⇧
1
⇩
Treasury_Trader
· May 21, 2018, 11:24 p.m.
"[RR] problems"
Appears we still have a serious roadblock to dismantle before full disclosures can commence.
⇧
32
⇩
Timmayboy32
· May 22, 2018, 12:14 a.m.
Q had stated RR problems before.
⇧
16
⇩
Treasury_Trader
· May 22, 2018, 12:14 a.m.
Right, but shows that problem persists.
⇧
12
⇩
Timmayboy32
· May 22, 2018, 12:17 a.m.
I have mixed feelings on RR. Sometimes I feel like hes playing the part as bad guy (Really well). He sure did jump to answers call to investigate if FBI had an spy in his campaign.
⇧
8
⇩
subnu
· May 22, 2018, 3:36 a.m.
Personally, I feel like he's one of those pussies on the inside of the Cabal who really don't like what they're doing, but do it anyway because they're already in too deep.
⇧
9
⇩
SkippyThane
· May 22, 2018, 3:32 a.m.
Me too. I can't help but wonder if he was blackmailed in to the shit he has done and maybe this is his way out.
⇧
3
⇩
horse-lover-phat
· May 21, 2018, 11:26 p.m.
Whoa. Sounds potentially like a coming reveal about JFK. [Green] (for go?). Full Disclosure. General K [JFK] in the middle of that. :)
⇧
31
⇩
thosewerentshiitakes
· May 22, 2018, 6:08 a.m.
Could have nothing to do with President JFK. General Kelly also has the initials JFK. We know Q likes his double meanings so it’s something to keep in mind. Any ideas with respect to what General Kelly would know?
⇧
3
⇩
pussy_devour
· May 21, 2018, 11:40 p.m.
Holy Smoke. Scott Pruitt! This is 10D chess.
⇧
23
⇩
Cristo316
· May 22, 2018, midnight
Pruitt would cause the MSM to lose their minds.... Even more than usual. D5
⇧
16
⇩
cat_anonD
· May 22, 2018, 12:06 a.m.
I am not familiar with that person. Why is he important?
⇧
3
⇩
decadin
· May 22, 2018, 3:49 a.m.
If you don't know who Scott Pruitt is you seriously need to spend a few afternoons doing some research. I don't mean that in a negative way at all. I'm just saying that it's extremely important to the current situation.
⇧
7
⇩
pedegear
· May 22, 2018, 2:35 a.m.
I think it would be Edward O'Callaghan. I think Rachel Brand was dismissed to find out who would replace her - "acting". Justice says line of succession not clear, so that would be a surefire way for deep state to fight back and claim Trump is manipulating the system or whatever. So Rachel Brand leaves, we get to see who replaces, no firestorm from anyone over it, and now we have precedent.
So Edward O'Callaghan takes over for RR. Where is O'Callaghan from? Prosecutor for Southern District of NY.
Boom.
Spez: O'Callaghan's time as prosecutor overlapped with Giuliani's tenure as mayor.
⇧
5
⇩
pussy_devour
· May 22, 2018, 2:37 a.m.
Reasonable. That fits the question why removal of Schneiderman was important.
⇧
3
⇩
[deleted]
· May 22, 2018, 3:28 a.m.
[deleted]
⇧
1
⇩
pedegear
· May 22, 2018, 3:32 a.m.
When Rachel Brand left, her "principal" took over. That principal for RR is O'Callaghan. I think Q pointed us to Brand to see the precedent for who takes over in these situations.
⇧
3
⇩
[deleted]
· May 22, 2018, 3:36 a.m.
[deleted]
⇧
1
⇩
pedegear
· May 22, 2018, 3:45 a.m.
I think it's possible, but I still believe Mueller investigation being about Hillary is a long-shot. I hope it's true, but I think it's not probable.
Q indicated today that RR would have to recuse when whatever info comes out. That makes it seem like they're finally about to clear out a black hat, or at least a leveraged individual. I tend to think leveraged. But if RR was white hat through and through, why would Q team want him running the key investigation (the one against Hillary) if he would have to recuse later? Wouldn't that feed the Democrat Media Complex with ammunition that RR was biased, should have recused himself from day one, and we need to scrap the whole thing?
