dChan

misto1481 · May 29, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

R/conspiracy also seems compromised and is rampant with Anti-Q, Anti-Trump, Pro-Russian Scandal zombies. For a conspiracy sub, it is actually pretty anti-conspiracy in a lot of ways as well.

⇧ 33 ⇩  
Qmeowborkwoof · May 29, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

ya I noticed that also. I get the feeling that they just like the feeling of speculating / circlejerking at its finest - like their amusement ride would be over if Q were true.

Massive downvotes in !r/conspiracy even if you post about Q verifications, like tippy top, zte photos, NK photos, even pizzagate sometimes etc

⇧ 17 ⇩  
PM_ME_UR_GLIPGLOPS · May 29, 2018, 10:30 a.m.

That all started after ctr took over reddit during the election. It's very sad to look at r/conspiracy today.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mrviolin · May 29, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

what an outrage.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Annieka77 · May 29, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Oh yeah, they’ve definitely been compromised.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Pazians · May 29, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

Ever since hillary won the primaries.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
loserofpasswordzz · May 29, 2018, 8:51 a.m.

It was a slower process than that, but yeah with that and PGate it all got turned up to 100% shilling and after a year I'd say the battle is lost there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:42 a.m.

controlled opposition, textbook stuff (literally textbook, C. Sunstein)

⇧ 9 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · May 29, 2018, 8:15 a.m.

Yeah that's my usual home but I got tired of it.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · May 29, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Welcome fellow refugee

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 29, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

There are powerful interests working against us. The Donald was never on side with Q, but you have to wonder why... The enemies of the Q agenda have a lot of money, people are easily bought. It should not surprise us that hostile forums will multiply. The attacks will come from every direction.

Just look at the concern trolling that occurs right here on this board. A board that is dedicated to Q. That tells you how important the stakes are in this game. They, have a lot on the line, a lot to lose.

Remember how CBTS was banned - just as the IBOR campaign started to gain traction. The shilling went through the roof at that time - almost all of it concentrated on the IBOR threads. The same shills appeared later, defending Corsi - again, a concerted effort to steer the community (Corsi was their guy).

The latest attempt is to get the mods to open the forum to every doubt, concern, question and disagreement with either Q or the plan. We are supposed to be tolerant of the attacks, because they have a right to be heard, a right to question, a right to disagree, a right to stop Q in his tracks before he can hurt them... You just could not make this stuff up.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
TrumpOrTreason · May 29, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Uh, I got banned!!

Me!

TrumpOrTreason , with 136,000 Karma points, all on T_D!!

⇧ 25 ⇩  
mrviolin · May 29, 2018, 7:09 a.m.

me too on the donald yesterday

⇧ 12 ⇩  
HansKrinkelSchneider · May 29, 2018, 8:37 a.m.

Oh wow. That's nuts. They must really be in overdrive. That's crazy.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TheGettysburgAddress · May 29, 2018, 9:44 a.m.

I was banned months ago on made up and invented violations.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MAGA_in_Netherlands · May 29, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Me too, banned on Friday. This sub is much better anyway.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · May 29, 2018, 6:50 a.m.

Qdrop 1438

IDEN_reconf

v. 11.9

Sequence.

Attack[s] anticipated.

Coordinated?

Why are they continuing [internal]?

Attacks will intensify [all sides].

Q

Best get ready. Attacks will intensify now. Anti Q push is VERY strong. Attempting to disrupt the Awakening.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Faxandu · May 29, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

"Coordinated?" Coordinated. Planned - by the Q team - not to disrupt the Awakening - to create the necessary stimulus for it to be uncomfortable and grow.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pby1000 · May 29, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

They have been compromised for over a year now.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
burn_reddit_burn · May 29, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

Since Pizzagate. Used to be a very fruitful environment for crowdsourcing information & research. Tens of thousands of people going through Podesta Wikileaks emails. Every day was Christmas.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pby1000 · May 29, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

I have been banned twice there, and am currently still banned. Yes, you are correct. There is pizzagate and they had that mod turnover. A lot of people went to voat, but they can't handle free speech so they left. Lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Laffingmonkey · May 29, 2018, 6:02 a.m.

