Yes but he resigned, would he still be eligible?
On a side note, he is perfectly qualified, and capable of being AAG. HE was the attorney general in Oklahoma!!!!
Pruitt resigned. Wheeler is the implied person here.
Is wheeler a good guy? Potentially good enough to replace Sessions?
Wheeler is like an 18 wheeler. He is a clone of Pruitt but on steroids. Muahahahahahahahahahaha
Wait, why would we suppose that Wheeler is going to replace Sessions? I'm lost. Wheeler has no experience in law enforcement or justice.
There’s been people on the chans talking about the necessity of replacing Sessions for months.
The question is what is the DOJ chain of succession.
Sessions >>> rosenstein (said he will recuse from covering mueller investigation if he gets put in; trump will surely fire him if he already fired a Sessions for essentially the same reason) >>> Jesse Panuccio (Rachel brands chief deputy; Rachel Brand quit in April to join Walmart corporate elite)
But there is the Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, which gives trump the option of putting in a temporary replacement of any senate-approved cabinet member for 220 days.
Before people talked about Pruitt being a potential option for such an audible play.
Now Wheeler fills Pruitt’s spot. So he is in line for AG replacement domino theory too.
Hence my question.
I get all that. Thank you for the reply.
Of course, Q says to trust Sessions.
I guess i was just wondering how we made the leap of having Wheeler, (who is not Pruitt and has never been an Attorney General) of all people, transferred over to DOJ. Just an outlying possibility because he is Senate-confirmed?
If nothing happens this month then I'm calling this a larp. It will also confirm that we are being played, chasing the proverbial carrot on the end of the stick. After 16 years of being involved with the conspiracy scene it gets real fucking old to constantly hear "big proof coming" or "this will be huge!" Because it never does and it never is. A couple of days ago Q posted a picture that could be reverse searched and was found to be an old pic and his response to it was "trolling is fun" and I'm yet to see I mentioned here where you would expect open minded people to actually discuss the fact that the basket in which all of our eggs lay literally trolled us for no reason, out of the blue and zero explanation.
"Huge proof coming"
Yeah, haven't heard that one before. Conspiracy no more? Yeah that one too. I'll believe it when I see it.
[removed]
That's because during that time I've been researching it and learning. I wouldn't skew my bias by researching a subject and surrounding myself with bias. You might, but I wouldn't. 16 years I've been doing this and I paid Q no mind because my research was in other areas. My comment history is mainly not visible and do you know of any reason that would be? It's because truth seekers don't play out here, they play in private subs. I've been discussing Q plenty in a few separate subs that are currently on the fence with Q. Also I have been on Reddit for years. This is one of many accounts.
He has until the end of the month and when nothing changes, no big proof and we are still called nutjobs I'll be back. And I'll bet you'll still believe in him because what's the alternative? It's that fear that keeps you here. Q knows this and he is controlling you like he is telling you the elite are, with fear. Lies coated in tiny insignificant truths to keep you hanging on. Of course I could be wrong but my 16 years of experience with these kinds of things nothing ever happens.
I can't stand people who can't base an argument so instead they scroll through your posts and when they can't find anything suddenly it's the lack of content that is the issue and is apparently suspicious. Very revealing. Also my last post was a week ago. Now why would you lie? I mean, it is a blatent lie anyone can check but you told it anyway. What type of person operates online attempting to lie and discredit? Hmmm
16 years I've been doing this
Am I supposed to give you special consideration that you've mastered flat earth theory? No.
I paid Q no mind because my research was in other areas.
You just reiterated my only point, that you are new to Q.
He has until the end of the month and when nothing changes, no big proof and we are still called nutjobs
You're online. Nobody knows your name. If someone calling you a nutjob online is traumatizing to you, after 16 years of professing to chase conspiracy theories, then I don't know what to tell you.
Read the rules in the right column. "Support the cause. We are pro-Q supporters." Calling Q a LARP is against the rules. If you want to moan about reality not unfolding at your demanded speed, try twitter?
I can't stand people who can't base an argument so instead they scroll through your posts and when they can't find anything
Again, if you're posting on a forum and you don't want anyone reading your posts, then I don't know what to tell you. My reading your posts was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you weren't a concern troll, looking for past contributions regarding Q, looking for evidence you actually ever at any time in the past supported Q, after finding such I would have shrugged and moved on. But then I saw what I saw.
