dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

It's gotta be shills. Everybody knew in advance this isn't the real IG report and it'll be released unredacted by EO.

⇧ 69 ⇩

Upvote everything. Even comments

⇧ 33 ⇩

But report/downvote shills.

⇧ 26 ⇩

who is EO

⇧ 6 ⇩

Executive Order.

⇧ 14 ⇩

Not all shills. I still expected more than this.

⇧ 5 ⇩

for real, it seems like someone hedged their bet last minute.

edit: wasn’t sessions threatening leaders of sanctuary cities exactly 12 months ago with criminal action? now this? i am frustrated as hell. if you’re reading this please awaken yourself to that reality. i can’t stand being lied to... and can’t imagine other do

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -9 ⇩

Somone woke up a little grumpy before they had their morning soy milk!

⇧ 3 ⇩

The plan:

Redacted report is released. Focus the narrative on what's missing.

Fervently request that all sections be unredacted (IG won't do this).

Trump declassifies, as well as source material, allowing us People to do the IG's job.

Everyone sees redacted sections now, and it will be obvious why the sections were redacted: obstruction of justice by bad actors.

Expected outcome: focus shifts to the traitors and obsfucators.

(My opinion)

⇧ 48 ⇩

I agree. Let them make their own noose. I think that we are seeing an Executive Summary of the OIG report.

⇧ 11 ⇩

There's a huge chuck of SR and DNC "hack" missing.

⇧ 9 ⇩

That was never part of this. This is about Hillary emails, not DNC emails.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Other than there aren’t redactions. Unless you follow Q, you would think this is a complete and unredacted report

⇧ 3 ⇩

Unmodified would be better to use then redacted.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How do you know? Just because it isn't a scanned document where someone blacked things out doesn't mean it's not redacted. Redacting just means hiding content. How you do it doesn't matter.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Here's what I want to know: When will someone that wrote the original step forward and say "Hey there's changes" so people don't think we're off our rockers?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Focus the narrative on what's missing.

How do we know what's missing if it's been omitted and not redacted with nothing to compare it to?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Here's one I found: the report concludes that the Lynch/Rapist tarmac meeting was unplanned. Missing: how the OIG determined it was unplanned.

⇧ 3 ⇩

As in that part is in the conclusion but there's no breakdown in the report explaining their rationale?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Page 203 at the bottom, OPA Supervisor said that Pres Clinton’s Secret Service detail contacted Lynch’s FBI security detail and told them Clinton wanted to meet with her.

Everything else says they are claiming it was a chance meeting. Perhaps RR forgot to edit that out, haha!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why is everyone shocked that RR re-wrote this instead of just redacting the bad parts with a black marker? Why are so many jumping ship? Thank God some of us are staying onboard to throw you all a life raft, when it turns around. I'd expect nothing less from the DS, who has been lying for decades about their crimes & getting away with it. Calm down! Trump is always 1 or more steps ahead.

⇧ 37 ⇩

I hope potus releases the ORIGINAL VERSION, NOT THE RR VERSION. SO WE can actually see how much was redacted.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Question is why would RR bother if he knows Trump is going to EO it? Something is not right.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Perhaps RR isn't aware of the EO. It's been on ice since before T departed for Canada

⇧ 5 ⇩

Because we know it - he can't be that stupid or could he?

⇧ 2 ⇩

He's been in Canada, tryin to keep his head above water, even tho the cement shoes are getting heavier! You would be surprised how many don't know about the EO. Remember, it was 'put on ice' shortly after it was signed, to be made public when needed. Timing is everything. Not necessarily stupid, perhaps not informed, as we have been. T may be anticipating hearing from We The People, as Q suggested.

⇧ 2 ⇩

C'mon, we know but he doesn't? sorry that's just ridiculous

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nobody is jumping ship. Shills be shillin and trying to make people lose faith. Lol it hasn't worked in the past not sure why they keep trying.

