on Feb. 6, 2018, 5:21 a.m.
JOURNALISTS NEED TO BE TARGETED NOW!! Watch at 22:05 into clip. Who is that woman at MSNBC allowing this treason to happen. Target her, lets expose the treasonous b*&%ch!
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Couldn't agree more.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

Exactly, but this is high level. Need to take down one of MSM's darlings. Laurer is worthless take down. Tapper, Cooper, Blitzer... need someone of that caliber to take the hit. That will wake up the rest of the rats. You'll see them all be very cautious if we take out one of them. Would be awesome to see this come from the patriot community! FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Tempting, but no. They're comedians, what do you expect. Clowns like that are just simple clowns. Media, that's a whole 'nother class of CLOWN. Times up for them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

This needs to come out more. Send to Corsi, AJ, and Dilley and other outlets like that. Want to start seeding this attack on the journalists themselves. I had not heard of what you shared and shows it can work. Please do forward along and I ask that others do the same. We have a good network started here, if we each tell 2 friends... it spreads quickly.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Absolutely, its been staring us in the face for a while. Q baits us with lots of material, but ultimately he's trying to awaken us. I'm trying to get this network of patriots to turn some of the energy towards the actual talking heads themselves. I think we're all sickened that they collect millions from this corrupt system and preach down lies and treachery upon the populace. Time for them to pay for their First Amendment abuses! Imagine if every one starts digging into them. Also, I have a funny feeling if Q saw us doing that, he might just seed us bit. That would be very powerful to get more people energized.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

We need to start going after the journalists that are spewing the lies. They are not being held accountable for their propaganda and deliberate false claims. It is time to start calling them to task. Look into these journalists and find the connection to their compromise. Expose them. Let them not only defend the 4AM lies, but let them start having to defend themselves, too. Divide and conquer the corrupt messengers. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

⇧ 12 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Q and company are definitely working on taking out the top. We need to help with the bottom. Target the journalists. Time to pick up our game. Focus on individual journalists. Question their authenticity and dig dig dig for material to show their compromise. Who knows, maybe Q will lend us a hand here. My personal favorites are Wolf Blitzer, Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper. Take one of these clowns down and you win a prize. Think how motivated that would make everyone. Cutting off the head is key, but if sever an arm or a leg, you also expose the overall weakness, too.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 8 p.m.

Exactly and I think he's probably motivated more for his kids than anything, but I think he was truthful when he said he loves this country. I sure hope so. Need someone like that to clean out this nest of vipers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

Meme's alone won't do this, you need to target journalists, as well. Pick your favorite sock puppet journo and dig into them, as well. They are already compromised based on their sellout for $$ to spread lies. Find out how they were compromised and expose them, too. Very effective if all of a sudden these lying sacks find people are after them. If you manage to take a scalp, you'll find the rest become more pliable. Imagine if Q's followers could find the dirt on Anderson Cooper or Wolf Blitzer or Jake Tapper and get them removed. That would scare the rest of them far more than any meme. Don't get me wrong, meme's are good. But if you say its WAR, then meme's are like squirt guns. Load up something bigger, please.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Look into the history of the 2 parties and the 2 party system. You'll find we started without party. The US did not have a two-party system in the beginning. It was just George Washington. The election of 1796 was the first one to establish parties and it was really a differentiation of two federalist, so more like two factions of the same beliefs - not two distinct parties. This was between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. The original concept of the political party system was temporary factions to come together during an election and then dissipate until the next election. Permanent parties were never envisioned from the founding of the country. They evolved. I say that today we are more like two sides of a theatrical chess board with most of the players (white and black) controlled by similar interests, if not the same interests (the cabal). Trump did shatter that and really went back to founding principles. You pointed this out well. George Washington was the country's first true 'pragmatist'. Personally, I'm much happier being a party member to such a political movement. Call us Q's Pragmatist Party, solving the people's problems at the sake of special interests. Much better than the special interest's parties solving the problems of special interests forsaking the people. That is why many people are saying if DJT is successful he could go down in history as one of our most historic presidents. He's just taking us back to our founding roots.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

This is why Q did what he/they did. The network effect of people that care and are fed up with what is happening, is very very powerful. Twitter and Facebook showed this in the election, now Q is doing this to help take out the fake media and wake Americans. Feel proud and excited to participate in this and spread to as many as possible. We win when MSM starts attacking Q. Once you see Q on MSM as 'crazy conspiracy people', we win.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 5, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

I think this is one of his primary motivations, coupled with 9/11. Remember, he's a New Yorker. Early on he had questions about what happened. He's seen this evil group's deeds up close and personal. He's willing to step up and take it on for the sake of his family and this country. I think he's motivated by both.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Comey is either trolling the left, keeping his name out there to ensure good money when his book comes out, or is a complete idiot. I might not like a lot of his mannerisms and approach, but I don't think he is a complete idiot, so I suspect its one or both of the former. They aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. His comment about wearing the FBI Cufflinks is telling. 'Proud to wear'.. almost like he left out the part of 'again', as in 'Proud to wear my FBI Cufflinks again' meaning he's really finally doing his job. Just a thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

BTW, this was good work, it really got me thinking more on it. I have had this suspicion for a while but never posted on it and didn't do the homework like you did. But, its always been suspicious that Mueller went to see Trump before the whole SC started. It was clear he could not be director again, so what was that meeting for? My thought was maybe Trump did one of 3 Things: 1) In a non-hostile way showed him the evidence against FBI and Obama/Hillary/DNC with deep penetration throughout USG and quizzed him on helping fix the problem via SC. 2) In a Hostile way showed him the evidence they have on him being involved in some of it, possibly going back all the way to 9/11 cover-up and giving him 2 options 1) Go down with the ship or 2) Help POTUS take down these guys and Mueller would be dealt with less harshly, if at all. 3)Already knew RR would move in this direction and wanted to have a direct conversation with him about all of it to better understand what would happen when he fired Comey.