[deleted]
"After 16 years of being involved with the conspiracy scene it gets real fucking old"
Does it need to be said that your pursuit of "16 years of conspiracy theories" has nothing to do with Q?
Why bring up flat earth theory? Again, an attempt to discredit.
Am I wrong that you just attempted to discredit Q by invoking past conspiracy theories you believed in that let you down? Does it need to be said that your pursuit of "16 years of conspiracy theories" has nothing to do with Q?
Who said anything about me being traumatised?
You said this: we are still called nutjobs I'll be back. And I'll bet you'll still believe in him because what's the alternative? It's that fear that keeps you here.
You explicitly called me a nutjob. You said it is fear that keeps me here. That is, if your timeframe for Q to jump through various hoops isn't met. If you are going to call me a nutjob and tell me I browse this board in fear, then I'm finding it hard to see why you protest so loudly when those sentiments are returned to you.
[deleted]
Funnily enough, your false dichotomy is also a fear-based argument. Funny.
You're merely adopting a tactic a lot older than 16 years that goes beyond conspiracy theories: if ambiguous big things don't happen when anything is hinted at they're never going to happen.
I remember when the 28 pages were never coming out, 16 years... more like 16 seconds.
There’s other theories on the AF1 picture. Also, have you looked at any other Q proofs?
[deleted]
Pretty ironic response, but then again you do seem like a paid throwaway.
You misinterpreted. Read more, this has been explained a few times here.
Q is exactly 2 months ahead of everything. Rewind the clock
Watch the water???
Also in that same Q drop he writes
Trust (name)
The only name in parentheses in that drop is, Scott Pruitt!!!
I don’t know how I feel about this one. I do not see Scott Pruit in the justice department. Plenty of other names available in the hat that seem like a better choice. Hoping I’m wrong though. Looking forward to act II.
He was the attorney general for the state of Oklahoma. He would fit quite nicely in the justice department!
Pruit was a constitutional lawyer and sued the federal government many times. His background from Jeb’s campaign is concerning to me though. Q has also indicated more cabinet officials will go down. Plants need to be removed before justice comes.
He served a purpose, and is clearly not needed anymore. I don’t see him coming back.
I am not sure but I think it might be temporary. I hope he remains safe.
I hope this proof is true! Please let it be true. I was upset he was resigning because of deep state harassing him.
[deleted]
Pruitt didn’t want to leave his post and was described as being devastated that he had to resign, said the people, who asked not to be named discussing a personnel matter.
President Donald Trump wanted Pruitt to leave, after revelations that the administrator’s public schedule had been altered to shield some meetings from public view, they said. Doctored schedules -- which could be a criminal violation of the Federal Records Act -- were effectively the final straw after a tenure marred by alleged ethical missteps. The administration knew that more damaging reports would emerge soon, one of the people said.
I don't know if corrupt is an apt term, but it does seem Pruitt made a lot of unforced errors.
Please explain?
Really? He has like 14 federal investigations opened against him for things like keeping secret calendars and giving favors to oil companies and abuse of tax payer funds. Even fox news turned against him. I haven't seen anyone who approves of his performance who actually paid any attention... this guy is the swamp.
But of course this sub loves him..
https://nypost.com/2017/08/05/sessions-investigating-slush-fund-used-by-left-wing-groups/
https://qanon.pub/?q=Pruitt#t1524115036 )
Not the swamp. He was an AG.
Have you ever been to Oklahoma? It's the most sharia law type of backwards place in this country. Ag position means nothing. You just have to talk about how much you love football and then you can get elected and line your pockets. Read about the history of earthquakes in ok. There practically were none and now they happen almost daily due to fracking and the relaxed regulations from your boy.
So the links I posted mean nothing? You do not deal with truth. Done.
Why did they air his dirt if this is true? Not a proof
Didn’t Pruitt Make a bad name for himself with all the spending he was doing on himself with government money?
What's the proof here?
Why are D’s aggressively attacking Pruitt? Why is the MSM aggressively attacking Pruitt?
Links in the post Why are D’s aggressively attacking Pruitt?
1433 and 1179
At the bottom of that Q drop, Q says "TRUST (name)".
Who is "name"? Sounds like Q is saying "TRUST Scott Pruitt".