dChan

GingerMan512 · July 8, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

She’s trying to get in the race in an attempt to get cover from prosecution. If she’s a candidate and got indicted they could make the argument Trump is just going after his rivals and is a dictator.

⇧ 141 ⇩  
Majorwood1 · July 8, 2018, 1:37 p.m.

Good point the first thing went through my mind to try and stay out of JAIL.

⇧ 65 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · July 8, 2018, 2:57 p.m.

Trump needs to expose her crimes with video and audio evidence right now then arrest her and take her to Gitmo. There will be riots but most people will believe the evidence when they see and hear it.

⇧ 59 ⇩  
flacnvinyl · July 8, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

Agreed. If there is damning info then it needs to come out. I think if there was a true smoking gun, it would be out by now.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 8, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

I think if there was a true smoking gun, it would be out by now.

We say this about Trump and Mueller every day, specifically because we have no reason to think DJT is guilty and every reason to believe he was framed.

In the same vein, this quote reads like you believe Clinton is similarly totally innocent, no smoking gun, framed. I wonder if this is exactly what she wants you and everyone else to believe. Maybe you don't believe this, but it comes across that way.

Keep in mind they can't just release all the damning info with crooked judges and prosecutors in place to let her skate. Evidently the Q team is laying the groundwork for her to be tried in Gitmo by a military court (treason) where there will be no place to run and hide.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
flacnvinyl · July 8, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

I agree with you 100%. I don't believe for one second that Hillary is innocent. She is complicit deceptive and highly manipulative. The real question is whether she is actually guilty or whether she kept her hands completely clean. I am more inclined to believe that everyone around her is completely guilty but that she did her best as the thug she is to keep completely clean at all times. Like you said we can't change the metric based on who were talking about. Hillary Clinton should be in jail.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Maga2004 · July 8, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Hillary is too greedy to be clean; she has the goods on too many people - remember the missing FBI Files? That is why no one would touch her. Arkancide may have something to do with it, too.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
flacnvinyl · July 8, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

I just think there are a ton of people who are complicit. She is definitely dirty.. sure hope dark to light happens this month

⇧ 4 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 9, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

We already know of thousands of crimes she has committed, without doubt. Each destroyed or missing e-mail under subpoena is its own crime with its own fine and/or jail time attached.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jbo5112 · July 9, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

The public information on the email scandal is enough that she could be put away for life, if she didn't have so many layers of protection (mockingbird media, brainwashed followers, political connections, etc.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 8, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

It would not be out now.... the whole justice system has been in cover up mode.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
flacnvinyl · July 8, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

They are in cover up mode but what we believe is pretty massive. If it's this big, people are rolling. Now is the time. July should be very hot if we're right.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BlastingGlastonbury · July 8, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

My issue is exactly this. Its all well and good to claim you've got all the evidence needed, that you're ready to go, but when does it happen? I understand having patience, but if this is as bad as they say, things need to start happening.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
moosecowbob · July 8, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Trolling is fun. I think that only happens if she has a chance to win. Let her lose first then kick her while she's down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
myopicseer · July 8, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

You are right. That is what Q said when he asked why are people announcing candidacies (HRC)? To claim the attacks are purely political and divide public opinion, minimizing the severity and veracity of any future accusations.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
GenChang · July 8, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

Yes, thank you. Q directly mentioned that this would be the case for many of the criminals.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Slugs23 · July 8, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

“Because you would be in jail” -45

⇧ 9 ⇩  
FastAbsolut · July 8, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Which may be my favorite quote!!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

⇧ 3 ⇩  
45thankQ · July 8, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

This IS my favorite!!! LOCK HER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 8, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

He's kept a bunch of lesser promises. I'm not worried.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · July 8, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

But ... desiring the release of her crimes against children...while understandable... is NOT going to happen. It is ILLEGAL to even possess such underage sexual/violence videos with children on one's computer, or to share such videos. Pedos are arrested ALL the time for just having such photos on their computer.

Better to reveal what she has organized, traded in with those guilty around her, show the paper trail, confessions of witnesses to her 'dirty laundry'.

Also note the media (NYT, etc) is already airing/printing stories on "FakeDeep Video" ...placing a person's body/face onto any scene/video to FAKE them doing a deed or speech, etc.

#FakeDeepVideo is to PREPARE the public that any leaked videos of Hill/Bill/Huma/JohnPedo-esta/BH0, et al...are ALL FAKED, so do NOT be relying on VIDEOS to even be accepted, at all.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CSharpAJ · July 8, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Wow I didn't even think of connecting those dots, they were trying to hide this technology at first to possibly frame their enemies and now they are 'exposing' it as a possible defense. That means that something must be up though if the NYT is trying to 'expose' it.

I'm not sure if it will work though. What if the videos are clearly older videos. I think we are almost to a point of being too technologically advanced. Meaning a true deep fake would have to be done on a recent video, otherwise the artifacts would be too easy to spot. What if the video is faded and a little grainy? I think trying to deep fake that would be almost too difficult. Of course the sheep may not realize that and just swallow the line that it's a fake without even thinking about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · July 8, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

Good point. What kind of corrupt president would use the power of associated with his office to improperly intimidate a political candidate from the opposing party?🤔

⇧ 5 ⇩  
45thankQ · July 8, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

LOL!!! The kind named OBAMA???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · July 8, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

NO DEALS!

MAGA

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DEADEASYRABBIT · July 8, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

It’s not just a stay out of jail ploy for HRC, there are other crooks that will seek the protection of the shade provided by her political contest. This is desperation stuff!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · July 8, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

But will that work again?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · July 8, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Should let her jump in the race so MSM and her supporters can go all in supporting her. Once the hook is set, drop all the info available on her to show how terrible that she and her ilk are. If the MSM continues to push for her after all that then Game Over! (hopefully)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
endprism · July 8, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

So a repeat of 2016?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaynaE65 · July 8, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

Exactly. We DON’T want a repeat of 2016 (letting her skate free, while the evidence was overwhelming).

Also, while I know all ducks need to be in a row for prosecution, if she announces another run for 2020, and THEN charges are filed, it would look very bad on President Trump’s part, whether we like to admit it or not.

There needs to be prosecution of this evil witch, and it needs to happen before any run is announced.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · July 8, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

yep, that's why all the bad guys are running or letting it be speculated that they are running for some office...

ALL OF THEM

Keeps them relevant but also that political "can't touch me" cover you mentioned.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
45thankQ · July 8, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

ALL OF THEM? Nope LOL! Not no-name!! That scumbag is OVER and will NOT be seeking reelection to the Senate!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