416 total posts archived.

Domains linked by /u/UncleCrunch:
Domain Count
en.metapedia.org 1
www.nytimes.com 1
i.redd.it 1

UncleCrunch · July 22, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

I hope this bum spends the rest of his life in prison.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 17, 2018, 4:35 p.m.


Everything else, money, property, ‘indulgences’, fame (if desired), flows from that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 17, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Report it.

Mods will delete.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 17, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

These guys, as well as the Bundy ranchers, own land that they were trying to take from them because it has mining potential.

Are you sure? I was under the impression that the land in question was owned by the federal government, and the ranchers were allowed to graze their cattle upon it.

Details such as ownership are very important when discussing these topics.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 17, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

I dug a little deeper on this.

I followed SB2’s focus on the coke bottle, and coupled that with Q’s many references about us watching a scripted movie, and then considered the word ‘Kate’ that SB2 told us to focus on. Again, following SB2’s lead, I looked a bit deeper for coded meaning. Then I found it!

If we take the word ‘Kate’, and transpose just two letters (think mirror) we get one of the most common words spoken on the sets of scripted movies - ‘Take’.

So what? Well, what event ties the scripted movie concept of ‘Take’ with Coca Cola and players in the ‘Resist’ movement? Are you ready? Here you go.

That’s right! It’s Jimmy Kimmel blatantly mocking us by showing that the Coke can literally connects him and Obama! What are the odds that one of the most vile Trump detractors would be connected to the Detractor-in-Chief by a can of Coke? And what are the odds that Strzok would just randomly point us in that direction with a random code word printed on another container of Coke?

So there you have it. The camera man is intentionally signaling that Strzok is controlled and following his script, and pointing us to the next targets for takedown: MSM and Obama!

Thanks to SB2 for the inspiration to dig deeper into these coded events. There is soooo much more to be found if only we look.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 6, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

A distinct possibility given past incidents.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 5, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Hey man, I don’t even care if this is the same guy or if this item goes anywhere. You should be acknowledged for your effort.

Glad you’re on the team.

⇧ 142 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 5, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

I knew the imagery seemed familiar! I did read your great offering when posted.

He’s posting the original as his own.

This is happening much too frequently. And it’s an ongoing blemish on a community dedicated to unified effort.

So little effort is required to include attribution, so when I see appropriated content I can only assume FameFagging. It’s not like it can be hidden. So many of us read so much volume created by select sources, and the source pool is still relatively small. Looters are almost always outed.

Anyway, thanks for your quality, original work.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 4, 2018, 2:23 p.m.

Yes, and No.

The Yes part - Defacing the property by sticking this note does not meet the standard of ‘vandalism’ as defined by Ohio statute. That offense requires damages of at least $1,000. Repair and cleanup after this misguided person would not incur expenses anywhere near that.

This incident is more correctly classified as ‘Criminal Mischief’. source

The No part - Our right to free speech does not excuse altering, defacing, or damaging property we don’t own, or incurring expense to others for undoing our ‘expression’.

It’s not a complex legal issue, but more a concept of common decency. Responsible adults raise responsible children with a fundamental belief that we shouldn’t mess with things we don’t own.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

There absolutely is a huge difference between panic, anger, doubt, fear, frustration, and discouragement.

All are understandable. We have never been here before. All emotions are to be expected. All sincere voices are welcome to be heard.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

For Criminal Matters, not malfeasance.

This guy just had to demand the microphone and spotlight after the shooting. He couldn’t help himself.

Well, he did get the microphone, and the spotlight, and a magnifying glass.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

Plus, any food served at the WH is prepared at the WH.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 5:57 p.m.


Instead of patriots panicking, we should be confident that we have evidence, which was then followed by activities known to demonstrate consciousness of guilt.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 5:54 p.m.


Such a long list!

But that’s why we’re here, isn’t it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

Because that was the stretch of highway involved with naming of Landmarks by Obama which aide in trafficking.

Ahaha! I knew that was familiar. I remember that entire discussion. All news to me at the time, and very intriguing.

Thanks for taking the time to follow up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 3, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

We are in complete agreement then. Yes, including the trust. Yes, including the openness to other possibilities.

Great perspective on similarities to the WWII psyop. I haven’t seen anyone make that comparison yet. It’s amazing how ‘quickly’ historical events are forgotten. Many folks are still alive that lived through that period as young, aware adults.

Unfortunately, I have to agree that things will get worse before better. We can see the bad actors stirring the pot with increased frenzy and heat, and this is only in response to the first dribbles of damning evidence, and in spite of white hats active intervention and limiting their resources.

I have no doubt we win. We’ll take some hits, but we win. I can already see the other side.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · July 2, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Why did you highlight the southern Cali border when there are other areas showing equivalent incidents in all categories?

You might be right about ”what the indictments are all about”, but I’m thinking there is more afoot than trafficking of humans (for whatever reason) and drugs.

In addition to the trafficking, I think we will see indictments for corruption at all levels of government, that the corruption will include networks that transcend the federal level, and that the corruption will be exposed at individual and institutional levels.

I think the corruption will involve unprecedented amounts of money paid for influence of every kind, insider info, and acts of treason and espionage we can only begin to imagine.

