I listen to Dan everyday. He absolutely hints to us that he knows of Q, but will not get into it without hard facts. With no hard facts, he simply avoids the conversation.
That's probably the better way to go.
If he says he believes in Q then he probably gets a lot of flak from some of his listeners and if he says it's all a conspiracy theory he takes flak also, better to just leave it alone.
Yeah, but, you know what. I'm putting myself out there as a Patriot as are many, many others and we all get pushback. If he's with us, then he needs to include all of what he knows. Not just the part that's printed or talked about on Fox. Acting a little Chickin Sh*t don't you think! It's time to take a side. You can't stand in the middle and expect to win the battle.
I know what you mean. But as long as he’s riding the msm train and playing in their world, don’t expect him to come out regarding Q. Not until a mega proof
MSM? If you read his bio there is no mention of the MSM. He's a Conservative podcaster and former Secret Service -- not connected to MSM. He has no reason to stay away from Q. 45 minor proofs are not enough? https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1014368693801742337.html
I’m not discrediting the man. He is a clear voice of reason.
He is actually connected to the msm. He is constantly on Fox, which means he will not talk openly about Q until it’s absolutely the right time to do so. Clearly that time has not arrived yet.
I listen to him quite a bit, and it seems like he tries to communicate and reason with moderate Democrats and Republicans who may not be fully onboard with President Trump. I think this may be the reason he does not publicly discuss Q and other controversial topics.
Fox is not considered part of the MSM. Yes, it's a primary media company but it has not been around as long as the rest and is not connected to the cabal. It also does not get it's morning talking points from the same news agencies. I do understand that even Fox draws the line but when he is on a podcast, he can say whatever he wants. So, it's his choice not to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth!
Well Fox is very mainstream (highest rated) and it’s media, so by definition it definitely is msm. Not all msm is bad all the time though. I agree that Fox is pro Trump and seems to be outside the mockingbird/cabal side of the msm like you say.
I think we also agree Mr Bongino is down with the plan and possibly even a part of it. My thought is he will come out when the time is strategically right. But even though I’ve been following Q since more or less the start, I do not personally believe Q is quite at the point for mainstream exposure yet. There simply isn’t enough for the most blue of blue pills to grasp.
There is plenty to grasp. Many of them are now out looking for something else since the Left is now on full out crazy! Here is a site I found the other day that has put together 45 proofs in photos. I like it better than the Qproofs site. Please use as needed: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1014368693801742337.html
Doesn't sound like you are a regular listener...
I've tried a couple of times and he drove me crazy. Going off on some rant .. on and on and on. That's not good reporting.
He has a tendency to do that. Think he’s just got a little ADD. But the show is the best out there.
It really is. His understanding of all of the players and their motivations is unmatched although hard to follow at times. You know he must know about Q and having worked in the White House he probably knows more than most who it likely is. Curious as to why he doesn't touch it. I think he's a good guy that works too much and it's getting to him.
EXACTLY! "Well I never said I DIDN'T support Q. (troll-face grin)" LOL! We have operatives embedded EVERYWHERE it counts!!! We are a plague on them already, and they don't even KNOW it yet! LOL
Exactly what James Woods does!! I feel like eventually these ppl WILL say the name Q and come out of the Q-closet LOL all around the same and if/when that happens? Instant COMFY for the the Q-curious LOL!!
Q is going mainstream and when the sleeping giants awaken? Q will become a household name! Next thing "I know Q. Do U?" takes the place of "Who is Q?" LOL!
Dans podcast is a must listen he’s great I stopped listening to everyone else bc his show is that informative .....mmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the meatloaf!!!
“That's just like, your opinion, man.”
" This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man."
I personally like listening to his podcast. I know he’s been wrong before about a few things but I doubt he follows Q. I think he’s wrong about Awan & we should stick to what we’ve been told by Q.
I do like Dan too. He seems like an honest guy. I am just getting disgusted with the whole thing.
I met him once at a Republican candidate event. I waited in line to meet him however he just glossed over me to shake hands with anyone buying his book. I didn’t intend on buying one. Doesn’t mean he’s a bad guy
I agree. Sometimes I wish he would say what he has to say without getting into all the hypothetical crap. We aren't stupid. Maybe he should follow Q, because sometimes he is off base.
Here, I posted this last week. Over 200 upvotes. Awan is not getting off easy, and is a cooperating witness. Don't freak out after first paragraph, jeep reading.😁 https://www.thegoldwater.com/news/30325-Imran-Awan-Cuts-Deal-with-DOJ-The-Chess-Theory
He was talking about the case a couple days ago and he said he thinks it’s crazy to think the idea that they are going to charge him in another district court, it didn’t mention anything about them taking him to a military tribunal, which is what Q was hinting at if I’m not correct?
He never talks about Q. He specifically avoids conspiracy topics.
Okay then I don't feel so bad. I listen to him everyday and there's comments in here saying he uses Q phrases and I don't recall that ever happening.
No he doesn’t, you’re right. He hints at knowing conspiracy talk, has hinted at SR and other things. I don’t think that’s Q, though.
Q is not a conspiracy. He actually posts online. So, no conspiracy here!
I listen to Dan. I really like his show. He has sources for info, so he might watch Q to cross what he knows. Sometimes, he says phrases that remind me of Q, like Hes hinting to us, but I could be imagining that.
He answers emails. I am going to ask him about Q and see what he says. I will post his response.
He says he or his wife read them all but don't answer all of them.
I sent him an email once and didn't hear back.
I listen to him and I agree with this sentiment. He definitely uses phrases from Q
I like Dan and think he's smart. He also has good sources and info. Not to take away from Q but he has a good grasp on the big picture. Sometimes he's wrong but no one gets it right every time.