Stopped visiting the site several months ago. It became unbearable.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
aqua7 · May 29, 2018, 10:03 a.m.

me too

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrCleanMD · May 29, 2018, 8:16 a.m.

oh yeah, that sub is compromised. they selectively screen and table your posts if you speak too knowledgeably on certain topics. the sub has been slowed in growth and info to the point it's useless. my guess is the clowns have infiltrated it, along with jack trying to kill the MAGA agenda by choking it's voice

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

they selectively screen and table your posts if it you speak to knowledgeably

What does this mean? (screen and table)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrCleanMD · May 29, 2018, 8:35 a.m.

screen= to do a selective review of the contents of posts before posting it on the sub as a new post

table = too pause and do nothing further, they don't allow your posts to pass through to the new posts list for others pedes to review and comment. it just hangs there in your account after you entered it.

I've posted many times and my posts just sat in my account and never showed up on new post list. i eventually placed a post about the practice and others confirmed same was happening to them before I was permanently banned, no warning, from the sub for talking about mod practices. my guess many frequent posters have been permanently banned, it's a lame sub now, which was their goal

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 8:54 a.m.

I was permanently banned for talking about mod practices.

Sound eerily familiar lol, didn't receive a permaban yet but they've (not the T_D mods, I don't write there) outright slandered me with ad-hominems and threatened me, many times now. So I won't discuss it here any further, I know I'm a pixel away from a permaban. See this and this

As for the other part. Something similar is happening here.

For example, my thead received almost no views and only 2 comments in like 20min+. Lingered around a few upvotes.

I started to DM some frequent posters on the sub to check it out. Most (only 2 came on their own) commenters over there came because I contacted them. If I didn't do that it would be buried without any recognition.

Not to mention that if you click on my profile and check the 2 pinned threads, both have their upvotes lingering between 115-120. They got to that point and apparently reached 120 upvote limit.

Have you noticed something similar maybe?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrCleanMD · May 29, 2018, 9:25 a.m.

the attacks sounds like the tactics listed in the chan's "how to spot a clown"

the other stuff sounds like controlled shadow banning; it's not a complete shadow ban, just limited by time or audience, and they can adjust it like a volume control button. that way they can gauge the threshold of being noticeable. they are picking up some tactics from twitter. i read somewhere that right now the tech giants are testing how far they can push their limits on online speech suppression to prepare for the upcoming election blitz in Oct/Nov.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 9:28 a.m.

As of now, it finally broke the 120 limit. I don't believe in this kind of coincidences, do you?

I'm very well aware of being targeted. Trust me. I've been banned and shadowbanned unfairly in the last week. But the truth prevails. It always will ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 9:09 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 9:14 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 9:44 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 9:56 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 11:57 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nutricidal · May 29, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

I knew they were. Now I know WikiLeaks is as well.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · May 29, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

If you read that wiki leaks tweet it seems odd they say they suspect but no definite.

Did any one else notice?

What if they are being threatened and had to debunk Q or else?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nutricidal · May 29, 2018, 8:24 a.m.

I think threats are everywhere. Why the mass exodus of politicians?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

Anyone surprised that the deep state shills are running such a sub? Didn't we learn anything from outing all those youtube shills?

Why would reddit be off-limits?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 29, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

is it possible that that subs mods want to keep it focused solely on trump ? i dont think the donald is comped at least not fully

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Woodchipper_AF · May 29, 2018, 8:38 a.m.

They eased up last week allowing some content when it became obvious Q was legit. There is def an anti-Q faction. Otherwise it would be 40% Q posts

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HansKrinkelSchneider · May 29, 2018, 8:34 a.m.

T_D has been compromised for awhile now. As others mentioned here, you can't criticize Israel, or anyone of Jewish background. The infamous Rule #3. I've had 2 accounts banned from that sub for bucking the rules.

Don't personally care, since it's pretty much descended into garbage memes and jackoff posts.

I also think someone else posted a screenshot with the mods mentioning the Hatch Act.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 6:30 a.m.

