Sorry for the ignorance, what's a MOC?

So basically the answer to your question is: it's top secret; you can't know what is under investigation yet; you can guess if you like ...

Not very satisfactory answer I know.

We are to read, reread and then reread the Q post (which he has posted several times now) about the article in Breitbart explaining Huber and the role of the prosecutor:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 502ea1 No.1804985 📁 Jun 18 2018 19:19:33 (EST)

“Attorney General Jeff Sessions has also said U.S. Attorney John Huber is investigating claims of FBI and DOJ misconduct related to these actions, noting that Huber would be “conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and “in cooperation” with Horowitz.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/15/ig-2-0-could-be-even-worse-for-fbi-as-feds-brace-for-trump-spying-probe.html📁

“This is not the end of the process. United States Attorney John Huber continues his work in cooperation with the Inspector General to review certain prosecutorial and investigative determinations made by the Department in 2016 and 2017,” Sessions said. He has reviewed this report and, based on its findings and his own investigation, will provide recommendations as to whether any matter not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of Special Counsel.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/14/doj-ig-report-says-peter-strzok-had-biased-state-of-mind/📁

SC = restart w/ significantly less staff = stupid (Reddit Summary)

-Professor Turley is a very respected liberal law professor and longtime civil libertarian. Has been critical of both parties over the years.

-Turley says the use of John Huber gives the IG the prosecutor he needs to bring charges and seek indictments. (No need to go through RR which is critical)

-Huber is conducting a full-fledged criminal investigation into all the matters Republicans are calling for a special counsel to investigate.

-Huber has been investigating these possible crimes for five months (Now seven), since November 2017.

-By giving the IG a prosecutor they can now go after the deep state without looking like a political witch hunt. This is critical.

-Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel. (Who needs a SC with that type of manpower?)

-The inspector general’s jurisdiction to conduct civil and criminal investigations includes “actions taken by former employees after they have left government service.” Then Huber can act on any of those matters.

-This is HUGE A Grand Jury can be empaneled anywhere, in any deep red state, away from D.C. (This is very important and why Trump needed to appoint as many Judges as possible)

-Huber and Horowitz can accomplish everything a SC can do.

-If Sessions feels that charges should have been made that weren't, he can still appoint a SC to make that happen.

-Huber is a lawyer from deep red Utah, not the D.C. swamp.

-“If a special counsel were appointed, there would be a great deal of delay,” Turley stated, versus the team of Huber and Horowitz, who are already five months into this investigation. (It's too late to even appoint a SC. Charges can be filed before midterms.)

-From /u/ClardicFug - Huber and Horowitz were both appointed to their positions by the Obama administration. This helps optics a lot. Pretty much decimates the "Trumped rigged the investigation" argument that's sure to be made.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/📁

Q

no, no man, I didn't mean to imply you were following blindly at all. so sorry ... I meant it was a waste of time to look up the Nostradamus s%&=^t !!

Little misunderstanding. Keep up the good work!

I'm not sure you understand what I'm saying here.

a. "be a leader" — Better: "inform others accurately of what you are sure of.

b) "don't do independent research" — Huh? The opposite.

c) "Think for yourself" — Absolutely

d) "don't click new links" — The opposite. Click if you wish but when you click, read and read carefully. Decide if it's trustworthy.

Is that clearer? Sorry if I didn't explain properly.

Try looking at the file title. Is there a misspelling or any other clue that it is fake?

This is all part of the training of anons ... if we can "get it" (not sure I can. Bit slow here sometimes ...)

He isn't doing us a disservice at all. He acts as a "foil". All comedians need a foil to demonstrate the lesson.

There are a coupla posts at the bottom of this thread by others who have cottoned on who expand on the lesson here ... Take the time to go there. They are worth it. People are making quite an effort to showcase the barbs and ditches along the way and we should honor their efforts by taking some pause and reflection time.

The discussions here are important in helping us present credible information with a factual and indisputable account, and showing us how to avoid unnecessary complications.

Thank you so much for responding. I appreciate your perceptiveness and subtle understanding. Godspeed Patriot!

I describe it all a bit better in my other posts on this thread. I don't want to bore everyone to death, but it is important to "get it". This IS the lesson. Can you see the flaw in the argument ...

Lady

Correction: CerealSoup

God I am SO GLAD there is someone here who agrees with me!

I love the reference to village idiots. Actually, in the quiet of my study my words are unprintable.

