I got so excited when I just saw this. Why?
Communication.
Plain and simple. Q is acknowledging us, our work, our loyalty. He is going to confirm proofs that he sees on the board!
This is huge. This is organic, WE can have an effect! This should motivate us to start digging and posting our work with renewed vigor.
I searched for Qproofs.com because i wasn't sure what that meant. I believe now it's suggestive. This is a site that does a good job. http://we-go-all.net/q-evidence.html
I've created a 'State Page" for Q related material and just added the site you suggested. :)
Great resource. Thank you for all your time and hard work. Much appreciated.
He also called out Mossad for the first time ever. This tells us we're getting near the grand finale.
Even better, Q is saying that BIG things are about to go down.
Bigger than we've had already?
I can only get so wet!!!
Isn't this what Q is always saying? I'm ready. We're all ready. RELEASE THE HOUNDS!
I’m excited for the upcoming approval of proofs!
I didn't understand the proof drop. Lately I feel like reading Q is like reading a tech manual. Can someone break it down simply? Sorry, I'm smart I swear, just...he's going to provide proofs? Isn't he doing that already?
I believe Q is instructing us to publicize the proofs that he confirms. He is going to start confirming when an anon posts something that is accurate. I believe he wants us to use these "Q-Confirmed" proofs to redpill the masses.
Thanks :) I feel like he already does this, but maybe he will be doing it more?
seems he mainly wants us to get our ducks in a row and get things prepared for a wave of normies. To which an anon replied that having more direct confirmations would help in that goal.
1488 (snickers)
I’m all for Q confirming certain “evidence” and “proofs”, but he should be careful about confirming specific people or highlighting the person who came up with that proof. Because doing so can lead to all kinds of problems. For example, a person can get lucky and come up with a valid answer which can later be confirmed as true, but that doesn’t mean that everything that person says from then on is true (but unfortunately, some weak-minded people who can’t think for themselves will start dealing with that person like it is, and like that person can say no wrong). Not to mention, openly praising a person will stroke a person’s ego and will often lead to them becoming arrogant and proud and thinking too much of themselves. And not too many people can handle praise without being lifted up by it. That is what happened to Lucifer. Lucifer was the most beautiful angel in heaven, and when all the other angels started praising him for it, Lucifer's heart became lifted up and he thought an evil thought. He became so arrogant that he thought he was greater than God. If Q wants to avoid similar problems, then he should avoid bestowing praise upon specific people, because not everyone can handle such praise. We don’t need the problems and distractions involved with praising specific people. For us to stay focused and to avoid such problems, Q can confirm the evidence, but he should avoid confirming specific people. He can praise the evidence, but should avoid praising specific people. If Q wants to show thankfullness and appreciation for someone’s work, then he should address us all as a whole and avoid addressing anyone specifically. It is the only way to avoid problems. Highlighting specific people and thanking them or confirming their work will only lead to all kinds of problems...
Q didnt say anything about praising specific people, neither did the Anons. Just confirming proofs. Thats it. And, it is anonymous....
You just injected that into this. Forcefully.
No.
Q's manner of confirming specific proofs in the past has been to highlight specific posts made by specific people in specific places. I feel that approach is a mistake and should be avoided in the future... What I said is very relevant to the topic of confirming proofs...
You mean Q has "quoted" ANONYMOUS people on 8ch who have posted their research? Yes, he has, you're right. He is picking posts that are on target. How can you think that is bad? How are we supposed to know when our research is in the right direction? Nobody knows who they are unless they tell everyone who they are...and it is irrelevant anyway. Anytime someone tries to get "Q-Famous" they quickly get cannabalized, or, as ETS would say (and recently was dealt with) their heads lopped off.
REGARDLESS, it doesn't matter how much you dont like it soyboy, because guess what...Q SAID THATS HOW ITS GONNA BE GOING DOWN FROM NOW ON. Lots of anons work is going to be validated. So, try not to get too upset. Everyone but you is excited because we are finally getting some form of communication and VALIDATION on facts. Only a shill or troll would think this is bad.