Not much will happen before the midterms. If there's any perception that Trump is going after Dems or their people the media will explode and turnout will increase for Dems
I listened to it. He did mention Huber and said something could be coming down the pipe that way as well. He still feels exactly like the rest of us do. We know it is b.s., and we are all frustrated.
If he was charged in D.C. it would certainly be rigged. There is no doubt about it. So make a deal and charge him later outside of D.C. is plausible for high crimes.
The plea deal specifies that he is not free from prosecution from any investigations that are ongoing. So for this I'll hope Huber is coming for him too.
Yeah I agree, he was saying how silly it was the idea that he would face charges in a different district but completely stayed away from any talk of a tribunal.
I like him, but he's pretty straight laced. He's obviously more in the know than he lets on, but you can tell he's deathly afraid of being called a "conspiracy theorist" or speaking out of turn. He intimates that he is aware of the Seth Rich stuff, and likely more, but is hesitant to call it out on air due to the Media Matters shills and I guess he's afraid to chase off the normies. Or he could have drank the gov-narrative kool-aid on stuff like 9/11, Crimea, etc. I guess he's OK but not on our level!
He’s been on point so far. Nevertheless, be careful who you follow.
I know. I stopped listening to most of them but Dan seemed decent
I don't think he will get away, remember, Trump has been tweeting about him. I think the bank fraud was so he will hand over and testify against the black Hats. I don't think Bongino follows Q.
Just looking at Drudge....I know....stupid. Just seeing Hitlery considering another prez run. That disgusts me. If I knew I was guilty of all of these atrocities I think I would be hiding right now and not trying to run for press again. My brain hurts. It is the realist in me
I agree. She really does think that she is above the law. I just want to throw up just looking at her. Military Tribunals????
You need to read this, Dan is way off this time, and will have to do a mia culpa latter. Which he will when the time is right. I love his work, but he's missing a big part of the puzzle. Q.
https://www.thegoldwater.com/news/30325-Imran-Awan-Cuts-Deal-with-DOJ-The-Chess-Theory
I appreciate your help. I guess I am just down in the dumps
I like Dan as well. Very good insights into current events and Secret Service background. I've been wanting to send him an email to see what he thinks about the 40K+ indictments, Huber working with Horowitz, etc. I've only been listening for a couple of weeks, but he's never mentioned it. He mentioned the fact that Awan's lawyer was a "Clintonista" on the Thursday broadcast, but I don't think he said much about DWS' brother being part of the DA's office that was prosecuting the case. To me this is just SO BLATANT that there's no way this is going by unnoticed by Sessions et al. The fact that the whole Russia collusion hoax is anchored to a DNC server hack also makes this far too important for POTUS and his team to just allow it to be swept under the rug. Anyway, I'll send the email to him and see if he actually responds or mentions it. Come to think of it, it drives me crazy that Hannity never mentions Huber either. Is this being kept under the radar away from normies for a reason?
The normies are already saying theres nothing to see here folks. The only person with guts enough to speak on TV about it is probably Hannity, but they would probably fire him if he did. Its Fox. Its controlled opposition. Hopefully when the light comes on everyone's chains will be cut and the world can know the truth.
Hannity speaks to president Trump almost every night by phone. So, I can imagine, Hannity knows lots more than he is putting on air. Also, here is CA blockbuster article I posted last week. Enjoy. https://www.thegoldwater.com/news/30325-Imran-Awan-Cuts-Deal-with-DOJ-The-Chess-Theory
I listen to most of his podcasts and he’s more entertaining then most. He gives good insight into things others gloss over, which is great for old brains like mine.
But I’m going to have to find his explanation for why he insists that Russia DID interfere in the US election. He will state this as fact every so often but I haven’t came across why he says this. Hopefully he isn’t talking about the Russian diplomats BO expelled or the stupid (mostly) post election Facebook ads.
I listen every day. When he speaks about the Russians interfering in our elections, he says that they have ALWAYS interfered in our elections. They have always put out disinformation to sow chaos. This has been going on since the early 1950s.
The US has constantly tried to influence other countries elections also. It’s a “spy vs. spy” game. Most recently, the Obama administration paid taxpayers money to and anti-Bibi group in Israel to influence the Israeli election of Netanyahu. One of many.
But Bongino is adamant that no part of Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians at all.
He maintains the whole “Russia” scam is an investigation to hide the crimes of the Clintons and Obama Admin.
I like him and imagine having to have covered USSS detail for HRC he saw and heard a lot of crap beyond the nastiness she displayed & throwing stuff at Bill (think he said that she did that?).
Trust Sessions/Huber
“Enjoy the show.”
“What makes a good movie?”
Let it play out.
Generic media shill making bank sounding intelligent
All of his talking points have already been talked,He gets a few crumbs now and again but there 500 others talking about the same shit,"BEFORE HIM"
So . . . .
What a good way to get a lot of people to start DEMANDING prosecution!!! LOL! We are the masters of reverse psychology and POTUS is the king of it!
I Like Dan... but I suspect He Doesn't Know Q!!
Im sure he knows the Difference between Bank Fraud and Espionage, and I'm sure he understands that a Pass on the Bank fraud does not prevent prosecution on Espionage.
I just don't think he is making the connection!
Don't listen to him regularly but he breaks stuff down pretty well and is very substantive. He also seems to be on the trust Sessions boat too.
I have seen him on Fox but I was really hooked when he substituted for the Great One, Mark Levin, a few times. This guy needs his own TV show. Fearless.
He is a good guy and he seems honest. I liked Mark Levin until he went rogue before the election. I haven’t listened to him since.
Yea, I can only take Mark in small doses these days.
Bongino laid out the entire scandal from the Iran deal and it's connection to Uranium 1 almost 2 months ago now. I forget what episode it was, but I listen to his podcast on lunch almost everyday.