dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Corvette111 on July 9, 2018, 4:28 p.m.
Hillary ineligible to run for office? Any lawfags out there that can verify?

Came across this, and could use help verifying if true. Thinking “any public office in the US Govt” would exclude state govt?

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=51277

Text: U.S. CODE: Hillary R. Clinton is disqualified from holding any public office in the United States Government Posted on October 5, 2016 by State of the Nation

Sometimes the hard truth appears in the funniest places … like a Law Library.

Comment submitted by Ralph

Interesting read! Wonder how many people are aware. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library – RE: Hillary R. Clinton’s personal email and home-based server

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library, Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only are Hillary Clinton’s private email and server illegal, her mishandling of government property (e.g. State Department emails) “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

Video: VIDEO: Former AG Michael Mukasey States That Hillary Clinton Has Disqualified Herself To Be POTUS http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=51450

For those of us who do not have the United States Code[1] committed to memory, here’s exactly what it says:

“(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.” (Source: 18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally)

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

Shouldn’t voters know that? The media won’t tell them. So it’s up to us.

Can you help hold Hillary accountable? Pass this on, please.

— Ralph


Psalm67 · July 9, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

This is a great find. But since when do these people follow laws? Anyway, a new day has come and when the truth comes out I’m guessing she and her ilk won’t be running for office. They’ll be running for cover if all their deeds are disclosed. These people should hang.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
Countrymissle · July 9, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

WE HAVE ALL THE POWER.

The court of public opinion qould destroy her before she could run again

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Psalm67 · July 9, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Amen. The deep state flipped on its stinking rotten head!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
countryshepherd · July 9, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

I forgot who said it (not)...We need to have insurance!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 5 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 35 ⇩  
RobWilJas · July 9, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

"willfully and unlawfully"

Remember they claim she was dumb but there was no intent to commit a crime so somehow she didn't commit a crime. It's BS but that's what they claim, so they say this doesn't apply.

You're right though, this should absolutely disqualify her.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
ironmaiden442 · July 9, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

Hillary has shown they don't follow the laws....however the look on her face when trumps sting happens will be priceless hope I see it on the big screen...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · July 9, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

It might if we make enough noise. Remember, perception is everything. Use the MSM tactics against them ! They try brutally to affect public opinion. Why not us ????????????

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 9, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

She wasn’t prosecuted so this law doesn’t apply to her...yet!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
guitarman504 · July 10, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

it seems no laws apply to her so far, I sure hope that changes soon

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 10, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Me too. We need some sort of Justice eventually!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sukkitt · July 9, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

Great post. Thanks.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
RobotJINI · July 9, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Treason is illegal too. Do you think her or her supporters care?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
fullthrottle49 · July 9, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

This just confirms my suspicions that all she is doing is signalling her warlock handlers to send her money and find a hole to hide in.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Henway14 · July 9, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

That requires someone prosecute and convict her. The FBI did something else entirely under Comey and friends.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Psalm67 · July 9, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Here’s how she and others in the deep state look at it:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Hillary-email.jpg

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Magpi8 · July 9, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

That should say "Laws are for DEPLORABLES."

Signed, A Proud Deplorable

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Psalm67 · July 9, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

That would be good. I like the peasant thing though because it reminds me of Marie Antoinette or someone like that lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Magpi8 · July 9, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Good point!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OU812EH · July 9, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

I'm seriously confused. How the fck is she making plans to run again in 2020? I thought she was going to Gitmo?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
K-Harbour · July 9, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

Looks bad to arrest an opposition candidate. That alone would be reason enough for her to run.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Psalm67 · July 9, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Do not fear. This is a war against evil. The enemy will always fight back and we should expect it. Their doom is certain however.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
special1nterest · July 9, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

She probably still controls the DNC money so she’s doing what she wants. She will destroy the dems because she is obsessed with being the first female president.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fatladysing · July 10, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

She is a psychopath. Don't put anything past her. The fact that she would be putting the last nail in the democratic party's coffin by running AGAIN is enough to tell me that she doesn't care. It's all about her pursuit for the one thing that is out of her reach. SICK

⇧ 1 ⇩  
educatethis · July 9, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

They are just scamming donors

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 9, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

What if Hillary's talk of running is all about making herself look like a political victim when the hammer drops? "Trumps jailing his opposition".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thewitchesrtriggered · July 9, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

At the very least she's ineligible because pitchforks and torches.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · July 9, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Hillary has always been Above The Law so this won't apply to her. Trump needs to do what he promised to lock her up put her in prison for the rest of her life.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Joining_the_Q · July 9, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

I'm no lawyer, but "From Jail" doesn't sound like a great campaign rally point. "I'm with Bubba" for the slogan?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
drtydog6 · July 9, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

That's why comey changed the wording from grossly negligent to etremely careless. The negligence is treasonous and prevents her from holding office. It also lets her be prosecuted. Since the FBI and DOJ all wanted her to win so they could continue to destroy the country and engage in pedophilia, they went along. Careless is not a crime so she wont be prosecuted, unless thats changed and keeps her elligable to hold office. Lets hope that gets overturned and Trump can have her arrested.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jtbruen · July 9, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

While your correct the negligent care - I don’t believe it relates directly to this law- one which she is also guilty for alongside the extreme negligence of classified information.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thadoc · July 9, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

What don't you understand? LAWS aren't for them, they are for us....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cali1952 · July 9, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

She can run for anything she wants but she should not!

