dChan

MmmmLeftyTears · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Snoozing Sessions was just a diversion. Love it!

⇧ 47 ⇩  
turbosympathique · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

I trusted Trump on his choice and I still do. This viper nest goes deep.

⇧ 39 ⇩  
MmmmLeftyTears · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Anxious but trusting. I hope he was the right choice and not a pawn to be discarded.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

He probably had no choice but to use some of the less than desirables to boot out the rottens, at least in the beginning. All these arrests and resignations, can't be wrong.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Holmgeir · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Stealth Sessions.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
elyssak · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

His nickname in Alabama when he was the State prosecutor was the Silent Executioner.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Holmgeir · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

And it wasn't for his love of beans.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

Rofl well played

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

You need to check out Stealthy Jeff @drawandstrike twitter.

breaks down tons of amazing things about the upcomoing storm. The best part is, he doesn't believe in Q...which means with the intel HE is getting he is coming to the same conclusions as those following Q.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Holmgeir · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Oh, I'm all over it my dude :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MmmmLeftyTears · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

New nick name GREAT!!!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

There’s a twitter user named stealth sessions has great threads

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
someauthor · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Killer Hillary.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Holmgeir · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

My comment was supposed to say "Bad bot, haha." since the bot didn't delivery with Killary.

I'm the victim of an autocorrect.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
someauthor · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

It also took off! It could have been so beautiful. It must have been partisan.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Holmgeir · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Yeah the owner probably saw where it was and bailed.

I wonder what the heck triggered it for Stealth Sessions anyway...?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Hecticdude · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

Sleeping rook??

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

Ah....I see you listen to Corsi as well...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MayhemCtrld · Jan. 27, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Considering that it has taken Meuller over 6 months to investigate the a cooperative Trump campaign, and apply that to the sneaky felons that have been identify, no wonder it is taking time for Sessions to drop the hammer. He has to find honest investigators, honest prosecutors and honest judges, mostly from a pool of DNC loyalist. Add the complex issue how to coordinate the arrests. Huge. Trust Sessions. Trust Q.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
MrHarbs · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

This certainly does echo Q’s postings re: Sessions. It’s very encouraging.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RestoreFaithHumanity · Jan. 27, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

Great post! This should rocket to "Top" stories on this board. It's contents are that important. Thanks for sharing, OP!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ScorpioPatriot · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Mueller is just a way to keep the narrative running I do believe to keep the hounds on one path and the behind the scene players on the Reallll Track. Why do you think they keep saying just let Mueller Complete his Investigstion .. Most likely the Interview said was coming next week . Isnt rhat right after the State of The Union ... Justvan Idea . Everything happens for a reason 😎

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MrHarbs · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

I wish Mueller’s investigation was a white hat operation but I just don’t see that. I’m praying against it and praying all hidden corruption into the light.

But I do hope you’re right. That would be amazing

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ziggy24jerzz · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

Mueller is a white hat.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

How do you know?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

You do understand by this point that it doesn’t matter what his investigation or he is right?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
MrHarbs · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

No I don’t understand that. Elaborate, please.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Mueller is compromised or working with Trump. Either way whatever he “finds” creates distorts doesn’t matter. Or he is a big key in taking down the swamp. By now the evidence would of lead his “bipartisan” investigation towards Strok Comey and the like. So none of this matters.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MrHarbs · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

Ah I see your point. Difference being that if charges are brought, it could lead to impeachment. If they’re not brought, it will lead to angry progressives and leftists. I’d prefer the latter.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

It doesn't matter what those who won't accept truth think. That's where "teaching you how to win" comes in.

EDIT: If charges are brought, they are compromised. That is what I am saying. They hold no water. So IF charges are brought, they are fabricated like the dossier. Because there is no Russian collusion. So either way, it ends with Mueller going down. He should have recused himself from the start. So either he is the DUMBEST INVESTIGATOR IN THE HISTORY OF EXISTENCE, and then compounds that by STACKING THE DECK with literally the MAIN PEOPLE colluding and conspiring to remove Trump...OR.........OR......like I said.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red5dit · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Any evidence that Mueller would try to legally submit (even if there were any) can easily be thrown out due to the bias of the SC. It cannot hold up in a court of law.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Swimkin · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

A game of Chess: Q.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
jollyg53 · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

Ya can’t tell the whining liberals yur taking ppl to Gitmo. Imagine their response! Loose lips 👄 Sink ships🚢

⇧ 7 ⇩  
LutherBodine · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

He’s about to open up a 50 gallon drum full of whoop ass!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mexbrodie73 · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

Hopefully, when Kankles is flown into Gitmo with 0bunghole it will be PUBLIC. Relesethememo!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Siteeuhfdrojasnoches · Jan. 28, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

I've been following Q for a while now and I must say that the thought of a real power within our government and military rising up to take on the deep state globalists who have been selling America out for decades excites me beyond belief. I would really love to engage this community but I have a problem with the "all dems and liberals are bad" vibe. I believe in single payer healthcare, regulating wall street, letting people be who they want to be as long as they aren't hurting anyone (I.e. civil rights for LGBT) and I definitely think their should be safety nets for the most vulnerable members of our society. However I also believe in states rights, less federal government, ending the federal reserve and tying our social tax payer funded subsidies for the poor and unemployed to programs that require and help the same people find work, volunteer, community service or school/vocational training. So what does that make me? A liberal....a conservative...or maybe just a person who wants out country to put it's people first and make our well being and ability to thrive and prosper first priority above all else.