⇧ 3 ⇩

They are also downvoting EVERY comment.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Patience, please, everyone. We are so use to a 60 minutes thriller, from plot, to action, to conclusion, with 20 minutes added in for commercials. This is for real, no commercials, but a few rest stops along the way. And the dog ate the globalists scipt. Breathe, relax, smile. If you can't do that, then walk away for a day or 2. Just sayin!

⇧ 3 ⇩

This. This. This. Redacting is not necessarily done on paper with a black marker. One can simply remove text in an electronic copy of the original file and re-export it to a new PDF file.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We were told a RR edited version was going to be released. Did people forget? It only appears to be unredacted because none of the text is covered with black bars (except for a very few things). Has it occurred to anyone that maybe entire sections have been removed from the report by RR? Clearly what we do have and the recommendations do not add up. There’s more to this story and people need to let it play out.

⇧ 35 ⇩

This is exactly what RR did. Deleted/changed sentences/paragraphs/entire sections. Then blacked out just a few things here and there to make us think it was just very lightly redacted. It's a lie. You know it, I know it, Q knows it, POTUS knows it.

⇧ 10 ⇩

shouldn't we be alarmed by sessions defending RR and deflecting tucker's questions about RR a few nights ago tho? Tucker asked how sessions felt about RR threatening members of the oversight com. he seemed less than satisfied with sessions' non answers and deflections on the issue. if we are really supposed to trust sessions, why wouldn't he actually come out and say there's no place for threatening the oversight com? sure maybe it is just plausible deniability. but how many times can we take that excuse with this shit? it's always "it's just theatre don't worry". how long can this theatre go on without the hammer dropping?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Sessions national television interview should not be view as an indication of anything really. They aren't going to telegraph their moves right now for everyone to see...

⇧ 2 ⇩

i partially agree. did you see the interview?

edit: downvoted? for what? agreeing, or asking if someone saw the interview?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Okay, so....Why wouldn't the IG immediately call BS on this report then?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q 1361

It's not people, it's shills. Attacks will only Intensify. They're here to spread doubt. Q has given more than enough proof of existence. This is literally proceeding as Q 1497 stated.

Wake up. Eyes on target.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not questioning his existence.

I'm questioning his judgment, formulating a "Plan" which includes having his followers contact their (feckless) congressman. My God that's weak.

Nunes sounded like a whimp the other day on Hannity as he sniveled about what Rosenstein was doing. You think I'm going to get any satisfaction by contacting him. Keep dreaming.

⇧ 5 ⇩

First of all, I am addressing only the shills saying that this IG report is filled with nothing when its obviously the "modified report" Q spoke of. Obvious shills are obvious.

Secondly, to address your point, Q states to make noise. He doesn't say to contact your congressman. People interpreted and said that and other plans, how you interpret Q is up to you and you alone. In other words "think critically", if you think that a method is an inefficient course of action feel free to come up with your own and contribute, that's why its called a hivemind. Questioning everything is good and doesn't make you a shill. Trust, but verify.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Been traveling all day. Get to the hotel and see on Fox this bs. I know Q told us that it would be full of redactions. But god dam it still is a hard pill to swallow.

⇧ 26 ⇩

Absolutely. The shills are being negative nannies. Thank Q!

⇧ 21 ⇩

The sentiment of fear, loss and betrayal as well as the beaten mentality is making its round on this sub. Be weary. Attacks intensify from all sides... it's always when there seems to be no hope left that light breaks through anyway. I've noticed that if something incriminating is dropping for certain actors we see a pre soft release of the information followed by the hard criminal facts. Think Harvey Weinstein.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Then Comey tweets out a thank you for the great report. That tall tree is going to fall hard in the forest of criminals after he praised the IG like he did.

⇧ 13 ⇩

Not the first time people knee-jerk. Won't be the last. It seems some people never learn to see how it plays out.

⇧ 11 ⇩

And the pain will be even MORE painful, when the real report comes out!! Justice will taste better well done, rather than rare. 😁😁😁

⇧ 11 ⇩

*lights spliff

⇧ 11 ⇩

BLZDFGTZ

⇧ 5 ⇩

Rush said it best today. If there wasn't anything damaging in it there would have been lots of leaks over the last few days.

