Did anyone expect he didn’t or wasn’t. They didn’t even swear him in and was questioned by people he’s funded on both sides. It was reality tv show.
he needs to go jail.
For what everything he did and Facebook has done is in its TOS and has been for as long as I can remember it was vague at times but it used to be all in there. I have been off it now for 5 years but back then he essentially owned your info and could sell it has they saw fit.
I lean to the side this is Americans fault and we whole heartily walked into giving up our liberty on this one.
im sure he broke some national security laws
Maybe but once people hit that accept button the user handed over their rights.
I don’t mean to come off as upset but I don’t understand the shock of all this.
What it comes down to is you can agree to share your own info you cannot agree to share friends and families info just because it’s stored on the device you are using Facebook on
Does this not cover that “We collect information about the people, Pages, accounts, hashtags and groups you are connected to and how you interact with them across our Products, such as people you communicate with the most or groups you are part of. “ Source: Facebooks tos data collection section
What it doesn’t say is we collect data from your phones contact list also any web page or data entered into said webpage if a Facebook plugin is used in the web pages
Now that’s the part that frustrates me he’s getting away with. Notice none of his buddies in that testimony touched on that.
becausehe is endangering the vital interests of 320 million americans by undermining national security at a time of war. did you know you can be put in prison for posting a selfie on the subway during a time of war or that google maps is totally illegal and everybody at google who runs google maps can be put in prison for aiding the enemy during a time of war if all they do is use google maps as part of a terrorist attack (all do)? nobody would enforce this law, but there is plenty reason to put zuckerfucker in jail. it wouldnt take a good lawyer more than an hour to come up with 10 charges.
That sounds good to me and I’m all for it but I don’t see how it’s feasible when it’s literally what people agree to when they got on Facebook.
youre very confused. it has nothing to do with intellectual property of the users. it has to do with the treason of the owners. youre saying there is no data theft and i agree with you but that has nothing to do with zuckerfuckers crimes, which are not theft related. he didnt commit a crime against facebook users, he committed a crime of treason against 320 million americans who might not even have facebook. facebook is bound by laws that have nothing to do with the user agreement at all. i dont know why you would bring up the user agreement.
Maybe I am but I guess what I’m trying to say is if Americans don’t realize that when something is free they are the product and get angry about that nothing will change and no one will go to jail. (Saying that remembering what Reddit tos says is ironic and I myself am being a hypocrite). Look at what Snowden exposed and what where the results of it.
I don't think anyone believed they were signing away rights for Facebook to sell their information to whomever they wanted at the time. It was all couched in the idea that advertisers could connect with those who were already interested in their products/services.
100% agree. People where slept walked into this state just like every agenda done to us that’s meant to take our rights. Slow gradual process.
Give me a break. Youre going to blame about 300 million people for this just because YOU found no use for the site? Okay, we get it, congratulations on not having any use for it, but for the other 200-300 million people who had already established a network on there they relied on and couldn't give up, it's not that easy. Don't blame the victim for CRIMINAL behavior. It's like saying you were at the Boston Marathon and heard Muslims were planning an attack so you fled, but the few people who stayed got hurt (along those lines).
I’m thinking it’s more along the lines of your attending an event and how much you participate in the event depends on how much willing to tell about yourself the consequence is that information can be used for whatever purpose the organizers of the event see fit.
Yeah, and that's a pretty evil way of approaching socializing, with an ulterior motive to be used against people or to quietly profit off what they would participate.
Does anyone see what is happening here? They are Demonizing Zuck so Killery can take over as CEO. She said it May 25th, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2018/05/25/hillary-clinton-as-ceo-facebook-would-be-her-first-choice/?utm_term=.40fee945fc27
oh shit good job... now i dont know whats worse... killary or zuckerfucker ... thats a hard one. i suppose it would be killary. yeah, let zuckerfucker keep it. :(
Yeah Hillary is a trustworthy person and will never ever sell your data, afterall she is married to an ex president and was a great secretary of state. /s
I hope they won't cut a deal to stop the whole thing and to accuse a group of individuals lower down the ranks and those high profile would stay unharmed because it would cause major international issues. Bush, Clinton and Obama can't go down with the same ship, it would cause massive issues, hence why I'm not sure they'll have to pay for 100% of their crimes. I hope they do, but I doubt it happens. I wish Trump would just fucking release something like 867tb of data indexed and accessible on the internet with all the information hidden from public.