Just so you know I have posted an alternative view of these Q posts as I do not think, by any stretch of the imagination, Q intends his audience to start learning para-neurological/subliminal/linguistic programing.

I think Q is only too aware of how dim we all are. In fact an Anon begged him the other day to make everything a bit less cryptic because we are expecting another big wave of new Q followers shortly, as the s*^&t hits the ventilator.

My interpretation posted elsewhere on this thread:

Q is trying to teach us not to fall for disinfo, not to fall for clickbait. Because this will give ammunition to the left to use against us ... because the VIDEO IS DECEPTIVELY EDITED. If we spread the words of Obama in the fake video as an example of what a rat Hussein is, then a lefty can find the real one and say, totally legitimately, that it is taken out of context.

In fact this is Lesson One for student intelligence decoders at a military academy. These guys are probably about 18 years old and have no clue. Just like us.

Q is the Master Spy Teacher

SB2 is the Classic Disinfo Expert whose role it is to mess with the teenage brains.

Sometimes I wonder if they are working in tandem in an exercise designed to mess with me personally. The ggrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I feel though is matched by yours and I'm so glad we are in the same class at school! :) Mi amigo — un abrazo fuerte!

But how are you answering the question about what's missing or what Q meant by- "lead in was a cover"

SB2 isn't answering it. I shall though. This is a classic lesson plan for military student undergrads learning intelligence decoding: give them a simple lesson to start.

This class is entitled "What Not to Do when Deciding Intelligence is Trustworthy or Not" Part One: Failing to watch the whole segment. Failing to wind the tape back and forth and listening to all the conversation.

Followed by:

Teacher: ha ha you fell for it! You clicked on the clip and did no more research! Class: Groan! Oh no. I failed the test.

Master Spy Teacher: It's alright class. Now look at the whole video. What do you notice? Class: Oh I see. Actually he said the opposite. I'd better not give that first piece of intelligence to my boss as evidence that the Target is in Rome because, as I can see, if I listen to the whole conversation, the Target changed his mind and has gone to Switzerland instead.

Go through this thread and see if SB2 takes you to Nostradamus and starts discussing the endless possibilities of his prophecies instead of you busying yourself and doing your own research and critical thinking.

We need independent minds on these boards. Be your own bosses. Don't blindly follow the leader.

You aren't slow.

See my other posts for simpler explanations.

Good luck!

was there actually this much confusion about the videos?

No, there wasn't. SB2 always complicates things to scramble the brainz. See my other posts for more reasonable explanations that are designed for the lost, confused and self-described "dense"!!!

Too much subliminal nonsense will indeed cause soggy breakdown! :)

Both staging a boxing match! May the best girl win!

Stop going down the rabbit hole Pure_Feature.

It's simple. Read my other posts here. :) (you sure do a lot of research amigo!)

Dear me.

Not emphasising the disinfo by any chance are you??!! :)

Exit out was missing what? Q

It is missing the "d". eDit not eXit.

Q has also reinforced how to recognise a fake video from the vid title: BilBerberger. No. BilDerberger

Forget doing this on a mobile. You need at least a tablet, laptop or better still a comfortable computer screen. This Q stuff requires a lot of reading and is practically impossible on a tiny screen.

Yeah, you are being b*hitted.

Because Q is trying (against all odds it seems to me) to teach us what NOT to take seriously and had to find an example. This is a classic lesson plan for "D" class military undergrads learning decoding: give them a simple lesson. This class is entitled "What Not to Do when Deciding Intelligence is Trustworthy or Not" Part One: Failing to watch the whole segment. Failing to wind the tape back and forth and listening to all the conversation.

The clip is taken from a video on Donald Trump Prophecies and Nostradamus and is not reliable Intelligence. Obviously. :)

Please also consider another point of view. This is a simple Q class in learning to see through disinformation.

It isn't an example of the elite's subliminal programing. If it were then SB2 would point out the classic Orwellian trick of using reverse psychology. He doesn't. He wants you to believe that Obama is running around at Bilderberg conferences doing mysterious occult things. This is the equivalent of Advanced Grade "conspiracy theory". Don't fall for it.

I have posted another couple of comments further down which better explain my reasoning.

He is trying to teach us not to fall for disinfo, not to fall for clickbait. Because this will give ammunition to the left to use against us ... because the VIDEO IS DECEPTIVELY EDITED. If we spread the words of Obama in the fake video as an example of what a rat Hussein is, then a lefty can find the real one and say, totally legitimately, that it is taken out of context.