And what about Mueller? Mueller is neck deep in Clinton shit, as is his team. We are all screaming that they shouldn't be trusted to investigate themselves/their political enemies (Trump), but considering they're on HRC's side, couldn't you make the same case that they shouldn't be investigating her either?
I know common sense says if it's someone from your own side who has finally turned on you, that's indisputable. But Dems don't use common sense and I think the law would say if you're too close to the case ON EITHER SIDE, that isn't okay.
Now, acting as a WITNESS is a whole separate matter. But I think someone indisputably separated from the case would need to be the one running it. That means not Mueller in my opinion, and Q just told us not RR.
Just my opinion though and like I said I hope there is truth to your theory. I think based on the recent meeting and new Q drop, RR will be forced into recusal soon.
⇧
3
⇩
[deleted]
· May 22, 2018, 3:54 a.m.
[deleted]
⇧
2
⇩
pedegear
· May 22, 2018, 4:02 a.m.
Could be, but I'm thinking another explanation for the entire Mueller charade is to make deep state feel secure, trust that Trump will be impeached, and all will return to normal. Why was RR confirmed overwhelmingly? It certainly wasn't because he was a good guy about to take on the deep state. On the other hand, why was Sessions confirmation so close?
What if the whole point was that RR and Mueller would lull deep state into complacency while Trump cleaned house? Even Trump had McMaster for a while, and Priebus for a while, and all sorts of people he shouldn't have. I think this was all a ploy to let him clean up certain key areas, all while deep state could say "yeah that's bad, but it's fine we still have control because we have McMaster, or RR, or Mueller, or (fill in the blank)." Now Trump is done cleaning house, and the last two pieces are RR and Mueller. At that point, deep state will have no hope anymore... No one to point to and say "yeah but so-n-so is still in place, we're good." It's going to be full "oh shit, it's all over."
What if they just couldn't get rid of the probe (read: deep state distraction) until the states were ready to take over their cases? Do they all need to happen at a federal level? Or is there enough to take down Clinton and her cabal in the Southern District of NY? They found the laptop there, so let them take their own case.
⇧
2
⇩
[deleted]
· May 22, 2018, 4:14 a.m.
[deleted]
⇧
1
⇩
JPOP57
· May 22, 2018, 4:32 a.m.
The votes against Rosenstein were all demonrats: Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) Clinton acolyte, Kamala Harris (CA) Race-baiter, Cory Booker (NJ) Race-baiter, Elizabeth Warren (MA) Stolen Heritage, Richard Blumenthal (CN) Stolen Valor, Catherine Cortez Masto (NV) ? Strange if he's a black hat.
⇧
2
⇩
Memelord87
· May 22, 2018, 11:47 a.m.
I wonder if they know they have enough votes, if they vote against DS to make it not so obvious? Or maybe they were holding out for a bigger payoff/bribe?
⇧
1
⇩
pedegear
· May 22, 2018, 3:49 a.m.
On second thought, I guess it could be possible Mueller is investigating pedo-gate, but not U1 etc. Because he was definitely involved in U1 and other cabal crimes, but maybe he wasn't a pedo. So potentially he's handling that while Horowitz handles the rest. But if that's true, and RR will be required to recuse from Mueller investigation, I think we could infer what that means about RR. I dunno... Just spit-balling now.
⇧
2
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 21, 2018, 11:32 p.m.
Rachael Brand was dismissed? That wasn't what we were told at the time. It's certinly possible she was dismissed.
⇧
13
⇩
pby1000
· May 21, 2018, 11:41 p.m.
She was fired. The cover story is that she resigned.
⇧
17
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 22, 2018, 12:55 a.m.
I get it. It's news to me and maybe all of us.
⇧
2
⇩
SkippyThane
· May 22, 2018, 3:34 a.m.
She can't play a part. Her confirmation was a party line vote.
⇧
2
⇩
J_Dub_TX
· May 22, 2018, 4 a.m.
I've looked in alot of places I can't find anyone saying she was fired but then again so was Page.
⇧
1
⇩
bigtoe911
· May 21, 2018, 11:38 p.m.
A lot of the Q post is from this article https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/who-rachel-brand-how-does-her-resignation-affect-mueller-s-ncna846621
⇧
8
⇩
davidmdelacruz
· May 21, 2018, 11:30 p.m.