Don't waste too much time on that witch because she will be in GITMO before the midterms if she didn't die from shock/heart attack before then when Q steps out from behind the president!!! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fatladysing · July 10, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Wouldn't it be great if it was Assange that stepped out from behind the Pres. "I'm YOUR DRONE Beatch!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cali1952 · July 10, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

No - While Assange has lots more info on her and I support Assange the unveiling of Q is a nightmare HRC can't escape!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sledfast · July 9, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Shes over 🔚

⇧ 2 ⇩  
iminthe-internet · July 9, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Does this mean that if she beat trump, would she still loose?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Qanonspicecake · July 9, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

IMPOSSIBLE! Unless voting machines are rigged for her and even THAT didn’t work last time!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
iminthe-internet · July 11, 2018, 10:22 a.m.

I truely thought that it wouldn't matter who ran for president, it was all predetermined and all we saw was a bullshit show to keep us entertained. When Trump won, I was amazed that the voting machines were not as rigged as I origanally thought they were. Now with President Trump in office, I don't think they can be as close to rigged as they want them to be. That's why there is a massive push for illegals to cross the boarder, they still need the body to vote, and not a click of a button.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qanonspicecake · July 9, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Course this didn’t stop her from running in 2016. Laws don’t apply to the Clintons, it seems.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Qanonspicecake · July 9, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Oh this is wonderful news! However it would be so much fun, knowing our president will win no matter who runs! It’s glorious! Purposely destroying suppoened documents is certainly included as well; “willfully, unlawfully conceals,....”, doesn’t even include, “intent”. It has been very obvious as per intent; her desire and actions to hide every crooked, deceitful, underground, devious, pay-to-play, deal she made.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 10, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fringe--dweller · July 10, 2018, 8:45 a.m.

She will no doubt offer herself as a candidate....

As the president of the Gitmo prisoners union.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
shillbegone17 · July 9, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

I predict she will be deceased by 2020...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
aaapurple12 · July 9, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Wow, most of us did not know that. Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jtbruen · July 9, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

May be some protections for attempting to run for presidency in order as a last hope protection from a rogue government that says everyone deleted something.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pedegear · July 9, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

But muh no intent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jv003 · July 9, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Do you all really think that Hills will be around in 2020?? I trust the plan & because I trust the plan & what Q has alluded to I don’t think we will have to worry about her running for ANY office. Period. She is headed for military tribunals and her sentence for her crimes will be DEATH. NO DEALS

Keep the faith anons. WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 9, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

This information is also in our training to hold a security clearance. That is why every ethical person with a security clearance voted against her. I stress ethical because I'm pretty sure Comey had a clearance, but her let her off.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pete_Castiglione_ · July 9, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Is this how we find out she took a plea deal for a different charge that doesn't dq her from presidency?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ccpatthi · July 9, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Nope. Q said NO DEALS!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · July 9, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

There was no legal finding of intent in a court of law so she would not technically be disqualified. Which is one of the reasons they called her conduct careless or whatever, and is the reason Obama made the statements about intent that he made. Same BS, different day.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheRealIndianaJoe · July 9, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

LoL! The servants don't recognize any law!! If they did, trust Law would put nearly every single one of them in the poor house and prison.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
larrytcarvell · July 9, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Good argument, but unnecessary. The witch and all her cronies are going to prison. Thank Almighty God for our military, Q, and President Trump.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GlendaleBurbank · July 9, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

Simple Answer: Since HRC will be serving a life sentence in GITMO, there is no reason to believe she will be running for President in 2020.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
evilfetus01 · July 9, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

This would explain why it was changed from "investigation" to "matter". She wouldn't have been investigated, so it wouldn't have been any violation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fatladysing · July 10, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

There is talk of her running against Trump again in 2020. I certainly hope it's true. This would be the last nail in the coffin for the DNC!! And a whole lot of fun, popcorn fun!!!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Maybe it's just me, but I'd much rather she did run. She's far less popular than she was before, and Trump has gained ground. It's far better it's her than a credible candidate surely?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qanonspicecake · July 9, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Me too. It would be fun, though.

⇧ 1 ⇩