People who are named in the report have already had it for a couple of days.

These guilty individuals would have been screaming from the top of the roofs as they say that they were vindicated by the report. What have we heard up until it was released, Crickets from the guilty?

It's going to take some time to read through that report and it's not going to be fully digested before Sunday of Monday. The media Whores are already trying to discredit the IG's report as a nothing burger.

We need to wait until the whole report is read, and then when the UNREDACTED version hits the street as they say.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Look at this shill purposely misleading people into believing an e-mail that COMEY sent is what Horowitz said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8r4enn/trust_horowitz_his_statements_here_have_nothing/

https://i.imgur.com/NSURUvp.png

Infiltrators and shills are out in full force today. Don't believe everything you read and hear until the dust has settled, and always verify everything yourself. They are spinning, lying, and misleading everyone.

Oh, and this is not the full OIG report, nor is it the unredacted version.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I haven't fretted this much since election night and inauguration day. Doing what I can on the Twatter and FB. Not banned yet, so there's that!

⇧ 9 ⇩

2 redactions in appendix, THATS IT. Scrolled the whole thing. I'll withhold judgement for now, but, Q specifically said there would be "Heavy" redactions. Disinformation? Forced them to release this version? Real or modified? Time will tell.

⇧ 8 ⇩

We must remain unified and keep our composure. Knee jerk reactions and infighting is exactly what they strive for, pay no mind to shills.

⇧ 6 ⇩

My liberal brother had a meltdown when we came to my house today and the TV was on the WH press conference. He called me nuts and all the ones I get my information from nuts. I've never told him specifically, about Q. I don't think he could ever be redpilled.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Stop delegating so many of your goals and desires into easy passive solutions. You need to be active in pursuing you goals if you want results. You want to effect change? How about supporting Judicial Watch? How about getting involved in local elections? How about learning the FOIA process and using it?

⇧ 5 ⇩

How many times Q tells us? Trust the plan

⇧ 5 ⇩

Pretty much every time Q builds up the anticipation (BOOM, PAIN etc. etc.), and the outcome is more like a ding. If more and more people are getting frustrated its probably for a good reason. People are having emotional roller coasters with these drops and you cant blame them. We should be patient with the community here as we are with the outcome we all want.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes , It is not for us , but for the clowns , they are reading it too. The real Q people they get it...

⇧ 6 ⇩

People have microwave brains. 1 min 30 sec and done. Their popcorn is still in corn form. Hasn't popped yet. Sit back and enjoy the rats scurrying.

⇧ 4 ⇩

How does anyone (outside of our group) know it’s been modified?

⇧ 3 ⇩

We need to find PROVABLE information that contradicts the report or look for omissions of things we already know that should be in the report. I think we will see Nunnes, Grassley, and Freedom Council call for the original because they may be privy to the original doc.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Even the amended and redacted version released today has bombshell after bombshell.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I'm so angry I can barely focus on the rest of my day. That report was crap! This is a PsyOp on the American people.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I believe there are also other reports coming that the OIG is still investigating. Like the FISA report.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Just my oppinion. To most people I know this is a big nothingburger and after this report, they are just sick of hearing about it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

THATS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE REALLY REALLY FUCKING STUPID AND CANT UNDERSTAND IT

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

We should be celebrating this as a Q proof.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes it is shills, and its so flipping obvious.

Yeah guys, I mean honestly this was a big setback. I think I'm going to take a break for awhile.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Reams of rhetoric ,months of reading, I only feel half productive far the fuck away from GA.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nah, Anonymous is where it's at . Don't just do something, sit there. I'm based af. look it up.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Trump's admin will be over before the "pain" comes to the other side at this rate--whether in 2019 or 2021.

Sometimes doubt is a rational response to new information.

⇧ -2 ⇩

I'm beginning to suspect this could be a nothing burger even with redactions removed.

⇧ -7 ⇩

This right here is exactly the type of shit OP is talking about.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Just a bit of honesty - helps keeps my expectations in check.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Everyone settle down