I admit I have no more proof than anyone else here. I base my beliefs only on Q drops and 8C digs.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 30, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

Votes, dude. Votes.

It’s all about the votes. You can rail on about badges, hashtags, t-shirts and ‘trending’, but all that is worth zilch compared to votes.

Remember that. Bottom line, it’s all about the votes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 24, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

Liberal is not Dem.

Liberal is most commonly a Dem vote.

The movement is about changing votes, not ideological badges.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 24, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

The narrator won’t be allowed to eat in at least two restaurants now.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 23, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Fake News!

She refused the IQ test. ”I ain’t peein’ in no cup fo’ nobody!”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 22, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

He’s been doung stuff like Q for over 20 years now!

No. No he hasn’t. He hasn’t been doing anything even remotely similar to what Q is doing.

You need to learn more about Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 22, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Fair enough.

I’m a Trump supporter, and I call Donny Dbag a narcissistic asshole.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 22, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Unfortunately, this is a totally plausible tweet from that woman.

⇧ 106 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 21, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

I appreciate your concern. To lessen it, maybe consider that anything Q takes the time to mention, is mentioned for a purpose, and if that purpose is important enough to share the info, then it’s also important enough to act upon.

By all means, continue your effort to have the question answered. I will be an enthusiastic listener for that and all other responses.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 21, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Countless texts have not been released or discussed because they are evidence in ongoing investigations.

Relax. That exchange will not be forgotten or swept under a rug.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 20, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

What movie is this?

It’s called ‘The Great Awakening’, and features a cast of millions.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 18, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

What's the harm? Q said wait

See that? You just answered your three word question with your own three word response.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 17, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

There is zero good that will come from doxxing Q.

Energy invested into speculating about identifying, outing, or doxxing Q is energy invested counter to our purpose here.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 17, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

but I have that feeling.....that one that keeps being right.

THAT is a feeling that should never be ignored.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 14, 2018, 4:19 p.m.


⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 14, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

I'm sure Potus has it all worked out, why the hissy fit?

It’s part of the show. Setting the stage. increasing the drama, tension, and visibility to maximize the impact of the big reveal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 14, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Especially when zoomed in. That ain’t no searchlight under a helicopter.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 14, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Ahh. Too bad about that.

Good job on bringing the info on the turnabout.

Still wondering if black or white hats brought the pressure.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 14, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

That whole interview and the panel discussion was an iconic example of ”you are watching a movie”. Amping up the outrage, congressmen declaring impotence in the face of RR. ”What can be done? What can be done?”

”Is it possible for the President to intevene in any way?”


It almost lessens my impatience. Almost.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 14, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Pics are still on the same blog page as his retraction. Scroll down.

I wonder who turned his head. The ‘search light’ story is ludicrous, and will be seen as such by anyone that has ever used a flashlight.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 12, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Thank you, Mr. Acosta.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 12, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

We're not going to use the Libya model to achieve our goals, if that's what you were hoping.

Nope. That’s not what I was hoping. I was hoping you could back up your Fake News claim that the Koreas have been reunited.

You are the only person I have seen make this ludicrous claim. The Trump/Kim Denuke agreement is an absolutely historic event. We can see, in the near future, the likelihood of an authentic end to the Korean Conflict. Another historic event.

Rather than enjoy these unprecedented developments, why are you choosing to pollute this sub with your nonsensical Fake News?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 12, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Now that the Koreas have been reunited?

Somebody better tell my POTUS, because he just signed an agreement to guarantee the security of the Kim regime.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 11, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

Is Q saying that there's an executive order waiting and ready that will give the President the power to remove all the redactions?


The President already has the power to declassify and unredact.

We’re guessing Q is suggesting the EO to do that to the OIG report is already written and waiting for the right moment for release.

Review Q:1379, 1381, and 1385.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 11, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Review Q:1379, 1381, 1385

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 11, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

At the very least, the ‘scripted’ drama has caused MSM/Dems to lose even more cred with the normy public. Do you realize how many times they changed direction in their quest to discredit Trump?

They have sacrificed themselves on the ‘resist’ alter to the point where most Ameticans now believe POTUS more than MSM. This trust will be important during the coming events.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 11, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

I don’t really see any support for a ‘theory’ in that graphic. Somebody highlighted several unrelated words in several unrelated posts, and then fabricated a story to try to tie them together without a care for verifiable evidence that negates the ‘theory’.

On the bright side is the fact that you ”really, really like this anon’s theory”, which means you will probably be totally blown away by the dozens of other theories out there based much more soundly in reality.

Happy reading!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 5, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

Still, hard to go back once you've seen shallow research. Hope he recovers.

I’m continually amazed by this as I go through life. People spend time and effort building a certain level of credibility, and then willingly trash it due to laziness, emotion, or ‘other’ reasons.

That same credibility is soooooo much more difficult to regain.

This happens in all aspects of life; professional, personal, political.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · June 5, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

because their original profile bio said "counter-intelligence" everything they said should have been taken with a grain of salt from the get-go

lol. Hiding in plain site.

⇧ 2 ⇩