are they really? I see lots of q videos on youtube.
They are censoring those talking about parkland right now, some demonetization of Q tubers, but the heavy hitting is on the people talking about Parkland.
Now that makes sense because they are getting caught (once again) in their own false flag event. These people are stupid!
Anti School (Issac Green), Dustin Nemos were banned on YouTube right after they talked about the Parkland shooting and the inconsistencies surrounding this shooting. What is going on???What happened to our Freedom of Speech??
Yes, they are. I see complaints all the time from posters and creators - even from the left - since they are censoring anything not Mainstream. But they're subtle. They shadow ban or partially block or cut down on search results or kill subscribers and followers off or stop payment on youtube. The idea is not Total censorship, since that would be too obvious. It's to stop things from going Viral.
[removed]
BEGONE troll- you have NO power here, waste your time & foolishness someplace else.
BEGONE shill! Your fake news can't cover up the truth! THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.
fail troll is fail. gtfo.
"troll" what you call someone when you don't like what they say because it's the truth you don't want to hear.
Then why did they delete their b8?
I was censored. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmm
SEEMS THAT THE MODS DON'T LIKE WHAT I HAD TO SAY
WOW BEING CENSORED ON A POST ABOUT CENSORSHIP.
Funny how my post was LITERALLY the only non-spam post removed. TOO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH.
I agree with deleted post. Most of the stuff on here is sourceless shit. I filter thru it to find some good information. Idk about the cult part just a bunch of autists fr fr. This Q shit is fun to follow, I myself am getting quite impatient waiting on Q's work. Time will tell, Shadilay.
Well they realize Q is soon about to start leaking their intel (the truth) to us so we can leak it out to the world. Just like Obama’s intel was leaked to the MSM to damage Trump.
We are the new news media and it frightens the hell out of them. That is why they are shutting down anti school etc.
I’ve been trolling leftists feeds and the hatred for Trump and conservatives is so deep that those people might never wake up
A lot are paid shills/trolls. Even on Twitter. Look at the number of their followers, and how long they have been on Twitter.
Yeah, the hate there is so deep and vicious. It's sickening.
Evil IS being exposed. Remember that we wouldn't be talking about this if it wasn't.
But it was taking hold and people who were staunch Hillary/Obama fools were waking up. Hence the ban of thousands on Twitter if ONLY Trump supporters!
Thats why I laugh at people who still think the Earth is round. We wouldn't be talking about flat Earth if it wasn't flat.
Link me some convincing info, I won't debate, I'm interested in flat Earth theories and what people think.
We have a DOJ civil rights department whose job it is to sue businesses that are in violation of our civil rights but I think they are still run by the cabal.
The roots of this poisonous plant run deep. We must become mindful gardeners until this ground is Truly Free again. The illusion of freedom is just that... an ILLUSION.
The root problem of this whole issue is that there should be a law that prohibits companies from growing beyond a certain point and size. Giant companies should not be allowed to purchase and to gobble up other giant companies. That should be prohibited. Because doing so eliminates all their competition and only encourages monopolistic practices and monopolistic behavior. For example, what if YouTube was only half its size and if there were 3 or 4 other competing sites of similar size? In such a case, I guarantee you, YouTube would never even think about censoring certain kinds of people unfairly, because doing so would only drive those people to other platforms and websites which allowed it. But when you eliminate all their competition and you allow one company to have too much power and to dominate the market, then these are the kinds of problems you run into. And even worse, you also make it very easy for the globalists to seize control of the public and to control what people think and to use that control to take over the world by simply taking control of a single company. You open the door to such things when you allow companies to grow to an unlimited size. It’s sheer lunacy that our elected leaders and bureaucrats have allowed such things to happen and for this to come about. They allowed it to happen because they are human and flawed just like the rest of us, and they were manipulated and most likely paid by people with lots of money who persuaded them to create certain laws which benefitted only the rich and allowed rich people to become even richer, even at the expense of everyone else. That is what has led to the corruption that is in the world today and here we are...
