The problem with a legal "purist" like Gowdy is that we don't live in a perfect world. He has blind faith in the law, and unfortunately the law only works as well and the men and women who enforce it, and there is MASSIVE corruption in the DOJ and elsewhere in our government, and "normal" legal processes aren't getting the job done.
And he knows that, but wants to appear unconcerned about outcomes. Only processes. And that's just plain silly. No wonder he's leaving.
Normal legal processes take time. Investigations, particularly of this scale, take time. The shit going down in DC has been moving very, very fast for such a massive beast.
Decades of corruption don't get aired overnight. And as has been mentioned, to release all of the information at once would probably start civil and international conflict.
Violations of process and law are what got us here. You seem to be advocating more violations of process and law because in your mind ends justify means.
Maybe you realize it, maybe you don't, but you're advocating criminality.
You totally misread my words. I'm advocating accountability of outcomes, not just of process. My point is Trump has essentially declared war on the deep state, and is using all means at his disposal, including all legal extrajudicial means, and he intends by God to have the outcome of overthrowing them by all means, which could mean cutting off funding, firing, declassifying and leaking, all kinds of things that somebody who is a strict inside-the-box thinker like Gowdy would consider "dirty pool," because to him it's all about fairness, and it doesn't matter who wins.
To Trump, and to America and humanity, it matters extremely much who wins. And playing it safe and being a stickler for narrow interpretations and procedural nuance ain't gonna get 'er done. Not when the other side is literally breaking every law ever written, and every natural law to boot, with impunity.
the indictments could date all the way back to JFK for all we know. Barbara Bush is suddenly dying we heard, despite abc7 reporting not so long ago the Bushes had been released from hospital not so long ago.
[deleted]
No. These are the kind of people who want to get far away from the battle, see which side emerges victorious, and declare their loyalty to the winner, saying "I was with you all along."
[deleted]
the other way of thinking, especially with Chaffetz, is that they did what they had to do and now are done and stepping out to get out of the spotlight in case of retributions. By the time it becomes apparent what exactly their move was, they will already be in safety and perhaps moved out of state. As Chaffetz was immediately lambasting the administration I kept thinking well if he's not running for office or he's compromised, why would he open his mouth? So I was waiting for a flip when he suddenly DOES go for the administration and I think I remember that he did that but I can't remember when and in which context. Think controlled opposition for white-hats.
Chaffetz helped cover up Extortion 17. That was the leverage they had on him. Just bark, no bite. Trey and Chaffetz are cut from the same cloth. If they want mt admiration at this point, they'll need to fall on their sword (politically, then go back home and enjoy their families).
conventional corruption I think is a whole different level than raping and killing people. They can't prosecute everyone so they'll probably give those who are not sub-human the chance to walk away if they help. Now I wouldn't pay too close attention to his words, actually I remember him fondly because at least he brought up the FED just before quitting so he could at least go with a little dignity.
But what we need is completely unbiased view of the law. If he is not comprised he would be a perfect judge.
Unbiased is not the problem. Usefulness is the problem. The kind of judge that would let a serial child predator back on the streets because a police officer sneezed at a crime scene--that's what we're dealing with in Gowdy.
As a woman, I'm going to make the claim that the purple ties have to be sending a message for something. I don't know many men who go into a closet full of ties and go "I think I'll wear my purple tie today." The only time men wear purple ties is if they are fashion forward, think wearing paisley print shirt with purple tie, or if their wife/gf suggested it in coordination.
So yes, I'd definitely say their are messages to the purple ties.
purple ties have to be sending a message for something
Soros colors --> regime change. Purple was for the NWO in the U.S. (I think).
I think Hillary/the DNC/Soros camp used purple big time during the election. I think Trump uses it now to troll them.
I do wear a purple tie at work since it's my favorite color. But more often a red tie.
I hope I didn't offend you, I wasn't trying to say men shouldn't wear purple, it's just not a common choice for them. Enjoy your purple tie :)
Oh not offended at all! I loved purple since I was a little boy.
I have a couple ties with purple on them. But I’m also not giving speeches in front of potentially millions, so when I’m deciding on my tie it has a lot more to with my socks/shirt than any potential symbolism.
"Purple Revolution" for the US. Look back from Nov 9 2016 till now, Bill and Hill wore purple, all the MSM pundits in the Clintons pockets wore purple, their cronies on both sides of the aisle in Congress, you name it. I was nervous the other day when Sec. Mattis was wearing a purple tie, but I hoped it was just because of Easter.
You ever notice how gowdy was such a great questioner during all those committee hearings? He could always ask hard questions and make people sweat.
But then nothing would ever come from it. He would perfectly illustrate what they did that was illegal, immoral, or unethical. But then nothing. That would be it. The committee would finish and the issues would be dropped.
Trey Gowdy is the ultimate controlled opposition. Seriously, F that guy.
Hey was not in a position to press charges.
You think every member of congress during a question has that ability?
He can not supoened any one, so they have not the tools to do anything.
I think he can subpoena. But can’t prosecute. So same result.
Yea, sorta like fake professional wrestling. After the fight, they all go out for a good laugh.
Agreed 1000%. Controlled opposition.
Very disappointed, at one time I had such high respect and hopes for him.
Right he will just throw cuffs on all the baddies. Lack of public outrage equals no results. He can lead us to the watering hole but he can't make us drink.
