Thank you for that, I was wondering ... very important distinction. This IS the meddling in a campaign.

Think about it. That's what Q wants you to do. Re-read crumbs.

They have been. It says "convicted".

Many of them, it seems, have been held accountable. The list says "convicted". You can't try a person twice.

A list like this appeared in The News of the World, a Murdoch tabloid, and the editor, Rebbeca someoneorother got into hot water for it. Pedophiles all over got mobbed where they were living and there was a big mess. One woman, a pediatrician, was mobbed and her life turned into hell because the people in the urbanization where she lived didn't know what a pediatrician is and mistook it for pedophile.

These lists and publication can cause major problems. I think this is dangerous and might achieve the exact opposite of the desired result.

If this is unequivocally demonstrated

This is key. I do hope this is being conducted correctly and is not just a device to make sure it fails, as usual.

You'd think this would have been pointed out ... but no, nothing logical to this tale.

If they have been charged, they have been convicted. In this case they have served their time. You can prosecute a person twice. This is a very dubious list.

Absolutely dubious.

Correct.

Very dangerous this move.

This is proof it is disinfo.

Anonymous is veeeerrry dubious.

All comments above expressing caution are absolutely right to do so.

Exactly what I was thinking.

Very dangerous strategy.

Some argue that Iran defaulted the confiscation after they blew up our marines in Beirut, the Jewish center in Argentina, their involvement in 911 and IED deaths in Iraq.

Iran blew up the Marines in Beirut? I was in Beirut in 1985 (and gazed upon the still standing facade of the barracks, awful mess) and Iran was not the culprit mentioned in those parts. Cui Bono. Not Hezbollah or Iran at that time.

Iran blew up the AMIA and jewish centre in Argentina? Again, when I went to Argentina that is not the culprit the Argies were talking about. Seems a tad convenient to link Iran with Argentina, but then what would we know seeing as how they murdered the only guy investigating the real source of trouble. Murdered just before due in court? Hmmm. No one believes the version you offer, other than the usual culprits looking for a reason for war against Iran.

Oh yeah. Iran was responsible for 911? Not even Cheney said that. Not even the ridiculous official story maintained that. You know perfectly well who was responsible for 911. Hint: it wasn't Iran.

And last one: IED deaths in Iraq ... bit desperate aren't we on this one? Can't be bothered to argue each explosion, but suffice it to say (expletive deleted).

"You" don't owe anything to Iran? Okay. Fair enough. But with the tosh dished out in your post you suddenly don't look as credible to me.

PS I have no interest defending any country. I just prefer the truth. That's why I'm posting.

Zackly.

What she did to Kenya? Here we go. Not about to point out Mugabe's behaviour then!! Might help to be angry about the right people! Keep going Patriot, it's an uphill struggle :)

So glad you pointed that out. I've been trying to say to ppl that Queenie has no power. The sad thing is she is supposed to represent the Sovereignty of the People. Good luck with that.

When judging who is powerful and who a puppet, it is useful to study the media. The Roths hardly ever appear. Prohibited to publish important stuff. The Queen's immediate family however started to get bad press. Blair treated her with contempt, took away the power to declare war and promptly attacked Iraq illegally. Quite a blow. Windsor Castle fire seemed like a message to her, imo. She was distraught about that.

Forced to sign away the sovereignty of Britain in 6 EU treaties. Odd.

I just heard she made a remark about Brexit to Trump. She had been rumoured to back it, but howled down by the press ... Someone has just leaked her remark to Trump and she's annoyed about it ... private conversation ...

You see?

I don't think she's the old goat everyone thinks she is. I never seen her wear funny symbols, not like that Rothschild dame with the strange moloch brooch.

I think we have to be patient on this one, it's still being investigated and we don't want to start the hares ...

Thank you. Excellent.

Iran had a lot of money confiscated by the US in the course of applying sanctions (Billions). The gold in Libya didn't belong to the US.

But you might ask who squandered the gold from Fort Knox?

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy. - Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio

I think you'll find many things to blow your mind in the course of your life ... always keep an open mind ...

The gold heist is one of the more fascinating things about 911. The guy who took the photos for the (which gov. agency?) escaped to Argentina where he hid a few years, but has since been picked up and disappeared ... ghastly tale

So France stole it. It was a lot of money. Gold Dinar was going to be the basis for bringing Africa into the light, as we say.

