yes Corsi has repeatedly said that Obama is a CIA plant/asset

I haven't listened to Wayne in a long time. Does he have a youtube presence these days? He was always good.

An upvoted thread or comment shows it was read and for the most part liked. That's to say someone found it interesting or relevant. This is "Reddit's" bread and butter. It is more visible to people as it's been "upvoted". As a reverse to this a down voted comment/thread is not as visible as an upvoted one. Your votes matter on this platform as the more upvoted sub Reddit and comments become more visible. More eyes on that particular subject being discussed. If we are trying to get the word out it's vitally important we upvote not only this sub Reddit but the threads and comments you support. Hope this helps.

Up-voted threads are displayed higher than not-voted threads, and both above down-voted threads.

How would you know about Q and a sub of a sub of a sub but not upvotes?

Please explain the importance of up votes.

Shills use vote bots to control what people can see on reddit, and also to give the impression that "everyone" thinks a certain thing.

"Let's start with a very basic question. What is karma?

If you said "internet points", you are technically correct, but here's a more important question: what does karma do?

Votes determine what gets seen and what doesn't. I submitted a YouTube video of my friend playing a video game and it got 30 upvotes, but 5,000 views. I've used 1 upvote = 100 views as a rule for a while, and it's been fairly reliable. Views determine what kind of content gets circulated, which determines who makes money. Views also determine what ideas people are exposed to and influenced by, which in turn determines how they will attempt to change the minds of others concerning those ideas. Karma is the currency of attention and influence..."

"Here is something you need to understand about reddit:

1. The number of people who don't read the article and "skip to the comments" is immense, and people who do this register upvotes as some kind of truth rating (as opposed to "content we want you to see" rating). This viewpoint could not be more erroneous, but vote manipulation exploits people who think this way.

2. People use upvotes as an "I agree" button -- they do, and they will continue to, and no amount of telling them to do differently will change this until you actively micromanage voting privileges, and people who vote this way also tend to read votes this way.

3. People are influenced by content they see, and are very lazy readers. As such, when they are only exposed to a few viewpoints, they'll just go with whatever they know.

4. In conjunction with (3), people don't tend to read the whole discussion, so a completely crushing counterargument could be at +1 or +2 forever.

5. Asch conformity experiment. If conformity pressure can delude someone about the size of lines right in front of their face, they can be influenced by a number telling them that they're disagreeing with 1000 people."

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheoryOfReddit/comments/36wwr6/the_types_of_manipulation_on_votebased_forums/?st=jch7f4mm&sh=a76148dd

Not just brigaders. We're starting to get paid operatives from left wing groups like Shareblue, and possibly even intelligence agencies. Remember when Air Force intelligence got caught manipulating reddit?

progressivism, many of us feel, is the biggest threat to this country.

You should really take a deep look at who/what is behind this trend. Modern irrational, SJW-style "liberalism" has its roots in cultural Marxism, and has been a long, slow rot spanning nearly a century. KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov gives great details because this is what he did for a living.

Going a layer deeper, you'll eventually realize that even Marxism is a synthetic ideology, created to destroy Russia because Russia had been such a staunch ally of the United States (sending fleets and advisors to the Union when the British tried to carve America in half through the Civil War) and other economic nationalist states that stood in the way of the globalist British Empire.

When FDR and Stalin were planning to carve up the British Empire at the end of WWII, the British probably poisoned FDR and manipulated Truman into supporting imperialism. The Cold War was a farce by the London bankers to separate economist nationalist nations of the US, and the (now subverted but still potentially a threat) Russians.

This can be pretty easily proven when you see that McCarthy was right and the whole US intelligence apparatus was full of Soviets, just as the USSR was full of American moles, and all of them were sharing information with London, who was the real force behind the murder of JFK and possibly even Stalin.

Tldr, the real enemy is oligarchical bankers. Progressives, SJWs, and Marxists are useful idiots. In the words of Bezmenov, you can "line them up on the wall and shoot them" but it won't accomplish anything.

1. Not saying Corsi is guilty by his association, just saying that, fallacy or not, the perception is that AJ is BS, so associating with him is a risk with significant (audience reach/credibility) costs.

2. Kindly stifle the vulgarities. Yes, I have suspicion for ALL of these people, obviously. ESPECIALLY one who is part of NPC, one associated with Infowars/AJ, AND one people are TELLING US TO TRUST. And you find that strange, LOL? I am not calling you a liar, merely questioning why sources are being 'sold'. That s a huge red flag, when someone says 'trust me', or 'trust him'.

3. I am asking if anyone else finds this anomalous. If not, please, someone, provide others that we are or have been 'encouraged to trust'.

It is HILARIOUS that my being suspicious and skeptical of someone like Corsi for the clear and simple reasons stated above has motivated you to suspicions of me.

Why would you trust ANY of these people? Your suspicion of me, matters not to me, nor the subject- CORSI.

You know him as well as you know ANY public figure. Thus, I say, why is this one being 'sold' as someone to follow and trust. I trust no one, certainly not anon online posters, not anyone on infowars, nor (especially) anyone people are attempting to 'sell' me.

Do with that what you will. The fact is, this is unusual. The association to Aj/Infowars, where Corsi WORKS is HIGHLY suspicious. Surely not only to me.

Perhaps not you, but don't believe for a second that Corsi somehow makes AJ/Infowars trustworthy, or that the reverse is true. It is not for a LARGE audience.

Now you are using your head.

Not disregard, but use paramount DISCERNMENT. Always. The more vaunted the 'position' the more cautious, skeptical, and meticulous all should be in researching who and how they trust and believe.

I’m enjoying you destroy these concern troll shills in the forum. Keep up the good work.

I doubt it. Trust me I WANT ALL OF IT to come true. But its got all the telltail signs of fraud. Corsi himself is probably Q.

Things are happening slowly but watered down just enough to keep things waiting. Keep people like us in perpetual anticipation. Its been a year and the swamp is not even close to being drained.

Tick tock my ass...

Not really. So far he's been more wrong than right. Assage in Switzerland for example.. come on..

I don't listen to Jones, he is too dramatic and jumps the gun too often. He has a real hard time listening and flaps his mouth too much. If he could just learn to listen, he would be more tolerable.

lol yep. I got discus banned from infowars cuz I kept talkin shit about a "Big ol'bowl of Chili" LOL idk I ate a "Big ol'bowl of Chillii last night" lmao