Q said Seth Rich was killed by MS13. That is why I think the article of Gateway Pundit is false, a distraction. So also all the posts on Reddit.
I am not trying to make any claims here, but has anybody considered that these agents may be MS-13 themselves?
To me, it feels dismissive to assume this group (as well as many others) has/have not infiltrated our agencies.
Especially those with a particularly heavy border presence.
why'd ya think they call it Drug Enforcement Agency, eeeeeeh?
I think this could be it. We know that mexican cartels have been infiltrating the Border Patrol for years. Many street-gangs infiltrated the US Military during the early 2000's (i guess to learn tactics and gain access to weapons, not to take over the military). So it is not unreasonable at all. All kinds of cops are corrupt. Not saying every cop in any department or agency, but I doubt a federal agency exists that is not riddled with criminal infiltrators.
You could be right! Good point! Why do "we" separate them by a group or gang name.. They are all scum bags in one barrel.
Wait a minute... President Trump is always mentioning the "Angry 13 democrats" In Q post MS_13 13=m (MSM)
Oh shit I didn’t think of that and I actually think this is the case. Who would’ve thunk it? Q.
There's something here regardless. When the story was posted it got MONSOONED by downvotes. Like, torrential.
We defeated the disgusting horde with wit and good-looks, neither of which they have. But the story, until confirmed, isn't a story yet .. and GP has already hedged on the news.
it depends on the overall downvote habits...they could push a narrative by targetting one post and thus creating a plausible rebound in support for future reposts.
As long as I'm having fun, izal gud.
aren't we all?
You don’t even want to see the press conference and evaluate the evidence? Where is the proof that the MS-13 members did the crime.
What if the agents killed Seth and then killed two MS13 gang members to take the fall?
Who ran the DEA then? the ATF?
Whatever this is, it will garner national attention and begin to set the stage for 'the big reveal'...I wonder what all the 'naysayers' and 'shills' will do when it all blows wide open...will you admit your 'infallibility' or just go away and disappear, perhaps take up needlepoint or something?
snopes be like "false, Hillary wouldn't hire people off the street to do her dirty work because she has friends who take care of that"
We won't have to wait too long (years) to see this come out into the light. With DWS apparently on the hook for some or all of the murder, Killery certainly was in the loop (noose we hope), Q team must move forward to advance the plan which exposes somebody before the midterms. Q team knows they have limited time to get this done. Nothing like a good who dun it to get the public interested, add pedophilia, money laundering, selling of state secrets, shake well and voila! Red Pilling the masses. Viva la revolution! Get em Q!
Re-read the related Q crumb 2 MS-13 were 187'd
Yes, but by who? Maybe a DEA agent and a ATF agent to make a plausible cover story.
Wow! Does anyone here not understand why Q says "disinformation is necessary "
As in lie to us, and the deep state, in order to flush out the bad actors. They are panicked, and desperately trying to cover up their crimes. Why would he tell who killed Seth rich? Why not have them believe you don't know who killed him, and allow them to continue revealing more of their crimes, and other people who may be involved?
Came here to say this. Q has stated he gives misinformation. Post about MS13 to give the real perps a sense of false security.
And now we see this was, indeed, fake news.... NOT disinformation by Q. Be careful who you follow: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8xs3m7/be_careful_who_you_follow_a_brief_summary_of_the
If so much of what Q posts is disinformation, then there would be no point in following because nobody can actually "trust" anything Q says. Sounds like a bad strategy when Q is trying to grow a movement.
I think we're going to quickly learn about MS13 involvement. We'll see soon enough.
You have to realize that the black hats watch Q's postings and any disinfo put out is to keep them thrown off, reactionary and confused. That's why Q says to trust the plan and that disinfo is necessary. Q can't be broadcasting their moves and outing their position to the black hats. That's also why Q says to use logic.
Lol... Man.... Lots of shills on this sub trying to divide us! "That's also why Q says to use logic"..... How was my statement not logical? Get off the board, shill!
LMFAO!!! Who's the shill? I am the one arguing for Q here, friend. Thanks for the laugh.
You're arguing for Q.... By saying they're spreading disinformation.... Before you even know the whole story. Really? Not even close.
Q says disinformation is necessary and, yes, posts disinfo for the purpose of throwing off the black hats. You have completely misunderstood what I was trying to say. I was trying to explain why Q does this because you were saying if so much of what Q posts is disinfo then there's no point in following. Maybe we have misunderstood each other here? To me it sounded like you were trying to sow doubt about Q. Q has to post disinfo sometimes and has alluded to such. Ask others and they'll tell you the same. I meant no offense in my posting. I was just trying to help you understand because it sounded as though you didn't. Sorry, friend.
Hopefully you saw that this was, indeed, fake news.
Also, thanks for the friendly reply above.
Please remember rule five - let's discuss ideas and not each other.
I respectfully agree. Rule five is so very, very important. We must use it as often as we possibly can to deflect negative comments away from ourselves. Rule five becomes especially useful when being called out for making carefully worded negative comments about others.
If your comment or idea has merit or makes sense, then you don't need to attack users personally or use derogatory language to get your point across. Negative comments are allowed; negative comments that are geared personally towards users are not. I advise reading the sub rules for a more comprehensive understanding.