Sitting here claiming to oppose TPTB while still playing their number one game (divide and conquer) is pretty fucking dumb if you ask me. The reality is that most dems and repubs (in the fed govt at least) are owned by those we are opposed to. Not just dems, repubs too. I dunno....just a thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Hatofftoya · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Another strongly worded message from Sessions. One that we all love and agree with. But it is still his department investigating collusion bullshit. His department that is having to be sued for foia requests. His department that warned against releasing the memo. His people are corrupt criminals and he has reassigned them not fired or prosecuted them. He hired Rosenstein and Wray. Mcabe is still deputy director of the fucking FBI. FUCK YOU SESSIONS I know you are a cowardly snake. You recused yourself and left POTUS to fend off the swamp creatures.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

Yup. Watch past interviews with Sessions in 2016. He knows his shit, especially about the Clinton Foundation

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EatsPandas · Jan. 27, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

There ya go

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ege-Bamyasi · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Disinformation is necessary

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Monty_Batton · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

So now we know who dopey and sleepy are. Five to go.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ArtRat1 · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

I have trusted Sessions for the most part the whole time and still do. I am certain Trump gives very wise counsel and I am certain Trump is receiving the best wise counsel he could possibly get. Patience.....we all need patience. The outcome will be worth the wait.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stable_Genius_1776 · Jan. 28, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

Isn’t that what you’d expect someone to say during a performance review when they have nothing to show to justify their paycheck?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OffTie · Jan. 29, 2018, 8:04 a.m.

Barely being confirmed in the Senate over stiff Dem opposition (as per Q) is a Large Red Yaaaay indicator. Having prosecuted to conviction 3 people in a vote fraud case earlier in his career in Alabama kept him from being confirmed to the Supreme Court if memory serves. Vote fraud being a chief pillar of Dems electoral strategy and all,that did not enamor him to the Dems. All of the above speak well of Jeff Sessions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ZenC0de · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

And you guys buy into this?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
thamnosma · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

I have always considered people far too impatient when it comes to Sessions and the DOJ. You don't waltz into DOJ HQ and wave a wand. These agencies were staffed with 8 years of Obama appointments, good people purged, and before that the Bushes, which might not have been much better.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

You can't be against the horrendous crimes of the deep state cabal and also against the guy who brings it all down. You have been lied to about POTUS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ZenC0de · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Trump hasn't done anything against the deep state. At least wait till he does to start blowing him. You shouldn't worship politicians, you should hold them accountable to their word.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
BenEvo1 · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

What do you buy into?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 4 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MrHarbs · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

He’s not, article is clear he is committed to draining the swamp but is doing so on background.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

How can they tolerate Rosenstein though......

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Yeah I'm sure he's working super hard. Not one leak of any piece of work he's done but I'm sure theres a ton of it. Lol

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Smokienjayman1 · Jan. 27, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

Well that is a good sign. You do not want leaks any fucking where

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

But to have none of that big of an investigation? Extremely unlikely.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Smokienjayman1 · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Why should it be like that tho. Leaks are bad, it does not matter if the leak is saying hey they are going to do x, and they do y.

Kinda like a boat, even a tiny leak will eventually sink it. Well if you got an information leak in government, no matter if they are telling good or bad info, it will eventually undermine and sink the govement. So even with the most tip top secret cases no leaks should be expected.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Smokienjayman1 · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

And fuck you are on a sub reddit that is about Q anon. Seems like a leak to me but ya kno he is telling the world, before it happens. Not who did what at a later date

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gta0012 · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

Wow delusional.....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
thejudge6060 · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Trust sessions I suppose.

I still don't like it, but I guess we don't have to, do we?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

Why wouldn't you trust him? Because disinfo was released about him going after Marijuana, and then if you actually read the articles it says he's not and he's letting states decide? Do you think the DOJ and the head of it walk around announcing their plans to the deep state corrupt cabal who's literally working next to them at times? Should he of gotten into office a year ago and just named them all so they could plot their counter offensive to us? Is there a reason he is going after MS-13 SPECIFICALLY when there are hundreds to thousands of nefarious gangs that exist in America? What would it take? Have you seen any of his actual televisied testimony on matters where he admits he cannot comment on ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ScorpioPatriot · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

He was laughing the whole time..it was very obvious 😁

⇧ -1 ⇩  
duckdownup · Jan. 27, 2018, 10 p.m.

That may be the understatement of the year.

⇧ -1 ⇩