Part 2:
My thought is this:
(From above) there was an actual bomber at first with own agenda, Clowns recognize that it's getting traction in news, decides to hijack the op, find the orig bomber, hold him to be used l&er.
Q knew, and posted 4am, info to us, but disinfo to <<them>>
We post it's about 4am drop on SDrop, clowns fig Q is saying this too and don't actually know he knows it's about a 3am event too not just a drop. So go ahead with op
'Someone' tips off popo on bombers (whoever that is, the orig bomber, a bad actor, antifa fk etc) location and they go to arrest him his home, Bomber gets tipped off by clowns and he tries to evade ending in Boom, but then this doesn't fit for a prediction, as no way to do that exactly…unless
…Clowns knew Sdrop Comped hence OP comped or knew that someone knew they had the orig bomber, I dunno could be a bunch of things)so they tip off LE to where original bomber will be & they post up orig bomber in a remote controlled vehicle on top of a remote controlled bomb, cops show up to spot find guy, guy "tries to drive off", cops open fire and Clowns detonate bomb…..@ 3am per op…or there never was a bomber all of it complete BS proved by foreknowledge of exact time of event…
Obviously there are some holes and other possibilities, which is why I bring it her to you genius fags.
Q Post:
The FBI opened a case on “Q” today re: ‘Boom’ statements and now the TX bombings.
Coordinated to end comms here.
Predictable.
They are scared [4am].
They will fail.
We know the details.
[Wednesday].
Q
Method used to decode message:
Predictable is the only one word sentence & before a marker [4am]
word just happens to be 'predictable' as in this scenario is predictable, as in look and see we have predicted it! I think it also says look at the number of words in sentences..
The Next line with marker, is a 4 'word' sentence if we include the marker in the count, as a word, but once you add marker you Then add or subtract it, and by doing so will give you a key number, giving you the actual intended number for the marker as [3am], and also telling you to look at the sentences, the next sentence is also a 3 letter sentence (confirms #3).
This is how I found out whether to add or subtract
# of markers in sentence with marker = 1 (this is the number we add or subtract)
Marker placement in the sentence is at the end.
I assume that since we are 'looking at the sentences' that Marker placement in sentence determines add or subtract
(For ex: If marker is in beginning of sentence then anything after it is in addition to the marker so we would add
Automatically making a marker at the end a subtraction
So if marker at beg of the line it = add, if at the end = subtract
(if marker is in the middle then we would neither add or subtract but take the number as is? Could be imp 4 past or future posts where this may have occurred, not yet using this method)
So back to the equation:
I subtract(cause marker is at end of sentence) and subtract 1(cause # of markers is 1 in that sentence) from 4 and I get 3.
Boom in quotations(after re:), 4am in brackets, Wednesday in brackets, assume all in brackets boom as quotations stands as itself, or in other words is a marker that doesn't need to be decoded….But [4am] is a marker and the first, and after the word predictable, so needs to be worked, and Wednesday is a Marker that stands for itself, as confirmation that marker is solved the marker says Wednesday as intended, but you don't get there till you decipher the meaning of the [4am] marker.
As confirmation using our #3 as a key
If we Walk back '3' sentences from marker takes you to "boom".
If Go up 3 sentences from marker it says [Wednesday]
Alternately if we start at boom go 3 spaces we get [4am] which we've determined with our subtraction number of 1, is actually [3am] and go 3 more we of course get [Wed]
Both ways Message reads "Boom 3am Wednesday"?
& what happened at 3ame(est) Wednesday AM, The Austin Bomber went boom in his car…
It makes sense to me or am I just seeing what I want to see? Am I high AF? Or are you autistic fags starting to wear off on me (fingers crossed)
Or just a coincidence?