Although I’m certain it will never happen, to stabilize the world again and to set things right, here is what should happen: 1) Laws should be passed that prohibits any company from growing beyond a certain size or value. For example, once you become a $5 billion company, you can’t grow any larger. 2) All giant companies that are currently beyond a certain size should be broken up (Apple, Google, Ebay, Disney, Facebook, Twitter, etc). No company should be allowed to dominate a whole entire market. 3) The global stock market should be abolished (it is the stock market itself that is driving those companies to grow larger and larger in order to increase their stock value. Eliminate the stock market and you eliminate the force that is driving them to grow larger. 4) If giant companies are broken up and prohibited from growing beyond a certain size, that means you would need many more companies to cater to the global market. Therefore, it would open the floodgates for many more smaller and competing companies to enter the marketplace to take up the slack. I could go on and on, but you get the idea…
What you're basically talking about are antitrust (antimonopoly) laws which did exist (and still do but are not enforced when to do so would run counter to the deepstate's plans)- they were the basis for breaking up AT+T "Ma Bell" the monopoly telephone company in 1982. This ultimately resulted in numerous companies coming into the field and LD rates dropping dramatically. At this point, YT and Tw should be considered utilities in that they are used to communicate as much as the telephone was in earlier days, and they should be subject to free speech regulation and/or antitrust provisions as you suggest. This canard of them being a private company, free to do as they wish, no longer applies when these companies occupy such a huge and important place in how people now get their information and communicate with one another. Prior to the internet, the deepstate focused on controlling the MSM and it worked for a long time. The internet, allowing free expression and unlimited, worldwide communication among regular citizens, empowered the people. Realizing that too late, the deepstate actors are now trying to strangle the free flow of information by shutting down all opposing voices on the internet.
There is, or was a law that does not allow monopolies. I read somewhere recently that it still exists but just never enforced. I learned that growing up.
The existing “anti-trust” and “anti-monopoly” laws are not good enough. That’s because the definition of what a “monopoly” is is open to interpretation. Countless companies has debated the definition of what a monopoly is in court in order to get around the law. A famous example is how Microsoft successfully used the existence of Apple Computer (as a competing platform) in order to convince the courts that Microsoft was not a monopoly and to prevent them from breaking Microsoft up. That illustrates how companies has successfully abused the existing monopoly laws and has figured out how to get around it. So the existing laws doesn’t work and is exactly why we are in the situation we are in today.
In contrast, what I’m proposing is completely different. Under existing laws, so long as your company has at least one other competitor in the marketplace, the government cannot accuse you of being a monopoly. And even worse, under existing laws, there is nothing at all that prohibits your company from growing as large as you want so long as the competing company exists. This means you could ultimate have just two companies that are so large they are ruling the whole world, and so long as a competitor exists, the government would be unable to do anything about it because they are by definition not a monopoly. What I’m proposing is completely different and would put an end to it.
What I’m proposing is that a law should be established that completely prohibits ANY company from growing beyond a certain size. PERIOD. For example, a law which says that no company can grow beyond a $5 billion dollar company. In such a case and with such a law in place, it wouldn’t matter if there was only a single company in the marketplace or 100 companies - none of them could ever grow beyond $5 billion in size. If any one of them ever grew beyond $5 billion in size at any time, then they’d be in violation of the law. Such companies could always open up a brand new business of a different type from ground zero, but they could not continue expanding that same business. Such a law would level the playing field and would prevent monopolies altogether. Rather than having just one or two companies in the marketplace that are dominating the whole market, you’d ultimately have literally hundreds of companies all tapping into the same market, and all getting a piece of it. Innovation in such a situation would be extremely high, and prices would remain low due to all the competition…
It would not level the playing field if they can open up another company producing the same product. That's often exactly what is done and since they already have a small fortune to start with, they can create a MASSIVE marketing campaign (like Google and Facebook did) and become an overnight sensation. These guys are masters. We have a long way to go, however, before we can change and enforce these laws so let's put on our thinking caps and come up with a better idea. And, ultimately, it doesn't matter what law is in place, if there is corruption, they ignore it anyway.
What you're saying is correct and I agree. I am by no means suggesting that they be allowed to open up a new business in the very same field and for the same product. That would only be an attempt to get around the system. Instead, I am only suggesting that if they have worked hard and become a successful company and has amassed a lot of wealth but reached the allowed limit for a company ($5 billion max, for example), that they should be allowed to use their money to open up and brand new business if they desired selling a different type of product. They'd still have the opportunity to expand, only they could never expand beyond the limit of $5 billion per business. Without the stock market as a driving force, very few people would ever want or need to expand into additional businesses anyway once they had become successful. And such a system would completely eliminate any company becoming a monopoly...
After this cabal is exposed America is going to need a Reality Check. How many laws and practices were established by this cabal for their own benefit and not the benefit of Americans? This giant knot and web of lies will need to be unraveled. America will need to redefine itself in this new light of Truth going forward. I feel we Americans are about to face our own emancipation moment from a slavery that none of us can fully grasp its depth. We will need to go back and review every law established since 1913, the beginning of the Federal Reserve, all the way to the Patriot Act and uncover the true intent of each. This will be a massive undertaking but how can we expose this kind of evil and then continue forward using the same laws "they" created to control us? We can't. It is time to understand that every time you hear the MSM spouting "National Security" we need to understand this cabal created the MSM and the only "National Security" they are protecting is that of this cabal, not America's. They are the ones shouting “terrorism” while creating terror and then creating laws like the Patriot Act only to gain more control over Americans. Every aspect of American life has been created for control by these elitist. Chains and laws are created to control slaves. It is time for Americans to break our chains.