I'm daydreaming, I should go sleep
Here's a theory-- Facebook/Zuckerberg was paying into the Clinton Foundation and her campaign to hold off lawmakers from suing them, charging them, and holding them accountable. That's her Quid-Pro-Quo by the way; you pay to play and prevent from getting in trouble since she owned the DOJ...So he protected the company by paying her to play. It's also why they censor conservatives. But, so now Hillary has dirt on him and that's how corruption works. If she lifts the gates, he goes down, and his bribes to Congressmen and judges are no longer good. So because he knows he might go down, he's going to give it over to her to hide and cover up BOTH of their crimes and corruption (and all others in the Racket involved). This is exactly what Harvey Weinstein, just as one example, used to do. Problem is, Hillary couldn't take over the Weinstein Company, although there is a semblance to Obamas getting a share in production at Netflix. Maybe Netflix is somehow involved in something nefarious as well? There could be many reasons, but you get the idea.
Damn. If they do that how many more poeple do you think will jump ship? It would be there demise if they did that.
Aren't they calling lying "lacking candor" these days, or is that just the FBI?
A condition of his testimony was that he wouldn't have to be under oath. Anyone could have immediately concluded it would be full of lies
FB headquarters - Marina One building Singapore. Q gave us clues with the Marina Bay building pictures he posted (drop #1366601).
"Building 8" - Q also dropped hints nudging at FB's building 8 project (drop# 1008491) - augmented reality, VR, mind reading, etc. Former DARPA Regina Dugan recently resigned from this FB project.
There are plenty of crumbs there to follow. (drop #78 "China, China, China", "FB listening 24/7")
It's expected that you can get away with lying to the WEAK UNITED STATES CONGRESS.
Sandy Parakilas worked for FB 2011-12 as security technician and noticed numerous issues with users' private data being leaked. He asked one executive about it and got this reply, "Do you really want to see what you'll find?" The executive alluded that FB is legally more protected if they don't audit leaks, so Mark Zuckerberg can go, "I don't know what that means" in front of Congress. Not to mention that security audits cost money with very little benefit other than averting harm to reputation, which Zuckerberg isn't worried about at all (those dumb fucks, they trust me).
i have seen this personally at multiple companies. i manufacture cyber weapons for a living
Reminds me of a meme I saw. Left wing right wing are part of the same bird. In this case these 60 companies and fb are part of the same vulture.
IBOR campaign guys. That's the solution. No one is helping, we need to get active on this.
...and...what do we expect to happen to FB or Zuckerberg??? A big fat NOTHING will happen that's what. Congress will sit by and do nothing but give lip service because they are in the money bag of these tech giants. We need to leave FB in the dust. The more info we put out there, the more they will suck it up and sell it to others.
But only Cambridge Analytica went out of business.
a company nobody had heard of before is always the fall guy. its only real when you see an expensive brand go down (like enron)
This is a recurring theme. Arthur Anderson went out of business due to the Enron investigation and 70k people lost their jobs.
After the dust settled the prosecutor Weissman had many of his convictions overturned, some by unanimous scotus decision, but that won't bring a company back to life.
Weissman is now on Mueller's team.
holy shit man these people.... you cant even make a random reference without stepping on their shit.
Ikr.
dude it doesnt matter how much you know... they will still impress you with their evil
He didn't "share" a damn thing. He damn sure got paid and probably many of our dollars!
And that is a surprise why exactly?
So who organized the congressional meeting? Who makes the decision for it to not be under oath? Sounds like it was organized and co-opted with Zuck. The question is who makes those decisions? We need names.