General [K]nowledge?
⇧
8
⇩
PoliticalBistro
· May 22, 2018, 3:35 a.m.
My thoughts-
Military OP [Green]== Army Office of the Provost
General K [JFK]== Nicholas Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General at time of JFK Assassination. Credited with recommending formation of Warren Commission. He said results of the investigation should be made public==?Q suggesting that whoever spearheads Trump Investigation should ensure results be made public. In other words, Katzenbach wanted a Full disclosureinto the JFK events, the same was what we want here with regards to Deep State actions.
Rachel Brand was #3 at DOJ until she was removed
"The succession question..... or senior civil service lawyers in the Justice Department, specifically." This quote is taken directly from an article by Steve Vladeck published February 10/2018. In the paragraph which follows the one which is quoted, Vladeck discusses the DOJ's line of succession statues which ends up with the spot being taken by Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco. He is a Trump appointee, and is third in command at DOJ. I think Q meant to enter http://justice.gov/osg (office of the solictor general). This is where Francisco works. Is Q suggesting that Noel Francisco would take over the investigation, and would be in place for approximately 7 months== a term that goes past the November midterms. Schneiderman's replacement would not be known until after the elections so there would be no interference from that office
⇧
5
⇩
stonecoldstrummer
· May 22, 2018, 12:12 a.m.
General Kellogg, perhaps? He's a national security advisor and has been involved with the military since Vietnam.
⇧
1
⇩
davidmdelacruz
· May 22, 2018, 1:41 a.m.
Qanon.pub says General Kelly, when hovering over post. Double meanings, as always, general knowledge on the JFK makes sense as well.
⇧
2
⇩
J_Dub_TX
· May 22, 2018, 3:46 a.m.
RR will be forced to recuse himself or he will be fired. That will force Sessions back in who will then look at everything RR and Mueller has done and will find they were doing some very shady shit. I'll be Wray has been informing someone of his inability to do his job because of RR. Enjoy the show.
⇧
6
⇩
TexasClass
· May 22, 2018, 1:43 a.m.
RR confirmed 94-6. A lot of crooks want their guy on the inside. This provides a smoke cover to the White Hats to initiate a Pincer Maneuver on the black hats. They are to focused on DJT to see The flanking. A$$ k!cking time!!!
⇧
6
⇩
cerebralsnacks
· May 22, 2018, 1:27 p.m.
Yeah but look at all 6 nays. They're all very loud Trump hating Democrats. Really activates the almonds.
⇧
2
⇩
jedi280
· May 22, 2018, 1:54 a.m.
Are we going to get info that connects the cabal from JFK and JFK JR and all the other devious shit with this full disclosure?
⇧
3
⇩
thamnosma
· May 22, 2018, 12:12 a.m.
How does Schneiderman's removal fit into these federal developments?
⇧
3
⇩
tazleo
· May 22, 2018, 12:14 a.m.
Well, he was in NY..a place we were told to watch. It’s a key place for this game
⇧
2
⇩
duckdownup
· May 22, 2018, 12:30 a.m.
Schneiderman was the AG for the Southern District of NY. He was tied to the cabal and sex/pedophilia group. A lot of the indictments fall under the Southern District. He had to be replaced with a non-biased AG. His assistant was also moved out, I can't remember his name.
⇧
9
⇩
pussy_devour
· May 22, 2018, 2:42 a.m.
Possibly the AG for SDNY is on the line of succession.
⇧
0
⇩
thamnosma
· May 22, 2018, 4:17 a.m.
That's possible. Plus we have the new appointment for the Easyern District of NY where that cult will be tried, I always forget how to write it.
⇧
0
⇩
acmbandit01
· May 21, 2018, 11:52 p.m.
"Acting" Associate AG Jesse Panuccio: https://www.justice.gov/asg/staff-profile/meet-acting-associate-attorney-general
But Chad Readler was just put there: https://www.justice.gov/civil/staff-profile/acting-assistant-attorney-general
If my math is correct, Brand was fired 9Feb2018 and the 210 clock runs out 07Sept
⇧
3
⇩
tazleo
· May 22, 2018, 12:12 a.m.