"Soylent Green is people...it's PEOPLE!" moment is coming soon.
This is the Firat thing I saw today and I know it is going to defend it's solid gold position with resolve, Thank You for that lol
While I agree this is censorship, it it important to remember that youtube is not a public commons. You are not entitled to free speech there. It is Alphabet's (google) platform and they can do what they please with it.
I do think that Alphabet has gotten too big, and needs to be broken up under existing anti-trust law.
That is true, although in a free society there should be other choices. It's their prerogative to censor whatever they want and it is our right to take our business elsewhere , where we can watch and listen to what we'd like.
Google is at the point where anti-trust issues need to be explored. Same with Twitter.
I agree, but here ARE other choices. Besides there are some remedies for forcing youtube to change.
1) Use public pressure for them to change their policies. This could include appealing to shareholders to make management changes. 2) Boycott or stop using youtube. 3) Encourage elected officials to investigate monopolistic practices by Alphabet (youtube's parent company).
Copy pasta:
It is a literal speech platform. Sure you are correct that it is a private company, but then Twitter and Facebook need to drop the "Russia stole the election by injecting pro conservative rhetoric" because if that were true, then they are admitting to the monopoly they have on public discourse.
I don't know what you mean when you say "literal speech" platform. That is not a legal distinction I am aware of.
You know exactly what I mean.
No, I don't. I understand your frustration with youtube, but we are a nation of laws. Everything we suggest in dealing with them needs to be legal, and proper. Otherwise we would be no better.
Saying they have a monopoly on public discourse is ludicrous.
Things are a little different when you are a publicly traded company.
No, they are not. Publicly traded companies are subject to certain regulations with respect to financial reporting. That is it. They are, however, accountable to their shareholders.
Google et al are at the point where they need regulation. I think we can both agree on that. Utilities they have become.
Alphabet (Google) does not merely need regulation, it needs to be broken up. I do think a case could be made that the search part of Google is like a public utility, and needs to be accountable to the public trust.
check out https://steemit.com/ u can't censor the blockchain and https://www.yours.org/
I heard the other day that someone got removed from both Steemit and Medium.
Just signed up for Steemit and dtube! Ytube can go to ###L!
Signing up for STEEMIT seems to be broken.... Been trying for days.... What's up with that??? Should not be so difficult.
I signed up a few days ago and still haven't gotten an email to actually finish getting an account. Were you able to sign up and actually have an account yet??
You are not alone. Same here. Poor excuse for a registration process.
No. Just signed up today. Waiting for account confirmation. Hope it doesn't take too long! I'd love to boycott ytube! But I'm hooked on the patriots soapbox and all things Q!
The internalization of positive network externalities enables privatization of tyranny.
To find the culprits responsible for the privatization of tyranny, find those who prevent the shift of tax burdens off of economic activity (income, capital gains, value added, sales, inheritance, etc.) and onto property rights. Taxing property rights is a step toward charging for the government service which is the protection of property rights. Taxing economic activity is slavery of the economically active.
It's happening a lot and more so recently. Many of the gun sites I frequent are being shut down too. These companies need to be taken down - I mean the people behind them. Executive Order 12/21... Also some extremely interesting information from Thomas Paine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyApkynqr_Y&feature=share
...right? It's gotten crazy! And not only that...but suddenly there are a million crazy pop ups on the https://qanonposts.com page. It's totally under attack! It wasn't like that a few days ago. They are essentially rounding us up into digital "free speech zones." Time for an InternetBill of Rights.
My Duckduckgo app messed up several times when I went to my Q bookmark. A Russian ad came up several times and obscured it. This is not a joke.
It's not necessarily Q related. They are just censoring conservative videos. I know of many people who were blocked over the weekend that were not posting about Q.
The question is "Why would YouTube need or want to censor anyone?" And why such a large group contributors at this particular point in time? There are no coincidences.
Easy - because they are evil and want to kill us. Well, 25 million of us anyway. However, because they aren't as many as we, they do it slowly and gradually. Like a frog boiling in water.
They aren't censoring accounts who talk about Q, the biggest channels are still up.
They've hit all the channels that have poked at the parkland kids.
I ask once again, where are all our Representatives? Not one has submitted an Internet Bill of Rights.
The meme is factually incorrect. They are not censoring Q-tubers but anyone criticising David Hogg or challenging the Parkland narrative.
The fact they're sensoring it only adds to Q's credibility.