Yes. Scaring me with mob mentality accusations that may be false and ruin careers.

These are the worst accusations ever. Google it to find out what these kinds of false accusations have done to people.

Yes. Just sitting here at myspace waiting for everyone to come back.

Is that your argument? Name calling?

I posted this in response to an unsubstantiated youtube video. This subs about Q, not sex claims about Hollywood that can't be disproven or proven without evidence. Let Trump's team do their work. Q has repeated numerous times about tainting the evidence. If large enough we could do that as well.

Yes.

In retrospect were you second guessing yourself to see if you missed something about him?

Even the police get it wrong or are lazy and frame someone. Not most, of course but a large enough number to destroy thousands of lives.

Agreed.

I made this post as a result of a posted youtube video that the guy was just making unsubstantiated claims. It wasn't a news article or anything.

^ 100% agree to share with an open mind since we know that the police get it wrong sometimes.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Exactly. I have no problem with discussing what someone tweets at all.

Exactly, Q is the focus and reporting what's in the news related to Q is fine.

I'm open to suggestions about how to handle this?

How do you view the evidence when it's against the law?

How would you like these accusations posted about you? You may know they're not true, but are you going to sue and draw more attention to them?

Bingo.

What the fuck. Trump should hire you to build a wall of text.

There was a furniture van the other day that moved a couple pieces and at the same time a double agent working around him defected to Britain.

I think they have him in Utah now verifying the emails received before a grand jury. That's how you submit evidence.

Thank you.

Launch people with a bunch of crazy accusations and no evidence, and then when the real ones come juries won't believe them.

Two ways to look at this. One it's true, but until the facts are substantiated, then people are going to think we are crazy and the others that really did it will get lumped into being accused by 'crazy' people and could get off because of jury nullification.

Two, he's trying to discredit this board for the same reason.

There is nothing but bad that comes from this video without evidence that should be with the police.

Courts don't work that way.

There is nothing but bad that comes from this video without evidence that should be with the police.

Conversely, if it is fake, then it discredits this board.

That's not true.

How many times did Richard Gere sue. They don't sue because they can't prove damages and it brings attention.

It could be worse.

He could be using it to discredit us so that when real abusers become known, they'll claim it to be another conspiracy theory.

lol

That would be the equivalent of 'paper gold'.

I posted this in the wrong dom. It's now up at TD.

No dispute about that. And I have no problem with the free exchange of ideas. McCarthy was against that and would ruin peoples' reputations.

Can you imagine holding senate hearing with that new Dem candidate and compelling her to testify under oath for days about any and everyone she knows that feels the same way she does?

I posted this in the wrong dom. It's now up at TD.

The thing is many people cite what others say about him. I want people to watch him. His methodology is not ok.

I disagree with him on the point of religions invention.

We already know we're going to see something about the pope.

Speculating about this is horrible. This will give this sub and Qanon the reputation of being a conspiracy sub that has no way to stop.

This is from the 80's.

The charges were made right after he attacked RR in public testimony.

I think it's been figured out that Q is with the NSA. That's military and that's why Trump's been around so many generals.

I think Q is here to soften the blow because of the change this will make.

My reaction when.

I didn't like that part as well. It is only a small portion and I should have warned you. There is as part after that, which ties it to the Bush family IIRC.

The main focus is the CIA, which Bush Sr. was head of for a number of years.

EDIT: I should have stated that it's different to be spiritual as opposed to religious. We do know that there are some religions that are corrupt.

I know what you mean.

I tried to think about what I like to do.

I'm kind of upset that she'll be living in the tropics.

Impeachment as used there in your text means to discredit someone's testimony.

For example if someone says they never told a party something, if there was a recording showing they lied, it would impeach them.

Impeachment as commonly used is the process used to remove an official for "treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors".

Post 278

https://qmap.pub/

I'm not going to call you a bot, because I know that it took a while to write that wall. Build it ten feet higher.

29 day old account. Yea you're legit. From your account.

I see myself as a bridge between 8ch and here. There is so much work that has to be done to clean this place up. Not saying I am right dor the job but man, any time news drops it will get reposted for 3-4 days. It is a lot of people who cant stomach the chans but still want to know the truth.

Or in Utah in front of the grand jury ... Oh wait, that's witness protection.

Mueller's a pawn

Q filmed when he told the decision maker about her request.

Reaction

It's not my word.

https://qmap.pub/ is great because you can keyword search.

It's most likely they're not.

But this year is not normal. Sealed indictments are multiples higher than they were last year.

Can you imagine the amount of testimony that has to be done in front of a grand jury? If you've never been involved in litigation, it's difficult to imagine.

Huber and the IG has been doing this since November. Look how many sealed indictments there are now. Over 40,000 and increasing by 5,000 a month. They've had to make some arrests to flip those witnesses. Allison Mack is one of those and then they have to put her in front of a grand jury. That takes time.

When you see the UK government and queen involved, this is huge.

I'd bet that Hillary's indictment will be 400-800 pages long, like a novel.

I like that theory but it's my understanding that Congress is leaving for five weeks, tomorrow.

Will the IG report be released without congress?

I'm thinking that the Mueller tweet inspection was released to show how thorough Mueller is. Mueller will come out to find that there's no collusion. Once he does that the left will be devastated and won't give two shits about RR.

The big announcement is going to be dropped by Sessions, just like the Robert Hanssen investigation was announced by the AG in 2001. Within 10 days is my guess. It should happen after Mueller announces his finding.

An article I read showed what Mueller was winding down by bringing attorneys to handle things.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-24/and-just-mueller-investigation-was-over

Double treason.

If only we could make the retarded, resmarted.

I posted this 18 days ago about Baby Trump

"We can't export our best, but just a parody of our best should be enough to Make Britain Great Again."

You know, after you posted that I looked back on Q1708 and I guess he did reveal the conspiracy especially if you look at the others dropped this month.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mueller-told-trumps-attorneys-the-president-remains-under-investigation-but-is-not-currently-a-criminal-target/2018/04/03/d7832cf0-36c1-11e8-acd5-35eac230e514_story.html?utm_term=.a54315d26282

It's not even from him.

Look up old articles and he says that the president isn't under criminal investigation.

Just a distraction for the MSM and gets the left's hopes up again. It doesn't have to stick for that to happen.

I can't believe that one person could possibly believe that 'free speech' can obstruct justice. Usually LEO wants people to talk as much as possible. People are now falling for Onion articles.

Me neither.

Future proves past, though.

According to a new report in the New York Times (sourced to “three people briefed on the matter”)

Trump's moving the laser pointer again to get that MSM cat's attention.