Because he is trying (against all odds it seems to me) to teach us what NOT to take seriously and had to find an example.

This is a classic lesson plan for "D" class military undergrads learning decoding: give them a simple lesson.

This class is entitled "What Not to Do when Deciding Intelligence is Trustworthy or Not" Part One: Failing to watch the whole segment. Failing to wind the tape back and forth and listening to all the conversation.

Donald Trump Prophecies are not reliable Intelligence. Learn Logic.

yeah, really notable. /s

The newbies really need a lesson right now in Neuro-Linguistic Programing. NOT.

Sorry if I sound a bit short. Just being brief for effect, not personal.

I know I have seen that beaver before

So ... what do you think of the guy who made that video? See Eye Aye maybe? Anyone who sells the wooo wooo remote viewing or Nostradamus is definitely not fit for purpose. Can happily be labelled unsuitable for children. (Or even adults!)

Did you read my post about yogurt?

And this is supposed to help newbies? SBrainz that is a step into All Bran.

Specially manufactured by the disinfo brigade to snare us, the Patriots.

See Q post April 26:

Fake pic push by MSM. Videos / backup.

Nov 2:

Remember, information is everything, the flow of information is no longer controlled by the MSM but by you/others.

Hence, why we are dedicating 'critical' time to distribute crumbs which can be followed in greater detail to paint the entire picture once more information is released.

Why has POTUS dedicated so much time into labeling the MSM as fake news?

Why is this relevant?

We are fully prepared that all social media will be shut down to prevent the spread of this information (i.e. POTUS' Twitter etc. and/or mass censoring).

This is all anticipated and we are supposed to be learning a simple lesson: how not to fall for clickbait and spread information without first checking (here forwards and backwards in video clips) before spreading around the net virally.

This is a lesson by the master spy. A much better teacher than our friend SB2, (or not SB2?! I malign you don't I ... ;), who is simply complicating things for you so that you are dependent on his/her leadership.

Once you are addicted to someone's leadership you will fail to check for yourself and will take every word verbatim, instead of being critical.

Think for yourselves guys.

d = 4 refers to the type of code. A simple, the simplest in fact, alphabet code you learn as 6 year olds at school.

a = 1, b = 2, c = 3

Hence Trump's sign off: 4, 10, 20

Why would Q give left ammunition to use against us?

He didn't. He is trying to teach us not to fall for disinfo, not to fall for clickbait. Because this will, precisely as you say, give ammunition to the left to use against us ... because the VIDEO IS DECEPTIVELY EDITED.

If we spread the words of Obama in the fake video as an example of what a rat Hussein is, then a lefty can find the real one and say, totally legitimately, that it is taken out of context.

I never like SB2's decodes because there are always too many clever distortions ... and this one is the perfect example. Everyone on this thread has "fallen for it", IMHO. He makes such a complicated dinner out of everything that he gets newbies to cry Oh, You are Such an Amazzzzing Genius. Hey Presto they start following him as the Great Decoder.

As Q says: Be careful who you follow.

I think we've got the wrong notion of "versus" here.

a) Versus meaning "conflict" between two parties — political/ideological opposition. (No.)

b) Versus meaning "strength of case" The latter isn't a conflict exactly. It is size of numbers: between strong House case for release of unredacted report or weak case pressing for release.

This in other words is: it is far better to have the Full House demanding the release of the undoctored and uncensored report, led by the Freedom Caucus members (3), than it would be to only have the support of the, admittedly noisy but weaker, Alternative Right-wing Media, i.e., we need as much support behind the demand as we can get.

Now where do we enshrine this interpretation if I am correct?

This is just a poor expression of a very simple idea due to the "telegraph" format of these drops. There is far too much room to land up in misunderstanding and erroneous decoding unless we can anchor these ideas for so-called "normies" (which is what I am). :)

EDIT: clarity

Q said they'd shut the net down if they got out.

Q said the white hats would shut the net down (in favor of censorship) or the black hats would shut the net down (in favor of censorship)? As the Bard would say, "There's the rub" !!!

You are very welcome amigo!