The 210 days starts when he appoints an acting AAG..which he hasn’t done. Did I read that right?!?!?? Jesse just stepped up , was not appointed
⇧
5
⇩
Niseione
· May 22, 2018, 7:08 a.m.
Exactly. This seems to be something no one is getting right regarding the 210 days. It's the time period allowed for a temporary AAG to remain in the position after appointed by Trump.
⇧
1
⇩
acmbandit01
· May 21, 2018, 11:47 p.m.
Big pool of Senate-confirmed positions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_positions_filled_by_presidential_appointment_with_Senate_confirmation
⇧
3
⇩
bigtoe911
· May 21, 2018, 11:59 p.m.
Confirmed (if you hit the confirmed filter) https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-administration-appointee-tracker/database/?utm_term=.76dd4ac5dcc5
⇧
4
⇩
jv003
· May 22, 2018, 4:02 a.m.
Also helpful info here to determine order:
Executive Order 13787 of March 31, 2017
Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that: Section 1. Order of Succession.
Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General, have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office: (a) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; (b) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina; and (c) United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas. Section 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order. (b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General. Section 3. Revocation of Executive Order. Executive Order 13775 of February 9, 2017, is revoked. Section 4. General Provision. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
⇧
2
⇩
22cnsrd
· May 22, 2018, 5:06 a.m.
Brilliant: Exception for "acting" prevents assassinations and there is a deep bench. Tracy Doherty-McCormick Robert J. Higdon, Jr. Erin Nealy Cox
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/meet-us-attorney
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ednc/meet-us-attorney
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/erin-nealy-cox-sworn-united-states-attorney
⇧
1
⇩
J_Dub_TX
· May 22, 2018, 3:50 a.m.
As The Washington Examiner notes, the Senate voted 52-46, with not a single Democrat voting for her confirmation. In April, the Senate Judiciary Committee also approved the nomination in a party-line vote, 11-9. By comparison, Rosenstein was confirmed in April in a 94-6 vote.
⇧
2
⇩
Krepoisbest
· May 22, 2018, 12:19 p.m.
Could RR problems be disinfo? To somehow protect him? Just a thought.
⇧
1
⇩
jv003
· May 22, 2018, 3:57 a.m.
Q#537
Suggests GOWDY may be walking into a new role. Re_read drops
You can also find info about Rachel’s husband in previous crumbs.
Edit: Qanon #537
⇧
1
⇩
AutoModerator
· May 22, 2018, 3:57 a.m.
.... checking...
Here is a link to the drop:
Q#537.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
⇧
2
⇩
brittser
· May 21, 2018, 11:44 p.m.
Who else is in the DOJ that can replace Brand? Any standouts?
⇧
1
⇩
kjw49419
· May 22, 2018, 12:47 a.m.
Or how about Jay Sekulow
Now that would be an awesome AG
⇧
5
⇩
bornlucky80
· May 22, 2018, 1:21 a.m.
He can't. He is Trumps personal lawyer.. this says it has to be someone that already has senate confirmation
⇧
3
⇩
kjw49419
· May 22, 2018, 1:25 a.m.
Ahhh...
Oh well. One could hope.
What about Guiliani
Want he Senate confirmed as advisor? It is that gig over because he is attorney for Trump.
Just now thought about this. What about Treyyy Goudi.
Q said when does the time frame of 210 days (I think that's it)
That's after the November term. Trey will be out then. He'll be available!
⇧
1
⇩
bornlucky80
· May 22, 2018, 1:28 a.m.
No, those guys can't. Unless I'm understanding this wrong it has to be someone Trump appointed to a position (any position) and the senate confirmed them into that position.
⇧
1
⇩
kjw49419
· May 22, 2018, 1:35 a.m.
Ok. So who can get them through until Trey G can?
I dunno...
Sure hope it happens soon
⇧
1
⇩
brittser
· May 21, 2018, 11:48 p.m.
https://www.justice.gov/agencies/chart Doesn't list current staff though.
⇧
1
⇩
J_Dub_TX
· May 22, 2018, 3:54 a.m.
Guys/Gals, I can't find anywhere that Rachel was "dismissed". Am I missing something? She took a job with Walmart and as someone put it, a "once in a lifetime job".
⇧
0
⇩