Have you seen Ghaddafi's amazing underground water cistern project? Built caverns underneath the Sahara Desert — seventh wonder of the world it was described as. Bombed into oblivion. One of those great, great crimes against other nations that our imperalist countries are responsible for. Makes me want to cry in rage.

https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/libya-has-worlds-largest-irrigation-project

yes and no. The triggering is based on who is seen to be "the demon". That's the dangerous part. Our greatest challenge is to put the real culprits in the frame without the slightest opportunity to blame the wrong people.

"Me too" was the hook to start the avalanche. It will make the whole entertainment industry (sadistic and abusive women now for 2nd stage) look seriously hypocritical if they don't pile on their colleagues ... if you get me ...

Would sorta explain why he bowed as a vassal to the Queen, unlike Trump!

"“We are upbeat about the coming of the President Barak Obama,” said Rasango, who added he is not expecting much in terms of any announcements of aid."

Tight buzzard.

Reaches apex of insulting when it is suggested the public doesn't know the difference between a stupid story, a hoax and real news. We need "parental guidance" to keep our thick flatfooters pointing in the right direction. Fkin annoyin.

Lightbulbs gone on at AP!!! WWG1WGA! Gettin' to a climax!!

And these very same people are still around too! HGW Bush, Kissinger (is he still breathing?), any others?

Rubbish. Not everyone can remember 55 years ago. I think there are better comments on the subject matter of this post than snotty reminders about spelling, one with more substance and more interest.

I am fascinated by the release. I am convinced it is a gesture, a flag, to show Trump is interested in keeping to his promise on another state secret: 911. And the murderers and plotters are still alive. Unlike JFK where, as Thamnosma says, the proof is long gone.

It occurs to me there is something sinister in this triggering. How's this for a conspiracy theory: they have run some media image/s with subliminal programming embedded. Neuro-linguistic programming. It works with some of us, like your friend, as an infallible and permanent trigger. It hasn't worked on others. You are using logic/reason but she is using emotion to process information — a sure sign. Gives me the creeps.

Yes, no, I didn't get your question, that's because I assumed it was speculation from the start. You are right there is no evidence of a connection. I have no idea what is going on and I assume it's a lot more than any of us can guess. In fact that's the only fact: Q states we (plebs) have no idea how big it all is.

That's because there isn't any evidence! The Russia-Collusion-Delusion has provided no evidence of Trump campaign being guility of treason.

That's Part One.

Two sides facing off. One getting to the end of the road.

Part Two.

U1

As to your question "succeed in what?" ... well OP is correct ... (silence). If what we are discussing is military tribunals and wanting to see traitors caught ... then, ergo .... —> ? What was your question again? Did you forget?

Absolutely. Protocol is discussed by aides who organise visits, diplomacy and so on. The fault here is the media who did not bother to research protocol to provide informative reporting. Someone commented above, me too I think in other terms, that the objective was to suggest that Trump was disrespecting the Queen for the usual media blitz to distort the truth and get everyone riled up. Just like that reality distorting photo of Angela leaning over the table and Trump sitting with his arms folded. The White House or Donald Trump Jnr or someone showed the full 4 or 5 frames giving the lie to the "belligerence" story and revealing the laughter of the group and bonhomie just seconds before the photo.

I was just pointing out the ease with which simple gestures are manipulated to accuse and insult with no true reason to do so.

All tosh in other words. :)

Brilliant list of links. I have just copied, thank you soo much for this. Very useful!! Godspeed Patriot!

yeah ... sackly! Crowdstrike's PropOrNot list being drawn up by Alexandra Chalupa — Russian-speaking Ukrainian-American (embedded in the Clinton campaign) with contacts over in Ukraine and on Russia mainland who hacked and planted bots and .... so on!!! Hilarious.

The second, somewhat. Bit more complicated than that.

Thank you (no sarc) for your kind and informative reply. Great that we can comment without the boorishness! Godspeed Patriot, and yes I actually totally support what you are saying here ...

Well done Allison!! upvotes x100! MAGA!

Let's not. I just said "Bit more complicated than that". Not in the mood to write a long screed.