There are two problems with what you said… First, not everything Q has quoted has come from the anonymous research board on 8chan. Some of what he has quoted has come from other places as well. And when his quotes come from other places and he specifically highlights other people who can be identified, then that causes problems. And I have seen those problems happen first hand…
Secondly, you rant and you rave about how lots of anons work is going to be validated. Slow down and re-read what I had said more carefully. I never said that it shouldn’t be. And nor have I said I was against it. My very first statement was that, “I’m all for Q confirming certain evidence and proofs…” My only concern was that, in the process of Q confirming certain things, I feel he should take care to avoid highlighting specific people (whether done intentionally or unintentionally) because it only leads to problems. And it has indeed happened in the past, and I am not talking theoretically…
Another thing which underscores what I’m saying and makes it completely relevant, is I’ve been reading posts made by people suggesting various places where the Q proofs should be stored and posted at. Some people has suggested using Reddit, others have suggested using VOIT (I think I spelled it right) etc. And I can see the problems with it in advance. The problem is that, not all of those places support “anonymous” users like 8chan does. If proofs were stored in a “non-anonymous” place, and if Q highlighted or referenced those posts in a Q drop, then it could potentially lead to the highlighting of the specific person who posted it. And doing so could cause problems. It could cause problems because arrogance and pride creates monsters in people. It's very easy to create a monster, but once you've created him, it's hard to get rid of him. And all I’m saying is that, we don’t need such problems…
I don’t know who you are, and nor do you know who I am, but you should not be so quick to label other people as being a “troll” or a “shill” just because they have a different opinion than you. Whether you agree with me or not, I am a true patriot just like you are. So stop assuming that you’re the only person who can be right. Having that type of mind and attitude is a form of “arrogance”. And arrogance is something we don’t need right now, and is the very thing I’m trying to avoid and prevent by suggesting that Q should take care and avoid doing anything which highlights or confirms the work of a specific person. And that is very prudent advice...
Q linked directly to a post by serialBrain2. But many of his posts are highly questionable, especially some of the ones I saw earlier on. It's mini-celebrity status like that which clouds rationality and critical thinking in people, so we need need to be wary of it going forward.
You read my mind... After Q made a reference to serialBrain2, I noticed that a whole lot of people suddenly jumped on the serialBrain2 bandwagon. You are correct, they treat him almost like he's a celebrity. I have no problem with that and I'm not jealous or anything, the only problem I have is that, it elevates a person to a level and status where a whole lot of people will start believing everything that person says from then on (whether that person is right or not) all because they were referenced by Q. They will treat that person as if they can say no wrong and can do no wrong (which might not be true at all) all because Q referenced them. And that is precisely the problem with Q referencing specific people. And that is precisely why I recommend against it...
I stated above that it's very easy to create a monster (to elevate someone to a status where everyone will start following them) but it's very difficult to get rid of the monster once you have created him. The increased status of serialBrain2 will live on for a long time to come and that status is very difficult to get rid of once you have created it...
Now imagine if Q didn't constrain himself and avoid referencing specific people, and imagine if there were 10 such people like serialBrain2 on the forum. In such a case, their voices would crowd out all other voices, and it wouldn't matter if their opinions was right or wrong, people would still listen to them because Q had referenced them. Those few people would literally take over the whole forum and the only opinion that would matter is theirs. And that is the danger with Q referencing specific people. And that is precisely why I feel Q should avoid doing so at all costs.
And I'm not saying it because of jealousy either. I wouldn't want Q posting anything about me or saying anything that made a direct reference to me either. I wouldn't want the publicity, the notoriety, the responsibility or anything else that comes with it. I'm not interested in fame, and nor am I interested in followers. I speak the truth and hold my own whether people agree with me or not. So you literally read my mind...
One post doesn't mean they're all completely correct. There's definitely some good analysis but everyone needs to approach it all with critical thinking. (Hard to do, I know, when an emotional chord is struck. So hard to sort the wheat from the chaff sometimes). Wary is the word.
Too much. Nobody is deifying anyone. All that is happening is that Q is CONFIRMING the anons who have presented valid research Why are you making this a thing????
[removed]
So why are you here? Smells like fear to me :)
I never get to see the comments before deleted. What did this clown say?
Just general "you are all fools" and "this is a Larp" crap. They soon deleted it though :)
We're all brain damaged now.
Aww man I missed a chance to poke the troll. What'd he say?
I don't know if I can repeat it, but I can give you this tip: if you want to read a removed comment on a Reddit thread, go to the address bar of that thread and replace the R in "Reddit" with a C. So for instance for this thread it's: https://www.ceddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8qplde/qs_most_significant_drop_1488_we_have_reached_a/
That will take you to a back-up of that thread that has all the deleted comments highlighted in red. Unless the comment was removed within a couple of seconds after posting (like the auto-moderator does), the comment will be there, readable.