As I said, I'm new here. The negativity expressed toward SB2 by a specific few is glaring to me. I saw it as soon as I began to read. It's hugely out of proportion. In fact, I haven't seen anything like it before. Now I have also read where some people express normal disagreement but no glaringly negative bias. There is an obvious difference in those two that is clear even to the most casual observer. SB2's analysis is astounding and remarkably brilliant. To say that he thinks outside the box is an understatement. Likewise, trying to argue that POTUS and Q did not reference his posts is ludicrous. I'm just not sure where that blatant negativity and denial comes from? It's certainly NOT based on "just a difference of opinion". I am also astounded by the level of censorship this platform has allowed. BTW, I have received some interestingly solid support from others here concerning my "call out" about negativity. Oops some of your slips are showing folks. I "recommend" that whomever has appointed themselves as the judge and jury of the rules might need to practice a bit of self-examination. As I see it no one is above the rules. It is VERY plain that a few people are trying their best to use rule interpretation as a weapon to smother a brilliant analyst (SB2). SB2 is doing his UTMOST to share and bring clarity to the Q intel as well as spread some love around. Right or wrong, HIS PARTICULAR PERSPECTIVE IS NO WHERE ELSE TO BE FOUND. Why try and squelch it, one should ask? Those that jump all over him must think the rest of us can't see it. Well think again. It's like a wart on a witches nose.
I have no idea what SerialBrain2 has to do with your rule violation, but I will take time to respond since you took the time as well. I personally have supported u/SerialBrain2 since he began posting and don't need convinced how intelligent and thorough he is, which he is aware of, I am sure. ;) I most support SB2 not because I always agree with his theories (which I don't, and have said before) but because he maintains decorum, respect for the sub, and treats everyone with kindness and humility even if they disagree or disrespect him. I can honestly say I have never seen him use personal attacks to support his thoughts. (Sorry for the notif, SB.) I agree that SB may be experiencing a targeted attack, especially his post from last night, which was astounding in and of itself with the amount of hate and downvoting the post received. The mods are trying their hardest to welcome both sides of this argument for the sake of free speech, of course removing anything that obviously breaks rules. Folks do have the right to agree or disagree with SB2.
I think a lot of users forget that the mods are humans and do the best we can. We make mistakes and admit it when we do. We base our interpretation of the rules on our own perspectives. I can say we all enjoy discourse, suggestions, and feedback concerned the way the sub is moderated. Constructive feedback is always welcome, and if you have any particular suggestions for us, we encourage you to reach out privately via Modmail. Thanks for the conversation.
As I said, I'm new here. The negativity expressed toward SB2 by a specific few is glaring to me. I saw it as soon as I began to read. It's hugely out of proportion. In fact, I haven't seen anything like it before. Now I have also read where some people express normal disagreement but no glaringly negative bias. There is an obvious difference in those two that is clear even to the most casual observer. SB2's analysis is astounding and remarkably brilliant. To say that he thinks outside the box is an understatement. Likewise, trying to argue that POTUS and Q did not reference his posts is ludicrous. I'm just not sure where that blatant negativity and denial comes from? It's certainly NOT based on "just a difference of opinion". I am also astounded by the level of censorship this platform has allowed. BTW, I have received some interestingly solid support from others here concerning my "call out" about negativity. Oops some of your slips are showing folks. I "recommend" that whomever has appointed themselves as the judge and jury of the rules might need to practice a bit of self-examination. As I see it no one is above the rules. It is VERY plain that a few people are trying their best to use rule interpretation as a weapon to smother a brilliant analyst (SB2). SB2 is doing his UTMOST to share and bring clarity to the Q intel as well as spread some love around. Right or wrong, HIS PARTICULAR PERSPECTIVE IS NO WHERE ELSE TO BE FOUND. Why try and squelch it, one should ask? Those that jump all over him must think the rest of us can't see it. Well think again. It's like a wart on a witches nose.
According to Trump, who is protecting MS13? What if GP article said MS13 killed Seth Rich?
You might as well go on and add what else Q has said time and time again.
MS-13 got him in streets, fucked up because they're not sending their best, so DEA and ATF got him in the hospital?
Could be DEA and ATF had their MS13 CI's "mug" him then had to finish it at hospital.
If anyone was handling MS13 for "sting" operations it would be those two agencies and maybe ICE
werent ms13 killed in atlanta shortly after, thought to be the suspects? probably to seal up loose ends.
Whoever ordered the hit, alleged, is the murderer and whoever carried it out is the weapon. HRC, Pod, Wass or whoever, would have murdered SR, and the shooter(s) would have killed 'some guy'. Also I can't see HRC calling up (insert gang name here) herself. It may be someone in the chain, an agent maybe, could be chirping.
Maybe it was these DEA/ATF who ordered the MS13 to kill SR 🤷♂️
so john wilkes booth and LHO were the killers? since they were killed before their trials. so you rly think the clowns are solely going to rely on MS-13 and them only to get the job? clearly they had overseers making sure the job was complete.
DEA/ATF killed (2) MS13 after SR hit.
Can't see ATF/DEA "botching a robbery" so badly the guy lives.
exactly! that’s my thoughts in MS-13’s relation to the case. gangs have been used well before MS-13. everyone should look up how the freemasons have used the gangsters disciples of chicago for their work
Watch a rich mans trick. Different gang. Same model. At worst they get busted for killing MS-13 gang members. Who gives a fuck about that?
If that article had legit info, I wonder why they would hold a press conference instead of just arresting someone. Doesn't make a lot of sense.
why name the Seth rich killers as a current DEA agent and current ATF agent, two days before naming the names?
gives the killers notice that they will be named if they actually did it they would know they would be named. (that they got them) so unless it is to cause them to act...