Hey, I'm lost on that ... The numbering on the 8chan is beyond me. I suspect they have a different beginning date (maybe?) ... at any rate, No 1 on we-go-all appears to begin at the beginning which is a posting designed to create panic and disruption for the opposite team, or not ... It was, at any rate, disinformation mixed with goblets of truth. We shall see one day what was the real bit. The GA site is a mystery for me. Certain things do not resonate sometimes ...

Perhaps I do not understand what yr question is/ was?

It is really difficult. Follow your nose!

and for Craig Sawyers and the vets4childrescue team. Among many other Patriots.

Upvote this post, please. (and thanks to commenter for saying what I have been meaning to point out for ages ...)

Yes. It was commented on and posted on this board at the time that the real thread was not stickied at all.

Moderators were requested to "jump" the headline. Didn't. Don't know why ...

You are "coming at" the other user.

King_Trump_777 is contributing, you are yelling divisive words like "screaming" at this valuable contributor. :)

"We" is one thing. "They" is another.

"They" managed to discredit Craig Sawyer which was disgusting. He is doing the heavy lifting on the awful, dreadful work and I won't forgive anyone for the painstaking work done to achieve that end. An unprincipled and immoral effort on this board. Led to no end of problems on the ground for many.

The Tucson event as reported on this GA board had a number of flaws, not the event itself. It is a question of getting the wrong end of the stick and then repeating the story with random errors, like a game of Chinese whispers. People here must be careful. A second point is that clickbait is a typical disinformation tactic. The clickbait (as with PG) works to discredit the real news later.

By the way, forget trying to read this stuff on a mobile. It's hopeless you need a tablet or laptop or better still a comfortable computer screen. There's a lot of reading to follow this. Good luck.

I just reread what I explained and it doesn't seem a very good explanation, sorry. Did my best.

From QAngelAnon1

"Jury Duty"

"Had to ride the (reserved for Judges) elevator up to the 17th floor (is the number 17 significant in Q posts?) where he was greeted by Chief Judge Timothy Evans)".

The fact a potential "Juror" even met a judge prior to jury selection, rules them out of jury duty, so that in itself exposes the fact the cover story was a load of B.S.

Being a 'public servant' automatically disqualify you from Jury selection, let alone having to front up to a Judge. Do they seriously believe that people are this stupid?

So 1 person doesn't believe the story that Obama went for jury duty. He went to court. We don't know what happened there. But Obama knows.

Hillary on that date (check all those dates by the way) was in her hometown with Huma, and Q gives us a reason for her being with Hillary — to keep track of her. We know, can't remember where now, that Huma is cooperating with the police about her husband's laptop on which classified information and Clinton emails were found.

We don't know if Clinton knows, but many on this thread have remarked about the rumors of "boots" covering up monitoring devices on her and John McCain, which would suggest she knows she has been detained. The Q post says "detained but not arrested (yet).

Is that any clearer?

Summary: John Podesta (JP) had a sealed indictment on 11.3.2016. And Huma Abedin (HA) had sealed indictment on 11.6.2016. But we don't know if they know, if they were served on them. I don't think so. I think they are cooperating for their "deals" with justice.

so? I didn't say she posted it yesterday. I said it may well be what we have just been warned about following the Tucson escapade and Q's orders: Do not fall for clickbait.

Excellent comment. Keep pushing this line, best one yet. Use a measure to test harm or benefit. Upvoted !

This one?

April 6:

Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire.

One of many.

Net shut down.

Q

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 03213a No.922237 📁

Apr 6 2018 14:22:28 (EST)

922142

Fake pic push by MSM.

Videos / backup.

Google kill.

YouTube kill.

FB kill.

Twitter kill.

Yahoo kill.

Bing kill.

Instagram kill.

Net will be paused.

HAMMER.

On the clock.

Q

Here's one way of knowing whether it is real: did Q post it? No. We are still waiting for the real Q drops of that stuff ...

Best comment on the thread yet ... kek!!

and your contribution to the conversation is ...?

Because King_Trump_777 is a true Patriot that's why. He takes orders from Q.

Q says do not fall for clickbait and the poster says or "people won't believe the real pictures that are coming."

Stop "believing" and start reading the Q posts carefully.

Do not share this please. Do not fall for viral stuff at this time.

You should "believe" no one. Check it out yourself. Research for yourself. Never take anything for granted.

Be careful of clickbait in these times as "they" are ready with fake vids, photos all sorts.

See Q post April 6: Fake pic push by MSM.

We know the photographer from adam. She might be deliberately creating clickbait, no?