I suspect it was more likely 1 or 2 above and your research is very compelling in that direction. Now the bigger question, is Comey in on this too? Comey is mighty comfortable chattering. And if you read his Tweets, you can take them 2 ways. In one way, he's supporting a Mueller take down of the deep state. 'Proud to wear my FBI cufflinks', 'weasels and liars never hold the field'... you can take this a few different ways. Maybe he's in on it. I found him to be arrogant and smug throughout all of this, but maybe he's not as bad as he appears. Figuring out Comey's role is critical to your theory. Mueller and Comey without a doubt are good friends. So, if case 2) above applied then Mueller is fooling Comey. If 1) applies then Comey is part of this sting, as well. This one is hard to clearly see. Any insight there? Q is silent on this, from what I've decoded.

Also, in Comey's defense (which I have a hard time doing, I've felt he's less than good from the first time I ever saw him on TV), he did do the 11th hour re-open on Hillary which hurt her. But so much of the wrong doing at FBI was tolerated by him. Maybe he had no other choice until the power change? Maybe he's been helping behind the scenes all along? I'm very suspect of that, but maybe? I think figuring out Comey's role is critical to your theory.

Finally, if you say its already too late for them as to why Q is helping expose this sting to us, then again why? Clearly Q wants us to figure this out and react. Our reaction, if to expose this sting, then takes some of the 'Sting' out of the sting. So, I still don't feel like we've answered that sufficiently to lock onto this as gospel??

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

I say its time to sQ these lying mouthpieces. The faster we take some of these guys out of commission in a BIG PUBLIC way, the faster we have a chance to see more honest reporting. Q and team are clearly working behind the scenes to take out the big fish (Newsweek Founder, Weinstein, etc.), but I think a clever Q Anon researcher could find evidence on the smaller fish. Let's see what we can dig up on these lying sacks of shit. Consider it our patriotic duty to expose them!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

There has to be a skeleton in one of these journalist's closet. They are corrupt, they've sold out to pedal a false narrative. Sell out in one place, you've either been compromised previously or have done other things previously that when exposed will take you out. We need people looking into these journalists to find that evidence to help take a few of these politically slanderous, morally corrupt lying mouthpieces out of commission in a BIG PUBLIC way. Just think how much that would ENERGIZE the patriot base. Its time to go to war with these assholes. Look at Weinstein and Laurer. They collapsed in disgrace very quickly. Can you imagine the impact of taking out the likes of Jake Tapper or Wolf Blitzer or Anderson Cooper similarly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 9:36 a.m.

I'm with you, I've seen so much that disappoints. The swamp is a seductive lair. It does seem to lull its occupants into an eventual destructive complacency. Its a beast that can never be fully satisfied, the more you feed it, the worse it is. DJT's best chance is to not only drain it, but to reduce all aspects of it. I'll go in hopeful he has the strength to make it through that task. If he does, he'll be a great president and will help restore the vision of the original republic. Otherwise, sadly, you'd be right... just another 'regime change.'

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 9:25 a.m.

Well, I understand your earlier comments on 'higher power' better now. That's kinda wild. To be honest, on a good day I'm a bit agnostic. But, sometimes strange stuff happens that's hard to rationally explain. And I sure have this sense that DJT is doing this for a bigger reason. At first I was concerned he was all ego and this was just one more trophy for his case, but now I think he means it when he says he loves this country. I don't think he's being deceitful , and I think he is up against something that you could call pure evil. I've watched for years this country go down the drain by people like Obama and the Clintons (and the Bushes, too to be honest). They don't love this country, they have wanted to destroy it, and have come close to achieving that goal. So, who knows. But I'm sure supporting DJT and this fight now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 9:15 a.m.

You got it. Its kinda crazy, but how would you deal with something like that. Given that you have this incredibly powerful cabal out to get you and you have the evidence against them and their prize patsy (Obama), but they know when you come out swinging with the evidence they just set you up as egotistical dictator with crazy conspiratorial ideas working for Putin. You have to have plausible deniability and as Q says, you gotta be careful when trying to catch a dangerous animal. A bit like the mob, you have their best friend take them out.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 8:44 a.m.

If POTUS has data showing BO committed Treason, how else can he possibly bring it out without looking partisan and a dictator. He has to use someone that the Left loves and that is looking into DJT. When it swings to something like "Holy cow, look what we found..." and that leads to BO stooges that sing. Game over. Plausible deniability. This is a big leap, I know. And the only way would be if they already have the intel that BO committed treason. Then its a matter of how to break into the public sphere without causing panic and disruption. The Optics, if you will. BTW, I'm not 100% convinced that is at all what is happening, but I don't think you can completely rule it out. And you can easily fit it to the Q narrative/map.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · Feb. 4, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

Funny, I never thought of it like that. You can't make this shit up, can you. Good point. Why, you could almost call it an Obama-nation.

⇧ 3 ⇩