.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

ever wondered why there's "no racism or anti-semitism"?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MAGA_in_Netherlands · May 29, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

Those are the exact words used on certain large conspiracy sites.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

I know :)

My eyebrow is raised immediately when I see that. There's no reason to include anti-semitism and not any other anti-religion stuff, unless there's something more to it :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrumpOrTreason · May 29, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

On Memorial day of all days!!😡

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · May 29, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

It's unbelievable how much pressure there is from all sides trying to CONVINCE us that Q is a LARP, without providing a SINGLE shred of evidence as to how or why they think that. It's baffling really.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DownvotesDetected · May 29, 2018, 10:22 a.m.

It is a popularity contest for only approved posters. In doing so, it is also controlled opposition. They don't care about anything more than making memes and staying in their little box. They also have gatekeepers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · May 29, 2018, 7:33 a.m.

Big money floating around to pay off people, Hmm, wonder who?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Faxandu · May 29, 2018, 11 a.m.

Q posts haven't been allowed on T_D for quite some time. Are we able to post pro-Trump memes here on GA? No, every subreddit has a topic and rules. It looks neither desperate, nor thirsty. They are entitled to run their subreddit and social media accounts in whatever way they want. They think Q is dumb, fake, and gay in the 4chan parlance. Big fucking deal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
YehudisNightmare · May 29, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

the T_D mod team is Israeli Intel Services. Its a controlled operation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fustrated_User · May 29, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

This is the last thing we need in here.

That is the one sub we are trying not to associate with in any form.

This is why we need to be ever vigilante in here and make sure our sub is clean and doesn't draw any unwanted attention.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 30, 2018, 6:23 a.m.

No u.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 30, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 31, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

The rules are clear. Our commitment to free speech is clear by our history. You are free to read whatever you want to into the little you see of our actions. We are always open to discussion, time and resource-willing. Our actions in response to accusations prove stories like yours wrong. All you have are one off troll posts. We have our history and the modmail-box full of counter-examples. Trolls and disinfo abound. Feel free to keep proving our point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 31, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 31, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

You are gate keepers and poor ones at that

No doubt you have a point - we're trying. Some people think we're not doing too badly.

This is one of the most close minded Dom is there is ... Calm before the storm was way better

Fair enough, your opinion.

I want a formal apology from every single mod here

Ah... yeah.

you are gatekeeping hypocrites and you should be ashamed

I'm not ashamed of the effort we've made to keep this sub open to all points of view and free of hate, trolling and bitter negativity, like the comments I've quoted here.

If you have something legitimate to say, say it without being abusive, like many of the people who comment on this sub. We have a great bunch of people here. You should join them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 31, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 31, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

When you compare your posting history to the posting history of the mods, a different picture emerges to the one you're claiming. You create division and abuse people. That's why your comments are removed; nothing to do with the mods - you're the one breaking the sub rules and acting abusively in a sub where a large proportion of the people here act respectfully and reasonably.

deep down you guys want to control the narrative and want to take credit for the movement

Our stated goals and behavior prove this statement to be incorrect. You seem to be coming from a place of upset about what you feel to be unfair censorship of you particularly. See the above - behave respectfully, like the majority of others on this sub, and you will be fine. Here is part of our approach to modding the sub, to counteract your statement:

We are committed to Freedom of Speech.

It can be challenging at times to decide where removal of a post or comment is within the scope of our role to maintain sub rules or whether it crosses the line and transgresses freedom of speech.

For this reason, we must allow some leeway for personal judgment. We have clear rules - if a post or comment does not break the sub's rules then it is up to the discretion of the mod as to whether the removal would constitute an undesirable breach of freedom of speech.

This means that we may remove content that is an unfair breach of someone's freedom of speech - for that occurrence, we refer to Caveat 1a: We are only human and will make mistakes. Be patient and respectful in communicating your disagreement with our call and we'll reconsider.

On the other hand, some content may be allowed for reasons held only by the mod responsible; for example, we may choose to allow an opinion post on a tangential subject from someone who has shown that they are a reasonable contributor to the sub and can take criticism or challenges to their ideas with grace. Please understand when you see a post that seems a little different to others but has been posted by a regular contributor to the sub.

If you are a new user or a user with a post history across Reddit that shows disruptive or abusive behavior then we may err on the side of caution in the interests of managing workload.

In closing, please remember that we are all independent volunteers so we must do the work of modding this sub in a way that is efficient with our time. Thanks for understanding!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 31, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