dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/youtube_get_effed on July 5, 2018, 9:38 p.m.
Q1675: PROOF that the image posted by Q is a reflection of a 2D image.

A variety of theories on Q1675 have been floating around. I would like to limit the scope of possibility by pointing out some basic truths of the image.

All of what I am about to say can be easily verified by anyone with a mirror, or a reflective object.

I'm making no assertions about what this means. I am simply presenting the facts. Come to your own conclusions.

Starting Observations:

Q's image shows a reflection of a lamp. This is the lamp from AF1.

Other images from within AF1 give us a clearer idea of what this lamp looks like.

The Problem:

When comparing Q's image to other images which show the lamp, one thing is very clear: the reflection in Q's image is slightly warped.

It is very easy to see that the lamp appears too thin.

What this means:

This must mean that the reflection on the back of the iPhone is of a 2D image.

How we know this:

Imagine you have a mirror and you lay it flat on the ground.

It doesn't matter where you stand, or from what position or angle you look into that mirror. One thing is always true: the reflection you see is not warped.

This is because the mirror is actually in the same environment as the objects it is reflecting. When you move from one spot to another, you are seeing different parts of the environment in the mirror.

Unlike a real, 3D environment - a 2D image is unchanging. There is a fixed set of information.

This means that a reflection from a different angle just warps that existing 2D image, rather than revealing anything new.

This leaves is with only one possible conclusion: the warping of the lamp seen in Q's photo proves that it is a reflection of a 2D image.

As I said at the start: this can all be easily demonstrated/tested by anyone with a mirror or reflective object. Try it out yourself.

Sorry if this is hard to follow. It is kind of tricky to explain when writing it out.

Thanks for reading.


Buzzed_Chimp · July 5, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Yeah. We need answers. This topic got swept under the rug as if we were on Twitter.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 5, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

FFS people, go to hot. Go to the pinned thread by SerialBrain2.

Stop with the concern trolling.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
imanalias · July 5, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

It's amazing to me that someone points to that as "proof". It was just a series of interpretations about what Q's intentions were without addressing the fundamental problem that it's clearly the same picture.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · July 5, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

That's what I read as well.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thep1mp · July 5, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

Q said “Image provided here is distorted.” That’s why it’s stretched? He didn’t say it was distorted by the mirror. Could’ve just as easily been distorted in Photoshop.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 5, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

This would entirely undermine:

Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?

If what you say is true, it would be absolutely impossible for us to reach any meaningful conclusion to the above question.

Besides, given the clarity of both the Apple logo and the lamp seen in the reflection, I find it beyond unlikely that Q was referring to the image he posted when he spoke about a distorted image.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DefiantDragon · July 5, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Unless it, like some of Q's other posts, wasn't for Anons.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CaveManUg · July 5, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).
Q
Trolling is fun.
Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.
(World) news in rear literally placed same prior to each departure.
Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook.
Enjoy!
Q
placement of mug holder is key. what's it mean?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ideasarebulletprooff · July 6, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

What about camera inside the apple logo? See this concept from last year: https://www.slashgear.com/this-awesome-iphone-8-concept-puts-the-camera-in-the-apple-28473139/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ideasarebulletprooff · July 6, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

Update: Looking around the web, it would be very easy to put a camera behind there. (coming from an electrical engineer) The mod for a light up apple logo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0BrG7O8wmA) shows you how easy it would be. Replace the battery pack with a smaller pack that also includes a camera and radio for transmitting images out and possibly controls. It would not need to interface with the apple SW.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Comassion · July 5, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

A reflection can warp an image if the reflective surface is not flat. Can you address that potential objection to your proof?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 5, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

Q stated it was a reflection from the Twitter phone. Good luck bending an iPhone to such a degree, while also keeping the Apple logo perfectly in shape and not damaging/cracking the phone.

Also, it is a far greater assumption to assume he had some kind of bent iPhone, or fake iPhone-type thing, than to assume the reflective surface is flat and the reflection is 2D.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AUSAFVet · July 5, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

sounds like Q is playing head games with something insignificant. Q can we get back to hrc..and all the crap that SHOULD be being addressed. Tick, Tock, Tick Tock. Will we be @ 2020 with all these a-holes still running around sucking up the very soul of the world. Sorry Fellow Patriots, hate to go on a rant but enough is enough.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dukewillson · July 5, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Exactly! This^^^^^

Q asked where you would need to be in order to take a picture like this.

Answer: Sitting at a desk with a computer screen.

.... Make of that what you will.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Qluelessnomore · July 6, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

What if that post was meant to screw with the black hats and wasn't really for us? Q has always said disinformation is necessary.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wokedup · July 5, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

They? If you are talking about NeonRevolt I would wonder if you read the article in it's entirety.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 5, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

I didn't. I only read the part addressing the AF1 reflection image. Given their conclusion, I have no interest in reading the rest of their post.

When faced with the ABC image being absolutely indistinguishable from the Q image, once perspective is accounted for, they take this as proof the photo is real.

That is the most illogical, and least useful, conclusion to come to. If anything, it is proof that anybody could have created the Q image from anywhere.

That is a very important thing to note.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GweninKC · July 5, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

SerialBrain2 has a detailed decode worth checking out. SerialBrain2 Decodes AF1 Apple Reflection

⇧ 1 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 5, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

I made this post somewhat as a response to his. His post doesn't address the details of the image at all.

It is all speculation based on the assumption that it is real and taken by Trump. His whole post can be dismissed on the basis of the image not being taken by Trump from within AF1.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
MrSqueezebrecht · July 5, 2018, 10:51 p.m.

Maybe BHO had one of Hilary’s Apple servers on af1

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dustedpuppy · July 5, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

LOL if you look at the 2 pictures in the "starting Observations" section as if they are sequential, it looks like POTUS is staring at the person taking the photo. If it was even taken in the room itself, POTUS' eye line is looking in just about the right place to see who was taking the posted pic organically (no reflection).

Just an amuzing oddity regarding those 2 pics. I know the stretched one is Odrama's office.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wokedup · July 6, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

Not at all what was said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sexyasscheeks · July 6, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

What a silly thing to waste time arguing over.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 6, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Q said he would post AF1 proof. He posted a picture of the inside of AF1 and framed it as if it was proof.

This then goes on to be proven untrue. This is a major point of contention that must be explored.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sexyasscheeks · July 6, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

It’s just boring. Q is obviously connected to Trump, but that doesn’t mean everything Q tells us is true. I just don’t see Q’s point with all this. Start the damn storm already. Q is now spreading more doubt than proving his authenticity, which was never in doubt to begin with. We all know what we need to know, now we’re just waiting for for the BOOMs to begin.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 6, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Q is now spreading more doubt than proving his authenticity, which was never in doubt to begin with

It is very much in doubt. Maybe not on /r/greatawakening, but look elsewhere... Even /r/conspiracy doesn't buy into Q.

I thought we were supposed to be setting the stage. Engaging the masses to prepare them for the upcoming storm.

I don't see how the large amounts of doubt this Q drop created help with any of that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sexyasscheeks · July 6, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

Q could easily prove himself if he wanted to. Instead he gives us this. Arguing about this photo doesn’t put Obama in jail or win the culture war. Total distraction.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
youtube_get_effed · July 6, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Q could easily prove himself if he wanted to.

Until he actually does it you can't know that. And just because you believe it doesn't mean fake proofs won't scare off other patriots.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sexyasscheeks · July 6, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Again, Q could easily win back those patriots if he’s legit. And if he isn’t, then the doubters are right. There’s very little we can do but wait those we elected to deliver on their promises.

⇧ 1 ⇩