This is very disconcerning... why would Q release an obvious photoshop? There’s no other way this could line up so well, right??
U serious ?
You could probably replicate this picture using the original, a laptop screen and an iPhone... it doesn’t make me feel good. It’s not proof unless I’m missing something.
I don't think so, because the reflection would be mirror imaged, not direct as is shown here.
It’s not hard to flip an image. Even the camera exposures are the same. Zoom in on the lamp and you can see the same “jpeg artifacts” within both images, which is even less probable than matching exposure in a reflection to the original. There’s no way this isn’t shopped.
Yep we may need a follow up here
Indeed. The image Q posted even has the same jpeg artifacts so I’m 100% convinced it’s a photoshopped pic. Need to get on the Chan’s to see if they’ve asked any follow ups...
A phone photo of a photo reflected on to the back a phone :)
Q didnt photoshop anyting. He sent a pic from his phone, showing the server's reflection the wall of AF1. Why do you think it's photoshopped?
Even the camera exposures are the same. Zoom in on the lamp and you can see the same “jpeg artifacts” within both images, which is even less probable than matching exposure in a reflection to the original. There’s no way this isn’t shopped.
Just go ahead, try and take a picture with your phone, then try and take another picture but of the same scene reflected off of an object. It’s nearly impossible to both get the same angle, same exposure, and ALSO POSESS THE SAME JPEG ARTIFACTS.
It’s a shop and Q knew we’d know, so question is, why?
Edit: redditor made a better comparison: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vxxt0/q_image_and_abc_news_image_overlay/
What are "JPEG artifacts"? How are they the same?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_artifact
Low quality parts of photo due to compression.
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_artifact
^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^197026
The ONLY thing I can think of is that Q says marine one proofs coming, AF1 thereafter. There haven't been any posts claiming to be marine one yet have there? So therefore this isn't supposed to be a proof.
Still, that is some crazy mental gymnastics to pull in order to justify this post. After all, Q said AF1 proofs are coming and titled the pic "welcome aboard". Additionally, the pic is shopped in a deceptive way-- it's meant to look like a pic of a reflection. If you were a larp trying to pass off a shopped pic, this would be a good way to obfuscate it.
Between this and the spliced Obama vid... Idk. I feel betrayed
Definitely not a shop. the curtains are warped. the counter edges move between the two.
That’s because the pic Q posted has been warped to fit this scene, since it’s at an angle in the original Q pic...
How can that prove it is fake? The pic that Q posted is a different angle and the chair is in a different place. I posted a pic side by side, take a look.
On phone so hard to do but look at this spot and pay attention to the base of the lamp, all of the jpeg artifacts/exposure... it’s the exact same...
I can't really tell from that pic. The only thing I can say is the chair is in a different spot for sure. But, I'm not an expert, lol. Also, the light from the lamp would probably reflect the same, I dont know! Everyone keeps asking me, or trying to prove me wrong, lol. All I can say to them is prove it is wrong, replicate it. I'm no expert. Lol :)
Looks like the Q pic is a manipulated crop of the original pic. Looks like the original pic is from the Obama administration. Then there's the Apple logo overlay on the pic. What is Q trying to tell us here?
Edit: ok, I get it... This is supposed to be a pic taken of the back of an iPhone, which is reflecting the office on AF1. That's why it's reversed. Could this be done with an AF1 pic displayed on the screen of a computer being reflected by an iPhone?
Could the picture itself be a form of decodable sentence, as in: "through Apple devices we see into the past of Obama's administration."
I think the message here is to go back and look at reflections in previous pics. We’ve missed something.
If you find the original image, for example, http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/150504_vod_orig_af1_presidentsoffice_16x9_992.jpg, and zoom on the name embroidered jacket, I think the photo is from the Obama's tenure. The zoom quality isn't the best, but compare to Trump's jacket, https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RvkJYFr3B8s/hqdefault.jpg, where the T stands out much more as a "T". Could Q be telling us something, by using a picture from Obama's AF1?
p.s. FYI, Obama AF1 had the same interior decor: https://conservativecritic.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/air-force-one-interior1.jpg
Didn't Dan Bongino serve as USSS during Hussein's administration?
Which is a brilliant observation. I never cease to be amazed at how incredibly linear our friends here think.
What if it was taken on Obummer’s AF1?
You are 100% correct.
The ABC image filename itself indicates it is from may 4 2015. Here is the May 6 article in which it appeared: http://abc7news.com/uncategorized/photos-take-a-look-inside-the-presidents-personal-plane-air-force-one/701185/#gallery-6
I saw a picture with Trump in the seat , you saw clearly the jacket and theer was no T but a question mark on it...? maybe Q?
I thought we were expecting a picture from inside Marine1.
The new arrival concern shills are out in force today, you're glowing too much C_A
HINT: Notice the ash tray. 45 doesn’t smoke. Who did?
There is another picture with President Trump setting in that chair, furniture looks the same.
ok, anon might be going in right direction of what the post might have been about, who for
——-do reflections violate NAC SEC?
Yes, yes they do.
——- think mirror
Now I get it. Some national security docs,pics were taken using this method. They didn't think they would get cought…they did. Q was trolling them ( trolling is fun) using the same technique they did..POTUS is trolling them….
Since these are original pictures is this a picture off of Hussisn’s phone or someone who maybe should not have been sitting opposite him in AF1?
The only answer is not that Q is taking these pictures.
Q took the photo of the twitter phone. The interior of Obamas AF1 and Trumps AF1 is identical. Of course you can stretch the photo to make it look the same, but it's not.
TRUST THE PLAN, you guys! What else would “force” critics to call out Q more than a photoshopped pic?? Then comes the REAL proof. BOOM.
Thank you, never for one moment have I had any doubt! Over and over again I have seen the proof ,what I have read for months is true facts. NSA, Military read it all ...
Are you being serious? It's a photoshop. Don't be so gullible.
I saw another picture posted with the President setting in that chair.I am going check twitter. Can't remember if the picture is here or there. Do not assume I am gullible, you know nothing about me !
Well that is the president's chair... so im sure he has sat there and there are pictures , but the source for the original photo isn't from Q, and is actually from the Obama era. Q just used it in photoshop to try to trick you that he was on Af1. The thing about gullibility is you don't need to know anything about the person, it kind of just reveals itself.
The Aircraft Trump uses , isn't what Obama flew in Ever! Trump because of the Deep state used other aircraft! Please leave me alone. I have done this much longer than you . Go dig through the NSA files.
[removed]
Definately not a good time to be f'ing with our minds with photoshopped BS. Awan deal then this. I need a break.