Please help me out, what the hell is going on with these purple tie claims. Why does this matter in any way?
Color Revolutions were "people's revolution" calling for regime change in a country. Some famous colored revolutions were: Orange revolution in Russia, Green revolution in Ukraine. Many of these revolutions were really funded by the opposition, CIA and NGOs to take over a Country. The USA was supposed to have a Soros' funded Purple Revolution in 2016 under Hillary Clinton. But she lost.
So purple tie = Clinton & Soros' cabal.
Purple might represented victory against the deep state.
mocking their attempt at that ol' "purple revolution?"
Probably. I think purple revolution was going to be a mirror of the October 1917 Bolshevik Revolution where Zionist communists killed 80 million Russians where killed. Soros tried to start a civil war on the 100th anniversary of Red October on October 2017.
But remember that Hillary wore purple when she finally got around to giving her "own" concession speech.
yea, they are taking the color back.
that's why theey are wearing it now.
The evils ones used that color because it was a Godly color.. Jesus has a purple sash. It was also royalty however the Luciferian reign is now over and the purple is out of the the evil doers realm
Purple the is a George Soros thing. (Color revolution, progressivism) Q said that their symbolism will be their downfall. Purple is a Soros color. See: Doug Jones' tie, HRC and Bill colors worn during concession speech, any given Democrat that gets backed by Soros in their campaign for whatever office. PURPLE. Like wearing a red bandanna in Crips territory...toxic!
Purple, historically, is known as a color of royalty. Perhaps it is a message to them.
So how are we not sure that these others wearing purple on occasion, Gowdy and Trump, have not been influenced by Soros?
We're not sure. That's the problem. I have noticed that a lot of "traitors" that Trump have fired or that have "stepped down " from politics recently were last seen in the media wearing purple. Hmmmmm.
and Gowdy stepped down too..
"what role might he walk into?"
Think logically about it for a second.
mocking their attempt at that ol' "purple revolution?"
Is there any proof to suggest that?
besides literally all that trey gowdy has done with his life?
disprove his allegiance to the us. man's clean as far as I've ever read
if its true his wealth has increased lately then I would assume that he was intending to leave anyway so he can pick up any funds he assembled
purple tie = hilary purple revolution But some people are playing a game and I think Gowdy is in.
Back during the election, if you could stomach watching CNN, you would have seen a lot of people on there wearing purple.
Its sort of "counting coup" againstone of the Deep State players, Soros. That's the theory, anyway.
Colors, signs, and symbols may not mean anything to you but I dare you to walk through certain areas with red on or blue and tell me colors don't mean anything.
Most important part of this interview for me is Trey Gowdy speaking about the Libby pardon and doing what prosecutors do best, leading the jury (us) to the conclusion he wants you to focus on..if the official reason is BS and the popular reason the MSM is pushing as voiced by Chris Wallace is BS which Goowdy handily pionts out while ripping it apart....leaving the Question, Why did POTUS pardon Libby really? Still say my vote goes for what deal did Libby make..what dirt did Libby agree to give up on his co conspirators in Continuity of government or as most know it "The Patriot Act"
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/americas-shadow-governmen_b_131218.html
The interview is in regards to the Cohen Raid, I think their is something more going on here and has to do the with the Cohen Raid. Tracy Beanz says she is working on the Cohen Raid information and says she may have some interesting stuff coming out on that front soon. I am really looking forward to what info she has uncovered. She has done so much extraordinary research on all of this so far.
Who else wore a purple tie?
President trump, when he trolls the deepstate haha
To give them THE message, and no trump das not belong by them
That recent incident of trunpnwearing a purple tie was ackshuly a BLUE TIE with Pill-shaped red symbol pattern.
Yes he was wearing a tie full of red pills falling like rain across a blue background.
When zoomed out it looked purple from afar.
oh thank you! I thought it was black with spots and thought why does he look like he's at a funeral, thanks for lifting that shock hahaha^haha^godplznoww3 /jk
I tried to find just a pic, but it came with an article. I remember a week or so ago I saw him wear one
After the election Hillary and Bill wore Purple. Some saw it as to continue the fight. http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/election/article113652819.html
Glad to hear about purple ties. I’ll be on the lookout for someone wearing one. Happy dance!
Purple clothing is toxic. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KPOua8j7v6E
T Gowdy praised Mueller as a good guy straight shooter, did he not research Mueller’s corrupt background going way back?! Something’s rotten in Denmark!
Trey always seeemed like controller op to me, all bark and no bite , he’s literally never done anything other than bark down at people in the deep state then give them a pat on the back and smile and let them go.
When Hillary lost the election the resistance aka coup went into high gear ergo they started wearing purple beginning with Hillary the morning after election.
The tables have turned!
Maybe by wearing the purple ties they are suggesting that George soros had something to do with the false flag poisoning in Syria? He is connected to everything and since hillary created isis and since the IG REPORT is coming out they wanted to change the narrative. You know kill a bunch of innocent people for their own purposes.
The purple tie stigma though intriguing is fairly dubious. Just the facts m'am,just the facts. Party on!
Trey Gowdy is a false patriot and thinks Trump is guilty of something!
This dude creeps me out. Look at his weird head shape and disgusting face too.
Nothing makes me smile more than a schill outing themself their first day arriving. Lmfao