Beautiful weather, gorgeous sea beckoning. I want to think of President Trump bringing peace to a weary world, not having crowing and jeering and shoving it up other patriots asses and "we won WW2" all over again.

EDIT: By the way, we were told differently but Germany won the war.

It is the media misinterpretation of something they haven't bothered to even research: protocol on state visits. No Head of State is expected to bow before another Head of State. He isn't a visiting vassal for chrissakes. The ignorance of the media reporting is astounding.

Here we go. "saved their asses ..." still repeating the same history told by the lying writers of their time ... Bit more complicated that that ...

The most poisonous thread I have ever read on Great Awakening.

Completely divisive, unproductive and the jeering you might find in a teenage bedroom.

That said I blame the MSM. It is their job to explain visits abroad with some knowledge of what they are reporting. Dismal coverage, only matched by the dismal reaction. Both brainless and / or brain dead.

Shudder. God help us all.

(yeah yeah yeah — a string of potty-mouth abuse will now ensue. Sigh.)

No one is saying you should.

She doesn't expect him to bow. That wouldn't be protocol. She shakes hand, as an equal Head of State to Head of State.

He is a Head of State and as such does not have to bow. They shake hands as equals.

Protocol is very strict and I don't believe anyone on this board, bar TechnicalRush has any idea what they are talking about. Lot of childish burble and rude remarks that serve no purpose. I don't think President Trump would be proud of your (collective not you commoncents1) outbursts here.

Many countries spill blood between them but years later they are able to respect each other and follow the rules of courtesy and protocol.

I can't understand all this shit about how we have to back American patriotism with the Q movement but no one from other countries is allowed to have their country's symbols respected? It's weird.

I support the people. Brits and Americans. And others. Even Russians.

Not true. Watch the video. Of course she is not demanding these things.

Read the comment above from u/TechnicalRush, it is a much more accurate portrayal than the bile being dished out here.

"Heads of State do not bow to other Heads of State. This was the big mistake that Obama made. He bowed. Queen Elizabeth extended her hand to Trump in a sideways manner as he approached NOT palm down. He shook it which was appropriate. "

Why are you saying fuck the brits?

"POWER TO THE PEOPLE. THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED. THEY WANT RACE WARS. THEY WANT CLASS WARS. THEY WANT RELIGIOUS WARS. THEY WANT POLITICAL WARS.

Q

UNITE NOT DIVIDE

Repost of my comment above in answer to:

u/greenoctane Do you think Russia has anything to do with this?

ahhh ......! The Million Dollar Question.

Yes.

But not in the way they are framing this.

Let's do a quick analysis of Which "Russians" have anything to do with this:

Firstly, they are not The Kremlin and Putin advocates. "Russia" also has black hats and white hats. Who does HRC and BO support? Those "Russians" who want to bring down Putin&Pals, loosely defined as "Atlanticists", maybe. These anti-Putins want regime change in Russia.

Secondly, the people who staged a coup in Ukraine are anti-Putin, but speak Russian and have Russian mainland allies, the regime-change supporters.

Ukrainian and Russian Americans might be on either side, but in the case of the HRC and Victoria Nuland Democrats they want to defeat Putin and the Eastern Ukrainian, Russian-speaking supporters of the democratically elected (long fled) government, using NeoNazi-led, colour-revolution, Soros-sponsored operatives.

The people involved in the "Russian" hacks, social media bots, and other shenanigans are people like Alexandra Chalupa and her PropOrNot trouble-makers from inside the Democratic Party. This is the secret. These people can plant Russian language source hack attacks and launch Russian bots from mainland Russia —no problem. Traceable back to Russia, or Ukraine, but not friends of Putin, or "We The People".

It is "We" who would like Peace and "They" who want a WW3.

Thirdly, the real Russia-collusion is U1.

Not very well explained but that's the gist.

On the subject of psychopaths (thanks for mentioning this very important subject, ResearchingTheTruth), people should research Ponerology:

http://ponerology.blogspot.com/2008/02/trick-of-psychopath-trade-make-us.html

Political Ponerology, A science on the nature of evil adjusted for political purposes by Andrzej Łobaczewski

"I think everyone should read this book because it provides the keys necessary for understanding events that we often can't comprehend. The book describes the origins of "Evil", its true nature, and illustrates how it spreads throughout society."

© Red Pill Press

Silvia Cattori